Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE. PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Mid-Term Review of The Illinois Commitment Assessment of Achievements, Challenges, and Stakeholder Opinions Illinois Board of Higher Education April.
Advertisements

Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Focusing on Two-Year Colleges Randy L. Swing, Ph.D. Kathleen M. Morley, Ph.D. Policy Center on the.
OCCC AtD Meeting, September 16, 2009 Mr. Stuart Harvey 1.
Foundations of Excellence ® in the First College Year Defining and Measuring Excellence in the Beginning College Experience Betsy O. Barefoot & John N.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Now That They Stay, What Next?: Using NSSE Results to Enhance the Impact of the Undergraduate Experience.
2006 Student Opinion Survey Summary November 2006 GUSTO Town Meeting on Accreditation & Assessment Genesee Community College Presented by: Carol Marriott.
Sophomore Success Program- A Residential Model with Graduation in Mind Cal Poly San Luis Obispo Housing & Residential Life October 2006.
1 Selected Results from UNCG’s Sophomore and Senior Surveys Spring 2000 Office of Institutional Research UNCG Planning Council August 24, 2000 The University.
Cincinnati State Technical and Community College Campus Completion Plan Presentation of Draft Plan Process & Categories (Dr. Tim Mott) Overview of Strategies.
Pre-engineering Education Collaborative: Providing for the Education of American Indian Engineers A Collaboration between: College of Menominee Nation.
An evaluation of the experience.  SHU Corporate plan aims for an excellent student experience. In practice this means:  An enhanced course focus.
The Institute for the Study of Transfer Students January 30, 2006 Dr. Mary F. Howard-Hamilton Professor Higher Education Leadership Program Educational.
Student & Enrolment Services Division Findings of a Student Retention Study University of Saskatchewan Overview of Findings Kelly McInnes Tonya Wirchenko.
The Faculty Said… (pt.3) Community College Faculty Survey of Student Engagement 2005 Findings Presenter: LaSylvia Pugh – September 14, 2006.
Understanding AQIP (Academic Quality Improvement Project) Some slides and/or information have been borrowed with permission from their originators: 1.
1 Student Shoreline Community College Results from the Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI)
Executive Summary 2009 Findings November 16, 2009.
1 Student Characteristics And Measurements of Student Satisfaction Prepared for: The Faculty Council Subcommittee on Retention The Office of Institutional.
1 IACRAO 68TH ANNUAL MEETING Racing Towards Tomorrow..... Racing Towards Tomorrow.....
Program Review  Health Profession Advising  Key Communities  Orientation and Transition Programs  Outreach and Support  Undeclared Advising.
Pilot New Student Orientation. Today’s Roadmap Background Orientation as part a piece of the puzzle Orientation learning objectives Overview of the in-person.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:8 Assure a Competent Public Health and Personal Healthcare Workforce.
Entering Community College Students: Consciously Creating Critical Connections 2012 FYE Conference San Antonio, TX.
J. F. DRAKE STATE TECHNICAL COLLEGE HUNTSVILLE, AL Carolyn Henderson.
Survey Data Summary Data Compiled Fall 2007.
St. Petersburg College CCSSE 2011 Findings Board of Trustees Meeting.
Results of AUC’s NSSE Administration in 2011 Office of Institutional Research February 9, 2012.
Foundations of Excellence Results of Surveys A Presentation by Arlene Santos-George April 1, 2008.
Using FoE to Promote a Culture of Continuous Improvement Austin Lane, President, LSC-Montgomery Wendell Williams, VPSS, LSC-Montgomery Chris Tkach, Director,
May Military Times EDGE magazine  2010 Military Times EDGE magazine  Evaluation criteria used: Financial assistance Financial assistance.
Faculty Said/Student Said 2008 Update (First Look) Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings LaSylvia Pugh – February 16, 2009.
Mountain View College Spring 2008 CCSSE Results Community College Survey of Student Engagement 2008 Findings.
1 N ational S urvey & F aculty S urvey of S tudent E ngagement (NSSE) & (FSSE) 2006 Wayne State University.
Catch Them While You Can! DCCCD 2 nd Annual Student Success Summer Institute 2010.
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services.
Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Vice President for Student Affairs Georgia Regents University Today’s Transfer Students: Building a Foundation of Success Transfer.
Faculty Force Field. Formal Strategies and Goals Promote a culture for faculty to make a full and unconstrained contribution to the quality of life and.
Betsy Griffin, Ph.D., Gardner Institute Darlena Jones, Ph.D., EBI MAP-Works 2013 NCA HLC Annual Meeting.
Increasing Retention through First Year Experience Dr. Paul Brown Santanu Bandyopadhyay Zane State College.
In this session, participants will learn what assessment of student engagement has shown St. Louis Community College (STLCC) about transfer success and.
CO-PALS A Partnership Between Colorado State University–Global Campus & the Colorado Community College System Seamless Educational Pathways from A.A.S.
Academic Affairs/Student Affairs Partnership Institutional Self-Assessment Questionnaire.
Research Findings: Good Practices in Student Retention and the First Year Experience Robert D. Reason Assistant Professor and Research Associate Foundations.
1 WHAT WORKS IN STUDENT RETENTION Dr. Wes Habley Principal Associate Educational Services ACT, Inc.
Noel-Levitz Student Satisfaction Survey of Classroom and Online Students Conducted Spring 2008.
Survey Data Executive Summary Fall 2008.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Four-year public colleges 1 WHAT WORKS IN STUDENT RETENTION Dr. Wes Habley Principal Associate Educational Services ACT, Inc.
Findings of a Student Retention Study University of Saskatchewan Overview of Findings: June 12, 2007 CACUSS 2007 Conference.
ESU’s NSSE 2013 Overview Joann Stryker Office of Institutional Research and Assessment University Senate, March 2014.
Partnering for Student Success The Bridge to Clemson University Program Sue Whorton Clemson University National Institute for the Study of Transfer Students.
BEAMS – Using NSSE Data: Understanding the Benchmark Reports.
1 This CCFSSE Drop-In Overview Presentation Template can be customized using your college’s CCFSSE/CCSSE results. Please review the “Notes” section accompanying.
Advising international transfer students Focus on international transfer students. Similar sized institutions in attendance Tasked to discuss the various.
INDIVIDUALIZED ACADEMIC SUPPORT FOR UA STUDENTS Role of the Learning Specialist Student Learning Services Team August Kick-Off 8/9/10.
UNDERSTANDING 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) RESULTS Nicholls State University October 17, 2012.
1 Results From UNCG’s Spring 1998 Sophomore Survey Office of Institutional Research September 1998 The University of North Carolina at Greensboro.
Foundations of Excellence John Lanning Assistant Vice Chancellor for Undergraduate Experiences Peggy Lore Assistant Vice Chancellor for Student Success.
Knowing Our Students, and Helping Them Succeed. 54.8% Latino Students (38.8% college-wide) 67.6% Female v. 32.4% Male (61.4% v. 38.6% college-wide) Average.
Using Groups in Academic Advising Dr. Nancy S. King Kennesaw State University.
Institutional Effectiveness: Sophomores’ Evaluations of UNC Charlotte Findings from the Sophomore Surveys Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
CCSSE 2014 Findings Southern Crescent Technical College.
The University of Texas-Pan American Susan Griffith, Ph.D. Executive Director National Survey of Student Engagement 2003 Results & Recommendations Presented.
The University of Texas-Pan American National Survey of Student Engagement 2014 Presented by: October 2014 Office of Institutional Research & Effectiveness.
ACT Student Opinion Survey Results
The University of Texas-Pan American
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Improving the First Year: Campus Discussion March 30, 2009
2013 NSSE Results.
Presentation transcript:

Foundations of Excellence SHARING THE InFOE

PowerPoint Overview  Survey Overview  Faculty/Staff Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Student Survey  Who Responded  Dimension Results  Overall Evaluation Results  Conclusions  We are going from Good to Excellent  We face challenges  What we are doing is working

Survey Overview The Foe Surveys are a Comprehensive Assessment  Two Sources of Information 1.Faculty/Staff 2.Students  Focus on Two Student Groups – 1.First-year students 2.Transfer Students  9 Dimensions 1.Philosophy -- 2.Organization – 3.Learning 4.Campus Culture – 5.Transitions – 6.All Students – 7.Diversity – 8.Roles and Purposes – 9.Improvement –

Faculty/Staff Survey Faculty/Staff: Who Responded Responded (60% - response rate*) 328 Faculty Member (74%) [37% FT, 63% PT] 27 Administrator (6%) 66 Staff (15%) 24 Clerical, Service (5%)

To what degree…1 st Yr. First-year: Philosophy Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 73% 39% 45% is a formalized institutional philosophy for working with new students valuable has an institutional philosophy for working with new students been communicated to you has a department/unit philosophy for working with new students been communicated to you Faculty/Staff Results

To what degree…1 st Yr.TR Transfer: Philosophy Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 73% 39% 45% is a commonly held philosophy related to the preparation of transfer- bound students valuable has an institutional philosophy related to the preparation of transfer- bound students been communicated to you has a unit-level philosophy related to the preparation of transfer- bound students been communicated to you Faculty/Staff Results 61% 26% 33% We face challenges, especially in the transfer area.

