Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Jersey

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Program Evaluation How to Effectively Evaluate Your Program Carol Pilcher Department of Entomology Iowa State University.
Advertisements

ALAMEDA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent Search.
Accelerated Schools Will the Missouri Accelerated Schools project suit Central Middle School to a ?
Proposal Development Guidelines for Signature Grantee Semi-Finalists The Covenant Foundation.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
Team 6 Lesson 3 Gary J Brumbelow Matt DeMonbrun Elias Lopez Rita Martin.
Identifying enablers & disablers to change
University of Nebraska Lincoln proudly introduces the Management Team.
External Review Team Conference Call: Preparing the Team for Off-site Review Work Digital Learning Institution.
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
Listening to the Future Presented by Larry Johnson and Kristi Nelson Transforming Lives, Education, and Knowledge.
NIDRR-funded AATT Project (Agricultural Assistive Technology Training) DOE/OSERS Project # H133G TRAINING OVERVIEW On-line and In-person Evaluations.
EVALUATION FINDINGS AND STATE SUCCESS STORIES AUGUST 30, CDC Field Triage Decision Scheme Implementation Project.
PATIENT-CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH INSTITUTE PCORI Board of Governors Meeting Washington, DC September 24, 2012 Sue Sheridan, Acting Director, Patient.
ISOTURE: A Model for Volunteer Management
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
CH4LLENGE has just started its series of online learning courses! We offer a SUMP Basics online course and four in-depth courses.
Customer Focus Module Preview
Grants to advance new ideas in sustainable agriculture. What is SARE?
1 The Profession of Business District Management Professional Certification Program Rutgers University, Newark, NJ, USA Dr. Seth A. Grossman, Ph.D.,
I.S.O.T.U.R.E. A Model for Volunteer Management Success Improving Lives. Improving Texas.
The Department of Federal and State Programs Presenter: Margaret Shandorf.
Leadership that Works: How can you help? 2013 Committee Chair Training.
4 Principles of Highly Effective Volunteer Involvement 1. Mission connection 2. Leadership management connection 3. Volunteer staff connection 4. Learning.
4-H Science Evaluation Learning Circle Webinar September 2011-February 2012 Course Plan.
Innovations in Engineering Education Why ? When ? How ? Ivan ŠIMAN, MSc. PhD.
Creating a Learning Community Vision
Food Safety Professional Development for Early Childhood Educators Evaluation Plan.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Promoting your program up and down the communication ladder Candance Gabel, MS, RD, LD FNEP State Coordinator.
Where the Jobs Are: developing competency in the use of labour market information Carole Brown Past President, Career Development Association of Australia.
How can school districts support the development of healthy school communities? Facilitated by: Rhonda Patton, Alberta Health Services Dr. Steve Manske,
CSREES Reporting Web Conference February 12, 2009.
Project Proposal: Survey and Assessment of Current Deployment of Applications for Surface Transportation Utilizing GNSS in the APEC Region Maureen Walker.
Welcome Office of Radiation & Indoor Air (ORIA) Tribal Strategy and Plan National Tribal Forum May 21, 2012.
Click to edit Master subtitle style. About us Chamber of Commerce and Industry Suceava is from over 20 years the oldest and the most representative autonomous.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
Office of Special Education Programs U.S. Department of Education GRANT PERFORMANCE REPORT FOR CONTINUATION FUNDING.
“A Truthful Evaluation Of Yourself Gives Feedback For Growth and Success” Brenda Johnson Padgett Brenda Johnson Padgett.
Building relationships and bridging social capital: An inclusive approach to immigrant civic engagement within libraries A PROCESS AND OUTCOME EVALUATION,
Module V: Writing Your Sustainability Plan Cheri Hayes Consultant to Nebraska Lifespan Respite Statewide Sustainability Workshop June 23-24, 2015 © 2011.
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals The Covenant Foundation.
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND YOU! PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATIONS CAN BE A GREAT ASSET.
Measuring the Impact of Your Volunteer Program Barbra J. Portzline, Ph.D. Liz Benton, MBA.
Schools Stakeholders Training Plan Accreditation.
Presented By Patricia Dawson Oregon State University Extension Service.
Welcome to PD Forum FY 11. Professional Development Support Structure SchoolsDistrict Support Department PD Team (Administrator, PD Contact, & PD Team.
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
Financing Natura 2000 WORKSHOPS 2nd meeting of the Steering Group, 2 March 2006.
New Mexico State University Land-Grant System Accountability: Learning from the CSREES Portfolio Review Process Steven Loring Assistant Director Agricultural.
Copyright © 2013 University of Minnesota. All Rights Reserved Multiple Year Farm Transition & Estate Planning: Program Outcomes & Impacts Through Evaluation.
12-CRS-0106 REVISED 8 FEB 2013 September 2015 IEEE Technical Activities Volunteer Training IEEE Technical Educational Activities.
Implementation Science: Finding Common Ground and Perspectives Laura Reichenbach, Evidence Project, Population Council International Conference on Family.
Small Group Session 1. Small Group Instructions Think about the climate impacts and adaptation options discussed earlier Discuss which adaptation options.
Sister Societies are Proudly Sponsored by The Global Women’s Leadership Network is a World Council Program The Global Women’s Leadership Network is Chaired.
Farmers Market and Local Food Promotion Program Grant Writing Workshop Developing Your Idea These workshops are funded by the USDA’s Agricultural Marketing.
Benefits of ESP Membership Epsilon Sigma Phi The Extension Professional’s Organization Updated September 2013.
© 2014 Regents of the University of Minnesota. All rights reserved. Food Networks & Policy Councils: EXPLORING THE LANDSCAPE IN MINNESOTA Minnesota Food.
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Mitsuo NAKAMURA Program Officer, Agricultural Department,
Using Logic Models in Program Planning and Grant Proposals
Building Extension’s Public Value
Clear Language and Organizational Change
Welcome to the CSBM operational workshop:
Local Action for Developing Regions
Orientation Classroom Teaching and Learning Theory Course Introduction and Overview.
Program Planning: Community Nutrition Assessment
COMMISSIONER STRATEGIC REVIEW
Presentation transcript:

Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Jersey Defining the Public Value of Cooperative Extension Concurrent Session Epsilon Sigma Phi Conference Tuesday, October 6, 2015 Presented By: Jeannette Rea Keywood Rutgers Cooperative Extension, New Jersey ESP Alpha Xi Chapter

Session Overview This concurrent session will provide an overview of the Defining the Public Value of Cooperative Extension Professional Development In-Service: Planning Structure Implementation Evaluation Program Content – Defining Public Value This concurrent session will provide an overview of the T5 Conference planning, structure, implementation, evaluation and potential for replication.

Rationale for Public Value In-Service Mini-Grant Proposal Extension professionals need to examine the concept of public value and learn how to capitalize on the value of Extension programming and its benefit to constituents. Identifying that public value, or lack thereof, is crucial in determining and prioritizing future programs and benefits to the community. In an effort to address these needs, the Alpha Xi Chapter submitted a proposal for a 2014 ESP Professional Development Mini-Grant to conduct the Defining Public Value In-Service for Rutgers Cooperative Extension (RCE) faculty and staff.

Conference Objectives To develop knowledge and understanding of public and private value and how Extension programs create public value. Train Rutgers Cooperative Extension faculty, staff and volunteers on how to create public value statements to convey program value to the public, including the economic impact. Determine how to utilize public value statements to promote Cooperative Extension programming, communicate its value to community leaders and decision makers, as well as constituents (both direct and indirect beneficiaries).

Conference Overview Hosted by the ESP Alpha Xi Chapter (New Jersey). Full day in-service. Workshops conducted by two ESP-Alpha Xi members (Sharon Kinsey & Jeannette Rea-Keywood) and Laura Kalambokidis, University of Minnesota Extension.

Conference Schedule 9:15 - 9:45 AM Registration and Light Breakfast 10:00 AM Welcome and Introductions   Module 1 - Defining Public Value & Understanding the Public Value Approach Module 2 - Skeptical Stakeholders 10:45 AM Overview of the Purpose, Value and Benefits of Building Extension’s Public Value (Laura Kalambokidis) Module 3 - Criteria for Public Sector Action Module 4 - Market Outcome vs Public Sector Action  

Conference Schedule 12:00 PM LUNCH 1:00 PM Module 5 - Public Value in Extension Programs Module 7 - Why Extension?   1:30 PM Module 8 - Demonstrating Extension’s Public Sharing Public Value Statements 2:45 PM Module 9 - Maximizing Public Value 3:00 PM Module 11 - Public Value Action Plan 3:15 PM Summary and Evaluation

Funding ESP Professional Development Mini-grant ($1,000) Registration Fee ($10.00 for members, $20.00 for non members)

