What is Social Accountability? “Social Accountability is an approach initiated by the community for collective responsibility of all stakeholders in ensuring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
RE-THINKING ACCOUNTABILITY Social Accountability and the Search for More Effective Public Expenditure Jeff Thindwa Participation and Civic Engagement.
Advertisements

EuropeAid Pre-Assessment and Assessment for Parliamentary Development Promoting domestic accountability: engaging with parliaments EC support to governance.
Participatory Research Aden Aw-Hassan Aleppo, April 28, 2005.
NETLIPSE Infrastructure Project Assessment Tool Stuart Baker, Deputy Director of National Rail Projects Department for Transport, UK Zagreb, November 10,
M & E for K to 12 BEP in Schools
PM&E Participatory Monitoring and Evaluation Prepared by BMCalub.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Monitoring and Evaluation in the CSO Sector in Ghana
1 Tools and mechanisms: 1. Participatory Planning Members of local communities contribute to plans for company activities potentially relating to business.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Skills for Routines Breakout Sessions Breakout session 1: Preparing for a routine: Self-assessment and calibration.
National Evaluation and Results Management System– Sinergia – Two decades of lessons and experiences Directorate of Monitoring and Evaluation of Public.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
PPA Advisory Board Meeting, May 12, 2006 Assessment Summary.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
Pestalozzi Children‘s Foundation emPower 2012 Monitoring & Evaluation Lecturers: Beatrice Schulter.
Legal & Administrative Oversight of NGOs Establishing and Monitoring Performance Standards.
Action Research In Organizational Development. Action Research Coined by Kurt Lewin (MIT) in 1944 Reflective process of progressive problem solving Also.
Participatory Audit and Planning (PAP) Process A tool for monitoring and ensuring “Decentralized planning’’ in utilization of Hospital Management Committee.
OSSE School Improvement Data Workshop Workshop #4 June 30, 2015 Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Training on Community Score Card Nepal, September 1820, 2012 Om Prakash Arya & Amar Deep Singh CUTS-International, India.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Evaluation methods and tools (Focus on delivery mechanism) Jela Tvrdonova, 2014.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 10, 2011.
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Project design & Planning The Logical Framework Approach An Over View Icelandic International Development Agency (ICEIDA) Iceland United Nations University.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Managing Performance The experience of the World Bank Mauritania Country Office.
Independent Monitoring & Evaluation for Accountability Presented to Health Sector Steering Committee, 21 st July 2009.
IAOD Evaluation Section, the Development Agenda (DA) and Development Oriented Activities Julia Flores Marfetan, Senior Evaluator.
Tools for Civil Society to Understand and Use Development Data: Improving MDG Policymaking and Monitoring Module 3: MDGs and the Policy Cycle.
Director of Evaluation and Accountability Manager, UW’s Grand Rapids, Michigan Robert McKown, CIRS Director of Evaluation and Accountability Sherri.
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
EDPQS in 10 minutes: Overview of European Drug Prevention Quality Standards (EDPQS) With financial support from the Drug Prevention and Information Programme.
Stakeholder Analysis. What is stakeholder analysis?  Stakeholder analysis is a process of systematically gathering and analyzing qualitative information.
21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 1. 21/4/2008 Evaluation of control measures 2 Family and Community Medicine Department.
Assuring Safety for Clinical Techniques and Procedures MODULE 5 Facilitative Supervision for Quality Improvement Curriculum 2008.
Participatory Planning Project Cycle Management (PCM)
PUBLIC EXPENDITURE AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTABILITY (PEFA)-PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT FRAMEWORK Module 4: The Assessment Process, Stakeholders Involvement & Quality.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
Professional Certificate in Electoral Processes Understanding and Demonstrating Assessment Criteria Facilitator: Tony Cash.
1 Self-directed Support – Older People’s Service Providers EVOC thinkSpace 20 June 2014.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 24, 2009.
Facilitate Group Learning
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
Independent Office of Evaluation IFAD’s Approach to Evaluation of Agriculture programmes Presentation at ECD Workshop, Addis Ababa, 6 November 2015.
Preparatory Groundwork For facilitators of a community assessment Programme Identify subject area Decide on date, time and place Decide on tools Identify.
Social Development Department The World Bank Scaling Up the Bank’s Multi- stakeholder Engagement Linking the “Demand” and “Supply” of Good Governance Rob.
Support the spread of “good practice” in generating, managing, analysing and communicating spatial information Evaluating and Reflecting on the Map-making.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Monitoring and Evaluation in MCH Programs and Projects MCH in Developing Countries Feb 9, 2012.
PRESENTATION BY THE GHANA TEAM By Eunice Dapaah Senior Education Specialist World Bank- Ghana Office.
1 Second Training of Trainers Workshop on the Community Assessment Process Methodology for the Gemi Diriya and VISHLI Programs March 20-25, 2006.
Recommendations on Monitoring and Tracking Quantity and Quality of Climate Expenditure, Accountability and Transparency Group 5.
UNIT 7 MONITORING AND EVALUATION  Monitoring and evaluation is the process of examining progress against institution’s goals or plan.  The term SM &
Monitoring and evaluation Objectives of the Session  To Define Monitoring, impact assessment and Evaluation. (commonly know as M&E)  To know why Monitoring.
SPM Essentials Module 6- Social Audit & Social Rating.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
Community Score Card as a social accountability Approach Methodology and Applications March 2015.
Gender-Responsive NAP Processes
Implementation of Community Score Card in Tanzania
Accountability Gyan Laxmi Shrestha Tara Prasad Kharel NASC.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Module 8- Stages in the Evaluation Process
Presentation transcript:

