Life-Cycle Flood Risk Management  Getting Comfortable with Multiple Protection Mechanisms Alex C. Dornstauder Deputy Director Office of Homeland Security U.S. Army Corps of Engineers December 9, 2010 ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®

Life-Cycle Risk Management USACE role/missions Support DOD – example of BG Berwick joining JTF-Katrina and BG Schroedel joining JTF-Rita Conduct Corps Missions as well - Example of initial flood fighting/levee repair - Project Conditions and assessment at other critical infrastructure projects 3. Execute ESF#3 in support of FEMA All in concert with other Federal agencies, States and local governments, contractors, and effected industries working as ONE TEAM.

Shared Flood Risk Management “ Buying Down the Risk “ Initial Risk Outreach Federal / State / Local Natural Storage Federal / State / Local Structural Federal / State / Local Non – Structural Federal / State / Local Risk Contingency Plans Federal / State / Local / Individual Building Codes State / Local Zoning Local This graph illustrates the definition of flood risk management, and carries our message that some risk will remain no matter what measures are in place. We have transitioned from flood control to flood damage reduction and now to flood risk management The graph shows just a few of the tools that can be used to buy down or manage risk Note that the tools are shared as is the responsibility for flood risk management, some of the tools lie within the responsibility of the nonfederal entities Also note that there will always be a residual risk and the goal is to collaboratively reduce the residual risk to acceptable levels. Insurance Individual / NFIP Residual Risk All Stakeholders contribute to reducing risk !

National Flood Risk Management This graph illustrates the definition of flood risk management, and carries our message that some risk will remain no matter what measures are in place. We have transitioned from flood control to flood damage reduction and now to flood risk management The graph shows just a few of the tools that can be used to buy down or manage risk Note that the tools are shared as is the responsibility for flood risk management, some of the tools lie within the responsibility of the nonfederal entities Also note that there will always be a residual risk and the goal is to collaboratively reduce the residual risk to acceptable levels.

Inter-Agency Flood Risk Management Silver Jackets Inter-Agency Flood Risk Management State-Led State sets priorities for Interagency Federal support Collaborative Leverage resources: talent, data, funding Facilitate integrated Post-Disaster solutions Continuous, not project-specific Life-Cycle Risk Reduction Watershed Perspective State teams facilitate regional, state-to-state flood risk management Active Inter-Governmental Flood Risk Management Team Fully Signed Charter Ongoing Effort to Develop Team As of: 6 DEC 2010

Objectives and Actions Synchronize Internal Programs and Activities With external partners, align, coordinate, and leverage FRM activities at a national scale Strengthen State and Regional Partnerships Risk-Based Inspection and Assessment Enable Risk-Reducing Mitigation by Managing and Aligning Existing Programs Update Flood Emergency, Flood Fighting, and Rehabilitation to Account for Life-Cycle Critical Infrastructure Protection and Resilience ( CIPR ) Collaborate Risk Management with International Partners Synchronize Internal Programs and Activities 8 Objectives: -Communication and outreach strategy. (D and O (implement) -Strategic plan to incorporate environmental mission, coastal flood damage reduction program, and R&D. (pending) -Incorporate SES oversight at HQ: periodic meetings (pending) -FRM participation with other CoPs (3 for Infra) With external partners, align, coordinate and leverage FRM activities at a national scale -Re-established FIFM-TF (O) Draft 5 year work plan: wide range of initiatives, programs, and needs involved with promoting appropriate development and sustainment of the Nation’s floodplains and contributing watersheds. Strengthen State and Regional Partnerships -Sustain 20 Active state Silver Jackets teams + offering to another 28 states (D and O) -Sustain and enhance leadership of regional teams (list) Risk-Based Inspection and Assessment -Collaborated with Resource Agencies on vegetation standards, R&D, ESA -Develop levee safety risk analysis ranking and communication tools Enable Risk-Reducing Mitigation by Managing and Aligning Existing Programs -Better align PAS &FPMS with state and local flood hazard mitigation plans to: link delivery through intergovernmental partnerships (SJ) to states; and identify FPMS/PAS POC to oversee funds to support national flood risk objectives and initiatives. Update Flood Emergency, Flood Fighting and Rehabilitation to Account for Life-Cycle -PDT formed to review and revise ER500-1-1 series regulation. (D) Draft revision completion scheduled for June 2011.(O) Collaborate Risk Mgmnt with Internat’l Partners -Develop and maintain relationships with governments and other organizations internationally to encourage information exchange to improve flood risk management. (O) -Hosting international flood risk management workshop with foreign government agencies (Nov 2010)

Case Study : Indiana Inundation Study Joint development of flood inundation model using: NWS flood predictions USGS gage data USACE depth damage curves FEMA’s HAZUS data Create real-time model views of flood inundation areas and depths of flooding This model is being used by the Indiana Department of Natural Resources to manage and mitigate flood impacted areas and emergency response planning for NWS flood forecasts Real Time Flood Inundation Model -- Army Corps of Engineers has damage curves for flooding and has some riverine flood models. FEMA has HAZUS, a GIS based modeling tool that can estimate damage levels for selected streams, the states have construction data and structural value information for residential and commercial structures along the rivers. The USGS has access to water science products and stream gages and the National weather service has both real time rain information as well as the predictive information based on storm modeling. Each database/model was written with a different digital structure. By adding Indiana University with their super computer to the team and Purdue University’s computing sciences lab, a bridge program was written to draw the individual models, and programs together under a open architecture format and allow a person to run the program automatically upon demand in real time. The program, when river levels reach a set trigger point, will run automatically and provide both current inundation information as well as provide predictive information for response and mitigation actions. Overall cost for the pilot project was $750K. No one single agency neither had the funding nor the personnel to complete this project alone, yet with the collaboration of skills and funding, the pilot project was created using a minimal investment. The state of Indian is now seeking to apply the tool to multiple other rivers to assure that the modeling which works very well for the pilot project area can be applied to other water basins. The opportunity for major cost savings from damages avoided is tremendous.

Case Study: Louisa #11, Iowa Non-structural alternative to proposed structural repair Required cooperation of levees public sponsor, county and state mitigation agencies, USACE, and NRCS Combined over 300 acres of NRCS flood plain easements with significantly reduced structural repairs 1200 acres of formerly protected area returned to floodway RESULT: Improved environmental habit Increase flood storage capacity Continued protection of important state road HOWEVER, similar efforts in other areas of IA and IL could not be completed, as post-event time was not sufficient - need support for pre-planning through Silver Jackets Development of a non-structural alternative project in Louisa, IA that resulted in a non-structural alternative to a proposed structural repair. The alternative required the cooperation of the levees public sponsor, county and state mitigation agencies, the Corps and NRCS to implement. The alternative comprised of the combination of over 300 acres of NRCS flood plain easements with significantly reduced structural repairs to protect a state highway. As a result of the collaborative actions over 1200 acres of formerly protected area was returned to the floodway gaining not only improved environmental habit but increase flood storage capacity while continuing to protect an important state road. HOWEVER, similar efforts in other areas of IA and IL could not be completed, as sufficient time was not available post-event—need support for pre-planning

Revising Executive Order 11988 on Floodplain Management Draft Revised EO 11988 submitted to Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) summer 2009 Draft revision does not represent the Administration’s position Federal Interagency Floodplain Management Task Force ( FIFM-TF ) re-established in early 2010 FIFM-TF developing a 5-year work plan which will consider the need and sequencing for revising EO 11988 Work plan will be based on existing federal government floodplain management activities, programs, executive task forces and orders, and input from listening sessions Discussions ongoing to decide if EO 11988 will be revised BLUF: Administration has not et determined if EO 11988 should be revised. 1977 EO11988 Purpose: … avoid to the extent possible the long and short term adverse impacts associated with the occupancy and modification of floodplains and to avoid direct or indirect support of floodplain development wherever there is a practicable alternative,…. Scope: When federal agency is acquiring, managing. and disposing of Federal lands and facilities; providing Federally undertaken, financed, or assisted construction and improvements; and conducting Federal activities and programs affecting land use, including but not limited to water and related land resources planning, regulating, and licensing activities. 9

Questions ? ® US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG®