The Plan A Trinity At Work: A One Year Plan. Teachers Working Together: The Starting Point. Collaboration is the key term in this game – At the end of.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Principal Professional Development Mathematics KCAS June 13 and June 16, 2011 Analytical and Applied Sciences June/July
Advertisements

A Guide to Implementation
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
Winchester School District In Need of Improvement Plan DINI Team: Mel Harrison, Valerie Wilber, Hannah Gagnon, Dee Salonen, Amanda Nordberg, Jane Cardinale,
Research and Impact The WaterBotics ® evaluation and research studies include two synergistic, but distinct, domains: educational impact and scale-up/sustainability.
Collaborative Evaluation Communities in Urban Schools.
Domain 4: Professional Responsibilities
Year 1 Progress AN EVALUATION OF OUR 9 TH GRADE IPAD INITIATIVE.
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Professional Learning Communities Heritage Middle School How Data Drives Instruction.
 Here’s What... › The State Board of Education has adopted the Common Core State Standards (July 2010)  So what... › Implications and Impact in NH ›
Resource Rooms Resource Room is a special education program for a student with a disability who is registered in either a special class or regular education.
Developing District Level Professional Learning Communities Woodford County Schools Jimmy Adams, Candace James and Sam Watkins.
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Stone-Robinson Math Information Night Dr. Nicholas King, Principal December 9, 2014.
GRAPHING CALCULATORS AND STUDENTS’ ACHIEVEMENT BY RAED DANDAN.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
SOCIAL SCIENCES STANDARDS REVIEW AND REVISION February 2009-June 2011 PRESENTATION TO THE STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION.
CCSS Mathematics Standards What are the learning expectations? Grade K- 8 Math Content Standards Build deep understanding, not just procedural.
The SIOP ® Model Continuing Professional Development.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Beyond the Basics -Instructional Shifts -Rigor: Depth of Knowledge -Assessment: SBAC, to CCSS -Shifts In Action: Close Reading Strategies & Text Dependent.
Supporting K-12 Mathematics Intervention Presenter: Jameson Rienick, Mathematics Project Specialist
 Participants will teach Mathematics II or are responsible for the delivery of Mathematics II instruction  Participants attended Days 1, 2, and 3 of.
The College of Saint Rose School of Education Department of Literacy and Special Education Teacher Candidate Assessment.
SAU 16 Curriculum Update Joint Board Meeting April 30, 2012.
CAPP ALGEBRA FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT GRANT Professional Development Aspect.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
A Change in Assessment Procedures.  Looking at Infrastructure  Computer updates  Working with IT department (more than pre id)  Integrating technology.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Leadership Team July 24, Learning Targets 1. Familiarize and use The Framework of Teaching in the areas of engagement and questioning to observe.
Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership External Evaluation Schools and School Leadership Report by Tanya Suarez, Suarez & Associates June 9, 2005.
November 1, 2012 Cambrian School District. School Plan (SPSA) process review Site SPSA updates Moving Forward Overview.
Data for Student Success Using State Assessment Data to Identify School Improvement Goals Lani Seikaly Professional Development Coordinator Data for Student.
SummerUp Role of the Instructional Staff Dr. Kimberly Samaniego.
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Principals’ Conference Network 609 October 4, 2012 Mathematics.
Systems of Support for Urban High Schools. Key Role of Large Urban Districts There are approximately 17,000 school districts in the US Approximately 66.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
When dealing with colleagues in PLC’s…. Welcome Professional Learning Communities Presenters: Pam Hughes & Kristin Magee
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
BEGINNING EDUCATOR INDUCTION PROGRAM MEETING CCSD Professional Development Mrs. Jackie Miller Dr. Shannon Carroll August 6, 2014.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Instructional Leadership and Application of the Standards Aligned System Act 45 Program Requirements and ITQ Content Review October 14, 2010.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Success through Technology and Assessment August 1 st -3 rd Attended workshops and training to prepare for the grant o Achievement Series o eMetric o Obtaining.
Effective Professional Learning Communities (PLC) Where do we begin at Myers Middle School? (Adapted from Professional Learning Communities at Work Robert.
Making an Excellent School More Excellent: Weston High School’s 21st Century Learning Expectations and Goals
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Welcome. BSI Parent Night October 13, 2016 Mrs
Welcome. BSI Parent Night September 19, 2017 Mrs
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Lesson planning 101 – Assessment & Questions
21st Century Learning Environments Phase 1 Professional Development
ISTE Illinois Burlington Central #301 School District Credit Recovery Best Practices.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
Maths No Problem; A Mastery Approach.
Curriculum Coordinator: D. Para Date of Presentation: Jan. 20, 2017
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
School Improvement Planning that increases CCRPI Scores
Presentation transcript:

The Plan A Trinity At Work: A One Year Plan

Teachers Working Together: The Starting Point. Collaboration is the key term in this game – At the end of the current academic year, teachers will meet with the supervisor to review their successes, difficulties and need for improvement. Note that the CAPA team had a recent visit to the school and recommended some changes regarding the use of technology. – Course specific teams will be created to work during the summer. The teams will review the curriculum and support it with additional framework, resources and activities. – A team of technologically committed teachers will be created to compile a set of activities to support the curriculum. (at least 3 technology based activities per chapter.)

The Curriculum Writing: The End of Curriculum Chaos A concise curriculum identifying what do the teachers expect the students to know by the end of each unit (UBD model) would be created. In addition, a clear reasonable and agreeable pacing will be developed for each course. A set of technological activities developed by the technology team will be incorporated into each unit of the revised curriculum. A source of projects aligned to the curriculum can be found at _list.do?cid=us _list.do?cid=us Hands on projects involving the use of Graphing Calculators and Computer Aided Design will be developed to be used as formative assessments to test the students’ mastery of the identified skills. A set of resources that help with this goal can be found at ub_connections_supplemental.html ub_connections_supplemental.html

Hand in Hand: Teachers and Supervisor Training and PDs The T. Team (Teachers) After reviewing the curriculum and supporting it with the framework and tech. activities, the teachers will create teacher specific PD plans that target their weaknesses. Teachers will meet on a biweekly basis in course specific teams to review the improvement process and discuss any challenges that face them. One of the trainers should be available in each meeting in order to assist in resolving any potential problem or challenge. The S Team (Supervisor and Administration) The supervisor would compile the PD plans and arrange for on site PDs in cooperation with AMTNJ outreach program. Having 25 teachers in the department, it is easy to host an AMTNJ and/or a TI set of workshops through their outreach department l/sites/US/nonProductSingle/pd_outrea ch.html The supervisor will assign 2 teachers to be trained by TI to become trainers. These teachers will have only tech duties during the year.

Suggested Technology PDs Other Training and PDs Training in Lesson Studies AMTNJ Conference Online courses in using TI Nspire for different courses : al/sites/US/sectionHome/pd_onlinetin spire_free.html al/sites/US/sectionHome/pd_onlinetin spire_free.html (The online courses can be scheduled for each individual team during in- service sessions or during the summer training program.) TI Conference for Math Teachers: al/sites/US/sectionHome/pd_conferen ces.html al/sites/US/sectionHome/pd_conferen ces.html Teachers Teaching Teachers: al/sites/US/sectionHome/pd_aboutt3. html al/sites/US/sectionHome/pd_aboutt3. html NCTM e Workshops:

Hand in Hand: Teachers and Supervisor In Class Support Teachers are teamed up based on courses. Professional Learning Communities are created. Teachers meet on a semimonthly basis to follow up on the concise set of essential curricular standards that they reviewed earlier, coordinate the technology use and activities. In addition to the common planning meetings, the use of technology will be emphasized through team teaching sessions. The supervisor will schedule teachers in a way to allow them common planning time and team teaching time. The supervisor will release any teacher from his/her duty when they need to seek help from the trainer. The supervisor will go on regular walk through in order to break the “Buffer”. The supervisor will be part of the training and the team teaching. He will make sure that the teachers see him involved the :scut work” as identified by Reeve. (When teachers see the supervisor modeling lessons with technology they will take the change more seriously.)

Hand in Hand: Teachers and Supervisor Team Work and Observations By the mid of the first year, teachers in specific courses will join in a lesson study team to work on the “Quadratic Equation” (this is a subject covered in algebra 1,2 precalc, and calc.) The lesson study team will compile a set of graphing calculator activities and analyze students performance and level of understanding with the help of technology Formal observation and evaluation will consider the use of technology as a main point. Supervisor will adopt the pacing created by the teachers and create school based chapter tests to insure that every one is on the same pace. School based tests are graded by a team created in cooperation with the supervisor and the results are used to track the improvement

Continuous Evaluation: 2 Main Stops At the end of the second marking period and after the midterms, every course team will evaluate test results, student projects and work in order to evaluate the progress. The team will review the common planning and the PLC’s reports and recommendations and adopt or reject any major changes to the plan. By the end of the year, all teams will meet and evaluate the plan, suggest and adopt alterations and design a new set of PDs based on the year long activities.

A Cultural Reform: Every One Is Involved – What Is Happening In the Process Teachers Review the curriculum with learning at the core of their plans. Reflect on the teaching and learning. Learn how to use the technology and change the misconception of dependency. Get engaged in hands on and real applications. Enjoy the feeling of success as students understand better and achieve higher. Exit the comfort zone of the Buffer and collaborate with others. Share best practices and learn from each other. Teachers are students for life. A lifelong learning process Students Get engaged in hands on and real life applications. Experience success in math like never before. Increase self confidence through successes and better understanding. Visualize complicated mathematical concepts. Feel in control of the math environment through the control of the graphing calculator. (Students will be able to see what happen to the function or graph as THEY change the parameters or dimensions.) Every student has a graphing calculator with him throughout the year. NO SOCIAL JUSTICE ISSUE.