Response modelling including dispersants BE-AWARE II Final Conference, 18-19 November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
To Next Slide Unit 3 Chapter 6 Lesson 3 Life Along the Gulf Coast 20 Questions!
Advertisements

The Marine Response Centre SPEAKER NAME SPEAKER APPOINTMENT National Contingency Plan – Environment Group Training.
Spill Response Waste Reduction. Gold Crew Gold Crew with the following capabilities: Spill Cleanup – Concentrated Type II Water based Oil Spill Dispersant.
VIEW TO CO2-EMISSIONS IN THE BALTIC STATES THROUGH REORGANIZATION OF ENERGY INFRASTRUCTURE Gintaras DENAFAS Department for Environmental Engineering, Kaunas.
Costs and Impacts from Leaking Wrecks: Response Costs and Removal Costs Dagmar Schmidt Etkin, PhD Environmental Research Consulting Wrecks of the World.
Session 11: Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA 1 Modeling Dispersion of Chemical Hazards, using ALOHA Prepared by Dr. Erno Sajo, Associate.
HEATING WITHOUT GLOBAL WARMING Euroheat & Power Conference, Brussels, 5 June 2008 Calculating savings from Final to Primary Energy Tomas Bruce.
BE-AWARE II What are the most appropriate response and risk reducing measures to address the risk of oil pollution in 2020? Co-financed by the EU – Civil.
Solar Hydrogen Energy Pilot Project for Libya Dr. Mansour Emtir LPI-Tripoli, Libya Berlin-28/03/2008.
Characterizing Vessel Travel Times with Waterway Levels in Case Studies Ivy L. Riley Jackson State University Civil and Environmental Engineering Department.
Phoenics Conference 2004 Phoenics in Safety Analysis of Offshore and Underground Constructions Dr Terje Toften, Dr Bård Venås.
Lab IV: Internal Combustion Engine 14:650:431:03 Max Tenorio.
Scenario discussion MESA 5th December Description of Scenario (1) End of November 1999 at 6pm, Norwegian coast Strong winds, cold water, visibility.
Oil Spills in Coastal Areas: Prevention and Control Victoria Broje Bren School of Environmental Science and Management University of California, Santa.
1 AirWare : R elease R5.3 beta AERMOD/AERMET DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352 Gumpoldskirchen AUSTRIA
At-sea oil spill response options. Oil spill response options for use at sea Monitor and EvaluateMonitor and Evaluate Contain and recover at seaContain.
Smoothing Factors for RE applications in DG David Meyer EE5250 4/18/2006.
1 Modelled Meteorology - Applicability to Well-test Flaring Assessments Environment and Energy Division Alex Schutte Science & Community Environmental.
Perry. us & ministry aerial application of oil dispersant (due to the large file size, a number of great pictures had to be removed from this presentation.
Future climate (Ch. 19) 1. Enhanced Greenhouse Effect 2. CO 2 sensitivity 3. Projected CO 2 emissions 4. Projected CO 2 atmosphere concentrations 5. What.
BE-AWARE Project BONN AGREEMENT
By:fatima G4B Oil ll spills. An oil spill is the release of a liquid petroleum into the environment due to human activity, and is a form of pollution.
How advances in Ocean/Sea transport have lead to reductions in distance friction & time-space convergence.
Assessment Report on the Wind Energy Potential over Europe. Part II. Wind Power Networks IMRE M. JÁNOSI & PÉTER KISS DEPARTMENT OF PHYSICS OF COMPLEX SYSTEMS.
Hans von Storch Institute for Coastal Research, GKSS Research Center and KlimaCampus, U of Hamburg,
Technical and Economic Analysis for Far Offshore Wind Farm Accommodation Nick Chung Ioannis Karakitsos Godstime Martins Pablo Morato Dominguez Olga Uflewska.
PERSPECTIVES OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY DEVELOPMENT IN MARINE AREAS OF LITHUANIA, POLAND AND RUSSIA, , PALANGA PERSPECTIVES OF OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY.
Energy and Electricity. The Cost of Electricity Electricity is measured in units called “kilowatt hours” (kWh). For example… A 3kW fire left on for 1.
The diagram shows weather instruments A and B.
Hinchinbrook Island Researcher: Gordon Dalton PhD student Supervisor: Dr David Lockington.
IP Advantages and disadvantages of fossil fuels © Oxford University Press 2011 Advantages and disadvantages of fossil fuels.
RENEWABLE ENERGY FOCUSING ON SOLAR ENERGY. NON-RENEWABLE ENERGY.
SCCOOS Web Site Training Oil Spill Response. Scenario There was an oil spill on June 26, 2009 at 17:00:00 PDT outside of Long Beach Harbor at
Ken Wright Sensis Corporation January 28, 2010 Modeling and Simulation Challenges and the New Vehicle NRA.
An-Najah National University Engineering College Civil Engineering Department Project title : Management of stormwater for a portion of Faisal street “Nablus”
Oil drift modelling BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
BE-AWARE I HNS Risk Assessment Bonn Agreement: Area-wide Assessment of Risk Evaluations Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
Vulnerability mapping BE-AWARE II Final Project Conference Ronneby, Sweden: November 2015 Environmental and socioeconomic vulnerability analysis.
Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
Accidents and potential releases of mineral oil the Bonn Agreement Area Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument BE-AWARE II Final.
Traffic model for the Bonn Agreement Area BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
Environmental damage: Combining impact and vulnerability BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection.
Risk Management Conclusions BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
Scenario Comparison Which are the most effective scenarios for the BE-AWARE project regions? BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Rönneby, Sweden.
CONCERTO Premium Performance indicators of energy supply units Michael Kleber 23 October Brussels.
Moon and earth By;noel grace. gravity Moon m/s2 Earth 9.78 m/s.
Vessel Energy Use Overview Alaska Fisheries Development Foundation University of Alaska Sea Grant Marine Advisory Alaska Longline Fishermen’s Association.
Monitoring Water Quality
Resource Analysis. Objectives of Resource Assessment Discussion The subject of the second part of the analysis is to dig more deeply into some of the.
MRC-MDBC STRATEGIC LIAISON PROGRAM BASIN DEVELOPMENT PLANNING TRAINING MODULE 3 SCENARIO-BASED PLANNING for the MEKONG BASIN Napakuang, Lao PDR 8-11 December.
Next Steps: Implementing the BE-AWARE Project Results.
Objective: Clean a simulated oil spill and evaluate methods. Catalyst: What steps in the Jardine filtration process might be effective in preventing oil.
April 13, 2007 Regional Planning Group Meeting Wind Impact/Integration Analysis Warren Lasher Regional Planning.
Washington State Department of Ecology Spill Prevention, Preparedness and Response Program November 2011 SOSC Report.
ANASOFT VIATUS. Challenges Supply chain optimization is necessary for achieving competitive price of final products Synchronization and utilization of.
Energy System Investment Models Paul Rowley & Simon Watson CREST Loughborough University.
RASP - Risk Assessment of flood and coastal defence for Strategic Planning A High Level Methodology Project partners and co-authors Paul Sayers / Corina.
Anchorage #9 Ship Booming Demonstration Overview PISCES II - Projections.
OPRC Level 3 Causes, Fate and Effects of Spilled Oil.
Special Waste Associates
Washington State Department of Ecology Prevention, Preparedness and Response Program 2011 Activity Review.
EXPANDED UNDERWATER ROBOTICS READY FOR OIL SPILL
AQA GCSE 1 Energy generation Design and Technology 8552 Unit 2
- Intro to Energy & Society Unit -
Vetting the GENESYS Model
Wave cut platforms.
Water Directors meeting - Dresden
Combined Science Physics Group Project
Natural Gas Coal Crude Oil.
1st Implementation Report of the Water Framework Directive
Presentation transcript:

Response modelling including dispersants BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument

Method aggregation overview >11 m/s5-11 m/s<5 m/s 5-11 m/s>11 m/s No ResponseFull Response With Response + + = Significant waveheight = 1,5 m 0% 25%75% 0%100% BeAware II Task E

Model run without response 476 representative points 4 oil type categorisations 4 seasons 8 release sizes cells (2x2km) 10 day model rum  Huge output DB (1.15x10^9 rows – 35 GB) The aggregation Wind aggregation (3 wind classes, 12 directions) Superposition of the representative points to the calculated spills. Combine the probability of the spills BeAware II Task E

Model run without response Impact on coast and environmental load based on no response View of surface impact Superposition gives better representation of the actual impact area. Clear correlation with the spills, e.g. main traffic routes. BeAware II Task E For illustrative purpose only – not representative current and wind

Model run without response Spill size 6 – representative wind, deep current and tide Pre-aggregation Post-aggregation BeAware II Task E

Model run without response Spill size 6 Oil 19 Oil 20 BeAware II Task E

Model run without response Spill size 6 Oil 21 Oil 22 BeAware II Task E

Model run without response Spill size 7 Oil 20 BeAware II Task E

Model run without response Spill size 7 Oil 21 Oil 22 BeAware II Task E

Model run with full response Not discrete model anymore, but evaluation of actual response at the time step evaluated. Mobilisation time Speed of vessel Vessel configuration – Pump capacity – Boom length BeAware II Task E

Model run with full response Total capacity at given time evaluated. Pump capacity 6 hours 12 hours BeAware II Task E

Model run with full response Total capacity at given time evaluated. Pump capacity 24 hours 60 hours BeAware II Task E

Model run with full response Total capacity at given time evaluated. Boom length 6 hours 12 hours BeAware II Task E

Model run with full response Total capacity at given time evaluated. Boom length 24 hours 60 hours BeAware II Task E

Method aggregation overview >11 m/s5-11 m/s<5 m/s 5-11 m/s>11 m/s No ResponseFull Response With Response + + = Significant waveheight = 1,5 m 0% 25%75% 0%100% BeAware II Task E

Model run with representative response Base case (reference scenario) – Oil on water All spills BeAware II Task E

Model run with dispersants only Spills where dispersants are applied. – Position of the spills (are dispersants used as a first line of defence) – Oil type: Crude or Heavy Fuel Oil – Spill size: <6 (15.000t) – Weather window - can spill be reached with sufficient amount of dispersants within given amount of time – For the base case use dispersants within UK EEZ at depths 20m +1 nm BeAware II Task E

Model run with representative response Base case (reference scenario) – Chemically dispersed oil All spills BeAware II Task E

Oil Model Outcome Base case (reference scenario) – Oil on water - Chemically dispersed oil All spills

Questions? Thank you beaware.bonnagreement.org