External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLEMENTING EABS MODERNIZATION Patrick J. Sweeney School Administration Consultant Educational Approval Board November 15, 2007.
Advertisements

Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator Best Practices: Program Review TCUs Chief Academic Officers Annual Meeting.
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study) Flex Activity March 1, 2012 Lassen Community College.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
 The Middle States Commission on Higher Education is a voluntary, non-governmental, membership association that is dedicated to quality assurance and.
Academic Assessment Report for the Academic Year Antioch University New England Office of Academic Assessment Tom Julius, Ed.D., Director Submitted.
Graduate Program Review Where We Are, Where We Are Headed and Why Duane K. Larick, Associate Graduate Dean Presentation to Directors of Graduate Programs.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Association for Biblical Higher Education February 13, 2013 Lori Jo Stanfield Evaluator Team Training for Business Officers.
Basic Workshop For Reviewers NQAAC Recognize the developmental engagements Ensure that they operate smoothly and effectively” Ensure that all team members.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
Institutional Accreditation: What is it? Higher Learning Commission accredits degree- granting institutions in the North Central region. Assurance to the.
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
What could we learn from learning outcomes assessment programs in the U.S public research universities? Samuel S. Peng Center for Educational Research.
Florida Tech’s University Assessment Committee For A Continuing Culture of Assessment.
Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science Review and Planning Process Fall 1998.
SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation 7/28/09 Academic Affairs Retreat Cathy Sanders Director of Assessment.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
SACS Leadership Retreat 9/23/ Western Carolina University SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation Frank Prochaska Executive Director, UNC Teaching.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Policy 2320: A Process for Improving Education: Performance- Based Accreditation System RESA 6 – October, 2014 Office.
The Quality Enhancement Plan from a SACSCOC Perspective 1 Leadership Orientation for 2016-A Institutions January 27, 2014 Michael S. Johnson Senior Vice.
Continuous Improvement. Focus of the Review: Continuous Improvement The unit will engage in continuous improvement between on-site visits. Submit annual.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Accreditation Update and Institutional Student Learning Outcomes Deborah Moeckel, SUNY Assistant Provost SCoA Drive in Workshops Fall 2015
Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.
SPC Advisory Committee Training - TAC Fall 2015 Institutional Research President’s Office 1 Abridged from the SPC Advisory Committee Training on October.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
1 Learning Outcomes Assessment: An Overview of the Process at Texas State Beth Wuest Director, Academic Development and Assessment Lisa Garza Director,
Council for the Advancement of Standards in Higher Education CAS Standards and Self- Assessment in Higher Education Tony Ellis, CAE Director of Education,
August 2, Welcome Who is the TSD Continuous Improvement Team ? What is the work of the TSD Continuous Improvement Team? What is.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Program Review 2.0 Pilot 2 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
What is Regional Accreditation? Regional Accreditation is a time-tested model of professional peer review that supports education excellence. Accreditation.
Council March PREVIOUS Reductionistic Whole = Sum of the Parts A Snapshot of the institution at a specific moment in time NEW Synergistic Whole.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Assessment Committee 20 October Self Evaluation HAPS is the result of a process that began in 2012, the last Accreditation self- evaluation.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
 Julie Bruno, Sierra College  Roberta Eisel, Citrus College  Fred Hochstaedter, Monterey Peninsula College.
Anna Parkman New Faculty Orientation ◦ ACCOUNTABILITY in Higher Education ◦ ASSESSMENT as validation of learning ◦ ASSESSMENT & ACCREDITATION ◦
1 Institutional Quality and Accreditation: A Workshop on the Basics.
Academic Program Review Workshop 2017
What it means for New Teachers
Dutchess Community College Middle States Self-Study 2015
The Application Process Understanding the IERs (Institutional Eligibility Requirements ) 2106 TRACS Annual Conference.
SACSCOC Fifth-Year Readiness Audit
Presenters: Lisa McLaughlin, Institutional Data Coordinator
Continuous Improvement through Accreditation AdvancED ESA Accreditation MAISA Conference January 27, 2016.
2017 Annual CRLA Conference November 2, 2017 Pittsburgh, PA
Overview of the FEPAC Accreditation Process
Sam Houston State University
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Introduction to the training
Associate Provost for Graduate and Professional Studies
Orientation to the Accreditation Internal Evaluation (Self-Study)
Roles and Responsibilities
February 21-22, 2018.
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Roles and Responsibilities
Sam Houston State University
Fort Valley State University
PROGRAM REVIEW PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment

Governed by AR II Three Major Components: –Self Study –External Review –Implementation Plan Program Review at UK

Process Flowchart & Timeline

Purpose of External Review Provides an external perspective regarding the quality & effectiveness of the unit’s programs, services, resources, processes, and operations Assures an objective, unbiased assessment [Revised AR II-1.0-6, Part 3, Section I, p. 14]

Guidelines for Accreditation Review Substitutions Review occurs at least once every 5-7 years (every 4-5 years for programs on a 8-10 year cycle) Mission areas not addressed in accreditation reports are submitted as addendum Includes outcomes assessment; student learning outcomes are essential for academic programs Demonstrates broad-based involvement of faculty, staff, and/or students [Revised AR II-1.0-6, Part 3, Section I E 4, p. 19]

External Team Uses… Accreditation self-study and team report Addendum addressing areas not covered by accreditation [Revised AR II-1.0-6, Part 3, Section I E 4 a-b, p. 19]

Tasks of the External Team 1.Examine the self-study report or accreditation reports 2.Engage in additional information-seeking, as needed 3.Confirm the validity of conclusions given in the self-study (if appropriate) 4.Identify additional strengths and recommendations for quality enhancements 5.Prepare a final report with recommendations [Revised AR II-1.0-6, Part 3, Section I D 2, p. 17]

Self-Study Elements (1 of 3) Program documents: Strategic plan, organizational chart and previous annual reports Resources: Summary information about budget, facilities, equipment and human resources (numbers & demographics on staff and faculty) Evaluation of quality and productivity Analysis of strengths and recommendations for quality enhancements [Revised AR II-1.0-6, Part 3, Section I D 1, p ]

Self-Study Elements (2 of 3) Evaluation of quality and productivity: evidence of… –adherence to university policies –adherence to academic policies (grading, probation, & termination) –quality of the collegial environment (equity & diversity) –quality & productivity in instruction, research, public service, and/or operations [Revised AR II-1.0-6, Part 3, Section I D 1, p ]

Self-Study Elements (3 of 3) …evidence of quality and productivity in instruction, research, public service, and/or operations, including, as appropriate, the quality of:  faculty and staff  orientation & advising programs for undergraduate, graduate, and professional students  student learning outcomes  customer/client satisfaction  business & operating procedures [Revised AR II-1.0-6, Part 3, Section I D 1, p ]

The External Team Report Describes team process and findings Identifies opportunities for quality enhancements in terms of programs & services Identifies possible strategies to achieve enhancements Notes resources needed to follow-through on strategies Recommends timeline for addressing issues Is delivered to administrative agent to whom unit reports

Uses of External Team Report Unit head and appropriate administrative agent discuss findings Faculty, staff and students receive access to report Unit head and unit members negotiate & approve an implementation plan to address recommendations & revise strategic plan Unit’s budget plans and decisions reflect implementation plan

This required form is described as Appendix A in AR II-I.0.6. Program Review Implementation Plan College/Unit : Research/Kentucky Water Resources Research Institute Date: October 2004

External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment