L ET ’ S I NCREASE W HAT W E K NOW ABOUT ACCESS TO G ENERAL E DUCATION L ET ’ S I NCREASE W HAT W E K NOW ABOUT ACCESS TO G ENERAL E DUCATION P UT E FFORT.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Pioneer Career and Technology Center, Shelby, Ohio Criteria of the Master Teacher Designation Criterion A: Consistent Leadership Criterion A: Consistent.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Continuous Improvement in the Classroom -Professional Learning Communities.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Building Inclusive Schools Presented by Kathleen King, Co-Director of Technical Assistance & Professional Learning & JoEtta Gonzales, Director.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
JoEtta Gonzales, Director The Equity Alliance at ASU February 15, 2011.
The Schoolwide Applications Model (SAM) An RtI-Driven Approach to School Reform Shannon O’Connor & Givanna Hymel Recovery School District (RSD) New Orleans.
Transforming Districts and Schools A framework to guide culturally responsive and inclusive changes Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Associate Dean University of.
Collaborating for Student Success Teacher Collaboration: Strategies & Outcomes ARCHES Seminar UC Irvine ~ 3/15/10 Ivan Cheng
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
E FFECTIVE CURRICULUM COACHING Meredith Dunn Principal, Northern Elementary Melody Gallenstein Curriculum Coach, Northern Elementary September 2010.
August Professional Development 1 Janise Lane, Interim Executive Director of Teaching and Learning Linda Chen, Chief Academic Officer August 25 – 28, 2015.
Theories of Action: What are they, why are they important, and how are they created? January 2015 Office of Student and School Success, OSPI Travis Campbell,
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Technology Leadership
National Institute for Urban School Improvement Synergy Site Meeting May, 2005.
Background Teachers often feel isolated within their classrooms, schools, districts, states (Meyers, Paul, Kirkland and Dana 2009) 1. Teacher networks.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
Business, Technology, and Design (BTD). Unifying Vision/Identity BTD will provide a personalized, supportive, and collaborative academic environment.
V Implementing and Sustaining Effective Programs and Services that Promote the Social-Emotional Development of Young Children Part I Karen Blase, Barbara.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Heather L. B. Smith. 1.Define the scope of the Entry Plan and initiate the process by identifying stakeholders, entry plan goals, documents for review,
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Culture, Practice, and Leadership: Where Do I Stand? Tiffany Young, M. Ed. Equity & Diversity Coordinator Josh Deason, M.A. Equity & Diversity Specialist.
Why Collaborate?. “Why do we have to collaborate? I know my job. If I do my job and everybody else does his, we will be fine. The teachers I work with.
Effective Behavioral & Instructional Support Systems Overview and Guiding Principles Adapted from, Carol Sadler, Ph.D. – EBISS Coordinator Extraordinaire.
The Olmsted Falls Continuous Improvement Process From District Leadership to Building Leadership.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Rob Horner OSEP Center on PBIS Jon Potter Oregon RTI David Putnam Oregon RTI.
Tier 2/ Tier 3 Planning for Sustainability Rachel Saladis WI PBIS Network/Wi RtI Center Katrina Krych Sun Prairie Area School District.
Intentional Levels of Supports: Instruction, Communities, and Culture Charlie Geier, Director of Early Learning and Intervention Nathan Williamson, English.
YEAR 1 INDUCTION Day One Workshop Pennsbury School District.
Roles and Responsibilites of the Mentor Teacher Thank you for participating in our Mentor/Mentee Program! Parkway School District Summer 2010.
Michigan Coalition of Essential Schools Welcome to the Critical Friends Groups November 1, 2013.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Accreditation (AdvancED) STANDARD #2: GOVERNANCE & LEADERSHIP
Amy Alexander. Analyzing Effectiveness Participants’ Reactions Participants’ Learning Organization Support and Change Participants’ Use of New Knowledge.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
Goal Attainment Scales as a way to Measure Progress Amy Gaumer Erickson & Monica Ballay December 3, 2012.
Wisconsin Administrative Code PI 34 1 Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction - Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Support from a Professional.
JoEtta Gonzales, Director The Equity Alliance at ASU February 15, 2011.
Curriculum Mapping Educating for the Future.
District Implementation of PBIS C-1 Rob Horner Brian Megert University of Oregon Springfield School District.
Kansas Multi-Tier System of Supports: Living a Culture of Engagement.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Working With Parents as Partners To Improve Student Achievement Taylor County Schools August 2013.
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
Beyond Rhetoric: Shared Responsibility for All Stakeholders in Making Inclusion a Reality Dr. Saroj Thapa Head, Teacher Development, Universal Learn Today,
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Building Our Plan Creating our Regional Action Plan
NC State Improvement Project
December 11, 2015 Varnville Elementary School, Varnville, SC
21st Century Innovation School
Comprehensive Planning
RESEARCH IMPLEMENTATION PRACTICE
NCSI Cross-State Learning Collaboratives Part B Meeting
Statewide InD Coordinators/ December 2017
Introductions Introduction
Project Outcomes (separate handout)
Introductions Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Introduction Introduction
Introductions Introduction
Presentation transcript:

L ET ’ S I NCREASE W HAT W E K NOW ABOUT ACCESS TO G ENERAL E DUCATION L ET ’ S I NCREASE W HAT W E K NOW ABOUT ACCESS TO G ENERAL E DUCATION P UT E FFORT INTO R ESEARCH FOR S TUDENTS WITH S EVERE D ISABILITIES Elizabeth B. Kozleski The Equity Alliance at ASU December 10, 2010

Systems Research: The Scale Question What does it take to – Move effective practices from classrooms to school-wide implementation? – Move from school-wide to district-wide implementation? – To move from district-wide to statewide implementation?

Systems Research: Sustainability What does it take to sustain change – when leadership changes? – when professional socialization changes? – across generations of families and children? – across seismic demographic diasporas and changes?

Systems Change: Policy Issues What does it take – To move from compliance to embedded practice? – To develop liberatory, emancipatory policies? – To educate so that we don’t have to keep doing the same work?

Systemic Change Framework

Practitioner

School Level

District Level

How do new teachers get assigned to schools, grade levels or content areas? How are buildings and grounds renewed across the district? How are class sizes distributed? Are all schools equipped with the materials, physical space, and digital technologies that their students need? Educational Equity: District Level

Local school councils Team and committee structures Building Leadership Teams Decision making procedures and structures Shared Vision Continuous Improvement Cycles Voice, representation, and action? Educational Equity: District Level

How are reform initiatives selected and what impact have they had? What are district processes for choosing professional learning topics and activities and how do they change teacher practice? How have districts provided opportunities for mentoring or coaching situations AND what benefits are achieved? Educational Equity: District Level

How have districts connected with families and what outcomes have resulted? What community centers and houses of worship do districts engage and collaborate with for what intentions and outcomes? In what ways do family/community events facilitate and support families and for what outcomes?

How do schools’ appearances differ? How do school schedules and calendars maximize learning time? Are all students’ classrooms in the same area? What students are well served through current configurations? What structures are supported for professional learning? Educational Equity: District Level

Systemic Change Framework Complexity Theory Multiple Regression Hierarchical Linear Modeling Structural Equation Modeling Robust Methods to Study Socio-Cultural Nature of School Communities Ethnographies Other Qualitative Approaches Intervention Research Policy Analysis Cross State implementation Extant DataFiscal Analysis Focus on Outcome Analysis

Kozleski, E. B. & Huber, J. J., (2010). Systemic Change for RTI: Embedding Change within a Critical Framework. Theory into Practice, 49, 258 — 264 Artiles, A. J. & Kozleski, E. B. (2010). What counts as response and intervention in RTI? A sociocultural analysis. Psicothema. Kozleski, E. B. & Waitoller, F. R., (2010). Teacher Learning for Inclusive Education: Understanding Teaching as a Cultural and Political Practice. International Journal for Inclusive Education. Artiles, A., Kozleski, E. B., Trent, S. Osher, D., & Ortiz, A. (2010). Justifying and Explaining Disproportionality, : A Critique of Underlying Views of Culture. Exceptional Children, 76, Kozleski, E. B., & Smith, A. (2009). The role of policy and systems change in creating equity for students with disabilities in urban schools. Urban Education, 44, What Audiences do we need to Engage?

NIUSILEADSCAPE.ORG EQUITYALLIANCEATASU.ORG Thank You!