Improving course evaluation response rates November 7, 2012.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

In an attempt to streamline, provide much faster feedback to Deans and faculty, and significantly reduce the cost, student evaluations of faculty by course.

Advertisements

SPC Faculty Publications Prepared by the SPC Office of Faculty Research and Sponsored Programs.

Holy Cross Catholic High School New PE Kit Consultation November 2014.

Learning Community II Survey Spring 2007 Analysis by Intisar Hibschweiler (Core Director) and Mimi Steadman (Director of Institutional Assessment)

WebLearn site templates Feedback welcome!. Properties of a course site Initial content – Standard, reusable documents – Initial starting point – Leading.

New Library Catalog Search Tool. CSU Libraries Discovery Tool Dennis Ogg Greg Vogl PDI--January 8th,

Clearing Up the Confusion Comparing General Education and Program Assessment A Panel Presentation Sponsored by the University Committees on General Education.

IT Learning Programme The Evaluations Tool – Workshop 3 18 th May 2010.

2006 LibQUAL+ Survey Results Information Services Concept Review on Assessment November 9, 2006.

Review of SUNY Oneonta Course Evaluation Form Report and Recommendations from The Committee on Instruction: Part II October 4, 2010.

AY Annual Program Survey Results NASPAA Annual Conference 2014 Albuquerque, New Mexico.

Higher Physical Education

CERTI Professional Development What You Need to Know About Electronic Student Course Evaluations Steph Fitch, Chair, Ad Hoc Faculty Senate Committee.

IDEA Course Evaluations New Faculty Academy Spring,

Presentation for Photography Evaluation This presentation is going to show what data I gathered and the results from the questionnaire I created.

May 8 th Assessment Day 2015 Agenda Introductions Assessment Overview Review General Education Outcomes. Overview of past assessment work. What.

Distance Learning Survey Fall Distance Learning Survey, De Anza College, Fall 2007 Andrew LaManque, PhD Supervisor, Institutional Research and Elena.

Computer Science Department Assessment 2008 Report Slippery Rock University.

EVALUATION REPORT Derek R. Lane, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Kentucky.

Development of student uptake. Survey among new master students  Cross-sectional survey  Questionnaire filled in by all students present at the first.

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Report Institutional Research & Information November 18, 2009.

Faculty & Student Use and Opinions of E-Books at UMD Tim Hackman Kelsey Corlett-Rivera August 14, 2012.

IDEA Student Ratings of Instruction Shelley A. Chapman, PhD Insight Improvement Impact ® University of Alabama Birmingham September 11, 2012.

Final Update on the New Faculty Course Evaluation & Online System November, 2003.

M ARK M ACIAS S HAWN B EARD SCC O FFICE OF I NSTITUTIONAL R ESEARCH 2007 SCC Employee Opinion Survey.

PhD Survey 2011 Some results. Respondents Active PhD:s Number of respondents: 403 Response rate: 57 % Women: 58 % or respondents Foreign degree: 34 %

Finding and Sharing Information in a Site Module 5.

Web Enhanced Course Evaluation at Columbia University Jack McGourty Columbia University.

Noel Levitz Priorities Survey for Online Learners (PSOL) Joan Costello —Chief Academic Officer, Inver Hills Community College Deborah Proctor —eCurriculum.

KUREKA at Open KU Enhancing Education through Peer-to-peer Learning Hikyoung Lee & Minja Kim Center for Teaching and Learning Korea University AROOC 2012.

The Impact of Mobile First and Responsive Web Designs Kevin Tharp

Physical Education department SENATE MEETING MARCH 12 TH, 2012.

LCI/ IND 101 Survey Results Fall 2007 Analysis by I. Hibschweiler and Mimi Steadman.

Dordt’s Institutionally- created Surveys Presented by Sheryl Sheeres Taylor.

Faculty Senate Information Technologies Committee May 13, 2008.

Student Learning Outcomes (Pharmacy) Susan S. S. Ho School of Pharmacy Faculty of Medicine The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 September 2007.

Adding SubtractingMultiplyingDividingMiscellaneous.

Evaluating Student Presentations Speaking Intensive Workshop.

WVASFAA 1. Counseling Strategies MARK A NEW TRAIL ~ LEARN TO BE A BETTER LISTENER AND EXPLAINER WVASFAA 2.

SCC Tenure Process November 13, Goal: Ensure Faculty Excellence  Faculty excellence supports Shoreline’s vision of being a world-class institution.

ECAFE electronic Course And Faculty Evaluations Jennifer Geis

Day Five Self-Assessment

Visual 6.1 Course Summary Unit 6: Course Summary.

Dave Neal “The Institutionalization of Disaster Management Programs and the Need for Theory Department of Political Science OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY.

Program Assessment: Understanding and Using Results Specify intended outcomes Measure whether students are meeting those outcomes Improve your program.

Standards Review Update. Standards Review Timeline ELA and Math –Last year, more than 130,000 reviews and more than 20,000 comments were collected on.

Campus Master Plan Online Survey Summary. Survey: Faculty, Staff & Students.

CIRTL Needs Assessment Meeting 3:00-4:00 ET/ 2:00-3:00 CT/ This meeting will be recorded Begin by running the Audio.

NSF Evaluator's Introduction Dee Hoffman, PhD IAB Meeting November 16, 2011.

ESET Timing Close Study Results Stefani Dawn, PhD Assistant Director of Assessment.

PERFECTLY CLEAR? MAYBE NOT

Lesson 2.3 6/9/2018 LESSON 2.3 RESPOND EFFECTIVELY

Undergraduate Student Environment

Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services

Repeated percentages Example: Due to inflation, prices increase by 5% per year. An item costs £12 now. What will it cost in 2 years time? After 1 year.

2017 ILO Survey Results.

التعامل مع ضغوطات العمل إعداد وتقديم إقبال المطيري

Academic Assessment: Data Day May 7, 2015.

Reasons for choosing your extended project

Student Satisfaction Results

MIS752: Research Seminars

Adding with 9’s.

Adding with 10’s.

Using a Faculty Learning Community to Take the Next Step

Unit 4 - A06 – Review Grade Criteria To get a c

Learning Community II Survey

Adding ____ + 10.

Using a Faculty Learning Community to Take the Next Step

Unit Fractions – Adding – Minesweeper

Presentation transcript:

Improving course evaluation response rates November 7, 2012

Response rates (CCE), Spring 2012 In classes with 10+ students, response rates ranged from 14% (5/35) to 77% (24/31) Top response rates among full-time faculty: – 525, Marciano, 75% – 465, Lee, 74% – 755, Tibbo, 73% – 780, Losee, 67% – 890, Hughes-Hassell, 67% – 582, Haas, 66% – 490, Pomerantz, 63%

Response rates (SILS form), S12 In classes with 10+ students, response rates ranged from 0 (4 classes) to 86% (25/29) Top response rates among full-time faculty: – 465, Lee, 74% – 500, Wildemuth, 65% – 525, Marciano, 60% – 490, Pomerantz, 58%

Suggestions for improving response rates Set aside class time for survey completion Stress the importance of providing feedback (repeatedly) Explain how the evaluations are used Collect and respond to students’ comments mid- term Other suggestions? Should we eliminate the SILS form (adding items to the CCE)? Would that improve the CCE response rate?