Activities and Resources Baseline Plan during construction and financing of the LHC (2003- 2010) Luciano MAIANI Council, December 13, 2002.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PEACE-KEEPING BUDGETS CURRENT PROCESS OF ESTABLISHING AND EXTENDING PEACE- KEEPING OPERATIONS A: New missions: 1.A Survey mission is sent to the area of.
Advertisements

US CMS DOE/NSF Review: May 8-10, US CMS Cost & Schedule Mark Reichanadter US CMS Project Engineer DOE/NSF Review 8 May 2001.
Management’s preliminary comments to the ERC Report.
Sue Foffano LCG Resource Manager WLCG – Resources & Accounting LHCC Comprehensive Review November, 2007 LCG.
LHCbComputing LHCb Computing Tasks. December Status of Computing Personnel m Currently available people insufficient to cover all activities o Estimate.
DOE/NSF U.S. CMS Operations Program Review Closeout Report Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory March 10, 2015 Anadi Canepa, TRIUMF Anna Goussiou, University.
Introduction to Facilities Management (FM). Facilities Management Benefits of FM for BSF Maximum benefits can be achieved by transferring all FM services.
October 24, 2000Milestones, Funding of USCMS S&C Matthias Kasemann1 US CMS Software and Computing Milestones and Funding Profiles Matthias Kasemann Fermilab.
Understanding Financial Management
LCG Milestones for Deployment, Fabric, & Grid Technology Ian Bird LCG Deployment Area Manager PEB 3-Dec-2002.
12 Dec 2005 J. Schukraft1 ALICE USA ALICE position towards US participation EU participation in emcal Requirements Formal steps & schedule.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Kaname Ikeda, October Status of the ITER Project Status of the ITER Project Kaname Ikeda ITER Nominee Director-General October 2006.
Impact on Project Planning and Cost. Agenda CERN Project Budget Planning Summary E. Gschwendtner, 9 April
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Budgeting Statistical Projects Section A 1.
In-Kind Contribution Management Update Allen Weeks March 20, Lund.
SuperB. SuperB has been approved as the first in a list of 14 “flagship” projects within the new national research plan. The national research plan has.
U.S. MICE Schedule, Cost, & Risks Peter H. Garbincius Mark Palmer, Alan Bross, Rich Krull Fermilab Presented at RAL – November 13, 2013.
23 October 2001 RRB-131 Draft Budget for CMS M&O and C&I in 2002 Draft Budget for CMS Maintenance & Operation and Commissioning & Integration in the Year.
Rackspace Analyst Event Tim Bell
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Project Baseline Jim Yeck NSLS-II Deputy Project Director NSLS-II PAC Meeting November 20, 2007.
John Peoples for the DES Collaboration BIRP Review August 12, 2004 Tucson1 DES Management  Survey Organization  Survey Deliverables  Proposed funding.
27-March-10 LCWS10 - Beijing Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish LCWS10 - Beijing 27-March-10 “Cost Containment” for the TDR.
Presentation to the Information Services Board March 6, 2008 Bill Kehoe, Chief Information Officer Bill Kehoe, Chief Information Officer.
Subcommittee on Design New Strategies for Cost Estimating Research on Cost Estimating and Management NCHRP Project 8-49 Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida.
Status Update Outline  General remarks - reminder  Progress since last Annual Meeting – June 2010  Next steps - timeline EUROnu Costing Ilias Efthymiopoulos.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
1 EURO REPORTING – Doing Business With The EC –. 2 Index  Relationship Overview  The FAFA Principles  Gain/Loss Scenarios  Financial Risk  Possible.
Geographical Enlargement of CERN Associate membership Principles and criteria S. Intoudi / 8 July
PS Days, January 2001 The “Plan” B.W.Allardyce The Medium Term Plan is presented at the June FC meeting by the Management and covers 4 years (I.e. in June.
ITWG Topical Workshop Management of Instrumentation Projects 19 to 21 May 2014 Rolf Lindner.
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
LHCbComputing Manpower requirements. Disclaimer m In the absence of a manpower planning officer, all FTE figures in the following slides are approximate.
Activities and news Last meeting: 2015 CERN budget allocations as expected, now distributed on accounts Annual report done, and MTP (Medium Term Plan)
1 Eurostat’s grant policy for 2010 Luxembourg, 23/03/2010 Unit A4 – Financial Management Section 3 – Grant procedures and agreements.
Medium Term Plan, with a Long Term Projection to 2010 L. Maiani. CERN Finance Committee June 19, 2002.
Management’s preliminary comments to the ERC Report FINANCE COMMITTEE June 19, 2002.
Plan to go forward Peter Wilson SBN Program Coordinator 27 September 2014.
1 Future Circular Collider Study Preparatory Collaboration Board Meeting September 2014 R-D Heuer Global Future Circular Collider (FCC) Study Goals and.
TALK TO THE CERN STAFF Luciano MAIANI December 17, 2002.
Opening CERN to non-European States (aka as ‘geographical enlargement’) Rüdiger Voss CERN International Relations Office FPRIB, SINP Kolkata| April 16-18,
November 27, 2001DOE/NSF review of US LHC S&C projects1 The Software and Computing Committee (SC2) in the LHC Computing Grid Project M Kasemann, FNAL.
CERN Education and Communication (ETT/EC) James Gillies 4 April 2003.
LHC Computing, SPC-FC-CC-C; H F Hoffmann1 CERN/2379/Rev: Proposal for building the LHC computing environment at CERN (Phase 1) Goals of Phase.
ECFA - European Commitee for Future Accelerators Tatsuya Nakada – EPFL, Switzerland– prepared for CERN September Council presented by.
Status of Contributions, Draft Budget Request for 2005 and Outlook for the Longer Term Future Martyn Davenport 8 TH October 2004 CAST FRC-D
WLCG Status Report Ian Bird Austrian Tier 2 Workshop 22 nd June, 2010.
CERN GS Department CH-1211 Genève 23 Switzerland cern.ch/gs-dep Internet Services GS AIS General Services Department GS Advanced Information Services EVM.
European Spallation Source Overview and Status Technical Advisory Committee 1-2 April 2015 James H. Yeck ESS CEO & Director General
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
ELIXIR Financial Documentation Working Group Report and Proposal.
Workshop summary Outline  Workshop’s aims  Highlights from the presentations (my selection!)  Costing Exercise – What we learnt  Summary - Roadmap.
K. Long, 25 June, 2016 IDR: structure and overall timeline: Slides are to introduce discussion of how we prepare IDR. Propose to revise slides as we discuss.
J. Templon Nikhef Amsterdam Physics Data Processing Group “Grid” Computing J. Templon SAC, 26 April 2012.
1. Baseline – from LMC  Presentation by F. Bordry at LHC Machine Committee 5.10 on LS1 Organisation: 1. Linac4 is not going to be connected.
Management’s preliminary comments to the ERC Report COMMITTEE OF COUNCIL June 20, 2002.
Completion and Pre-Exploitation Costs for the Initial ATLAS Detector
Options for association and collaboration with CERN
4th FRC meeting, Antti Onnela, CERN-PH-DT
Ways to industry participation in CLIC 24th October, 2017
MICE Project in the US: Completion of Efforts
Process of the 2nd update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics FCC week, 29 May 2017, Berlin Sijbrand de Jong, President of the CERN Council (slides.
Financial Status and proposed Budget for 2019
Department of Licensing HP 3000 Replatforming Project Closeout Report
Delta Water Supply Project
Scientific Policy Committee
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Africa Centers of Excellence (ACE II) Project Financial & Disbursement Management NAIROBI, May 13 14,2019.
LHC Computing, RRB; H F Hoffmann
Presentation transcript:

Activities and Resources Baseline Plan during construction and financing of the LHC ( ) Luciano MAIANI Council, December 13, 2002

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan2 INTRODUCTION The Baseline Plan for the construction and financing of the LHC project ( ), Doc. SPC/818/FC/4629, aims at providing a solid basis for the completion of the LHC and a corresponding revision of the 1996 agreement This document marks the conclusion of the complex processes set in motion by the LHC Cost to Completion Review made in 2001 It builds on a very large amount of work (Task Forces, ERC, Medium Term Plan June 2002, Action Plan, September 2002);

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan3 Throughout the process, a consistent picture has been developed by CERN Management whereby the Plan would contain a balanced package of measures: Reduction of non-LHC programme and savings Revision of the LHC schedule, to follow the industrial production; Prolongation of the LHC repayment period to First proposals made by CERN Management in March have been finalised in the Medium Term Plan presented in June.

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan4 The Plan is finalised to the construction and financing of the LHC; it provides a base-line only, certainly not an optimal picture of what CERN could do for European Particle Physics in the long run; CERN’s know-how and infrastructure under used. We hope Council may reconsider the scientific activities, with more resources added (P&M!)

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan5 Seven Pillars Activity Programme MTP 2002 (SPC/811; FC/4567) LHC in 2007; Limited scientific and R&D programme. Resource Plan: MaterialMTP 2002 (SPC/811; FC/4567) LHC cost to completion; Contingency Savings in Industrial Services Local Staff: M  P transfer if established. Resource Plan: Manpower CERN/FC/4628 CERN-wide analysis for the period 2— Indexation of the expenditure budget during the LHC construction periodCERN/FC/4619/Rev. Builds a margin against cost escalation of LHC contracts Monitoring and Control Tools Action Plan (FC/4591; CC/2461) Finance and Programme Control; Earned Value Management; Annual LHC Cost & Schedule Review, first results; Audit Committee. Indexation of MS/HS Contributions over the periodthis document Indexation to keep purchasing power over Loan from the EIBFC/4608 (recommended by FC, Nov.6)

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan6 2. Scientific Activity of CERN, The phasing out of a broad scientific programme has continued after LEP2000. Today, the whole of CERN is committed to the LHC, with a limited number of ring-fenced parallel activities To keep a minimum of scientific diversity To preserve vital options for CERN’s future

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan7 Resources for the LHC , Personnel+Material

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan8 LHC Experiments LHC experiments fully engaged in the construction phase, to have detectors ready for the LHC physics run in Experiments have agreed to live within the limits of the pledged funds at any time. ALICE, ATLAS and CMS. Contingency plans, compatible with the available funds have been reviewed by the LHCC and presented to the RRBs Plans include staging and deferrals of items that will only be needed later, for high-luminosity running. No cost over-run has been identified so far by LHCb.

