IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EM Simulations for PETRA3
Advertisements

Cavity BPM for Spectromety: progress and plans A. Lyapin.
Development of ML-BPM for STF cryomodule H. Hayano, KEK SunYoung Ryu, PNU.
S. N. “ Cavities for Super B-Factory” 1 of 38 Sasha Novokhatski SLAC, Stanford University Accelerator Session April 20, 2005 Low R/Q Cavities for Super.
1 KEK Cavity BPM Hitoshi Hayano Development of Cavity BPM for Q-magnet attachment, Aiming; compact design, 0.2µm resolution, BPM center error (between.
Development of a mover having one nanometer precision and 4mm moving range Y. Morita, S. Yamashita ICEPP, University of Tokyo Y. Higashi, M. Masuzawa,
Effects of wake fields in ATF2 low aperture kicker and IP nano-BPMs Karl Bane April 19, 2005.
Sta bilization of the F inal F ocus : Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – Cavity BPM October 12, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
PEDM Review 12/7/091 Beam Position Monitors William Morse.
Bob Lill Undulator Cavity BPM System April 16, 2007 Undulator Cavity BPM Status.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Stability Workshop April , 2007 NSLS-II Electrical Systems G. Ganetis NSLS-II Electrical Systems NSLS-II.
Progress towards nanometre-level beam stabilisation at ATF2 N. Blaskovic, D. R. Bett, P. N. Burrows, G. B. Christian, C. Perry John Adams Institute, University.
ATF2 Status and Plan K. Kubo ATF2, Final Focus Test for LC Achievement of 37 nm beam size (Goal 1) – Demonstration of a compact final focus.
IP-BPM NOV. BEAM TEST RESULTS Siwon Jang (KNU). 11cm Low-Q IP-BPM design  11cm Low-Q IP-BPM drawings of HFSS 100mm Sensor cavity Wave guide Antenna Designed.
High Resolution Cavity BPM for ILC final focal system (IP-BPM) ILC2007/LCWS 2007 BDS, 2007/6/1 The University of Tokyo, KEK, Tohoku Gakuin University,
7.8GHz Dielectric Loaded High Power Generation And Extraction F. Gao, M. E. Conde, W. Gai, C. Jing, R. Konecny, W. Liu, J. G. Power, T. Wong and Z. Yusof.
ATF2 ILC Final Focus Test Beam Line at KEK-ATF References : ATF2 Proposal, KEK Report ATF2 Proposal Vol.2, KEK Report ホームページ:
1 FONT Results 2010 Philip Burrows Robert Apsimon, Doug Bett, Glenn Christian Michael Davis, Colin Perry, Javier Resta Lopez John Adams Institute Oxford.
1 Plans for KEK/ATF 1. Introduction 2. Related Instrumentations at ATF 3. Experimental Plans for Fast Kicker R&D at ATF Junji Urakawa (KEK) at ILC Damping.
Bob Lill Undulator Systems – BPM January 31, 2006 Undulator Cavity BPM Design and Status.
Status of the Fermilab Cold BPM R&D Manfred Wendt Fermilab 10/1/20091LCWA09 Main Linac WG.
Energy Spectrometer for the ILC Alexey Lyapin University College London.
Tohoku university Daisuke Okamoto TILC09 1. Motivation 2. Principle 3. Design 4. Expected performance 5. Conclusion contents.
Marc Ross Saturday, June 5, 2004 nanometer BPM status and plans.
Cavity Beam Position Monitor (BPM) for future linear colliders such as CLIC. N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, et al. Royal.
Development of a Low-latency, High-precision, Intra-train Beam Feedback System Based on Cavity Beam Position Monitors N. Blaskovic Kraljevic, D. R. Bett,
1 ATF2 Q BPM electronics Specification (Y. Honda, ) Design System –Hardware layout –Software –Calibration Testing Production schedule ATF2 electronics.
Tomoyuki Sanuki, Daisuke Okamoto, Yosuke Honda, Toshiaki Tauchi TB&SGC meeting.
The beam-based alignment and feedback systems, essential operations of the future colliders, use high resolution Beam Position Monitors (BPM). In the framework.
Requirements concerning the interface linking the BPM to the quadrupole M. Wendt, S. Zorzetti.
Philip Burrows ATF2 project meeting 14/1/111 Plans for ATF2 IP Feedback Philip Burrows, Colin Perry John Adams Institute Oxford University.
Production and Installation Policy of IP-BPM ATF2 Project Meeting, 2006/12/18 Y. Honda, Y. Inoue, T. Hino, T. Nakamura.
