1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Investigations of Semileptonic Kaon Decays at the NA48 Еxperiment Milena Dyulendarova (University of Sofia “St. Kliment Ohridski”) for NA48 Collaboration.

Advertisements

PHYSTAT2007, CERN Geneva, June 2007 ALICE Statistical Wish-List I. Belikov, on behalf of the ALICE collaboration.

Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.

III Convegno sulla Fisica di ALICE. Frascati 1 Vertex reconstruction and selection strategies for D s detection in Pb-Pb collisions Sergey Senyukov,

9/27/101 Decay length study. 9/27/102 outline Look at the CuCu200GeV ~ 70k events after Zvertex (|zvertex|

1 RTS effect on fake hit rate in Mimostar3 Xiangming Sun L. Greiner, M. Szelezniak H. Matis T. Stezelberger C. Vu H. Wieman Lawrence Berkeley National.

Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.

1 N. Davidson E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias events Jet Note 8 Meeting 15 th May 2007.

Invariant Mass Calculation J/ψ Rosi Reed 10/31/07.

Particle Identification in the NA48 Experiment Using Neural Networks L. Litov University of Sofia.

MC Study of B°  S Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 06/27/01.

MC Study on B°  S (Status Report) Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 05/25/01.

Exclusive D s Semileptonic decays using kinematic fitting.

Research Review June - November 2007 Colin McEnroe.

Algorithms and Methods for Particle Identification with ALICE TOF Detector at Very High Particle Multiplicity TOF simulation group B.Zagreev ACAT2002,

Topological D-meson Reconstruction with STAR Using the Silicon Vertex Tracker (SVT) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University SVT review, BNL, July 7 th /8.

1 N. Davidson, E. Barberio E/p single hadron energy scale check with minimum bias event Hadronic Calibration Workshop 26 th -27 th April 2007.

1 BaBar Collaboration Randall Sobie Institute for Particle Physics University of Victoria.

MC Study on B°  J/  ° With J/      °     Jianchun Wang Syracuse University BTeV meeting 03/04/01.

Measuring the bb cross- section using B  D o X   decays Liming Zhang & Sheldon Stone Syracuse University.

L. Greiner1PXL Sensor and RDO review – 06/23/2010 STAR Heavy Flavor Tracker Overview With parameters pertinent to the PXL Sensor and RDO design.

The HERMES Dual-Radiator Ring Imaging Cerenkov Detector N.Akopov et al., Nucl. Instrum. Meth. A479 (2002) 511 Shibata Lab 11R50047 Jennifer Newsham YSEP.

Performance requirements High-Level Key Performance Parameters (KPP) The high-level KPPs cannot be directly measured without beam. The capability to achieve.

GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell Indiana University Detector Review, October 2004.

HFT + TOF: Heavy Flavor Physics Yifei Zhang University of Science & Technology of China Lawrence Berkeley National Lab TOF Workshop, Hangzhou, April,

D 0 Measurement in Cu+Cu Collisions at √s=200GeV at STAR using the Silicon Inner Tracker (SVT+SSD) Sarah LaPointe Wayne State University For the STAR Collaboration.

SQM2004, Cape Town, Sept. 16, 2004 STAR 1 Cronin Effect for the identified particles from 200 GeV d+Au collisions Xiangzhou Cai Shanghai INstitute of Applied.

Material budget, energy losses and multiple scattering.

 Production at forward Rapidity in d+Au Collisions at 200 GeV The STAR Forward TPCs Lambda Reconstruction Lambda Spectra & Yields Centrality Dependence.

D0 analysis update with (  Vertex) code MIT 8 July 2009 BNL: Y. Fisyak, V. Perevoztchikov Kent : J. Bouchet, J. Joseph, S. Margetis, J. Vanfossen Nantes:

Impact parameter resolution study for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov

Experience With CBM Muon Simulation Partha Pratim Bhaduri.

Kalanand Mishra April 27, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,

Status of GlueX Particle Identification Ryan Mitchell September 10, 2004.

1 Scan of DCA resolution - run 7 MinBias Production2 Issues Improvement for DCA resolution estimation : Dependence with η Dependence with particle Id.

Track extrapolation to TOF with Kalman filter F. Pierella for the TOF-Offline Group INFN & Bologna University PPR Meeting, January 2003.

Search for the decay B c  B s  Masato Aoki September 13, B s  J/  channel 1.Pion reconstruction efficiency 2.Cut variables and optimization.

V.Petracek TU Prague, UNI Heidelberg GSI Detection of D +/- hadronic 3-body decays in the CBM experiment ● D +/- K  B. R. 

Higher harmonics flow measurement of charged hadrons and electrons in wide kinematic range with PHENIX VTX tracker Maki KUROSAWA for PHENIX collaboration.

V0 analytical selection Marian Ivanov, Alexander Kalweit.

FTPC status and results Summary of last data taken AuAu and dAu calibration : Data Quality Physic results with AuAu data –Spectra –Flow Physic results.

Impact parameter resolutions for ILC detector Tomoaki Fujikawa (Tohoku university) ACFA Workshop in Taipei Nov

Sabino Meola Kloe meeting 10 March 2005 Status of analysis.

I.BelikovCHEP 2004, Interlaken, 30 Sep Bayesian Approach for Combined Particle Identification in ALICE Experiment at LHC. I.Belikov, P.Hristov, M.Ivanov,

CBM-Meet, VECC July 21, Premomoy Ghosh CBM – MUCH Simulation for Low-mass Vector Meson Work done at GSI during June 2006.

1 Hadronic calorimeter simulation S.Itoh, T.Takeshita ( Shinshu Univ.) GLC calorimeter group Contents - Comparison between Scintillator and Gas - Digital.

1 Guannan Xie Nuclear Modification Factor of D 0 Mesons in Au+Au Collisions at √s NN = 200 GeV Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory University of Science.

5/03/11APS April Meeting 2011, Anaheim, CA1 Charmed Meson Reconstruction using Silicon Trackers in STAR Experiment at RHIC  Motivation  STAR Detector.

Radia Sia Syracuse Univ. 1 RICH 2004 Outline:  The CLEO-III RICH Detector  Physics Requirements  CLEO-III RICH at work… Performance of the CLEO-III.

07/24/07 Francisco Carrion OPTIMIZING THE TRACK DETECTOR Francisco Javier Carrión Ruiz Mentor: Hans Wenzel 07/08/09 SID CONCEPT FOR THE INTERNATIONAL LINEAR.

Charged Particle Multiplicity, Michele Rosin U. WisconsinQCD Meeting May 13, M. Rosin, D. Kçira, and A. Savin University of Wisconsin L. Shcheglova.

D0 analysis in HFT era with (  Vertex) code LBL May 12, 2010 BNL: Y. Fisyak, V. Perevoztchikov [A. Kisel (guest)] Kent : J. Bouchet, J. Joseph, S. Margetis,

Charged and Neutral Kaon correlations in Au-Au Collisions at sqrt(s_NN) = 200 GeV using the solenoidal tracker at RHIC (STAR) Selemon Bekele The Ohio State.

1 Geometrical efficiencies of a patch Pixel detector via GEANT J. Joseph, S. Margetis and J. Vanfossen Original note based on a MathCAD simulation by H.Wieman.

Поликарпов Сергей, 12 апреля 2012, ИТЭФ Статья принята в Physics Letters B 1 марта 2011.

Heavy stable-particle production in NC DIS with the ZEUS detector Takahiro Matsumoto, KEK For the ZEUS collaboration.

Kalanand Mishra June 29, Branching Ratio Measurements of Decays D 0  π - π + π 0, D 0  K - K + π 0 Relative to D 0  K - π + π 0 Giampiero Mancinelli,

J/ψ simulations: background studies and first results using a compact RICH detector Alla Maevskaya INR RAS Moscow CBM Collaboration meeting September 2007.

4/27/101 Test of KFParticle with K 0 s J. Bouchet.

Paolo Massarotti Kaon meeting March 2007  ±  X    X  Time measurement use neutral vertex only in order to obtain a completely independent.

Eunil Won/Korea U1 A study of configuration for silicon based Intermediate Trackers (IT) July Eunil Won Korea University.

Progress on Simulation Software Hai-Ping Peng(USTC) Xiao-Shuai Qin(IHEP) Xiao-Rong Zhou(USTC) Yu Hu(IHEP) 2014 STC Workshop (ITP) Hai-Ping Peng.

Performance Evaluation for Open Charm and Beauty Measurement at LHC ALICE PID capability from λ and K s 0 measurement at LHC ALICE 筑波大学数理物質科学研究科 Kengo.

Susanna Costanza - Pavia Group PANDA C.M., Stockholm – June 14, 2010

Technical Specifications

Measurement of track length and time-of-flight hypothesis

Jonathan Bouchet, For the STAR collaboration

Reconstruction of short-lived resonances in pp collisions

Samples and MC Selection

Presentation transcript:

1 Fast Pixel Simulation Howard Wieman, Xiangming Sun Lawrence Berkeley Lab

2 outline Approximation Processes in simulation Cut set and cut optimization Compare between detectors Summary

3 Approximation track: hits in two pixel layer build a line layer1layer2100% TPC match efficiency 100% tracking efficiency 5% momentum resolution Perfect PID Primary vertex

4 Processes in simulation D0 generation and decay Position dispersion in two layers for secondary particles (pixel resolution) Coulomb scattering in layer1 Background generation analysis

5 DCA Distributions for primary particle Compare DCA distribution between fast simulation and Geant in STAR. The agreement shows the approximation is reasonable

6 Cut set η cut -1,1 Invariant mass cut 1.6 GeV, 2.2 GeV Cosθ cut kaon DCA to Primary Vertex pion DCA to Primary Vertex DCA between kaon and pion Kaon and pion DCA to Primary Vertex cut is set the same value in the analysis

7 Cut optimization CDR cuts: Cosθ cut >0.98 kaon DCA to Primary Vertex >50um pion DCA to Primary Vertex >50um DCA between kaon and pion <50um Significance=S/sqrt(S+B) S signal ;B background How Significance varies with cuts? fast simulation allows to do this

8 Cut optimization Significance distribution with cut at 500MeV for PIXEL

9 Cut optimization Optimized cut value for PIXEL

10 Compare between detectors PIXEL equ. pixel size r 27 um equ. pixel size z 27 um Radiation length 0.583% hybrid equ. pixel size r 50 um equ. pixel size z 450 um Radiation length 1.413% Cut optimization is treated on hybrid detector too The significance ratio between two detectors is compared

11 Compare between detectors After optimization significance ratio is very high The significance ratio increase with D0 momentum at GeV tracking efficency ratio 76.5%

12 Summary Fast simulation generates similar DCA distribution with STARsim. The basic idea is reasonable. Cut optimization gives significance improvement of a factor of 3.7 in 500 MeV D for 1.5 GeV Comparing between PIXEL and hybrid with the cut optimization, significance ratio is 4.6 for 500 MeV D0, 11 for 1.5 GeV(include tracking efficiency)