Presenter: David Curd Database Analyst IT Kentucky Department of Education Division of Assessment Design and Implementation 1.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

May 3, 2006WV Department of Education Annual Measurable Objectives for Improving the Achievement of LEP Students Title III AMAOs.

Advertisements

OVERVIEW OF H.B HB 555  Revises benchmarks for Indicators Met and Performance Index to 90% for A  Raises performance proficiency benchmark to.

‘No Child Left Behind’ Loudoun County Public Schools Department of Instruction.

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

SAISD Board Report Office of Research and Evaluation

Data Source: Virginia School Report Cards / Date: Data as of September 2012.

ESL Results and Targets Montgomery County Schools.

District Accountability Update May February 2007.

Reliability and Linking of Assessments. Figure 1 Differences Between Percentages Proficient or Above on State Assessments and on NAEP: Grade 8 Mathematics,

Alternate Accountability Understanding the Alternate Accountability Process in Wisconsin June

Rule Development Workshop: School Accountability for Exceptional Student Education (ESE) Center Schools Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August.

Rule Development Workshop: School Improvement Ratings Rule 6A , Florida Administrative Code August 13, 2013 Florida Department of Education Division.

Title IA Eligible Attendance Areas Title IA Online Training

Data Interpretation ACCESS for ELLs® The Rhode Island Department of Education Presented by Bob Measel ELL Specialist Office of Instruction, Assessment,

MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.

Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.

The Common Core: Moving Ohio Forward Stan W. Heffner Superintendent of Public Instruction February 15, 2012.

2012 NSSME THE 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION Chapter 5 Instructional Decision- Making, Objectives, and Activities.

KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Assessing California Standards Test (CST) Data.

Michigan’s Accountability Scorecards A Brief Introduction.

Know the Rules Nancy E. Brito, NBCT, Accountability Specialist Department of Educational Data Warehouse, Accountability, and School Improvement

State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.

A Closer Look at Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski Conference.

Dubai’s 15 year old students Results from PISA 2009 Fatma Al Janahi Head of International Assessments Knowledge & Human Development Authority GCES Symposium,

Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.

Title III Notice of Proposed Interpretations Presentation for LEP SCASS/CCSSO May 7, 2008.

Helping EMIS Coordinators prepare for the Local Report Card (LRC) Theresa Reid, EMIS Coordinator HCCA May 2004.

Davis Junior High Action Plan English Department Tier II Indicator: Writing 2010 – 2011.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) and Analysis of the Mathematics Section of the California Standards Test (CST) Data Elementary.

ELPA, MEAP, and MME Reporting Office of Educational Assessment & Accountability (OEAA) 2006 OEAA Fall Conference Marilyn Roberts – Director, Office of.

NAEP 2011 Mathematics and Reading Results NAEP State Coordinator Mark DeCandia.

No Child Left Behind Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Know the Rules Division of Performance Accountability Dr. Marc Baron, Chief Nancy E. Brito, Instructional.

Fall 2007 MEAP Reporting 2007 OEAA Conference Jim Griffiths – Manager, Assessment Administration & Reporting Sue Peterman - Department Analyst, MEAP.

Arkansas P-16 Partnership. Arkansas P-16 Partnership Goals Improved Student Achievement P-16 Improved Quality of Teaching P-16 5-Yr P-16 Plan for Arkansas.

State and Federal Accountability Old English Consortium Assistant Principals’ Conference October 2009.

Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.

ELL AMAO and Grad Rate Data ELL Outcome Improvement Group Oregon Department of Education July 21, 2015.

Title III Updates & AMAOs Jacqueline A. Iribarren, Title III Susan Ketchum, Office of Educational Accountability September 24, 2008.

Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.

ESEA Flexibility: Student Growth Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 6 of 8.

1 New Jersey Department of Education Division of Educational Programs and Assessment Office of Evaluation and Assessment 2006 Statewide Assessment Results.

ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.

NC Elements Web-based instructional management for planning, implementing, and improving instruction.

Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) for Special Populations Michigan Department of Education Office of Educational Assessment and Accountability Paul Bielawski.

RECYCLE Jenkins Independent District Data STATE NCLB DATA 103 of 175 school districts (58.9%) met 100% of their No Child Left Behind (NCLB) AYP goals.

Data Source: Virginia School Report Cards Date: Data as of September 2009 Note: The Virginia Assessment Program includes.

October 25, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.

703 KAR 5:240 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw.

Title III Native American and Alaska Native Children in School Program Grantee Performance Reporting June 19, 2014 Prepared under the Data Quality Initiative.

703 KAR 5:225 Next-Generation Learners Accountability System Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:cw,ko.

Novice Reduction & Non-Duplicated Gap Group

Rhonda Sims, Associate Commissioner Jennifer Stafford, Director Office of Assessment and Accountability Monthly DAC Webcast February 11, 2016 KDE:OAA:DSR:

3 STUDENT ASSESSMENT DEPARTMENT

ELL – ACCESS for ELLs PIMS Data Collection School Year.

Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.

School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.

Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP

Beresford School District Report Card Data 16-17

Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.

WIDA Standards for ELLs

76% African American 14% Latino 9% Asian 1% White 51% Low-Income

Elementary/Secondary Education Act (1965) “No Child Left Behind” (2002) Adequacy Committee February 6,2008.

Bridgewater-Raynham Regional School District

School Business Division NC Department of Public Instruction

Delaware SAT Performance Levels

Fall Regional Curriculum and Instruction Meeting

2019 Report Card Update Marianne Mottley Report Card Project Director

Virginia Board of Education’s

Adequate Yearly Progress: What’s Old, What’s New, What’s Next?

Presentation transcript:

Presenter: David Curd Database Analyst IT Kentucky Department of Education Division of Assessment Design and Implementation 1

2

Did students make progress? ― If the student’s Composite score was 1 point higher than prior year. (Requires two years of data) ― If the student made Attainment then they made Progress. ( 5.0 Composite and 4.0 or higher in Literacy Grades 1-12, on a Tier B or C) Did the district, consortium or state make progress? ― If the percentage of student making progress was greater than the goal. ― Percentage of Progress is the number of students making progress divided by total count. 3

YearsGoal Starting Point50% Year 2 (SY )51% Year 3 (SY )53% Year 4 (SY )54% Year 5 (SY )56% Year 6 (SY )57% Year 7 (SY )59% Year 8 (SY )60% Year 9 (SY )62% Ending Point63% 4

5

Did students make attainment? ― If the student had a Composite score of at least 5 and a Literacy score of at least 4 ( only Grades 1-12 on a Tier B or C). Did the district, consortium, or state make progress? ― If the percentage of student making attainment was greater than the goal. ― Percentage of Attainment is the number of students making attainment divided by total count. 6

YearsGoal Starting Point3.2% Year 2 (SY )3.8% Year 3 (SY )4.4% Year 4 (SY )5.0% Year 5 (SY )5.6% Year 6 (SY )6.3% Year 7 (SY )6.9% Year 8 (SY )7.5% Year 9 (SY )8.1% Ending Point8.7% 7

8

A replay of the School Report Card reporting  READING AMO, LEP sub population.  MATHEMATICS AMO, LEP sub population.  PARTICIPATION RATE, LEP sub population.  ATTENDANCE RATE, entire district. 9

10

11

David Curd Database Analyst IT (502) x-4744 Department of Education Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Assessment Design and Implementation 12