Survey Of KOICA Training Programs Evaluation Dear Participants This questionnaire survey is designed to evaluate the KOICA training program you attended.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Slovenian experience MEASURES TO STRENGHTEN THE CIVIL DIALOGUE AND PARTNERSHIP Irma Mežnarič Brussels - 10 October 2006.
Advertisements

Identifying enablers & disablers to change
The Project for Capacity Building in the Trade in Goods and Services for Cambodia Song Bum SHIN Director of Regional Cooperation Division Ministry of Foreign.
Barbara M. Altman Emmanuelle Cambois Jean-Marie Robine Extended Questions Sets: Purpose, Characteristics and Topic Areas Fifth Washington group meeting.
ALIGNING ACADEMIA CURRICULA TO INDUSTRY NEEDS: THE CASE OF ORGANIC FOOD PROCESSING COURSE Maite Cháfer 1, Chelo Gonzalez 1 1Universitat Politecnica de.
The questionnaire had been made to evaluate the service quality and quantity perception of the members. The survey was implemented on mayors of the member.
EDUCATIONAL NEEDS SURVEY REPORT FIRE AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY Dr. William Parle Dr. Anthony Brown Ryan Janda.
Effect of Staff Attitudes on Quality in Clinical Microbiology Services Ms. Julie Sims Laboratory Technical specialist Strengthening of Medical Laboratories.
1 w w w. c a p l a b. o r g. p e Rio de Janeiro, May 20 – 21, 2008 Panel 3: Developing and encouraging comprehensive policies, strategies, and services.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
The evaluation of quality of the training offer at territorial level The evaluation of quality of the training offer within territorial systems Isfol –
Emerging Latino Communities Initiative Webinar Series 2011 June 22, 2011 Presenter: Janet Hernandez, Capacity-Building Coordinator.
TEAM MORALE Team Assignment 12 SOFTWARE MEASUREMENT & ANALYSIS K15T2-Team 21.
Vision Is to engage the African students – both Egyptians and foreigners- together into a series of lectures to enrich their knowledge and to make them.
1 Educational System of the Official Statistics in the Russian Federation: new methods and approaches Mr. Lev Lovat, Deputy Director of Administrative.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Training and Procedural Manuals Section A 1.
AIGS – PG Department For students PG (M.com and MFA)
South-South Cooperation for Sustainable Development in Benin, Bhutan and Costa Rica Partners Benin Buthan Costa Rica.
Title Consultation on the 7 th replenishment of IFAD’s resources IFAD’s operating model : overall structure and components Consultation on the 7th replenishment.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Reviewing Management System and the Interface with Nuclear Security (IRRS Modules 4 and 12) BASIC IRRS TRAINING.
Project:“Support to the Internationalization of Kosova Higher Education System through establishment of the Kosova Students’ Union” Status Quo on Student.
How to evaluate ICT use for small organisations Session 2.
QUALITY ASSURANCE IN ESTONIA: EVALUATION OF ACADEMIC PROGRAMMES Workshop: Boosting quality: International Credential Evaluation and Higher Education Quality.
The inspection of local area responsibilities for disabled children and young people and those who have special educational needs Charlie Henry HMI National.
University of Leeds Ethnicity and Cultural Diversity Network The Globe Centre, Accrington 22 nd September 2005.
Towards Sustainability: Challenges and Demands for Environmental Education in Hungary Márton HERCZEG&Noémi NAGYPÁL Ph.D. Student and Assistant Lecturer.
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
FORESTUR: “Tailored training for professionals in the rural tourist sector” ES/06/B/F/PP QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN Sucevita, May 2008.
INTRODUCTION TO THE UNIDO/REEEP TRAINING MANUAL ‘SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REGULATION AND POLICY-MAKING FOR AFRICA’ User Manual.
1 Analysing the contributions of fellowships to industrial development November 2010 Johannes Dobinger, UNIDO Evaluation Group.
Evaluating HRD Programs
Converting from Military to Civilian Employment Presented By Sophia Alexander Stringfield.
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil May Challenge of the State in Democratic Modernization New forms of interaction with a citizenry that has changed. The presence.
Natural Europe Questionnaire for teachers (school visit) The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information and on the features and tools of the Natural.
INTRODUCTION TO STUDY SKILLS. What are Study Skills?  Study skills are approaches applied to learning. They are considered essential for acquiring good.
Community Health organizing concepts. community health professionals must possess specific knowledge and skills.  identify problems,  develop plan to.
Natural Europe Posttest Students (Control group) The questionnaire is aimed at collecting information on the features and tools of the Natural Europe project.
LOGO Personnel satisfaction survey and strategic direction of personnel capacity building in state statistics bodies of the Republic of Belarus National.
CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY OVERVIEW REPORT PRESENTATION TO PARLIAMENTARY PORTFOLIO COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC SERVICE AND ADMINISTRATION 09 APRIL 2003.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Department of Healthcare organization and Medical Law YSMU YSMU Center of education quality assessment and assurance A. Markosyan L.Avetisyan A. Mkrtchyan.
Challenges in WTO Accession —The case of Vietnam By Cristina Hernandez (UNDP-MPI Project VIE/02/009) World Bank Training Course “ Trade in Services and.
Community Of Practices Tools Date : March 13 th, 2012 Marie Claire Gahizi CAPACITY BUILDING: COP MEETING.
The Curriculum Development Process Dr. M
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
TAPPING THE KOREAN-FUNDED “EAST ASIA CLIMATE PARTNERSHIP” ASSISTANCE PACKAGE ( ) Dr. Graciano P. Yumul, Jr DOST 13 April 2009.
Enhancing Education Through Technology Round 8 Competitive.
Haphe.eurashe.eu 1 Presenter NameEvent Name HAPHE Survey Results First results – EU Level versus Belgium HEI All Perspectives Prepared by Prof.
Waisea Vosa Climate Change Unit Division of Political and Treaties Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation.
10 August Inter-Regional Workshop on the Production of Gender Statistics New Delhi, India, 6-10 August 2007 Strengthening National Gender Statistics.
Capacity-Building Needs of Ghana By Harrison Dapaah and Alex Ablordey Presented at the Dissemination Workshop of ECIATA-EDULINK II Project at Meaglant.
PP 620: Public Policy and Health Administration Unit One Seminar Kris R. Foote, J.D., M.P.A., M.S.W. Kaplan University.
Presenter: Mazinza Ndala Tel:
Improved socio-economic services for a more social microfinance.
Planning Planning is considered the most important element of the administrative process. The higher the level of administration, the more the involvement.
Access to Information, Participation in Decision-Making and Justice in the OECS: some thoughts Peter A. Murray OECS Secretariat.
RESULTS FROM THE SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRES (The Project - Re-CVET: Comprehensive policy frameworks for continuing VET – Reform of Continuing Vocational.
Developing reporting system for SDG and Agenda 2063, contribution of National Statistical System, issues faced and challenges CSA Ethiopia.
CIRAZ Key factor in Smart Specialization Strategy implementation
Gender statistics in Information and Communication Technology for Women’s Empowerment and Gender Equality Dorothy Okello, Annual.
GENDER STATISTICS IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION
الاستراتيجية القطاعية للتعليم " "
AGRICULTURAL EDUCATION IN UNIVERSITIES BY YEAR 2030
Trade Union Training on Economic and Financial Analysis of
HRWG september 2009 Stockholm Session on MTP and WP
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
PRESENTATION OF EXISTING EVALUATION
Finalization of the Action Plans and Development of Syllabus
Oriented by the SDG 11 and Supported by the City Prosperity Initiative
Presentation transcript:

Survey Of KOICA Training Programs Evaluation Dear Participants This questionnaire survey is designed to evaluate the KOICA training program you attended during 2003~2006 in Korea. Please read attached questionnaire carefully and check (v) the most appropriate answer or write down your comments. This survey which contains private information will be highly protected by Statistics Law (Statistics Law 13 th ). KOICA would like to provide better services and improve its implementation of Training programs for the future on the basis of results of the Survey. We assure you that your responses in this questionnaire will be only used for research purpose and will be kept strictly confidential. Best Regards! September /2007 KOICA Training Team Ⅱ Dear Participants This questionnaire survey is designed to evaluate the KOICA training program you attended during 2003~2006 in Korea. Please read attached questionnaire carefully and check (v) the most appropriate answer or write down your comments. This survey which contains private information will be highly protected by Statistics Law (Statistics Law 13 th ). KOICA would like to provide better services and improve its implementation of Training programs for the future on the basis of results of the Survey. We assure you that your responses in this questionnaire will be only used for research purpose and will be kept strictly confidential. Best Regards! September /2007 KOICA Training Team Ⅱ Fields of Training ProgramEducation( ), Health( ), Governance( ), Rural Development( ), ICT( ), Industry & Energy( ), Environment & Others( ), Disaster Relief & Reconstruction( ) The type of training program - Basic( ), Country( ), Long-term( ) - Manager( ), Staff( ) Period of the training program duration 1 week( ), 2 weeks ( ), 3 weeks ( ) 4 weeks ( ), 4 weeks over ( ) ■ The Information of the Course attended. ■ The Information of respondents Nationality Organization Position Age Gender male ( ), female ( ) Educational BackgroundUnder B.A ( ), B.A ( ), M.S ( ), Ph.D. ( ) ■ The Topics of the Assessment The following questions are classified as five assessments points which are the Relevancy, Efficiency, Effectiveness, Impact, Sustainability toward the training program implemented by KOICA. ● 1: very satisfied, very agreed. very relevant ● 2 : satisfied, agreed, relevant ● 3 : moderate, medium ● 4 : dissatisfied, not agreed, irrelevant ● 5 : very dissatisfied, very disagreed, very irrelevant The following questions are classified as five assessments points which are the Relevancy, Efficiency, Effectiveness, Impact, Sustainability toward the training program implemented by KOICA. ● 1: very satisfied, very agreed. very relevant ● 2 : satisfied, agreed, relevant ● 3 : moderate, medium ● 4 : dissatisfied, not agreed, irrelevant ● 5 : very dissatisfied, very disagreed, very irrelevant

Q1-1. How appropriate or relevant do you think the KOICA training program was in your country ’ s social, economic or technical needs and national development strategy(plan) ? ( ) Q1-2. Please specify the reason why you choose the above answer. (Ex, The priority of your national development Strategy or plan) Q1-3. How appropriate or relevant do you think the coverage of topics of the KOICA training program was in your organization's needs ? ( ) Q1-4. Please specify the reason why you choose the above answer. (Ex, The Relevance between the Action Plan or Master Plan of your organization and the KOICA training program ) Very Irrelevant Very Relevant medium Irrelevant Relevancy Very Irrelevant Very Relevant medium Irrelevant Q1-5. Do you think the process of trainee selection is rational? ( ) Very dissatisfied Moderately Satisfied Moderated Dissatisfied Q1-6. If you choose 4~5, Please specify the reason why you choose the above answer. (Ex, A Specific person ’ s overlapping selection etc.)

Effectiveness Q2-1. Was there any special goal to achieve from the KOICA training program ? ( ) Very Insufficient Very Sufficient Moderate Insufficient NO YES Q2-3. If there was, the KOICA training program was sufficient to achieve the goal ? ( ) Q2-4. If you choose yes and 1~3, What was the most efficient method of the KOICA training Program? ( ) Lecture Study visit Country Report Etc ( ) Q2-2. If your answer is “ no ”, Please explain why? Q2-5. What do you think about the satisfaction of the whole training program? ( ) (Ex, Curriculum, lecture level, time, method etc.) Very dissatisfied Moderately Satisfied Moderated Dissatisfied Q2-6. What do you think about the satisfaction of the training program period? ( ) Very dissatisfied Moderately Satisfied Moderated Dissatisfied

Q3-1. Did you think the period and the number of the KOICA training program was appropriate? ( ) Q3-2. If you choose 4~5, Please specify the reason why you choose the above answer. (Ex, 2 weeks was not enough for the program, 10 people was too much for the program etc) Q3-3. How well organized do you think the ratio of lecture and study visit, cultural experience was? ( ) Q3-4. If you choose 4~5, Please specify the reason why you choose the above answer. (Ex, More discussion session recommended etc ) Efficiency Q3-5. The level of the KOICA training program was specialized enough to applied to your job ? ( ) Very dissatisfied Moderately Satisfied Moderated Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Moderately Satisfied Moderated Dissatisfied Very dissatisfied Moderately Satisfied Moderated Dissatisfied Q3-6. If you choose 4~5, Please specify the reason why you choose the above answer. (Ex, It was too general, more specific topics would be useful etc)

Impact Q4-1. Was there any change on your position after the completion of training? ( ) not changed transferred to other job promoted to higher ranking Q4-2. Was there any influence on organization related regulations and legal system arrangement, policy establishment ? ( ) NO YES Q4-4. Do you think the KOICA training program is more effective at strengthening the capability of participants, contributing to the organization, or contributing to the nation? ( ) Individual Organization National Both Etc( ) Q4-5. Please Specify how did the KOICA program contribute to your individual, organizational, national development ? Q4-3. If your answer is “ no ”, Please explain why?

sustainability Q5-1. Do you think is the KOICA training program is need to open every year for your country ? ( ) Q5-2. Did you share the knowledge and skills learned with other staff after the training? ( ) NO YES Q5-3. If your answer is “ no ”, Please explain why? Q5-4. Which of KOICA ’ s priority sectors are in the most demand? ① ② ③ Q5-5. Which field do you think is the most important? Education( ), Health( ), Governance( ), Rural Development( ), ICT( ), Industry & Energy( ), Environment & Others( ), Disaster Relief & Reconstruction( ) Q5-6. Please write down any additional comments or suggestions about the KOICA training programs. ▣ This is the end of this questionnaire, thank you very much for your help and cooperation ▣ NO YES