1 H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration Low Emittance Beam Generation in ATF H. Hayano for the ATF collaboration BPM electronics improvement emittance tuning.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Cavity BPM studies Marc Ross Explore uses (and limitations) of uwave cavity BPM’s Develop nanometer resolution 10x.
LASER FRAME: Straightness monitor (Tentative results of resolution test) Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF May 30-31,2005 KEK Nano BPM Group Y.Higashi,
Low-Q IP-BPM Schedule Siwon Jang KNU. IP-BPM Schedule IP BPM schedule –Reference cavity (middle of October) Frequency tuning parts –Electronics (middle.
Beam Test status and Plans of the ILC Main LINAC BPM
1 Cold L-Band Cavity BPM: Design Status July 2006 Gennady Romanov Linda Valerio Manfred Wendt Fermilab July 21, 2006.
1 ATF 2 Nanobpm (Q BPM) Electronics. Mark Slater: Cambridge Yury Kolomensky, Toyoko Orimoto: UCB Stewart Boogert, Steve Malton, Alexi Liapine: UCL Mike.
BPM for FF test (ATF2) Vladimir Vogel KEK 2nd Nano Workshop, KEK, December 12, 2004.
SLAC ESA T-474 ILC BPM energy spectrometer prototype Bino Maiheu University College London on behalf of T-474 Vancouver Linear Collider.
Current Status of LASER FRAME for KEK-Nano BPM (Tentative results of resolution test) Second Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF December 11-12, 2004.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Nano beams in the ATF extraction line Marc Ross Linear collider challenges: Energy Emittance source Stability ATF.
MLI Summary Chris Adolphsen SLAC. Summary of MLI Talks Quadrupoles (V. Kashikhin) –Expect test of a SLAC/CIEMAT and FNAL cos(2phi), ~ 60 T/m, SC Quads.
Cavity BPM: Multi-bunch analysis N Joshi, S Boogert, A Lyapin, F. Cullinan, et al. Royal Holloway University of London,
Cold BPM development in KEK H. Hayano, March 2011 Jung Keun Ahn (PNU), Sun young Ryu (PNU), Eun San Kim (KNU), Young Im Kim (KNU), Jin yeong Ryu (KNU),
Cavity BPM Simulations A. Liapine. Analysis of the Existing BPMs BINP KEK.
Low-Q IP BPM Y. I. Kim *, A. Heo, E-S. Kim (KNU) S. T. Boogert (JAI) D. M. McCormick, J. May, J. Nelson, T. Smith, G. R. White (SLAC) Y. Honda, N. Terunuma,
Development of a High Resolution Cavity BPM for the CLIC Main Beam
Instrumentation at ATF / TTF Accelerator Test Facility (KEK) Tesla Test Facility – FLASH (DESY) ESA / LCLS (SLAC) Marc Ross, SLAC.
1 ATF2 Q-BPM Magnet Movers & 1 st Pulse Calibration Progress from May 7-11 J. May, D. McCormick, T.Smith (SLAC) S. Boogert (RH)
Progress report of the tilt monitor Daisuke OKAMOTO Tohoku University.
LCLS Digital BPM Processor for ATF2 Extraction Line BPMs Steve Smith 26 August 2009.
MLI Update Chris Adolphsen SLAC. CAVITY VESSEL T4CM QUAD T4CM BPM QUADS LEADS 80K BLOCK 4K BLOCK Quadrupole Package.
May 31, 2005Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF (M. Ross) Plans for nanometer cavity BPM studies Energy Spectrometer evaluation (Hildreth) Integration.
1CEA/ Saclay/ SACM CARE/SRF/WP11 Development of a new Beam Position Monitor for FLASH, XFEL and ILC Cryomodules Claire Simon, Michel Luong, Stéphane Chel,
Re-entrant BPM R&D for ILC Main Linac
Wakefield & Cavity based Monitors: Fermilab BPM Development Plans
IPBPM test results at the LINAC end
KNU IP-BPM and Reference cavity
ATF nanoBPM system - nanoGrid ATF2 Movers TTF HOM – dipole / monopole
    BEAM POSITION MONITORS USING A RE-ENTRANT CAVITY C. Simon1, S. Chel1, M. Luong1, P. Contrepois1, P. Girardot1, N. Baboi2 and N. Rouvière3.
Intra-Pulse Beam-Beam Scans at the NLC IP
Bunch Tiltmeter Steve Smith SLAC Snowmass July 16, 2001 Update date
Fabrication of KEK-ATF2 Q-BPM
Report on ATF2 Third Project Meeting ATF2 Magnet Movers ATF2 Q-BPM Electronics Is SLAC ILC Instrumentation Group a good name?
Two-Plate Waveguide
Undulator Cavity BPM Status
Breakout Session SC3 – Undulator
Presentation transcript:

IP BPM’s for ATF2 Vladimir Vogel KEK May30, 2005 Third Mini-Workshop on Nano Project at ATF

 z = 5 mm  z = 2 mm  z = 8 mm BPM frequency (Hz) BPM relativity resolution  z = 0.3 mm

The purpose of the bunch length shorting in ATF DR is: - to increase the sensitiveness to the beam offset, which will be worse when we will do shorter the sensor cavity length to reduce the beam angle sensitivity. - to start study how the BPM work with short bunch length. - study the interaction of high order modes and the working mode in the sensor cavity.

Frequency (GHz) Pout Y out X out Electric field in the sensor cavity Rv.t.=8mm Rv.t=6mm Rv.t=5mm BINP BPM’s X – Y coupling -40 ~ -50 db ATF2 IP BPM’s X-Y coupling Less than -80db (expected)

Reduction of the angle sensitivity, in the assuming that the signal proportional to the beam angle is equal to the signal from beam which has a 1 nm position displacement      Sin  Cos  The beam angle signal has phase difference 90 degree to the signal of the beam offset, We can use this fact! If Sin(  ) and Cos(  ) outputs will give us only 20db isolation, we can get enough reduction of the angle sensitiveness. Beam angle measurement in ATF extraction line. BINP cavity#4, 2001 Cavity effective length (m) Reduction of angle sensitivity BINP ATF2 F=6426MHz F=9000MHz Sin  position Cos  angle referencesensor

Q=1*10^10, Zload=50 Ohm,  ^-9 m,  z = 8 mm Thermal noise (dF=3 MHz, T = 300K) 1.57  V Qload=1500  Frequency (GHz) BINP BPM Leff =7mm Dtube =5mm BPM output voltage (V)

Block diagram of the BPM’s electronic for IP BPM 1.One reference cavity 2.Six sensor cavity

Method of determination the BPM resolution 1.Three BPMs for Y and X: nm step mover 3. Beam movers and two steering magnet in the fix distance

Welded bellows IRIE KOKEN CO., LTD NS122-1, Dmax=22mm Dmin=8mm L from 7 to 17 mm +2*3mm VLEPP type vacuum connectors F TM110 = 9 GHz, Leff. = 7 mm  = 2.0 Resolution 1-2 nm Angle sensitivity To 1 nm –200  rad IP BPM’s setup for Y position measurement Temperature control