Summary of Kick-Off Meeting: AWAKE Technical Board 9 April 2014 E. Gschwendtner, 11 April 2014 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of the Design Report and Next Steps Edda Gschwendtner for the CERN AWAKE Project Team Edda Gschwendtner, CERN1.
Advertisements

An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
Compressor status AWAKE Technical Board meeting 19 May 2015.
Laser news AWAKE performance meeting Overview There was a meeting on with the supplier of the laser system (AMPLITUDE) No new information.
AWAKE RF Synchronization and LLRF Budget Review Reported by Wolfgang Hofle Acknowledgement: A. Butterworth, H. Damerau, S. Doebbert, J. Molendijk, S. Rey.
Beam Instrumentations: Requirements for Proton and Electron Beams C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements:
AWAKE electron source New Electron Source WP at CERN
Summary of the AWAKE Technical Board Meeting September 2014 – March 2015.
Impact on Project Planning and Cost. Agenda CERN Project Budget Planning Summary E. Gschwendtner, 9 April
VELO workshop, Amsterdam, april ‘00M.Ferro-Luzzi Difficulties with current mechanical design recent FEA results: to obtain sufficient stiffness of center.
Consolidation of access systems for the injector Complex ATOP days 4-6 March 2009 P. Ninin & R, Nunes in behalf of the PS and SPS access project teams…
Laser Beam Transport and Integration. AWAKE Collaboration meeting. Mikhail Martyanov Christoph Hessler CERN, EN-STI-LP Valentin Fedosseev CERN
Proton Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration – AWAKE – Project
Integration of the Experimental Facility in West Area & CNGS 1Ans Pardons, 18/10/2012 Integration of experimental facility in West Area and CNGS With input.
FAIR PROJECT COST BOOK. FAIR cost 1.2 mld euro 1. Civil construction and infrastructure 322Meuro 2. Accelerator systems 592 Meuro 3. Experimental facilities.
Integration, Installation & Infrastructure Ans Pardons, with input from the WP4 members September 2014.
Laser Status Update J. Moody, E. Oz, P. Muggli MPP Future Accelerators AWAKE Collaboration
Roman Pot Engineering Design Review CERN, 14 February 2006 M.Oriunno, CERN PH-TOT Installation, Commissioning and Schedule.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Update on Laser Beam Lines Christoph Hessler, Mikhail Martyanov, Valentin Fedosseev (CERN laser team)‎ Thanks to M. Battistin, N. Chritin, F. Galleazzi,
P. Muggli, CERN, 09/04/2014 Summary of the 1 st Meeting of the Physics and Experiment Board Patric Muggli Max Planck Institute for Physics Munich
Agenda : CLIC Civil Engineering and Services (CES) WG.
1 1. Some recent views ( ) 2 Linac tunnel
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Storage Ring Commissioning Samuel Krinsky-Accelerator Physics Group Leader NSLS-II ASAC Meeting October 14-15, 2010.
9 th AWAKE Technical Board 11 March Actions from Last Technical Board WP laser and MPP: decide until March 2015 which compressor design will be.
E. GschwendtnerMDI, 18 Feb Post-Collision Line and Dumps Working Group The PCLD Working Group shall co-ordinate the design and experimental work.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
Update on the Laser Beam Line
BDS: 1 October 13, 2007 BDS KOM EDR planning discussion Andrei Seryi October 13, 2007.
CM27 – 8 th July 2010 LH2 System Progress and Future Plans M Hills T Bradshaw M Courthold I Mullacrane P Warburton.
Design, integration and installation milestones Legend: 2015/Q1= 1 st quarter of 2015 (January-March) Phase 1 = proton & laser beams operation Phase 2.
CNGS Operation Summary Edda Gschwendtner, CERN. Outline Introduction CNGS Performance Highlights since last NBI 2010 in Japan Issues Summary 2E. Gschwendtner,
1 The ILC Control Work Packages. ILC Control System Work Packages GDE Oct Who We Are Collaboration loosely formed at Snowmass which included SLAC,
Hardware Commissioning  Preparation Documentation MTF Programme  Status The Review The commissioning activity in Resources  Outlook The new.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
PHIN Fabrication of a photo-injector for the CTF3 accelerator and for the NEPAL test stand WP 4 of the JRA2 PHIN 1.Status of the construction of RF guns.
AWAKE Technical Board, 19 August E. Gschwendtner, CERN.
HIGH RADIATION TO MATERIALS: HIRADMAT STATUS HiRadMat Scientific Board, 23/4/2012 Outline  Location  Status  Beam line  Infrastructure  Exp. Area.
Extraction and beamline progress B.Goddard TE/ABT.
NA62 Organisation of the work - proposal 2/24/20161PD/DT/PO-MH.
Lau Gatignon. The open session of this meeting was fully dedicated to the AD program with 6 presentations by AEGIS, ACE, GBAR, ASACUSA, ATRAP and ALPHA.
Integration and Installation Status for Collaboration Meeting Ans Pardons, 29/9/2015.
Status of the AWAKE Control System Edda Gschwendtner, Janet Schmidt, Marine Gourber-Pace, Roman Gorbonosov, Peter Sherwood AWAKE Technical Board, 27 January.
Interface of FP420 to LHC FP420 meeting 28-Sep-2006.
Issues Concerning Different Beam Lines Integration C. Bracco, E. Gschwendtner, B. Goddard, M. Meddahi, A. Petrenko, F. Velotti Acknowledgements: WP3 and.
Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration CERN Project Structure Edda Gschwendtner, CERN Lisbon Meeting, 22 June 2012Edda Gschwendtner, CERN2.
CERN AWAKE Project Status. Outline Introduction Project organization West Area and CNGS AWAKE facility studies Required input from the Collaboration Summary.
D.Macina TS/LEATOTEM Meeting25/02/2004 Roman Pot test at the SPS Test of the Roman Pot prototype in the SPS proposed in December 2003 (CERN/LHCC ):
Summary of the AWAKE Technical Board Meetings Edda Gschwendtner.
AWAKE: A Proton-Driven Plasma Wakefield Acceleration Experiment at CERN C. Bracco on behalf of the AWAKE collaboration C. Bracco - ICHEP2014.
Status of AWAKE Installation and Integration Presented 9/3/2016 at the AWAKE Collaboration Meeting Ans Pardons, for the AWAKE CP4 team.
TRD Gas System Layouts Production Readiness Review 03 – Nov F. Hahn.
O. Kester, NuSTAR annual meeting, 27/02/2013
Feasibility Study of the AWAKE Facility at CERN Edda Gschwendtner, Chiara Bracco, Brennan Goddard, Malika Meddahi, Ans Pardons, Elena Shaposhnikova, Helga.
Laser Line work package (WP6) AWAKE Technical Board meeting 19 May 2014.
Status of AWAKE Laser Line Installtion For the EN-STI Management Board - 30 May 2016 Presented by Valentin Fedosseev.
ELENA installation progress F. Butin / ELENA collaboration.
Mandate Priorities Other tasks Membership Forthcoming reports to CTC
EAAC, Isola d’Elba, September 2017, WG1
Equipment simplified model SMR UR safety
CLEX Building Layout, Conventional Facilities, TL2, TL2’,
ELENA installation and commissioning status
Installation of an Instrument on a CERN machine
CLEX* Status and Plans CTF3 complex CLEX
Plasma Wakefield Acceleration and a possible eP scattering Experiment MPP Retreat January 21, 2014 Allen Caldwell.
The ILC Control Work Packages
AWAKE proposals for BE/BI
352MHz Klystron Control for the 3MeV Linac test stand
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
LCLS Injector/Diagnostics David H. Dowell, SLAC April 24, 2002
Presentation transcript:

Summary of Kick-Off Meeting: AWAKE Technical Board 9 April 2014 E. Gschwendtner, 11 April

Motivation Based on the experience in the last months (since the AWAKE experiment got approved), there is an urgent need to restructure and better organize the AWAKE collaboration in order be more efficient to meet the experimental goal of having first proton beam to the plasma cell in 2016 and electron acceleration in – Too many parallel issues/contacts – Lack of information distribution – Integration of the experiment at CERN covers every equipment from institutes. We need an institution where all issues concerning the design, installation and integration of the AWAKE experiment are coordinated and addressed: – Follow-up the technical progress of the different groups/tasks: Groups/institutes explain what they do and issues must be made aware to all concerned. The work is justified in front of the collaboration and put on the table. – Providing specifications of the technical implementation. – Milestone tracking and scheduling. – Take technical decisions. – Follow-up and documentation (minutes, reviews) We need an institution where the the required performance of the experiment and the physics goals are defined: E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Technical Board Physics and Experiment Board

AWAKE Collaboration Structure Technical Board (TB) Technical Coordinator: Edda Gschwendtner Deputy Technical Coordinator : Chiara Bracco Management Board (MB) Physics and Experiment Board (PEB) Coordinator: Patric Muggli Deputy: N.N. CERN AWAKE Project Project Leader: Edda G. Deputy Project Leader: Chiara Bracco WP1: Project Management WP Leader: Edda Gschwendtner WP2: SPS Beam WP Leader: Elena Chapochnikova WP3: p/e Beam Lines WP Leader: Chiara Bracco WP4: Integration, Installation WP Leader: Ans Pardons WP5: Electron Source: WP Leader: S. Doebert Institutes Task Group Coordinators 3 Collaboration Board (CB) Spokesperson: Allen Caldwell Deputy Spokesperson: Matthew Wing Technical Coordinator: Edda Gschwendtner Physics and Experiment Coordinator: Patric Muggli Simulation Coordinator: Konstantin Lotov E. Gschwendtner, 11 April 2014 WP6: Laser Beam Line WP Leader: V. Fedosseev

Technical Coordinator Mandate Coordinating the design, installation, integration and interfaces of the experiment. Providing a resource loaded planning and milestone tracking of the experiment. Providing specifications for the technical implementation of the experiment. Monitoring, on behalf of the Collaboration, on a regular basis the technical progress of the different tasks through technical reviews, test results and site visits. Organizing and steering the hardware and beam commissioning of the experiment. Organizing and preparing the operation of the experiment. E. Gschwendtner, 11 April

Technical Board The Technical Board (TB) is the principal steering group in all matters of technical coordination and is chaired by the technical coordinator. The TB is composed of the Task-Group Coordinators (TGCs), CERN Work-package leaders (WPL) and sub-work-package leaders (SWPL). Members of the MB and the Deputy Technical Coordinator are ex-officio members of the TB. In the spirit of the mandate of the Technical Coordinator (TC) the TGCs, WPLs and SWPLs work together with and report to the TC on all issues covered by the mandate of the TC. The TC may set up, in consultation with the TB and on an ad-hoc basis, special working groups or task forces to address specific technical issues or advise on certain technical solutions. The TB is authorized to take technical decisions, which the TB deems not to have a significant impact on performance or cost of the AWAKE experiment. More important technical decisions are prepared in the form of a proposal by the TB for discussion at and decision by the MB. The Technical Coordinator or, in his absence, the Deputy Technical Coordinator chairs the TB. The TB meets regularly, typically once a month. The TC may call for extraordinary meetings of the TB to deal with specific or urgent topics. The decisions of the TB are recorded in minutes, which are made available to the Collaboration. E. Gschwendtner, 11 April

TaskMemberInstitute/Technical Group Chair Technical CoordinatorEdda GschwendtnerCERN/EN-MEF Deputy Technical CoordinatorChiara BraccoCERN/TE-ABT Ex-officio members SpokespersonAllen CaldwellMPI Deputy spokespersonMatthew WingUCL Physics CoordinatorPatric MuggliMPI Simulation CoordinatorKonstantin LotovBINP Task Group Coordinators Metal vapor sourceErdem ÖzMPI Munich Helicon plasma cellOlaf GrulkeIPP Greifswald Pulsed discharge plasma cellNelson LopesIST Self-modulation diagnosticsRoxana TarkeshianMPI Electron spectrometerSimon JollyUCL Laser Electron gun elementsGraeme BurtCockcroft Institute Data Acquisition SimulationKonstantin LotovBINP, CERN, IST CERN work package leaders SPS beamElena ShaposhnikovaCERN/BE-RF Proton and electron beam linesChiara BraccoCERN/TE-ABT Experimental area, integration, installationAns PardonsCERN/EN-MEF Electron sourceSteffen DoebertCERN/BE-RF Laser beam line and interfaceValentin FedosseevCERN/EN-STI CERN Sub work package leaders Radiation ProtectionEduard FeldbaumerCERN/DGS-RP RF synchronizationAndy ButterworthCERN/BE-RF VacuumJan HansenCERN/TE-VCS Beam InstrumentationRhodri Jones, Lars JensenCERN/BE-BI Technical Board 6 E. Gschwendtner, 11 April 2014

Integration/Installation (A. Pardons) 7 Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Equipment needs:Racks, cables, electricity, ….All Next TB: 19 May 2014 Equipment: Dimensions, material of equipment, … CATIA drawings All Phase 1: T2/2014 Phase 2: T3/2015 Self-modulation diagnostics : DesignR. Tarkeshian Electron spectrometer:DesignS. Jolly, R. JonesT3/2014 Laser dumps:DesignP. Muggli, V. Fedosseev Electron source:DesignS. Doebert Laser roomLayoutV. Fedosseev, Cool&Vent,…T2/2014 QuadrupolesDownstream plasma cellPEBJune 2014 Task to be done for integration/installation DetailsDead-line Integration and Installation of the AWAKE experiment Beam lines, experimental area, experiment equipment, services, Laser room, electron source area Phase 1: T1/2016 Phase 2: T2/2017 Electron dumpDesignT1/2016 Radiation Protection constraintsInclude shielding, etc…Phase 1: T3/2015 Phase 2: T1/2017 SafetyRisk assessment E. Gschwendtner, 11 April 2014

Equipment Needs Equipment name and function: Equipment responsible: Location of your equipment: tunnel (in TT41, TT43, TCC4, TSG40, TSG41 or TCV4) and distance w.r.t. reference element or point Weight: Dimensions: Cooling needs: (air-cooled or water cooled): Electrical needs: (V,A) Power consumtion (average and max.) Special alignment needs? Auxiliaries: – Do you need space in racks underground? If yes, how many Units (standard AxBxC for 1U) and what is the max. distance between rack and equipment. (CERN provides standard racks) – Do you need cables to the control room (1000m distance)? If yes, which type of cables and how many? Do you have vacuum pumps, motors, chillers or other auxiliary equipment that needs to be installed? If yes, please give dimensions, weight etc. as above PLUS maximum distance from main equipment. Does your equipment (or its auxiliaries) need any of the following (if yes, please specify quantities, levels, …): – Gas/Vacuum/UPS back-up/Ethernet/ E. Gschwendtner, 11 April  Dead-line: 19 May 2014

Vacuum (J. Hansen) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line VAT fast opening valve: Control system: is it fast and stable? Supply of fast alarm signal to beam permit? Link Rb vapor density measurement to VAT controller? E. Oz, P. Muggli, C. Bracco October 2014 Electron beam vacuum: Maximum acceptable pressure increase in gun and electron beam-line? Do we need a foil to avoid pressure increase? PEB, S. Doebert, C. Bracco October 2014 Where is the foil and what is the thickness? Bake out the electron beam-line? C. BraccoEnd April 2014 Proton beam vacuum: Carbon window to protect SPS beam. Where is the position? C. BraccoEnd April 2014 Laser vacuum:Laser stopper size (1) and laser mirrors supports (2)? P. Muggli (1), V. Fedosseev (2) End April 2014 Beam instrumentation:Size, amount, positions needed PEB, C. Bracco, L. Jensen October 2014 Electron spectrometer:Vacuum tube inside spectrometer and around detectorS. Jolly Beam dump line:Beam size C. Bracco, A. Petrenko End April 2014 Task to be done for vacuum DetailsDead-line Vacuum for laser, proton beam, electron source, electron beam and ‘secondary beam’. Valves, pumps, interlock system, control system, Study gas-load, outgassing. Design: Installation:

Beam-Lines (C. Bracco) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Studies on proton/electron interaction Shielding wall needed? Details on electron injection PEB, G. Rumolo, DESYOctober 2014 Specification for vacuum tube and diagnostics Decision on on-axis/off-axis.PEB, Collaboration MeetingNovember 2014 Task to be done for Beam-Lines DetailsDead-line Electron and Proton beam-lineSpecifications, design Proton – laser merging point Beam interlock systemAll beam-lines Electron-proton injectionVacuum chamber, instrumentation, magnet… Commissioning stepsDefine precision requirements, diagnostic needs,… Control systemDAQ, logging, etc.. Equipment needsCables, racks, cooling, …Next TB: 19 May 2014 SafetyRisk assessments

Electron Source (S. Doebert) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Timing: How is it organized (beam, controls, DAQ) C. Experiment data taking What needs to be synchronized, sampling rates PEB Integration Locations for power supplies, DAQ, diagnostics,… A. Pardons, equipment owners BoosterG. Burt – Cockcroft Institute Task to be done for Electron source DetailsDead-line PHIN-source, klystron, beam instrumentation, additional equipment Convert source to copper cathode? Beam dynamics simulations Synchronization3 GHz Pre-commissioningIn CTF2 in 2016 SafetyE.g. modulator oil, HV, Risk assessment Control systemTiming, DAQ, logging, remote control, … Equipment needsCables, racks, cooling, …Next TB: 19 May 2014 …

Laser (V. Fedosseev) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Layout at CERN Amplitude design adapted to CERN: description of laser setup with diagnostics and compressor P. Muggli, Amplitude Control system Amplitude control system, remote desktop or full integration in CERN P. Muggli, Amplitude Optical delayOptical path difference in laserP. Muggli, Amplitude Pulse compressorDesign, who provides what?P. Muggli, Amplitude SynchronizationLaser mode-locker, …P. Muggli, A. Butterworth Beam pathsFrom CATIA drawingsA. Pardons Laser beam dumpDesign, specificationsP. Muggli, V. Vlachoudis (?!) DiagnosticsWho provides what?P. Muggli, V. Fedosseev Task to be done for Laser DetailsDead-line Beam transfer optics and mechanicsTo plasma cell, photo-injector, laser beam monitoring and control Design of system at photo-injector Implementation of laser safetyAccess system, risk assessment Installation of laser setupLaser room, beam-lines, laser shutter Control systemRemote laser control Equipment needsCables, racks, cooling…Next TB: 19 May 2014

RF Synchronization (A. Butterworth) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Laser:Frequencies, mode-locker,P. Muggli Control system:What exists at CERN? Task to be done for RF Synchronization DetailsDead-line Synchronization of proton, electron and laser beamRephase SPS beam to AWAKE Jitter budgetJitter from all possible sources (equipment, slow drifts,…) Signal distribution from AWAKE to BA3 (~3km)New hardware Other synchronization signals?10 MHz reference, fast valve, kicker Control systemDAQ, logging, etc… Equipment needsCables, racks, cooling, …Next TB: 19 May 2014

Radiation Protection (E. Feldbaumer) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Material of equipment:First design of all equipment/materialAll Updated integration: Electron source and area downstream the plasma included A. Pardons Task to be done for Radiation Protection DetailsDead-line Radiation Maps of AWAKE experimental areaDose maps, radiation to electronics Define areas for racks, electronicsNeeded additional shielding Electron source shieldingWall around electron source

Metal Vapor Source (E. Öz) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Integration: Detector integration in the area downstream the plasma A. Pardons Control system:What exists at CERN? RF synchronization:Fast valve signalA. Butterworth Beam Interlock system:Fast valve signalM. Zerlauth Task to be done for Metal Vapor Source DetailsDead-line Design of the plasma cellSize, needed supports,… Density measurements of RbMust be linked to fast valve VAT fast opening valveDesign, control system, alarm, connection to beam interlock system and RF sychnronization SafetyRubidium, oil heater, risk assessment Control systemDAQ, logging, etc… Equipment needsCables, racks, cooling, …Next TB: 19 May 2014

Helicon Source (O. Grulke), Discharge Source (N. Lopes) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Integration:Area downstream the plasmaA. Pardons Control system:What exists at CERN? Task to be done for Helicon and Discharge Source DetailsDead-line Design of the sourceSize, needed supports,… Safety Control systemDAQ, logging, etc… Equipment needsCables, racks, cooling, power, …Next TB: 19 May 2014

Electron Spectrometer (S. Jolly) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Vacuum window:Recommendations (e.g. Mylar, Silicon)J. Hansen Integration:Spectrometer and detectors in areaA. Pardons Task to be done for Electron Spectrometer DetailsDead-line Spectrometer magnet (UCL)Decide on MBPS or other magnet (new design?!) Vacuum pipe (UCL)Size, viewports, windows Spectrometer detector (BI)Study different detector types, supports Control system (UCL & BI)DAQ, logging, etc… Equipment needs (UCL & BI)Cables, racks, …Next TB: 19 May 2014 Note: many specifications are results from studies in the PEB! Note: For the electron spectrometer task a collaboration between UCL and CERN Beam Instrumentation Group will be setup.

