Focus Session: Transformative Assessment Educational Technology Strategic Planning at The University of Colorado, Boulder Lecia J. Barker Alliance for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Collaborative Spaces in Libraries
Advertisements

Building the Foundation of an Information Literacy Program
INSTITUTIONAL READINESS What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready?
READINESS CRITERIA What does it mean to be ready to do a major course redesign? Is your institution ready? Which courses are readyi.e., are good candidates.
What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
Update on Goals 1 and 2 Curricular Domain Curricular Domain – accomplishments to date Developed baseline information about current level of faculty.
Lessons Learned Central Connecticut State University Nancy Birch Wagner, Director The George R. Muirhead Center for International Education.
Making the Case for Vision and Change Science Case Network ASMCUE 2013 Denver, CO.
SEM Planning Model.
Creating an Advanced Learning Community Learning Community Faculty Development Institute.
Retention Plan  Between 2007 and 2009, several committees, including A&S department chairs, issued recommendations for student retention.  Their.
A Definition of Distance Education Distance education is a formal educational process in which the majority of the learning occurs when student and instructor.
Academics and Research Working Group Teaching Future Generations.
Mellon Library/Faculty Fellowship for Undergraduate Research Elizabeth Dupuis, University of California, Berkeley
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Linda Nickel EPSB Project Specialist 1.
College Strategic Plan by Strategic Planning and Quality Assurance Committee.
From the IT Assessment to the IT Roadmap ( )
THE SOUTHEAST MISSOURI STATE SOTL FELLOWS PROGRAM Margaret Waterman May 1, 2012 cstl.semo.edu/sotl.
Dr. Judy Ashcroft, Associate Vice President and Director Dr. Rob Bruce, Deputy Director Ms. Shan Evans, Associate Director Mr. Michael Sweet, Graduate.
Supporting Learning With Digital Literacy. Goals of Meeting Information tools to share with your staff; launching survey on instruction using technology.
Bridging the Traditional Divide Between Academic Support Programs and Student Services CACUSS 2007 David McMurray, AVP Student Services and Dean of Students.
Stages of Commitment to Change: Leading Institutional Engagement Lorilee R. Sandmann, University of Georgia Jeri Childers, Virginia Tech National Outreach.
ELearning Update March 12, National Trends Approximately 1.9 million students were studying online in the fall of 2003 In 2009, 11.9 million students.
This series of five presentations has the following goals: Presentation III A Discussion with School Boards: Raising the Graduation Rate, High School Improvement,
Information Literacy Update: Accomplishments and Initiatives Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe Coordinator for Information Literacy Services and Instruction Office.
Leading Change. THE ROLE OF POLICY IN CHANGE Leading Change – The Role of Policy Drift to Quantitative Compliance- Behavior will focus on whatever is.
Creating a faculty support model to increase faculty adoption of technology Drew Daniels Ed Evans Paul Fisher Ruth Maschino Bo Zigner Instructional Technology.
We built it, They came, Now what? Lessons learned from creating a successful course integrated information literacy program Margaret FainJamie GrahamLisa.
Navigating the Shoals of Portfolio Implementation Susan Kahn and Lynn Ward Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis.
The College of Education We develop educational leaders who create tomorrow’s opportunities.
Institutional Effectiveness &. Institutional Effectiveness & Strategic Planning IE & SP Committees have developed a new system that integrates these two.
ACADEMIC SUCCESS STARTS WITH INFORMATION LITERACY A Pilot Program.
Top Issues Facing Information Technology at UAB Sheila M. Sanders UAB Vice President Information Technology February 8, 2007.
GENERAL FACULTY MEETING OCTOBER 28, STRATEGIC PLAN: YEAR ONE IMPLEMENTATION UPDATE.
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH. Outcomes assessment can tell us if our students are really learning what we think they should be able to do.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Made by: Mudassar Iqbal 1 INTEGRATION OF IT PLAN IN SCHOOL SYSTEM.
Technology Use Plan Beta Group Collaboration Sarah Miller, Erin Okazaki, Dann Mosteller.
UNC TLT Annual Conference, March 2004 questions | comments 
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
6 Key Priorities A “scorecard” for each of the 5 above priorities with end of 2009 deliverables – with a space beside each for a check mark (i.e. complete)
Instructional Technology Agenda u Looking Back – u NITLE Consultant Overview u Looking Forward – u Upcoming Sessions.
What do you do when your assessment data are in? Using Assessment Data to Improve Learning 1.
Massachusetts Tiered System of Supports State Personnel Development Grant National Meeting Fall 2014 Madeline Levine
Teaching Council Recommendations to the Faculty Senate DRAFT 2/9/09 & 3rd DRAFT Feb 13, 2009 for use by the FS Exec Committee, March 4, 2009.
1 Roles and Responsibilities of The Learning Evidence Team at CCRI Presented at CCRI Peggy Maki
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Aligning IT Investments (Plan) and the Institutional Strategic Plan Team 2 Ed Pokraka Shelley Reed Jeff Cepull Will Krause Educause Seminars On Academic.
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
October 15, 2015 QEP: PAST AND PRESENT AND FUTURE.
Assessment of Technology at the UW March 15, 2002 Nana Lowell, Director Office of Educational Assessment University of Washington.
Anmai University Library Reconstruction Project Team Three
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
Some Thoughts and Questions on Centralized vs. Distributed I.T. Functions 1. (mainly questions) 2.Classroom / Faculty / Desktop support 3.Governance.
Capabilities Analysis Briefing for Chancellor and Senior Leaders.
Time to answer critical and inter-related questions: Whom will we serve? What will we offer? How will we serve them?
Transformative Assessment EDUCAUSE NLII Coalition for Networked Information TLT Group Flashlight Program.
Standard 6 Unit Governance and Resources. 6a: Unit Leadership and Authority The unit and other faculty collaborate with P-12 practitioners in program.
Peer Coaching for Effective Professional Learning.
1 Program Details Name: TIGER DAD (Design & Development) of College Pedagogy Courses Persons responsible: Laura Border, PJ Bennett, Vivek Kaila, Abby Watrous,
Presented by Diana Mitchell Beaumont ISD Central Medical Magnet High School.
Intro to GETSI-Field Development Model & Guiding Principles
Planning (secondary version)
Converging Instructional Technology to Encourage Faculty Adoption
Strategic Planning Committee 2017 Year End Update
A five-year community effort to improve Earth literacy and build a workforce prepared to tackle environmental and resource issues InTeGrate supports integrated.
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment Educational Technology Strategic Planning at The University of Colorado, Boulder Lecia J. Barker Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society University of Colorado, Boulder

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment Organizational Context Faculty initiative: Alliance for Technology, Learning, and Society Infrastructure for students, faculty, research; Fall 1997

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment 1 Issues Identification Led by Provost and campus CIO Campus-wide faculty participation –What are the issues? –Which have the greatest priority? –What information do we need to act on priorities? –How will plans be funded? –What are the next steps?

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment Issues identified Instructional technology support personnel and programs Course software environment Instructional facilities and physical infrastructure Student IT literacy and fluency Distance learning

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment 2 Information Gathering All-faculty use, needs (survey) In-depth faculty use, needs (interviews) Student skills, knowledge (survey) Roles of service providers (interviews) Classroom inventory Peer institutions’ use, funding, support, advice (interviews)

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment 3 Visioning Process Focus on desired outcomes Two committees of interested, high credibility faculty –Student issues: technology skills and information literacy –Faculty issues: technology integration into teaching and research

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment 4 Recommendations Students –Information literacy integrated into early core courses –Departments assess field-specific needs, integrate into curriculum

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment 4 Recommendations Faculty –Support, funding for innovations, instructional design –Improved scheduling for facilities –Information provision for educational technology and resources

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment 5 Implementing Recommendations Just beginning Cost issues –Implications for departmental budgets –Strategies for future funding Curricular change –Faculty prerogative, can’t be top-down

Focus Session: Transformative Assessment 8 More information Process, reports, data all online: etsp.html