Trait ontology approach Marie-Angélique LAPORTE NCEAS June 7 th 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1/ 26 AGROVOC and the OWL Web Ontology Language: the Agriculture Ontology Service - Concept Server OWL model NKOS workshop Alicante,
Advertisements

Consistent and standardized common model to support large-scale vocabulary use and adoption Robust, scalable, and common API to reduce variation in clinical.
RDF Schemata (with apologies to the W3C, the plural is not ‘schemas’) CSCI 7818 – Web Technologies 14 November 2001 Van Lepthien.
IPY and Semantics Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Paul Cooper Peter Pulsifer Paul Overduin Eugeny Vyazilov Heather lane.
Building and Analyzing Social Networks Web Data and Semantics in Social Network Applications Dr. Bhavani Thuraisingham February 15, 2013.
Thesauri, Terminologies and the Semantic Web
Of 17 course outline. of 17 marek reformat ecerf building, w ece 627, winter'13.
Ontology Notes are from:
PR-OWL: A Framework for Probabilistic Ontologies by Paulo C. G. COSTA, Kathryn B. LASKEY George Mason University presented by Thomas Packer 1PR-OWL.
SKOS and Linked Data Antoine Isaac ISKO, London, Sept. 14th 2010.
SKOS and Other W3C Vocabulary Related Activities Gail Hodge Information International Assoc. NKOS Workshop Denver, CO June 10, 2005.
OWL-AA: Enriching OWL with Instance Recognition Semantics for Automated Semantic Annotation 2006 Spring Research Conference Yihong Ding.
Aligning Thesauri for an integrated Access to Cultural Heritage Collections Antoine ISAAC (including slides by Frank van Harmelen) STITCH Project UDC Conference.
UML CASE Tool. ABSTRACT Domain analysis enables identifying families of applications and capturing their terminology in order to assist and guide system.
1/ 22 AGROVOC and the OWL Web Ontology Language: the Agriculture Ontology Service Concept Server OWL model DC 2006 Mexico, 4 October.
A Registry for controlled vocabularies at the Library of Congress
Module 2b: Modeling Information Objects and Relationships IMT530: Organization of Information Resources Winter, 2007 Michael Crandall.
Foundations This chapter lays down the fundamental ideas and choices on which our approach is based. First, it identifies the needs of architects in the.
A Really Brief Crash Course in Semantic Web Technologies Rocky Dunlap Spencer Rugaber Georgia Tech.
Semantic Web Technologies Lecture # 2 Faculty of Computer Science, IBA.
Vocabulary Services “Huuh - what is it good for…” (in WDTS anyway…) 4 th September 2009 Jonathan Yu CSIRO Land and Water.
1/ 27 The Agriculture Ontology Service Initiative APAN Conference 20 July 2006 Singapore.
Information Extraction with Linked Life Data 19/04/2011.
9 th Open Forum on Metadata Registries Harmonization of Terminology, Ontology and Metadata 20th – 22nd March, 2006, Kobe Japan. XMDR Prototype Day: 21.
The OAI-ORE based data model of Europeana and the Digital Public Library of America: implications for educational publishing Dov Winer MAKASH – Advancing.
An approach to Intelligent Information Fusion in Sensor Saturated Urban Environments Charalampos Doulaverakis Centre for Research and Technology Hellas.
A J Miles Rutherford Appleton Laboratory SKOS Standards and Best Practises for USING Knowledge Organisation Systems ON THE Semantic Web NKOS workshop ECDL.
TOWARDS INTEROPERABILITY IN TRACKING SYSTEMS: AN ONTOLOGY-BASED APPROACH Juan Gómez Romero Miguel A. Patricio Jesús García José M. Molina Applied A.I.
Environmental Terminology Research in China HE Keqing, HE Yangfan, WANG Chong State Key Lab. Of Software Engineering
The New Zealand Institute for Plant & Food Research Limited Matthew Laurenson Ontologies.
AthenaPlus: WP4 Eva Coudyzer Koninklijke Musea voor Kunst en Geschiedenis Europeana Overlegplatform, 7 juni 2013.
PART IV: REPRESENTING, EXPLAINING, AND PROCESSING ALIGNMENTS & PART V: CONCLUSIONS Ontology Matching Jerome Euzenat and Pavel Shvaiko.
The MMI Tools Carlos Rueda Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute OOS Semantic Interoperability Workshop Marine Metadata Interoperability Project Boulder,
Multilingual Information Exchange APAN, Bangkok 27 January 2005
D4: SKOS and HIVE—Enhancing the Creation, Design and Flow of Information Speakers: Hollie White Jane Greenberg Coordinator: Alan Keely.
1 Ontology-based Semantic Annotatoin of Process Template for Reuse Yun Lin, Darijus Strasunskas Depart. Of Computer and Information Science Norwegian Univ.
Incorporating ARGOVOC in DSpace-based Agricultural Repositories Dr. Devika P. Madalli & Nabonita Guha Documentation Research & Training Centre Indian Statistical.
The Agricultural Ontology Service (AOS) A Tool for Facilitating Access to Knowledge AGRIS/CARIS and Documentation Group Library and Documentation Systems.
Metadata. Generally speaking, metadata are data and information that describe and model data and information For example, a database schema is the metadata.
Value Set Resolution: Build generalizable data normalization pipeline using LexEVS infrastructure resources Explore UIMA framework for implementing semantic.
Ontology Summit2007 Survey Response Analysis Ken Baclawski Northeastern University.
Coastal Atlas Interoperability - Ontologies (Advanced topics that we did not get to in detail) Luis Bermudez Stephanie Watson Marine Metadata Interoperability.
A Context Model based on Ontological Languages: a Proposal for Information Visualization School of Informatics Castilla-La Mancha University Ramón Hervás.
A Systemic Approach for Effective Semantic Access to Cultural Content Ilianna Kollia, Vassilis Tzouvaras, Nasos Drosopoulos and George Stamou Presenter:
SKOS. Ontologies Metadata –Resources marked-up with descriptions of their content. No good unless everyone speaks the same language; Terminologies –Provide.
Metadata Common Vocabulary a journey from a glossary to an ontology of statistical metadata, and back Sérgio Bacelar
User Profiling using Semantic Web Group members: Ashwin Somaiah Asha Stephen Charlie Sudharshan Reddy.
Of 33 lecture 1: introduction. of 33 the semantic web vision today’s web (1) web content – for human consumption (no structural information) people search.
Mining the Biomedical Research Literature Ken Baclawski.
Extending the MDR for Semantic Web November 20, 2008 SC32/WG32 Interim Meeting Vilamoura, Portugal - Procedure for the Specification of Web Ontology -
Knowledge Representation. Keywordsquick way for agents to locate potentially useful information Thesaurimore structured approach than keywords, arranging.
THE SEMANTIC WEB By Conrad Williams. Contents  What is the Semantic Web?  Technologies  XML  RDF  OWL  Implementations  Social Networking  Scholarly.
A Portrait of the Semantic Web in Action Jeff Heflin and James Hendler IEEE Intelligent Systems December 6, 2010 Hyewon Lim.
Extending the Metadata Registry for Semantic Web - Enforcing the MDR for supporting ontology concept - May 28, 2008 ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 32 WG 2 Meeting Sydney,
Web Ontology Language (OWL). OWL The W3C Web Ontology Language (OWL) is a Semantic Web language designed to represent rich and complex knowledge about.
OWL Web Ontology Language Summary IHan HSIAO (Sharon)
SKOS : A language to describe simple knowledge structures for the web
Ontology Technology applied to Catalogues Paul Kopp.
© Copyright 2012 TopQuadrant Inc. 1 Investigating Semantics for Systems Engineering David Price, TopQuadrant Allison Feeney, NIST.
Semantic and geographic information system for MCDA: review and user interface building Christophe PAOLI*, Pascal OBERTI**, Marie-Laure NIVET* University.
MEKON & HOBO Java Frameworks for building Ontology-Driven Applications Current use cases:  Almost (!) products:  Knowledge-driven clinical documentation.
OWL (Ontology Web Language and Applications) Maw-Sheng Horng Department of Mathematics and Information Education National Taipei University of Education.
SysML v2 Formalism: Requirements & Benefits
Stanford Medical Informatics
ece 720 intelligent web: ontology and beyond
knowledge organization for a food secure world
Controlled Vocabularies: What, Why, How?
Taxonomy of public services
Taxonomy of public services
Presentation transcript:

