FY 2010 and FY 2011 USPTO Financial Report Trademark Public Advisory Committee Meeting February 25, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 AIAA Delta Forum AIAA Public Policy A CRISIS IN AERONAUTICS The NASA Landscape Aerospace Sciences Meeting January 8, 2001 Carol A. Cash, Chair Aeronautics.
Advertisements

2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
“city of people, ON THE MOVE” ONE TEAM, ONE VISION.
FY 2014 Budget Revision Addressing the Winter of 2014 John W. Lawson Chief Financial Officer April 16, 2014.
Trustees Academy August 30, 2010 Indiana Commission for Higher Education HIGHER EDUCATION FUNDING IN INDIANA: THE ROLE OF THE INDIANA COMMISSION FOR HIGHER.
Intellectual Property Rights Regulations in Russia: Case of Government-Supported R&D Irina Dezhina Leading Researcher, Ph.D. Institute for the Economy.
1 Clearing the Oldest Patent Applications (COPA) John Barlow Subject Matter Expert Technology Center 2800.
STEM Education Reorganization April 3, STEM Reorganization: Background  The President has placed a very high priority on using government resources.
USPTO Implementation of the America Invents Act Teresa Stanek Rea Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the.
Data Transparency Town Hall September 26, 2014 Christina Ho Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary Accounting Policy U.S. Department of the Treasury Karen F.
GEF and Environmental & Conservation Funds Presentation for the Workshop on “Management of Environmental Funds for the Financial Sustainability of Biodiversity.
Privileged and Confidential Strategic Approach to Asset Management Presented to October Urban Water Council Regional Seminar.
1 FNGATSWG-Initial Observations Financing the Next Generation Air Transportation System Working Group (FNGATSWG) July 27, 2005.
The South Carolina Technical College System System Update and Initiatives January 7, 2010.
2006 Budget Challenges Additional Increases in Pension Contributions = +$451,200 Additional Assessment from RVSA = +$315,000 Increases in Fuel and Utility.
Sustainability and Total Cost of Ownership Strategies for Higher Education.
EMU Strategic Planning Strategic Planning Material Mission/Vision/Values Goals and Objectives January 10, 2014.
University Strategic Resource Planning Council Budget.
AN INVITATION TO LEAD: United Way Partnerships Discussion of a New Way to Work Together. October 2012.
1 Improving Administration in Your Financial Aid Office SFA’s Tools for Success.
11 IP Section Colorado Bar Association Robert Stoll Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office.
DRAFT – Not for Circulation Investing in Innovation (i3) 2012 Development Competition Summary Document February 2012 Note: These slides are intended as.
State Legislative Update Faculty Senate April 3, 2013.
Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members in Alaska’s Commercial Fisheries Documenting the Participation of Fishing Vessel Crew Members.
FY 2010 Interim Plan WVU Board of Governors June 5, 2009.
A Glance Back  We have made significant progress in spite of significant financial challenges created from:  Declining state appropriations  Pressure.
0 0 Six Sigma – Financial Overview. 1 1 Roles and Responsibilities of the Finance Support Team Policy Setting – Define Savings/Benefits – Provide tools.
December 14, 2011/Office of the NIH CIO Operational Analysis – What Does It Mean To The Project Manager? NIH Project Management Community of Excellence.
Full Costing An introduction and lessons learnt from the UK and Finland Pierre Espinasse.
FY10 Spending Plan Process Finance and Administration Advisory Group September 30, 2009.
St. Johns County Association Roundtable June 8, 2015 Jesse Dunn Assistant Director OMB St. Johns County BCC Fiscal Year 2016: Separate Challenges Looking.
Powering Alberta AESO Annual General Meeting May 14, 2009 Reliable Power Reliable Markets Reliable People.
. Integrity  Innovative  Collaborative  Professional  Responsive  Respectful  Ethical  Transparent  Customer first!  Effective & efficient Building.
1 Reduction to our parliamentary appropriations Our challenge doesn’t end there.
September 23, 2011 Maury M. Tepper, III Tepper & Eyster, PLLC © Tepper & Eyster 2011.
Christian Chace Patent Process Reengineering Team December 8, 2010 Patent Process Reengineering Team and Patent End-To-End Processing Team The Biotechnology.
 Population: 45,578  Median Household Income: $54,871  Persons below poverty level: 8.3%  Housing Units: 27,925  Homeownership rate: 78.8%  Persons.
Shaping Our Future Together What we Heard Alternatives and Opportunities Moving Forward February 23, 2015.
USPTO Updated Strategic Plan in Brief March 3 rd, 2010.
Christian Chace Patent Process Reengineering Team September 8, 2010 Patent Process Reengineering Team as part of the Patent End-To-End Processing Team.
Group discussion toolkit. The Financial Challenge The council needs to save another £128 million over the next five years. This is in addition to the.
State Budget and Election Fall 2010 University Priorities Questions/comments/discussion.
March 2, 2011 Status of the Patent Budget. 2 Steps in the Budget Process Strategic Planning – long term Budget Formulation and Performance Planning -
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
OCFO - Financial Status of USPTO May 7, FY 2010 Status Authorized level of $1,887.0 million Mid-year Budget Execution Review currently underway.
September Board Meeting FY08 and FY09 Spending Plan.
Progress Update- August IDENTITY Solidify UME’s identity as the provider of excellent research-based educational programs in defined priority areas.
Georgia Perimeter College FY2011 Budget Transforming Lives, Strengthening Communities, Fostering Teamwork.
Community Budget Forum FY 2015 Budget Development Dr. Patrick K. Murphy, Superintendent Deirdra McLaughlin, Assistant Superintendent, Finance & Management.
Presentation to Board June 17, 2008 Presented by: J. A. Sabo, Associate Director – Leading Services & Treasurer of the Board BUDGET York Catholic.
Copyright © 2015 Oblon, McClelland, Maier & Neustadt, LLP Inside the USPTO Peggy Focarino Senior Patent Advisor.
FY 2010 and FY 2011 Budget and Fee Collection Update March 3, 2010.
Law Seminars International Spectrum Management Conference NTIA: SPECTRUM POLICY FOR THE 21 st CENTURY The Federal Government Spectrum Management Perspective.
1 Biotech/Chem/Pharm Customer Partnership Meeting June 15, 2005 USPTO Study on Restriction Reform and Update on TC1600 Restriction Practice Action Plan.
College-wide Meeting Budget Planning For FY March 17, /10/20161.
The 7th Framework Programme for Research: Strategy of international cooperation activities Robert Burmanjer Head of Unit, “International Scientific Cooperation.
Presented September 2013 Board of Trustees Meeting Financial Review for the Board of Trustees Year End: FY 2012 – 2013 Budget: FY 2013 – 2014 Kurt Buttleman,
Proposed Budget and Superintendent’s Message FY Presented to the Board of Education April 14,
Medium Term Budget Policy Statement Presentation to: Joint Budget Committee 17 November 2003.
Oxnard College Campus Budget Forum Presented by: Richard Duran, President John al-Amin, VP Business Services Scott Corbett, President Academic Senate April.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
DNR Supplemental Budget 2016
Massachusetts Clean Energy Center Budget Overview
Post-YU Trilateral Bottom-Up Learning – PYTBUL Ljubljana,
2018 Preliminary budget and tax levy SEPTEMBER 25, 2017
Revolutionize USACE Civil Works
Budget and Planning Update
Ministry of National Economy of The Republic of Kazakhstan
The National Association of Patent Practitioners (NAPP)
Presentation transcript:

FY 2010 and FY 2011 USPTO Financial Report Trademark Public Advisory Committee Meeting February 25, 2010

2 FY 2010 Fee Collections FY 2010 USPTO appropriation of $1,887M  Patent estimate of $1,664.8M  Trademark estimate of $222.2M Current Fee Collection Projections are $2,003M  Patent maintenance and issue fee increases are the main drivers $116M in patent fee collections estimated as unavailable without further legislation USPTO is in discussions with OMB and DOC regarding full access to fee collections in FY 2010.

3 Operating In 2010 at $1,887M — Reductions in Patent Funded Programs  Used 2009 Savings to Offset Costs in FY2010  USPTO Made Further Reductions in FY2010 to Redirect Additional Money to Activities with Direct Impact on Pendency  Hire 250 Examiners, Limited OT & PCT Outsourcing (2/2010)  Early Data Capture Halted—Funds Redirected to PCT & OT  Awards Curtailed—Funds Redirected to OT and Examiner Hires  Efficiency Improvements

4 FY 2011 President’s Budget Highlights  Introduces a new set of Strategic Priorities  Provides authority for Sustainable Funding – 15% interim patent fee adjustment and fee setting authority  Multi-year plan to achieve goal of an average patent first action pendency of 10 months, average total pendency of 20 months  Investment in IT – accelerate critical initiatives  Establishes an operating reserve to manage multi- year planning and budgeting.