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan9 LHC Computing Of particular interest, the work on computing facilities for physics data analysis and computational Grids, and on advanced electronics techniques for detector readout systems. The R&D phase (phase 1) of the LHC Computing Grid (LCG) project started in The construction phase (phase 2) of the LCG project will extend over Catalyse the development of data-intensive Grid computing, pursuing open solutions to fulfill the challenging requirements of science at CERN's Large Hadron Collider; Open environment where investments on applied research for data-intensive Grid computing can be made by government, academia and industry.

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan10 The Scientific Programme Budget line for Fixed Target Experiments established from 2006 onwards dotted lines = = extensions yet to be approved

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan11 The experimental programme described above implies the support of a large number of external users. about 6500 registered CERN users (4750 of which are from the Member States) in On average some 2000 of these people are on site at any one time, requiring support of one kind or another. This demonstrates the vitality of the scientific programme of the Organization but also inevitably places a heavy burden on the infrastructure. Users

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan12 3. Budget Estimates Basically coincide with those given in the Medium Term Plan, June 2002, in particular for the scientific programme, the cost to completion of the LHC and the CERN share to Detector construction. Fully consistent with the Draft Budget for 2003

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan13 Tab. 1A. CERN share of LHC Detectors: all-out estimate Includes cost escalation of contracts and PE cost Gives an absolute ceiling to the total cost to CERN (current money) Total CERN share of detectors construction+C&I Common construction, C&I, M&O Cost Escalation21 TOTAL MATERIALS463 Personnel GRAND TOTAL Indexation of PE cost

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan14 Tab. 6A. LHC construction: all-out estimate Includes cost escalation of contracts and PE cost Gives an absolute ceiling to the total cost to CERN (current prices) Total Machine Hardware, Installation & Experimental Areas Test & Preoperation (includes additional infrastructures, 94 MCHF) LHC Injectors Contingency140 Cost Escalation of contracts191 TOTAL MATERIALS3743 Personnel GRAND TOTAL Indexation of PE cost

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan15 Annual LHC Cost&Schedule Review Committee –J. Peoples (FNAL), Chair –R. Bacher (DESY) –M. Cox (JET) –M. Harrison (BNL) –M. Pannier (Min. Finances, France) –A. Wrulich (PSI) Met on Oct. 21 to 23 Conclusions to be included in the December 2002 LHC Status Report. Committee was asked to respond to three issues whether the LHC Project Cost-to-Completion could be used as a baseline cost estimate for tracking project cost performance; whether current project schedule could be used as a baseline schedule for tracking project performance; to evaluate the tools that project team currently uses and plans to use to monitor the cost and schedule performance.

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan16 Recommendations (Dec. 1, 2002) –that CERN Management adopt the LHC Project Cost-to-Completion estimate (hereafter Cost-to-Completion) of 3,220 MCHF, as the project cost baseline for tracking the project cost performance for the remainder of the project. –that CERN Management adopt the current project schedule that forecasts the start of commissioning on April 2007 for tracking the project schedule performance for the remainder of the project. –that the LHC project team continue to use the project tools that are currently in use and that they quickly move to complete and deploy the proposed earned value system (EVM), since it will provide additional tools to closely monitor cost and schedule performance. Note: 3220=

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan17 Extra costs (wrt. Dec. 2001) submitted to the Comittee “ The Project Director informed the Committee that two cost overruns had occurred since the Cost-to-Completion had been prepared. These were 9 MCHF in civil engineering and 7 MCHF in magnet cryostats.” Are reported in the LHC Status Report, Dec.2002 To be added to the Cost to Completion and compensated from the contingency, in next MTP, June 2003

4. Income and related Budgetary Balance 4.1 Regular Contribution The level of the annual contribution base is MCHF at 1995 prices (Council, Dec. 1994) This basis reduced by 9.3% (in stages) to reach MCHF, at 1995 prices, from 2001 onwards. The regular contribution is the sum of this base and of the contributions to the budget of six Member States. Planning proceeds on the basis of a 2% cost-variation increase per year model for expenditure. From 1998 to 2005 inclusive, the Host States’ contribution are indexed by 2% per year while the regular contributions of the other Member States are indexed by 1%. From 2006 onwards, we ask Council to “make its best effort to index the regular contributions according to the calculated overall Cost Variation Index”.

Tab. 10. Anticipated Budgetary Position (MCHF, current prices) Advanced contributions from MS can ease the burden of the interests cost…and liberate resources for new activities!

Council. Dec. 12, 2002L. MAIANI. Baseline Plan20 6. CONCLUSIONS The Baseline Plan is the result of an impressive amount of work during the last year, by CERN Staff, the ERC and other external collaborators; A very detailed and solid evaluation of programmes, resources (P and M) and costs; A stable cost estimate of the LHC programme; The Plan provides a tough but solid and viable basis for the LHC completion in 2007.