Based on your understanding of this institution's organizational structure, to what degree… 1 st Yr. First-year: Organization Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 42% 85% 65% has this institution effectively organized collaborations between academic and student services can you correctly refer students regarding help with coursework can you correctly refer students regarding help with personal issues (money management, family matters, etc.) Faculty/Staff Results

Based on your understanding of this institution's organizational structure, to what degree…TR Transfer: Organization Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale does your college's organizational structure facilitate effective support for transfer-bound students? can you correctly refer students to the college resource regarding questions about choosing the best institution for transfer? can you correctly refer students to the college resource regarding questions about course/program articulation? Faculty/Staff Results 46% 48% 43%

To what degree…1 st Yr. First-year: Transitions Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 61% 55% 67% does this institution communicate to new students the importance of academic honesty does this institution communicate to new students the importance of ethical conduct does this institution assure that all new students experience academic support outside the classroom Faculty/Staff Results

To what degree… TR Transfer: Transitions Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale does your college encourage students to explore transfer opportunities? does your college collaborate with receiving institutions to provide your students access to information on academic requirements for transfer? does your college encourage you to mentor transfer-bound students? Faculty/Staff Results 60% 48% 29%

To what degree…1 st Yr. First-year: Campus Culture Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 69% 73% 66% is faculty involvement with new students considered important by institution leaders is faculty involvement with new students considered important by your department/unit leader is faculty involvement with new students considered important by your colleagues Faculty/Staff Results

To what degree… TR Transfer: Campus Culture Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale is your college committed to increasing the number of students who transfer to a four-year institution? Does your college support and encourage student transfer? are you aware of the academic needs of transfer-bound students? Faculty/Staff Results 74% 75% 45%

Student Survey

Students: Who Responded - 1,424 Responded Overall (12% - response rate) 545 First-year Student (38%) 963 Female (69%), 437 Male (31%) 875 White (61%) 317 Hispanic (22%) 111 Black (8%) 50 Asian (4%) 955 Planning to Transfer (68%)

To what degree do you understand how this college is organized so that you know where to go if you … 1 st Yr. First-year: Organization Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 61% 55% 69% have an administrative question (e.g., financial aid, registration, tuition payments)? have a question about academic rules (e.g., withdrawal, academic probation)? need help with your coursework (tutoring, academic support) Student Results

To what degree do you understand how this college is organized so that you know where to go if you … NoYes First-year: Organization Dimension (Took Orientation) Looking at the effects of New Student Orientation on students organizational knowledge responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 56% 51% 68% have an administrative question (e.g., financial aid, registration, tuition payments)? have a question about academic rules (e.g., withdrawal, academic probation)? need help with your coursework (tutoring, academic support) Student Results 64% 57% 69% Orientation New Student Orientation is helping students.

To what degree do you understand how this college is organized so that you know where to go if you …TR Transfer: Organization Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale need help with your coursework (tutoring, academic support) have a question about the transfer process? have a question about how courses and credits will transfer? 69% 46% 47% Student Results

Making Connections - As a new student, to what degree has this college … 1 st Yr. First-year: Transitions Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 40% 38% 65% connected you with other new students? connected you with faculty members outside of class? connected you with academic support outside the classroom (e.g., tutoring, advising)? Student Results

As a transfer-bound student, to what degree has this college …TR Transfer: Transitions Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale connected you with representatives of the institution to which you are planning to transfer? connected you to other students who are planning to transfer? academic advisor: Informed you about institutions you might consider for transfer? 25% 37% Student Results

To what degree…1 st Yr. First-year: Learning Dimension responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 82% 69% 79% has this instructor helped you learn the course material? does the instructor provide individual attention? does the instructor use effective teaching methods? Student Results

To what degree…1 st Yr. First-year: Overall Evaluation responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 54% 67% 70% has this college provided you the right amount of attention and support? has this college helped you succeed as a student? is this college committed to the success of new students? Student Results

Rate the overall value Good to Excellent Overall Evaluation: First-year and Transfer Students responses of 4 or 5 on a 5-point scale 79% 56% First-year Students: Comparing the cost of attending this college to the quality of the educational experience, please rate the overall value of the experience Potential Transfer Students: Overall, to what degree: Do you feel that this college is giving you the support you need to transfer to another college or university? Student Results

Overall Evaluation: First-year Student Results Comparing the cost of attending this college to the quality of the educational experience, please rate the overall value of the experience Excellent 42% Good 37% Neutral 17% Poor 4% Very Poor 0% Good > Great

Overall Evaluation: Transfer Students Student Results Overall, to what degree: Do you feel that this college is giving you the support you need to transfer to another college or university? Very High 33% High 23% Moderately 24% Slightly 11% Not at all 8% Challenge

Summary  Importantly, the Learning Dimension had some of the highest scores  82% of first-year students reported that the instructor helped them learn the course material  79% reported that the instructor used effective teaching methods  79% of first-year students give LSC-Montgomery an overall rating of good or excellent  56% of potential transfer students rate the transfer support received from LSC-Montgomery as high or very high Students Results Summary

Conclusions  LSC-Montgomery is poised to go from Good to Excellent – 4 out of 5 students give LSC-Montgomery an overall rating of either Good or Excellent  We have more work to do – especially in the transfer area  What we have done so far is working (e.g., New Student Orientation) Students Results Conclusions

FoE Web Sites LSC-Montgomery’s FoE SiteFoE Home Page