Self-Modulation Diagnostics (R. Tarkeshian) E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Needed input from others ResponsibleDead-line Integration: Detector integration in the area downstream the plasma A. Pardons Control system:What exists at CERN Task to be done for Self-Modulation Diagnostics DetailsDead-line Diagnostics instrumentation (CTR, OTR, TCTR)Design, needed supports, … Vacuum pipeSize, windows Control systemDAQ, logging, etc… Equipment needsCables, racks, …Next TB: 19 May 2014 Note: many specifications are results from studies in the PEB!

Planning E. Gschwendtner, 9 April T1T2T3T1T2T3T1T2T3T1T2T3Q1Q2Q3Q4 CNGS dismantling Cabling Cooling and Ventilation installation Laser installation: clean room, laser beam- line, laser LS2 Civil engineering: electron tunnel, laser tunnel control room refurbishme nt MagnetSurvey Power converters Vacuum Beam instrumenta tion Access system Beam interlock implement ation Alarm, fire system Experiment installation: Plasma cell, diagnostics, Electron source and electron beam-line installation Commissio ning Physics Commissio ning Physics Installation planning: Specifications of p/e beam instrumentation and e-beam magnets 2 years (design, specifications, procurement, tests) Specs frozen for vacuum Equipment needs Note: Not a lot of time for physics! Phase 1 physics run (proton/laser/plasma) during end 2016 and in 2017 During 2017 also also installation of electron source and beam-line. Phase 2 (proton/laser/electron/plasma) only first half of LS2 lasts until beginning 2020!

Planning Deadlines: – End May 2014: Cable needs defined. – October 2014: Specifications for vacuum system of phase 1 experiment in 2016 frozen – End October 2014: electron/proton beam merging area defined Specifications for magnets, beam instrumentation, vacuum – Beginning 2015: Electron spectrometer vacuum design specified – Much more to be defined by next TBs !!! E. Gschwendtner, 9 April

Summary Important meeting to coordinate and address AWAKE experiment design, integration, installation issues. We have a short time-scale of preparing the experiment and tight planning Allows the tasks owners and work-package leaders to get ‘proactive’ and raise important points. – Integrate not only the experiment, but also the task owners into the organization. – Task owners and work-package leaders are supposed to take their role very seriously. Working very closely with the Physics and Experiments Board (PEB). – Many points are defined by physics needs, e.g. electron spectrometer design, … Regular meetings: ~every month Then: Follow-up! Decisions and Action Items are summarized in minutes. E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Typical Agenda of the TB: – Progress reports from task owners/WP leader – Planning – Follow-up – Matters Arising

Next Steps E. Gschwendtner, 11 April Task group owners makes sure that the dead-lines in the current tables (and those which come up) are taken care of. Until the next TB meeting each task-owner – Prepares for each task the milestones Allows to check how this fits into the general planning and whether there are any issues for any tasks. – completes the tables shown in the kick-off meeting (tasks to be done/needed input from others) – Fills out the equipment needs table.  Next TB meeting: Monday 19 May 2014 at 14:00

Equipment Needs Equipment name and function: Equipment responsible: Location of your equipment: tunnel (in TT41, TT43, TCC4, TSG40, TSG41 or TCV4) and distance w.r.t. reference element or point Weight: Dimensions: Cooling needs: (air-cooled or water cooled): Electrical needs: (V,A) Power consumtion (average and max.) Special alignment needs? Auxiliaries: – Do you need space in racks underground? If yes, how many Units (standard AxBxC for 1U) and what is the max. distance between rack and equipment. (CERN provides standard racks) – Do you need cables to the control room (1000m distance)? If yes, which type of cables and how many? Do you have vacuum pumps, motors, chillers or other auxiliary equipment that needs to be installed? If yes, please give dimensions, weight etc. as above PLUS maximum distance from main equipment. Does your equipment (or its auxiliaries) need any of the following (if yes, please specify quantities, levels, …): – Gas/Vacuum/UPS back-up/Ethernet/ E. Gschwendtner, 11 April  Dead-line: 19 May 2014