Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 15, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Null Hypothesis : The dynamics of the forest ecosystem will not be affected by the fire. Hypothesis 1 : The fires will have a considerable effect on the.
Advertisements

H EURISTIC S OLVER  Builds and tests alternative fuel treatment schedules (solutions) at each iteration  In each iteration:  Evaluates the effects of.
Welcome Chequamegon National Forest, Wisconsin FARSITE and HARVEST model Interactive By Jacob LaCroix, LEES Lab, UT Introduction Introduction Introduction.
Figure 3. Outlines of the study with links between different components used. The figure presents the main inputs and outputs from the model used (Glob3PG)
Rapid River Schools FOREST ECOLOGY “Conservation is a state of harmony between men and land.” “A Sand County Almanac” Aldo Leopold
BUSHFIRES IN AUSTRALIA
Evaluating landscape flammability through simulation modeling Marc Parisien 1, Victor Kafka 2, Bernie Todd 1, Kelvin Hirsch 1, and Suzanne Lavoie 1 1 Canadian.
Habitat Fragmentation By Kaushik Mysorekar. Objective To enlighten the causes and consequences of habitat fragmentation followed by few recommendations.
Examining fire spread patterns across a managed forest-land mosaic in northern Wisconsin, USA using a modeling approach Jacob LaCroix, Daolan Zheng, Soung-Ryoul.
Carbon Information Needed to Support Forest Management Bob Davis, Director Of Planning, Watershed And Air, USDA Forest Service 0.
Interagency Prescribed Fire Training/ Fire Ecology and Management, University of Florida Ignition Techniques (adapted from FL DOF)
Principles of Landscape Ecology ENVS*3320 Instructors: Dr. Shelley Hunt (Module 1) Rm. 2226, Bovey Building x53065 Dr. Rob Corry (Module.
Landscape Hazard Assessment Past Approaches and Current Modeling Tools.
Scale What is scale? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? What are the correct scales to use? Scaling:  UP: bottom-up approach  Down: top-down.
Landscape Planning for Fuel Reduction and Forest Restoration Alan Ager, PNW Research Station, Western Wildlands Environmental Threat Assessment Center,
Scale & Scaling What is scale? What is scale? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? Why is scale important in landscape ecology? What are the correct.
Salmon recovery does not just mean more fish Management decisions are driven by politics & logistics—science can only contribute if we provide technically.
FOREST STRUCTURE AND DEVELOPMENT Stand Dynamics and Succession
Solar input. Slope and aspect Temperature- big scale variation.
1 Spatially Explicit Burn Probability across A Landscape in Extreme Fire Weather Year Wenbin Cui, David L. Martell Faculty of Forestry, University of Toronto.
CHAPTER 50 AN INTRODUCTION TO ECOLOGY AND THE BIOSPERE Copyright © 2002 Pearson Education, Inc., publishing as Benjamin Cummings Section B2: Factors Affecting.
Habitat Reserves 1.What are they? 2.Why do we need them? 3.How do we design them?
ESRM 450 Wildlife Ecology and Conservation FOREST PATTERN Managing Stands, Landscapes, and Habitat.
Climate and Climate Change
An overview of a few of the methods used in landscape ecology studies.
Monitoring for Sustainability at Multiple Scales Thomas W. Hoekstra Director Inventory and Monitoring Institute.
Climate Change: SEAFWA Thoughts? Ken Haddad, Executive Director Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission September 2007.
Using Birds to Guide Post-fire Management in the Plumas & Lassen National Forests Ryan D. Burnett, Nathaniel Seavy, and Diana Humple 4/21/2011.
FireBGCv2: A research simulation platform for exploring fire, vegetation, and climate dynamics Robert Keane Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Rocky Mountain.
These three elements form a “fire triangle.” Heat Oxygen Fuel.
The Vegetation Module Seth Bigelow, Malcolm North Sierra Nevada Research Center, USDA-FS Pacific SW Research Stn, UC Davis Dept of Plant Sciences.
1) Hot air is heavier than cold air. TRUE or FALSE?
PERD POL Toronto Jan. 23, 2003 Estimating the effects of climate change on large scale natural disturbances, and their impact on biomass productivity.
Truckee Ecological Restoration the evolution of project design Tahoe National Forest, Truckee Ranger District PSW Sagehen Experimental Forest UC Berkeley.
Final term paper: Your final term paper will be on linkages between species and land mosaics. An emphasis of landscape dynamics, ownership, disturbance,
The HIBECO Model Summary of final results Arild O. Gautestad*, Frans E. Wielgolaski*, Birger Solberg** and Ivar Mysterud* * Department of Biology, University.
Space, Relativity, and Uncertainty in Ecosystem Assessment of Everglades Restoration Scenarios Michael M. Fuller, Louis J. Gross, Scott M. Duke-Sylvester,
Managing Patch Edge Fuel Effects Fire Spread in a Fragmented Landscape By: Jacob J. LaCroix, Soung- Ryoul Ryu, Qinglin Li, Daolan Zheng, and Jiquan Chen.
The impacts of land mosaics and human activity on ecosystem productivity Jeanette Eckert.
EEES4760/6760 Landscape Ecology Jiquan chen Feb. 25, Fragmentation 2.Island Biogeographic Theory (IBT)
Natural Disturbance and Environmental Assessments in the Oil Sands Region Linda Halsey April 2012.
Fire in Florida’s Ecosystems A program of the Florida Division of Forestry Implemented by Pandion Systems For more information: Welcome.
Edge Corridor (road) Patch Matrix LANDSCAPE MOSAIC.
Jeopardy VocabularyDefinitionListingClimate Zones DBQ $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
A Decision Making Tool for Sustainable Forestry: Harvest Patterns and Biodiversity Risk J.M. Reed 1, D.W. DesRochers 1, and S.H. Levine 2 1 Biology Dept,
Landscape ecology methods
Essential Questions What are the characteristics of populations and how they are distributed? What are the differences between density-independent and.
1972 – 2001 Landscape Dynamics Wisconsin ha ( ac)
1 Aika Yano, Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Armistead Russell Georgia Institute of Technology October 15, th annual CMAS conference.
1.Define a landscape. What is the focus of Landscape Ecology. Notes 2. Discuss the role of spatial and temporal scale in affecting landscape composition,
Introduction to Models Lecture 8 February 22, 2005.
Landscape Ecology (EEES4760 & EEES6760) DES, University of Toledo, Spring 2009 Instructor: Dr. Jiquan Chen, Ph: ;
Disturbance and Reserve Design Neville Handel Fall 2005.
Spatial distribution of mature and old forest Dave Daust, Feb 25.
Lesson 1: What is Weather?
Estimating fuel loading under various disturbance regimes and vegetation types in Northern Wisconsin forest landscape Class presentation, Mar Soung-Ryoul.
Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 20, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes.
Welcome Chequamegon National Forest, Wisconsin and FARSITE Surface Fire Interactive By Jacob LaCroix, LEES Lab, UT ► Introduction Introduction ► Fire Spread.
Ecology & Management of Disturbed Landscapes Challenges and Opportunities Jiquan Chen Landscape Ecology & Ecosystem Science University of Toledo Apr 16,
Julia Touza-Montero and Charles Perrings Environment Department, University of York Policies for the management of landscape diversity and collectively.
Climate Sensitivity Succession Regime Shifts Integration Current Proposal: The Dynamics of Change Next Proposal (due in < 4 years!!) Human Dimensions K-12.
Wildfires in Florida David T. Butry US Forest Service Marcia L. Gumpertz North Carolina State University Marc G. Genton Texas A&M University Funding provided.
POLICY, PLANNING, & MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVES S-244 Field Observer & Fire Effects Monitor Goals Objectives Monitoring.
JOINT FIRE SCIENCE PROGRAM 2015 FUNDING CALL October 9, 2014.
What are they? What do they do?
What are they? What do they do?
Jiquan Chen Kim Brosofske Asko Noormets Tom Crow Soung Ryu Many others
X y y = x2 - 3x Solutions of y = x2 - 3x y x –1 5 –2 –3 6 y = x2-3x.
Population Ecology.
Landscape ecology methods
Presentation transcript:

Landscape Management & Harvest Model A Case Studies from Chequamegon National Forest EEES4760/6760 April 15, 2009 HARVEST used to simulate different landscapes Fire spread in different land mosaics Local and landscape diversity under different landscape mosaics

Landscape Management: Landscape Management: Managing landscapes in space and time. Harvest Model Harvest Model ( was designed as a strategic research and planning tool, allowing assessment of the spatial pattern consequences of broad timber management strategies. The model is well suited to evaluate alternative strategies, providing comparable predictions about how the alternatives affect the age (or successional stage) distribution and forest type composition of the forest, the spatial distribution of forest interior and edge habitats, and the patch structure of the resulting forest landscape. With HARVEST, the object is not to find a scheduling solution (i.e., determining the order in which individual stands should be harvested), but to assess the spatial pattern consequences of general management strategies.

Simulating fire spread with landscape management scenarios Jacob J. LaCroix, Soung-Ryoul Ryu, Daolan Zheng and Jiquan Chen Forest Science, 2006 Objectives: 1) 1)To simulat fire spread on five landscapes, each with a different structure resulting from harvest simulations using HARVEST, 2) 2)To xamined how weather (rain and wind) affects fire spread on all five landscapes, and 3) 3)To explored spatial variation among fires ignited in different parts of the landscape (i.e., different mosaics).

Washburn Ranger District of the Chequamegon National Forest, Wisconsin

Simulations: The current landscape was considered as the non-harvested (i.e., control) to be compared with four other hypothetical landscapes created with the HARVEST model: two types of harvesting methods, clustered (C) and dispersed (D) patterns and two levels of amount of harvest (i.e., 2% & 4% harvest of the total landscape) Mean wind speed was 8 km/hour from multiple directions. The mean temperature for this time was 18.1 o C. Humidity varied from 43% to 99% Rain and wind were set to increase by 100% and decrease by 50% to simulate the highs and lows within the range that occurred over the past 100 years The nine combinations of the weather were applied equally to each of the five landscapes at the same 12 ignition locations, resulting in a total of 540 simulations

One simulated fire

HarvestPercent area in each fuel type Landscape AreaUnitsBrushPineHardwoodSlashMPSAWMSI (ha)(#)(5)(8)(10)(11)(ha) Control N/A D C D C Landscape structure among the five landscapes generated from combinations of two levels and two methods of harvesting

LocationControlD2C2D4C4 (ha) (113)3566 (115)3551 (110)3514 (107)3530 (93) (153)3931 (147)3956 (149)3998 (145)3906 (153) (250)5409 (244)5355 (235)5330 (250)5297 (250) (130)4578 (84)4368 (163)4430 (135)4399 (160) (104)4170 (102)4221 (119)4202 (118)4135 (95) (135)4222 (133)4213 (136)4180 (136)4166 (130) (142)4864 (160)4805 (164)4815 (155)4781 (139) (75)1648 (73)1647 (74)1649 (75) (118)3244 (118)3207 (119)3195 (117)3209 (101) (189)3860 (164)3876 (183)3818 (164)3810 (166) (176)4029 (162)4056 (168)3961 (181)3951 (175) (154)3725 (152)3722 (151)3700 (144)3724 (158) Mean STD Minimum Maximum The mean burned area of five different landscapes at each fire-ignition location

Effect of landscape structure caused by harvesting on burned area (ha).

The influence of location on the area of fire spread

Burned area among five landscapes by changing rainfall