What is Social Accountability? “Social Accountability is an approach initiated by the community for collective responsibility of all stakeholders in ensuring those in power accountable for proper delivery of services to the community.”

Objectives of Community Assessment Process Improve quality of services Generate information and create transparent rural organizations Create trust and coordination between service provider and user Collective problem solving Ability to conduct a self-assessment Ability to ensure wider participation Create positive thinking in service provider and user

Social Accountability is A community initiated process to ensure that those empowered by the community to supply services are responsible and answerable to society for the decisions and actions

Community Assessment Process Why should we use CAP in Gemidiriya Project? Because Gemidiriya is a community driven project and community groups are responsible for planning, resource allocation and decision-making Can use successfully to improve efficiency and quality in service delivery; to empower community and ensure good governance

Objectives of CAP Ability to improve service delivery through scoring exercise of quality and quantity of services Create transparency by sharing information with all stakeholders Include all groups Build trust, coordination and communication between all stakeholders Collective decision-making and planning

Characteristics of CAP Uses the community or service as the unit of analysis Focused on the monitoring and assessing at the local level Generates information through focus group interactions Enables maximum participation of all stakeholders in the Gemi Diriya Project Provides immediate feedback to service providers Emphasizes joint decision-making between all Solutions are arrived at through mutual dialogue Allows for increased social responsibility of all stakeholders of the Gemi Diriya project, as well as the inclusion of different groups, promoting empowerment and good governance.

CAP- Stages and Tools Preparatory groundwork and gathering the community Input tracking Performance assessment through community scoring Self-assessment Interface meeting Institutionalization

SUMMARY: STEPS IN CAP Community Gathering Input Tracking Community Generated Performance Assessment Interface Meeting and Action Planning Feedback and Dialogue Change Accountability TransparencyEmpowerment Efficiency Development Divide into focus groups Information on entitlements/ budgets Develop input indicators Collect evidence on input use Record data Divide into focus groups Develop performance indicators Finalize indicators (5-8 max.) Performance scoring by groups Verify High/Low Scores Record data Service Provider Self- Evaluation Assessment Institutionalization

Decide on which inputs will be assessed Get official information on the chosen inputs Get information on community rights Divide community into groups Fill in the input matrix format Examine the project outputs and undertake field tour Steps in Input Tracking Exercise

Input CriteriaPlanned TargetsActual InputsOther observations/ issues Goods i ii iii Labour i ii Finances Time Format for Input Tracking

Steps in conducting a Community Assessment Identifying and prioritizing the indicators for assessment scoring Providing reasons for the score Recommendations for improving service Divide Community into groups Explain the Methodology

noPerformance Indicator/Criteria ScoreReasonsRecommendations Community Assessment Report

Provider Self Assessment Objectives of this Session Ability to judge whether the service delivery is of required quality and quantity Identify changes that should be made A positive feedback from service users Ability to deliver better efficient and systematic services

Steps in Conducting Provider Self Assessment Identify performance criteria Decide on scoring method for each criteria Give reasons for the scores Identify recommendations for negative scores

CriteriaScoreReasonsRecommend ations Format for Service Provider Self-Assessment