BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal on the Middle Mississippi River 1 RRAT 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UMR = Balance of Environment and Transportation 1. Pool # 8 - Environmental Management Project 2. Transportation Route – human habitation & settlement.
Advertisements

US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® PNWA Conference Update COLONEL Jose Aguilar District Commander Portland District 2 October, 2014.
US Army Corps of Engineers Portland District Fiscal Year 2007 NWP Dredging Plan Including: The Columbia River Channel Improvement Project (CRCI)
Timeline of Key Milestones and Dates DateKey Milestone February 2007Washtenaw County Drain Commissioner’s Office authorizes a project to identify opportunities.
St. Louis District Water Control Operations
Public Information Meeting #6 City of Fargo Flood Risk Reduction Projects Rose Creek Coulee October 9, 2012.
Vance County Water District Overview and Update Jordan McMillen Director Vance County Planning and Development Department 156 Church St. Suite 3 Henderson,
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Methods for Determining Maximum Flood Elevations Landward of Failed Levees: An Example from the Great Missouri.
Sustainable development of inland waterways transport Tamás Marton – Ministry of Transport, Communications and Energy – Hungary
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT COASTAL DAMAGE REDUCTION FLOOD DAMAGE REDUCTION NAVIGATION ECOSYSTEM RESTORATIONREGULATORYINTERAGENCY.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® RIVER RESOURCES ACTION TEAM BOAT TRIP Upper Mississippi River (Pools 24, 25, and Mel Price) St. Louis District.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® St. Louis District Dredging Lance Engle Dredging Project Manager St. Louis District WEDA – Midwest 2012.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® FOLSOM DAM MODIFICATIONS APPROACH CHANNEL EIS/EIR Major Robert Dion and Cameron Sessions Project Managers.
JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT FY08 DREDGING SCHEDULE JACKSONVILLE DISTRICT FY08 DREDGING SCHEDULE NAD/SAD REGIONAL DREDGING MEETING/WEDA NAD/SAD REGIONAL DREDGING.
Mid-Barataria Diversion - Status Update committed to our coast Andrew Beall Project Manager Governor’s Advisory Commission Meeting December 5, 2012.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® St. Louis District Low Water Operations Russell Errett Water Control St. Louis District February 2013.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Eastern Shore Navigation Partnership Meeting “ A Unified Voice for Navigation, Project Prioritization, and.
Dredging, Disposal Management and Impacts on Lake Sediments US Army Corps of Engineers.
1 | Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov Water Power Peer Review Sustainable Small Hydropower Innovative System Testing (1.2) Department of Energy,
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation 1-Dimensional Modeling CWPPRA Technical Committee and.
NAD/SAD REGIONAL DREDGING MEETING/WEDA WILMINGTON DISTRICT
Oakland Jr. High – STEM Classes – Project Update and 3D Printing March 26, 2015.
One Corps Serving The Army and the Nation Tulsa District The Tulsa District Corps of Engineers and Its Cooperative Partners.
Savannah Harbor Expansion Project
Youghiogheny River Lake Storage ReAllocation for Downstream Water Supply by Werner C. Loehlein, P.E.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mouth of the Columbia River (MCR) Jetties Laura Hicks Chief, Planning and Project Management Branch Pacific.
MVS Mainstem Forecast Model Update: NETMISS2 by Joel Asunskis, P.E. Hydraulic Engineer, St. Louis District Water Control U.S. Army Corps Of Engineers October.
Permit Process.
Big Horn Lake Sediment Management Study. US Army Corps of Engineers Omaha District Study Background Bureau of Reclamation and Omaha District Interagency.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District Channels & Harbors Project Presentation for 2012 WEDA Midwest.
St. Croix River Crossing S.P Contractor Informational Meeting May 15, 2013 Contact: Paul Kivisto, P.E. St. Croix Crossing Bridge Construction.
BUILDING STRONG SM Presentation to Society of American Military Engineers Arkansas Post St. Louis District Program Overview BY Michael G. Feldmann Assistant.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® JOINT FEDERAL PROJECT UPDATE for SAFCA Board US Army Corps of Engineers Pam Amie 19 May 2011.
MORRIS MILL PROPOSED URBAN SERVICES DISTRICT Presentation to County Council September 17, 2013.
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Murrieta Creek Flood Control, Environmental Restoration and Recreation Project June 2006.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority June 8, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Physical and Numerical Model Study of Montgomery Locks and Dam, Ohio River Allen Hammack, Howard Park, Cecil.
BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi River Ship Channel Gulf to Baton Rouge, LA Propeller Club for Port of New Orleans 24 September 2015.
Millbrook Dam Environmental Assessment Study Dan Marinigh CAO/Secretary-Treasurer Otonabee Region Conservation Authority October 20, 2015 Otonabee Conservation.
BUILDING STRONG ® Value Methodology Applied to Levee Repairs Missouri River Basin 2011 Flood Repairs.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mark Twain Lake Water Control Manual Update Joan Stemler St. Louis District Water Control.
Project Update: Hudson River PCBs Superfund Site October 24, 2012 Mr. David King, PE – USEPA Region 2 Mr. Gary Klawinski – USEPA Region 2 Mr. Mark Surette.
Christopher Knotts, P.E. Public Works & Water Resources Association of Levee Boards of Louisiana Annual Meeting December 3, 2015.
US Army Corps of Engineers ® Engineer Research and Development Center West Bay Diversion Evaluation Integration of Results 6 Month Progress ERDC West Bay.
Three Rivers Levee Improvement Authority February 26, 2007 Presentation to the State Reclamation Board Subcommittee Proposed Feather River Setback Levee.
Inland Navigation - A National Perspective Jim Walker USACE, Headquarters November 8, 2007.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Mississippi Coastal Improvements Program (MsCIP) “Comprehensive Barrier Island Restoration Plan” PIANC 2012.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Repairing the Mississippi River Levee with Dredged Material after the Historic 2011 Flood Dredging 2012 Shane.
1 Calcasieu River & Pass, Louisiana Dredged Material Management Plan (DMMP) Kick off Meeting February 2, 2005 Project Manager Mireya Laigast, Civil Engineer,
BUILDING STRONG ® St. Louis District Low Water Operations Russell Errett Water Control St. Louis District November 29 th, 2012.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Inner Harbor Navigation Canal Lock 2016 Dewatering Marine Industry Day USACE - New Orleans District 20 May.
CALCASEIU RIVER AND PASS DREDGED MATERIAL SEDIMENTATION STUDY.
1 US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® U.S. Army Corps of Engineers St. Paul District Channels & Harbors Project Pool 2 Channel Management Study.
2017 National Waterways Conference
Chromium 6 Regulation Corrective Action Plan October 6, 2015
NEW ENGLAND DISTRICT Operations and Maintenance Projects Maine Dredge Team Meeting October 2015 Ed O’Donnell Chief, Navigation Section.
Little Rapids Habitat Restoration St
St. Louis District Biological Opinion RRAT
Mid-West Electric Consumers Association
Integrated Channel Maintenance Planning in the Lower Columbia River Innovating Dredged Material Management Planning to incorporate Regional Sediment.
Hoover Dam.
Dredging Operations Low Water Dredging Operations:
Illinois Waterway 2020 Consolidated Closure
GIS Applications in the Water Management Sector
Module # 8 Channel Evolution Implications & Drivers of Instability
Aquatic Center Rock Excavation Status
I Street Bridge Replacement Project
BOSTON HARBOR DEEP DRAFT IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
Sacramento Environmental Commission January 2019.
Space Coast TPO State Road (S.R.) 528 Update
Presentation transcript:

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal on the Middle Mississippi River 1 RRAT 2014

BUILDING STRONG ® 9 feet deep 1,500 feet long Navigation Channel Design During low water periods required to maintain a 9 feet deep and a minimum of 300 feet wide navigation channel, with additional width in bends Develop a Reliable, Safe, and Environmentally Sustainable Navigation Channel on the Middle Mississippi River 2

BUILDING STRONG ® Why is River Industry Important 3

BUILDING STRONG ® Regulating Works Project Benefits vs. Costs 4

BUILDING STRONG ® Pools vs Open River MVS Pools Open River

BUILDING STRONG ® Lock & Dam #24, Clarksville, MO Pools: Impounded Mississippi River Upper River (RM ) 6

BUILDING STRONG ® Tools To Maintain Navigation (Open River RM 195-0) Dikes and other Rock Structures Weirs Revetments Dredging Rock Removal 7

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal What are we trying to remove? MVS NN Thebes Grand Tower Mississippi River 8

BUILDING STRONG ® Problem Statement Low Mississippi River stages will impact the St. Louis Districts’ ability to maintain the navigation channel at authorized project dimensions, in the Thebes Reach (RM 46-38) and Grand Tower Reach (RM 80-79), in the mid-December Pinnacle Rock Thebes Reach 9

BUILDING STRONG ® Phase 1 Engineering Analysis Pinnacle Rock Impacts at Thebes Reach St. Louis from -5.0 to -7.0 A-Minimum B-Unacceptable 10 C-Minimum D-Unacceptable E-Minimum F-Minimum G-Unacceptable

BUILDING STRONG ® PHASE 1: Accomplishes a 300 ft minimum channel in 4 locations that previously had insufficient width and depth. The resultant channel can only support 15 barge tow. Larger tows must “double-trip” or break their tow apart and take individual pieces separately through the reach. PHASE 1 MILESTONES 7 December 2012 – Decision made to go Urgent & Compelling -Award 2 contracts based on sources sought query (Newt & Durocher) 7 December 2012 – Received verbal approval on Justification & Approval 7 December 2012 – Contract award. Letter contracts 50% ROM, Newt & Durocher 11 January 2013 – Minimum channel requirements achieved through Thebes Gage 0’ (approx -7’ STL Gage) 29 January 2013 – Contracts definitized to include modifications 27 February 2013 – Phase 1 Completed 1,000 cubic yards of material was removed at a cost of $8M Rock Pinnacle Removal Phase 1 This what a 20 barge tow may look like trying to navigate through a 300 ft wide channel. Notice that there is no room for error considering the boxes along the channel border show additional phases of rock removal. Acceptable Channel Condition for a 20 (4x5) Barge Tow (300+ ft wide channel) Minimally Acceptable – at risk for a 20 (3x5) Barge Tow (300 ft maximum) channel or questionable channel width to flank through bend or for alignment purposes. What Phase 1 Accomplished A B C D G E F 11

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Pinnacle Removal Typical view of rock formation impacting the navigation channel Navigation Channel DS View - Rock Pinnacles near River Mile 41, Thebes, IL 12

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Pinnacles at River Mile 38.5 Thebes Reach IllinoisMissouri 300 ft Minimum Channel Phase 2 Rock Removal Highest Pinnacle Provided Cross Section 13

BUILDING STRONG ® Current Water Level Removal Elevation River Bed Low Water Channel Water Depth at 0 Thebes (9 ft Channel After Removal) 0 Thebes (9 ft) Water Depth at was 5.8 ft at Thebes 2 Thebes (11 ft) 4 Thebes (13 ft) 6 Thebes (15 ft) 1 Thebes (10 ft) -1 Thebes (8 ft) -2 Thebes (7 ft) 3 Thebes (12 ft) 5 Thebes (14 ft) 7 Thebes (16 ft) 8 Thebes (17 ft) -4 Thebes (5 ft) -3 Thebes (6 ft) -5 Thebes (4 ft) -6 Thebes (3 ft) -7 Thebes (2 ft) -8 Thebes (1 ft) -9 Thebes (0 ft) Gage Reading (Depth after Removal) Geometry of a cross section at RM 38.5 (Not to Scale) Rock Pinnacles Cross Section at River Mile

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal Surveys 15

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal Surveys 16

BUILDING STRONG ® 17 Rock Removal Methodologies Environmental Assessment required us to “minimize the impact of the environment” 16,000 lb hydro-hammer

BUILDING STRONG ® 18 Rock Removal Methodologies 4.5 ton GrappleDrill & Blast

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal - Drill and Blast Method Courtesy of NWP 19

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal - Drill and Blast Method Courtesy of NWP 20

BUILDING STRONG ® 21 Rock Removal QA/QC

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal Phase 2 Base FY July – Awarded Rock Removal Phase 2 to Massman Construction for contract minimum of $1M Includes a base and 3 option years, total contract amount$19M to remove 6,300 cy NTP given on 27 November. Massman on site 7 December with removal beginning on 11 December. Locations have been prioritized to minimize the impacts to navigation during the months of December and January. To date approximately 750 cy of material has been removed, 50% of the base contract. C B D E

BUILDING STRONG ® C B Rock Removal Phase 2 Thebes River Miles Massman Construction A B D E F G C D Minimum 300 feet Navigation Channel

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal Phase 2 Thebes River Miles Massman Construction A B D E F G C Minimum 300 feet Navigation Channel E

BUILDING STRONG ® Sites B, C, D, E Thebes River Miles Massman Construction Update (As of ) Hydro Hammer at C-106 Excavation at C-106

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal Phase 2 Option 1 Thebes River Miles Massman Construction A B D E F G C Minimum 300 feet Navigation Channel E

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal Phase 2 Option 1 Thebes River Miles Massman Construction A B D E F G C Minimum 300 feet Navigation Channel F

BUILDING STRONG ® Rock Removal Stage Requirement 28

BUILDING STRONG ® 29 Rock Removal at RM 44.8

BUILDING STRONG ® 30 Rock Removal at RM 44.8 June 2006 Survey

BUILDING STRONG ® 31 Rock Removal at RM 44.8 October 2012 Survey

BUILDING STRONG ® 32 Rock Removal at RM 44.8 February 2013 Survey

BUILDING STRONG ® Reporting Incorrect Information 33

BUILDING STRONG ® Current Water Level Removal Elevation River Bed Low Water Channel Water Depth at 0 Thebes (9 ft Channel After Removal) 0 Thebes (9 ft) Water Depth at was 5.8 ft at Thebes 2 Thebes (11 ft) 4 Thebes (13 ft) 6 Thebes (15 ft) 1 Thebes (10 ft) -1 Thebes (8 ft) -2 Thebes (7 ft) 3 Thebes (12 ft) 5 Thebes (14 ft) 7 Thebes (16 ft) 8 Thebes (17 ft) -4 Thebes (5 ft) -3 Thebes (6 ft) -5 Thebes (4 ft) -6 Thebes (3 ft) -7 Thebes (2 ft) -8 Thebes (1 ft) -9 Thebes (0 ft) Gage Reading (Depth after Removal) Geometry of a cross section at RM 38.5 (Not to Scale) Rock Pinnacles Cross Section at River Mile

BUILDING STRONG ® Questions ? 35