Public Value Expert Dr. Laura Kalambokidis, Extension Economists, University of Minnesota Presenters took on-line course Used Adobe Connect for Laura to present the following sections and to critique the public value statements developed. value and benefits of building Extension’s public value criteria for public sector action market outcome vs public sector action

End-of-Program Evaluation 27 people attended the professional development. 84% of the participants indicated that the program content was “excellent” or “good.” 58% indicated that they feel they can apply the ideas or skills they learned in this workshop to their program area “To a Great Extent” and 42% “To a Moderate Extent”. 100% of the participants increased their level of understanding in the following: The public value of Extension programs The different ways programs can create public value The difference between public and private value How to explain the public value of the program(s) I work with Conference attended by 62 individuals representing all Rutgers Cooperative Extension Departments. Used on-line (Qualtrics) end-of–program survey. Incentives (gift cards) were used to encourage participation.

Evaluation Program area groups developed public value statements. The RCE Ag & Natural Resources Department Chair who attended the in-service developed several public value statements that are being used by faculty and staff across the state. More structure needed for roundtable discussions. Conference held in October. Follow-up evaluation distributed in February.

Defining Public Value of Cooperative Extension In-Service Program Content

Module 1 Public Value Defining public value and understanding the purpose of the public value approach Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

The Public Value Approach In Cooperative Extension, we understand the value of our programs to participants. But “public value” is the value of a program to those who do not directly benefit from the program. Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

The Public Value approach The purpose of the public value approach is to: ⦁ secure support for activities with strong public value, ⦁ open the discussion about how to fund activities that do not have strong public value, and ⦁ provide some insight to the task of prioritizing Extension’s work. Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

Module 3 Criteria for Public Sector Action Criteria for public sector action (information, fairness, benefits created or imposed costs) Recognizing the sources of public value (criteria for public funding) Understanding the difference between private and public benefits in Extension programs Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

Module 5 Public Value in Extension Programs Sources of Public Value for programs

How does an Extension program create public value? ⦁ Does it narrow an information gap? ⦁ Does it address a crucial concern about fairness? ⦁ Does one person’s participation benefit people who do not participate in the program? ⦁ Does one person’s participation reduce costs for others? ⦁ Does the program improve upon the market outcome? Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

Communicating Extension’s strength in creating public value Module 7 Why Extension? Communicating Extension’s strength in creating public value Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

Module 8 Demonstrating Extension’s Public Value Identifying the changes that participants make, the outcomes that result from changes and the public value that arises from those outcomes. Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

Demonstrating Extension’s Public Value Program participants… have been shown to change their behavior in specific ways… that have been shown to lead to specific outcomes… that directly benefit the participants. that generate public value.

Participants in an integrated pest management program… have been shown to adopt techniques that are effective against pesticide-resistant insects… which slows the spread of pesticide-resistance in the insect population… which improves yield for the participating farmers. which increases the pest-control options for all farmers in the region.

which has been shown to reduce the incidence of diabetes,… Participants in a nutrition education program… have been shown to increase their consumption of fruits and vegetables,… which has been shown to reduce the incidence of diabetes,… which directly improves quality of life for participants. which reduces public health costs for all community members. Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

Participants Changes Outcome Private benefits Public value

Generally, a public value message: is directed to a specific stakeholder focuses on the outcome that matters to the stakeholder ⦁ uses the stakeholder’s language ⦁ is free of jargon and empty words ⦁ is believable ⦁ is short Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

⦁ is about a specific program ⦁ doesn’t focus on the learning step ⦁ doesn’t focus on the program’s private benefit ⦁ does focus on the program’s public value ⦁ uses positive framing ⦁ tells us how non-participants—the greater community, state, world—benefit from the program ⦁ makes the case for public funding

A Public Value Message: When you support ______________program, participants will ____________________, (changes) which leads to ______________________, (outcomes) which will benefit other community members by __________________________________. (public value) Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

The Public Value Approach is not just about the message; it’s about doing the work that justifies the message. Building Extension's Public Value: U. of MN Extension

Summary & Questions Thank you for your attention!

Contact Information For more information contact: Jeannette Rea Keywood Rutgers Cooperative Extension 450 East Broad Street Bridgeton, New Jersey 08302 856-459-1900 ext. 4522 reakeywood@rce.rutgers.edu Sharon Kinsey 1301 Park Blvd. Cherry Hill, New Jersey 08002 856-216-7130 ext. 2 kinsey@aesop.rutgers.edu