Strategic Highway Research Program 2 – Safety Component (SHRP2 Safety) 2012 Update Forrest Council.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.
Advertisements

Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM)
HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Safety Conversation: NLTAPA Conference Michael S. Griffith Director Office of Safety Technologies Federal Highway Administration.
1 Element 1: The Systemic Safety Project Selection Process Element 1: 4-Step Project Selection Process.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Introduction to SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study and Roadway Information Databases CUTC Summer Meeting May 2014.
Incorporating Safety into the Highway Design Process.
SHRP2 Implementation | July 22, 2014 Implementation Update AASHTO RAC Meeting, July 22, 2014 Debra Elston, Director, Office of Corporate Research, Technology,
SHRP2 Implementation Update to the Standing Committee on Highways Pam Hutton, AASHTO May 29,
Moving Research into Practice.  Implementation is the routine use of a SHRP 2 product by users in their regular way of doing business.  Users can include.
AASHTO Subcommittee on Rail Transportation Sept. 18, 2012 Kevin Chesnik.
SHRP 2 Safety Implementation: Strategic Planning Using the Data Meeting with AASHTO Safety Management August 30, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway.
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A VERY BRIEF SUMMARY for SCOHTS 2011 Richard Pain.
SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study [Presenter’s Organization] [Presenter’s Name] [Presenter’s Title] Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal,
Charles Fay, Sr. Program Officer Big Data Meets Computer Vision Dec. 7, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway safety and performance SHRP 2 Strategic.
Analysis of the SHRP 2 Naturalistic Driving Study Data [S08(B)] Evaluation of Offset Left-Turn Lanes Jessica M. Hutton Presentation to MCTRS August 15,
Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity SHRP 2 Outreach and Implementation AASHTO Technology Implementation Group.
Releasing Your Inner Innovator Kathleen Penney CH2M HILL.
1 SHRP 2 Implementation Outcomes and Products July 28, 2010 Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity.
Incident Management in Central Arkansas: Current Settings and Proposed Extensions Weihua Xiao Yupo Chan University of Arkansas at Little Rock.
AASHTO Research Advisory Committee July 24, 2012 Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity Innovation in Lean Times.
Implementation Overview Research Advisory Committee July 24, 2012.
WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 WSDOT SW Region, Vancouver, WA December 7, 2009 Tolling Study Committee.
Roadway Safety Panel How can ITS assist in bridging vehicle technology with roadway design and function?
V ehicle I nfrastructure I ntegration Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator for Operations and Acting Program Manager for ITS Joint Program Office.
Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015.
Using Data To Drive Down Fatalities Roseanne Nance Bureau of Safety Engineering Illinois Department of Transportation.
AASHTO SUBCOMMITTEE ON SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT PHOENIX, AZ – APRIL 2013 SYSTEM OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT TONY KRATOFIL, P.E. MARK GEIB, P.E. STEVE.
C ONSIDERING L ARGE T RUCKS IN THE D EVELOPMENT OF T RAFFIC M ANAGEMENT P LANS Neil Boudreau, MassDOT State Traffic Engineer April 13, 2015.
Implementation Overview SHRP 2 Oversight Committee June 18, 2012.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
Evaluating Remotely Sensed Images For Use In Inventorying Roadway Infrastructure Features N C R S T INFRASTRUCTURE.
Jason Chapman Data Collection & Management Systems.
Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.
HSM: Another Tool for Safety Management in Wyoming 1 Excellence in Transportation.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES TRB SAFETY ACTIVITIES A BRIEF SUMMARY.
IntelliDriveSM Update
Working Smart for the Customer’s Benefit Pam Hutton AASHTO SHRP2 Implementation Manager June 11, 2013.
Status of ITS research May Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
1 Using Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS) Technologies and Strategies to Better Manage Congestion Jeffrey F. Paniati Associate Administrator of.
AASHTO Standing Committee on Research July 26, 2011 Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity Update.
Accelerating solutions for highway safety, renewal, reliability, and capacity AASHTO Design Subcommittee Albuquerque, NM July 17, 2008.
1 based on Federal Highway Administration Capability Maturity Model Workshops Transportation Systems Management and Operations (TSM&O) Performance Measurement.
Evaluation and Redesign of Rojeeb Street. Objectives ▪ Evaluation of existing conditions of Rojeeb Street. ▪ Estimation of future conditions of Rojeeb.
Corridor Congestion Management Innovation for better mobility sm.
Fall  The central goal of SHRP 2 Safety research is to address the role of driver performance and behavior in traffic safety. This includes developing.
Safety Data and Analysis Center (STAC) Traffic Records Forum 10/27/2015 Carol H. Tan, PhD Team Leader, Safety Data & Analysis Office of Safety Research.
PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION & OVERSIGHT WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY BOARD Update on TRB Activities July 29, 2015 PHASE 1 OF SHRP 2 DATA IMPLEMENTATION.
Intersections.
SHRP2 Reliability Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Reliability Focus Area February 7, 2013.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Combination Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips Dr. Frank Gross, VHB.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
Highway Fatalities A National Health Crisis Highway Designers Can Help Turn Around By Anthony Kane Director, Engineering and Technical Services American.
Integrated Corridor Management Initiative ITS JPO Lead: Mike Freitas Technical Lead: John Harding, Office of Transportation Management.
SHRP 2 Safety Databases: Continuous Observations of Seat Belt Use Jim Hedlund APHA Annual Meeting November 18, 2014 Accelerating solutions for highway.
AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan Development & Implementation Status 2004 Traffic Records Forum David M. Smith Senior Transportation Specialist, Office.
1 Evaluation of Low-Cost Safety Improvements (ELCSI) Pooled Fund Study Roya Amjadi, Highway Research Engineer FHWA, Turner-Fairbank Research Center 10/24/08.
SHRP2 Capacity Implementation | February 2013 When Research Meets the Road Capacity Focus Area February 4, 2013.
Iihs.org Automated enforcement. Number of U.S. communities with speed cameras and red light cameras January 2016 Automated enforcement uses technology.
Safety Signs. Traffic Light Ahead Slow down and prepare to stop.
1 THE HIGHWAY SAFETY MANUAL Michael S. Griffith Federal Highway Administration July 26 th, 2004.
FHWA Update SHRP2 Implementation and Other Agency TSMO R&D Efforts Tracy Scriba, FHWA 12/8/15 1.
Safety Training and Analysis Center (STAC)
Shrp2 and safety training and analysis center (stac)
Safety Research within Strategic Highway Research Program 2:
Status Update AASHTO RAC
Reduced Datasets from Roadway Information Database (RID)
Presentation transcript:

Strategic Highway Research Program 2 – Safety Component (SHRP2 Safety) 2012 Update Forrest Council

Congressional-mandated (and AASHTO supported) research Four areas, –Renewal (get in, get out, stay out) –Reliability (of travel times) –Capacity (increasing with systems approach) –Safety (driver behavior) Overall SHRP2

SHRP2 Safety Overall goal: Make a significant improvement in highway safety by greatly increasing our knowledge of driver behavior –How the driver interacts with and adapts to the roadway, traffic environment, traffic controls, weather, etc. –Differences in crash risk associated with these interactions –Proposed countermeasures based on the findings

SHRP2 Safety (cont.) Proposed safety research program originally had two “tracks” –Naturalistic Driving Study Instrument 2K private vehicles and observe and record driver behavior, roadway, surrounding traffic, environment, etc. Collect roadway inventory data for sample of roads driven and merge with instrumented vehicle data –Site-based Risk Study (Feasibility Study) Instrument series of locations (e.g., intersections, curves) and observe and record vehicle interactions under different roadway, traffic, and traffic control/warning conditions Feasibility study completed – no more effort

Naturalistic Driving Use new technology to continually record –Driver behavior –Vehicle behavior –Roadway environment –Weather –Surrounding traffic 1,950 data collection system used for two years -- 3,700 vehicle years Six locations across nation Supplemented by Roadway Inventory Data –12,500 centerline miles of data collection –Collection at each of six sites Emphasis on ROR and Intersection crashes

NDS Data Being Collected Pre-driving –Vision and Visual-cognitive –Cognitive and psychomotor (e.g., memory, reaction time) –Physical (e.g., upper and lower body strength/flexibility) –Health-related (e.g., sleep quality, medical conditions) –Psychological (e.g., risk-taking behavior, attention deficit) –Driver knowledge and driver history While driving –Multiple cameras/video –Accelerometer data –GPS –Forward radar –Passive alcohol sensor –Turn signals –Vehicle network data (accelerator, brake, ABS, airbag deployment, seat belt use, etc.) –Cell phone use records (begin/end, no content)

Data Collection Sites

Current Status – Naturalistic Driving Study Data Collection –To be completed by November, 2013 –2,000 vehicles now in field, 1/3 of total data –450,000+ trip files in database; 2.5M+ miles of driving Analysis contracts: working with initial data sets –Four contractors in phase I proof of concept effort Road departure on rural 2-lane curves Offset left-turn bays Driver inattention Rear-end crashes on congested freeways

Roadway Inventory Data (RID) Spatial-based inventory data on sample of roads in each site to link with vehicle position data –Sample determined in part by NDS vehicle use Two sources of RID data –Collect spatial data from existing mapping and inventory sources in each site –Collect additional data on-site with mobile data collection Fugro-Roadware vehicle 12,500 centerline miles (both directions)

RID Mobile Data Items Horizontal Curvature: Radius, Length, PC, PT, Direction –Had to change required specification Grade Cross Slope/Superelevation Lane in terms of the number, width, and type ( turn, passing, acceleration, car pool, etc…) Shoulder type/curb; paved width if exists Intersection location, number of approaches, and control (uncontrolled, all-way stop, two-way stop, yield, signalized, roundabout). Ramp termini are considered intersections Posted speed limit sign and location Median presence (Y/N), type (depressed, raised, flush, barrier) Rumble Strip presence (Y/N), location (centerline, edgeline, shoulder) Lighting presence( Y/N)

RID Supplemental Data Supplemental data on things affecting safety and operations –Historic crash data –AADT –Short duration traffic counts –Seat belt laws –Winter road conditions –Weather –Work zones –Safety treatments (maybe!) –etc.

RID Current Status Existing RID being collected from DOTs Initial mobile data collection –Completed by end of 2012 for FL, NC, NY –Completed early in 2013 for WA, IN –Completed end of 2013 for PA Additional 6,300 miles to be distributed among sites and collected in 2013 Supplemental data collection just initiated. Completed in 2013.

Implementation Plans for Safety Preparing for wider data use –Decisions on and preparation of user- friendly files (no personal identifiers) –Possible web-based tutorial, training Planning for implementation and long- term stewardship –Volpe Center study to identify long-term stewardship/ownership options for NDS and RID.

2012 – 2014 Implementation for Other SHRP2 Areas Other three SHRP2 areas –Renewal (get in, get out, stay out) –Reliability (of travel times) –Capacity (increasing with systems approach) Funding for implementation came from continuing resolutions (and some MAP-21) FHWA and AASHTO developed a joint 3-year implementation plan (Approximately $81M)

2012 Starts Project Management Tools $0.5M –R09 Managing Risk in Rapid Renewal Contracts –R10 Managing Complex Projects R04 Bridge Designs for Rapid Renewal (2011) $4.0M R26 Preservation on High Volume Roadways (2011) $3.0M L12 Training for Traffic Incident Responders (2011) $4.5M Organizing for Reliability $6.5M –L31 CEO Workshop on Operations (2011) –L17 Knowledge Transfer System (2011) –L06 Organizing Agencies for Systems Operations and Mgt. –L01 Business Processes for Reliability C06 Integrating Ecosystem & Highway Planning $1.5M $20.0M 15

2013 Starts – Estimated TCAPP $6 – 7M –C01 TCAPP –C02 Performance Measures –C19 Expedited Project Delivery R07 Performance Specs for Rapid Renewal $0.2 –.05M R15B Integrating Utility/Transportation (2011) $2 – 3M R16 Railroad Agreements (2011)$1 – 2M R23 Long-Life Pavements (2011)$1 – 2M R06 Web Tool for Non-destructive Testing$1 – 2M Estimated costs ~ $14M 16

2014 Starts - Estimated Economic Impact Tools $1 – 2M –C03 Economic Impact Case Studies –C11 Economic Impact Analysis Tools C10 Travel Demand and Network Models $3 – 4M C15 Freight Planning Guide $1 – 2M Reliability Analysis Tools $3 – 4M –L02 Monitoring Programs for Reliability –L05 Planning/Programming for Reliability –L08 Reliability in the Highway Capacity Manual L36 Regional Operations Forum $0.5 – 1M R19A Bridges Beyond 100 Years $1 – 2M Pavement Technologies –R05 Modular Pavement Solutions –R21 Composite Pavement Systems TBD Estimated costs ~ $11M 17

Additional Implementation Funding Additional funding for continued implementation of SHRP2 projects in FY 2013 and FY 2014 recently approved by AASHTO vote –4 percent of each state's State Planning and Research (SP&R) funding –Two-thirds of funding for product demonstration –Remaining one-third for educational outreach, communications, IT support, evaluating the demonstrations, and administration of the program. So the future planning will now have to be modified. 18