Influencing Policy through Research: Introduction to Principles and Tools Arnaldo Pellini:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Theory-Based Evaluation:
Advertisements

Linking research to policy in Vietnam: how can complexity concepts help?
Mapping Political Contexts
Bridging the Gap between Research and Policymaking in India Seminar, Workshop, 4 rd January 2004 Some Specific Tools Political context (Engaging Policymakers)
Implications for Think Tanks Need to be able to: –Understand the political context –Do credible research –Communicate effectively –Work with others Need.
Tools for Policy Influence. RAPID Programme SMEPOL, Cairo, February, Practical Tools.
Public Policy: a key for right based approach to development What role for Handicap International ? Atelier de travail sur la RBA – Handicap International.
Role of CSOs in monitoring Policies and Progress on MDGs.
Thematic evaluation on the contribution of UN Women to increasing women’s leadership and participation in Peace and Security and in Humanitarian Response.
Towards a model M&E system for AIDS programs Kampala April
Maximising the impact of research: experience from ODI’s RAPID Programme John Young Overseas Development Institute
CAIM Start up Workshop Knowledge Management Ankita Handoo, IFAD India.
Designing Influential Evaluations Session 1 Introduction Uganda Evaluation Week - Pre-Conference Workshop 19 th and 20 th May 2014.
Measuring policy influence: like measuring thin air? John Young:
Monitoring and Evaluation of Influence John Young.
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
1 Day 4. 2 review of day 3 & feedback from evaluation.
Begin with the End in Mind
INTEGRATING BENEFICIARY FEEDBACK INTO EVALUATION- A STRUCTURED APPROACH Presentation to UKES Conference May 2015 Theme: Theory and practice of inclusion.
Dissemination pathways Science and policy
Making the case: using research-based evidence for policy advocacy John Young, ODI, London BOND Advocacy and Capacity Building Group.
3ie Grantees Communication for Policy Influence Clinic Negombo 16 th – 18 th July 2012.
Lessons from RAPID’s work on research-policy links John Young.
@VOLCROWE Develop new models of motivations for volunteering in the context of non-commercial crowdsourcing projects. Evaluate a range.
Too expensive Too complicated Too time consuming.
1 Introduction to Evaluating the Minnesota Demonstration Program Paint Product Stewardship Initiative September 19, 2007 Seattle, WA Matt Keene, Evaluation.
Slide 1 Final Conference Stratos Papadimitriou Cracow, September 2009 Work Package C A Quality Management Approach for Managing Mobility in Medium and.
Developing Indicators
Stakeholder Analysis.
Inclusive Business in Agrifood Markets: Evidence and Action FANRPAN Model – A Regional Multi-stakeholder Platform for Research, Knowledge Sharing and Policy.
Rwanda MCC Threshold Program CIVIL SOCIETY STRENGTHENING PROJECT Cross-Cutting Advocacy Issues Data Collection Monitoring and Evaluation.
Taking account of culture: Lessons from Iraq Rebecca Ingram: Senior Schools Adviser, British Council Peter Fell: Consultant for.
Gender Responsive Budgeting An introduction Catharina Schmitz.
Evaluating Effectiveness To what effect? Joanne Sharpe, Office of Development Effectiveness, AusAID.
INITIATING THE PLANNING PROCESS. CONTENT Outputs from this stage Stage general description Obtaining government commitment Raising awareness Establishing.
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach Simon Hearn, ODI 16 April 2010 Bern, Switzerland.
Tony Karbo, Ph.D. AHSI/UPEACE Africa Program.  Action or inaction taken by interested entities such as NGOs, Think Tanks, government departments, ministries,
Bridging the gap between research and policy making? Ajoy Datta Foundation for the Future, Dead Sea, Jordan Civil Society Partnerships Programme
International Health Policy Program -Thailand Reflection on experience in using JANS with sector strategy Phusit Prakongsai, MD. Ph.D. International Health.
M&E of policy influence some guidance thoughts…. Elements of a monitoring frame.. Policy objective and theory of change Indicators Data collection tools.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
The Major Steps of a Public Health Evaluation 1. Engage Stakeholders 2. Describe the program 3. Focus on the evaluation design 4. Gather credible evidence.
Hosted by: Funded by: Research into Reality Overcoming the challenges of knowledge exchange Foundation for the Future Research Conference 26 th – 28 th.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
NSDS DESIGN PROCESS: ROAD MAPS & OTHER PRELIMINARIES Prof. Ben Kiregyera NSDS Workshop, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia 9 August 2005.
AfCoP and the AAA Reflections on future engagement By Richard Ssewakiryanga
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Photo: David Brazier/IWMI Photo :Tom van Cakenberghe/IWMI A water-secure world Farah Ahmed Date- 1 st December, 2014 Location- IWMI HQ, Sri.
WinS for Girls: Advocacy and Capacity Building for MHM in WinS Module 12: Advocacy: From Data Collection to Decision Making.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
A STRATEGY FOR REDUCING DEMAND IN ILLICIT PRODUCTS FROM ENDANGERED SPECIES Background: Why reduce demand? Expert Workshop outcomes Strategy principles.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
DEVELOPING THE WORK PLAN
What is convincing evidence? Naved Chowdhury & Enrique Mendizabal Objective of the session: –To arrive at a definition of CONVINCING evidence –what makes.
1 Rights in Action Good practices for inclusive local governance in West Africa Benin, Burkina, Faso, Mali, Niger, Senegal, Sierra Leone, Togo Side event.
Capacity Development Results Framework A strategic and results-oriented approach to learning for capacity development.
Advocacy and Partnerships for the MDGs. Context and Rationale The MDGs were created in 2000 as a concrete means to help improve the lives of poor people.
Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre Strengthening the evidence base for improvement science: lessons learned Dr Nicola Gray, Senior Lecturer,
THE ROLE OF RESEARCH IN TELECENTER DEVELOPMENT Why does research matter? Raul Roman Center for Internet Studies University of Washington APEC Telecenter.
By Dr. Talat AnwarAdvisor Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad Centre for Policy Studies, CIIT, Islamabad
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
NSA Added Value to CAADP Policy Formulation and Implementation
RAPID Outcome Mapping Approach
Rights in Action Good practices for inclusive local governance
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Gender Equality Ex post evaluation of the ESF ( )
Strategic Communication Planning
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Planning process in river basin management
Research design and techniques Workshop ICBEDC 2010
Presentation transcript:

Influencing Policy through Research: Introduction to Principles and Tools Arnaldo Pellini:

ODI 200 staff Research / Advice / Public Debate Fellowship scheme For more information see:

ODI

RAPID Knowledge Policy and development processes

RAPID Power, Politics and evidence use Evidence production and communication Knowledge intermediaries and interactions

Policy processes are... Monitoring and Evaluation Agenda Setting Decision Making Policy Implementation Policy Formulation Civil Society Donors Cabinet Parliament Ministries Private Sector

R APID O utcome M apping A pproach Strategy for influencing policy processes ROMA

Power, Politics and evidence use Evidence production and communication Knowledge intermediaries and interactions 1. Learn about the context

Knowledge, Politics and Power (KPP) 1. Mapping the political context 2. Role of key actors 3. Types of knowledge 4. Knowledge intermediation processes

1. Learn about the context 1. Mapping the political context What is the political context? Separation of powers Formal/informal political participation processes Who has the strongest voices in policy debates? How does the political context condition the behavior of different actors involved in it and the search for knowledge?

1. Learn about the context 2. Role of key actors Who is involved in policy making and knowledge processes? How do these actors interact and what role does knowledge play in this process? How do interest, values, beliefs and credibility shape the knowledge-policy interface?

1. Learn about the context 3. Types of knowledge What sources of knowledge do different actors rely on and why? From where do they source this knowledge? How do power relations between actors serve for privileging some sources of knowledge versus others?

1. Learn about the context 4. Knowledge intermediation processes Are there intermediaries involved in the knowledge to policy link? Bearing in mind an understanding of these dynamics, what innovative ways of working could be used to mediate the knowledge-policy interface? When, where, how can policy makers/ decision makers make best use of knowledge in order to tackle complex problems?

2. Define the policy change Attitudinal change Procedural change Policy content Behaviour change

Power / influence Low High Interest in the topic High Low 3. Stakeholders’ mapping 1.List stakeholders 2.Map them on a matrix 3.Identify which are the most influential

4. Research plan and communication Quantitative / qualitative / mix Data collection and analysis tools Get to know your audience Research report + Policy brief Research brief Articles in newspapers Interviews in TV Workshops and presentations …. Research Communication strategy

Overall strategy and plan Stage 1Stage 2 Stage … Outputs POLICY OUTCOME 5. Management approach

6. Assess your competencies

1.Strategy and direction –are you doing the right thing? 2.Management –are you doing what you planned to do? 3.Outputs – are the outputs appropriate for the audience? 4.Uptake – are people aware of your work? 5.Outcomes and impacts –are you having any impact? 7. Monitoring and learning framework 1.Strategy and direction 2.Management 3.Outputs 4.Uptake 5.Outcomes and impacts

7. Monitoring and learning framework Strategy and direction Logframes, Theory of Change, Peer Review, Strategy Document, … Management processes Project Documentation, Processes and Systems,. Project Governance, Research Management, PRINCE2, … Outputs Peer reviews, After Action Reviews, Output logs, … Uptake Citation Analysis, Uptake logs, User Surveys, … Outcomes and impacts Stories of Change, Episode Studies, …

Conclusions Clear intent A systematic approach The right systems and management approach To accept change To spend more on communications To engage, engage, engage Have a long term view To improve research impact you need: Clear intent

Thank you

RAPID publications: apid/activities-resources.asp Resources