Trait ontology approach Marie-Angélique LAPORTE NCEAS June 7 th 2010

Ontology construction Construction of a functional plant traits ontology Terminological aspects process using SKOS vocabulary Domain knowledge representation using UML class diagram Model transformation : UML → OWL => Formal/explicit representation of a knowledge domain => reasoning on the knowledge => emergence of new knowledge

SKOS Description and sharing of the terms and the relations between these terms, of a knowledge domain, using a simple vocabulary. W3C Recommendation The SKOS vocabulary: Simple Knowledge Organization System  Based on RDF  Data publication on the web  Can be extended by other vocabularies (eg. OWL) or thesauri  Data tagging Advantage : easy way to communicate with the domain experts (no informatics background is needed to understand the notions of definition, preferred label, alternative label, broader relation,narrower relation...)

SKOS Allows to represent “concept schemes” A concept scheme is a set of concepts including relationship between these concepts :  Labels : prefLabel, AtlLabel, HiddenLabel  Semantic relationships : broader, narrower, related,...  Documentaty notes : definition, notes,...

SKOS A concept scheme is not a formal representation => not an ontology Allows mapping between concepts from different concept schemes : exactMatch, closeMatch,broadMatch, narrowMatch, relatedMatch.

SKOS OWL = formal description of a domain SKOS = vocabulary and hierarchical structure SKOS vocabularies are instantiation of OWL Full ontology

SKOS SKOS labeling properties and SKOS note properties are defined as OWL annotation properties. SKOS semantic relations are defined as OWL object properties Future step : enrich SKOS vocabularies as OWL ontologies

UML Modeling the functional plant domain : the semantic relation between the terms are precise Advantage : easy way to interact with the proposed model Exchange with OWL model at the level of metamodel and metametamodel.

Thesauform Web tool dedicated to terminological aspects of a domain: the terms are represented using SKOS vocabulary Domain experts can identify and define rigorously terms of a specific domain. Allows easy management of the conflicts on the terms and the versioning of thesaurii.

Thesauform Technologies used : Tomcat JSP technology to develop a dynamic Web application Jena (Java framework) and SPARQL query language to deal with semantic aspects and manipulate OWL/RDF file SKOS vocabulary specifications to define terms and their organization into thesaurus. DCT, OWL and vocab status vocabularies to manage versioning aspect on terms and scheme aspect.

Plant trait ontology Main purpose: combine the data from the plant trait domain with data from other domain (climate, ecosystem,...) Linkage to OBOE Data integration : TRY, LEDA, Biolflor,... Difficulties : A trait is an vision invented by biologists : modelisation problem to separate the aspects entity, characteristic of an observation