5 USPTO Strategic Priorities The USPTO strategic priorities support the Administration/Department high priority performance goals:  Reduce Patent Pendency and Backlogs  Improve the Quality of Examination  Improve/Enhance Patent Appeal and Post-Grant Processes  Demonstrate Global Leadership in all Aspects of IP Policy Development  Improve Information Technology Infrastructure and Tools  Implement a Sustainable Funding Model for Operations, and  Improve Relations with Stakeholders

6 Trademark Strategic Priorities Information Technology  Separate trademark systems from patent systems to allow for new infrastructure and virtualization  Collect user community feedback on preferences and needs for a 21st century Trademark Office Quality Initiatives  Accuracy of Goods and Services in Applications and Registrations  Improved Examination Quality – establish a new quality measure that focuses on the excellence of the entire Office Action Human Resource Initiatives  Continuation of the Trademark Human Capital Strategic Plan launched in partnership with the Office of Human Resources nearly three years ago. Anti Counterfeiting and Anti Piracy Initiatives  Education – Partner with OIPPE to develop public awareness of effects of trademark counterfeiting and  Customs Recordation Project – Partner with OIPPE and Customs and Border Patrol to develop on-line system to permit Trademark Owners to request Customs recordation when filing for a federal Trademark registration.

7 Information Technology Investment FY2010 Stabilization and continued operations and maintenance of our existing IT systems; develop documentation of patent business requirements to proceed with redesign of patent IT. FY 2011 Funds are requested to begin working towards a new IT Vision which includes:  Conducting a ground up redesign of the USPTO’s infrastructure and applications on 21st Century platforms  Stabilizing current systems to “keep the trains running” Investing $122.3M in  Patent end-to-end electronic processing  Trademark’s Next Generation

8 Implement a Sustainable Funding Model to Support Operations Short Term / Interim Funding Authority – Begins putting USPTO on stable ground to set USPTO priorities in motion  Access to USPTO fee collections  Interim Fee Adjustment on Patent fees  Fee Setting Authority  Operating reserve Long Term / Sustainable – Reform USPTO Fee Structure and manage multi- year plans  Establish fees that better reflect costs of services  Structure fees to provide appropriate incentives for innovation  Structure fees to facilitate the effective administration of patent and trademark processes  Establish and Maintain Operating Reserve

9 Trademark Performance TrademarksFY 2009FY 2010FY 2011FY 2012FY 2013FY 2014FY 2015 Applications352,051356,000374,000397,000431,000474,000518,000 Growth Rate-11.8%1.1%5.1%6.1%8.6%10.0%9.3% Balanced Disposals784,990742,000753,000824,000889,000975,0001,067,000 Registrations241,637218,000221,000241,000261,000286,000313,000 Performance Measures Applications Processed Electronically62.0%65.0%68.0%71.0%74.0%78.0%81.0% First Action Compliance Rate96.4%95.5% Final Compliance Rate97.6%97.0% Avg. First Action Pendency (Months) to 3.5 Avg. Total Pendency (Months) Examining Attorneys at End-of-Year

10 USPTO Requirements vs. Funding DescriptionFY 2011FY 2012 FY 2013 Total Requirements2,3312,4762,533 Fee Collections/ Other Income 2,1162,2292,258 Interim Funding Adjustment Total Collections2,3402,4612,486 Reserve-Activity9(15)(47) Reserve-Balance Dollars in Millions

11 Requirements vs. Funding by Business Line DescriptionFY 2011FY 2012FY 2013 Total Requirements 2,0812,2222,275 Fee Collections/ Other Income 1,9031,9922,001 Surcharge Total Collections 2,1272,2242,229 Reserve-Activity 462(46) Reserve-Balance PATENTS Dollars in Millions DescriptionFY 2011FY 2012FY 2013 Total Requirements Fee Collections/ Other Income Reserve-Activity(37)(17)(1) Reserve-Balance TRADEMARKS Dollars in Millions