Stakeholder Activity Shaping Future Work Programmes Catherine Simm and Laura Dunaway

Session Format Plan ‘A’ was to ask you to vote using handsets. Today we are using plan ‘B’! Ask you to discuss in tables and give feedback. Results used to inform priorities over next 3 years. Feedback given via regional networks and newsletters.

Structure 3 Sections Career Framework Building organisational capability in workforce planning and modernisation The Evidence Base Each table will be asked to look at one section (15 mins) Results collated and fedback.

Assumptions Respond thinking about your organisation or give your opinion. Think about next 3 years No right or wrong answers Your views 8 Facilitators available Give a consensus in tables

Should the development of Assistant /Associate Practitioner roles continue to be a focus? 1.Yes, these are a priority. 2.No, these are mainstream. 3.Partly, but equal weight given to other priorities.

Should the development of Advanced Practitioner roles continue to be a focus? 1.Yes, these are a priority. 2.No, these are mainstream. 3.Partly, but equal weight given to other priorities.

How should the issue of regulation for APs move forward? 1.Wait until there is a national decision 2.Interim, regional approach, employer led, voluntary register 3.Lack of regulation not a barrier to developing the role.

How should the issue of regulation for Advanced Practitioners move forward? 1.Wait until there is a national decision 2.Interim, regional approach, employer led, voluntary register 3.Lack of regulation not a barrier to developing the role.

Where in the Career Framework are your main Workforce Challenges? 1.Bands Band 4 3.Band 5 4.Band 6 5.Band 7 6.Band 8a/b 7.Band 8 c/d 8.Band 9

Modernising Scientific Careers (MSC) is a national priority. How will it affect your workforce? 1.We have begun to look at the impact it will have. 2.We know it will have an impact but not sure what this will be. 3.We are aware of it but would like to know more. 4.We don’t have any scientific roles.

End of section 1

Is there still work to be done around raising awareness of AP/AdP roles? 1.Yes, still a need to raise awareness 2.No need to raise awareness 3.No, current focus is on embedding roles and maximising benefits.

How has your organisation benefitted most from the regional Workforce Modernisation Network? 1.Seeing how new roles operate elsewhere 2.Sharing blockages 3.Sharing strategy/approach 4.Debating issues 5.Understanding the processes 6.Developing knowledge/expertise

There have been a number of outputs from the networks, which has been most valuable for your organisation? 1.Guidance / policy documents 2.Task and finish group work 3. Showcasing events 4. Joint meetings with planners 5. Topical guest speakers

Which of the following would you like to see more of from the WM Hub? 1.Workshops and master classes 2.Short webinars 3.Showcasing events, sharing practice across the region 4.Focussed work around specialities/pathways 5.Policy and Guidance

Would you like to see the work of the NW WM Hub focused around particular clinical pathways? 1.Yes 2.No, pathway work is not my preference 3.Yes, particularly cross organisation working

Which of the following would you most like help with to meet QIPP challenges? 1.Service redesign 2.Approaches to workforce planning 3.Skill mix review 4.Role redesign

Should the NW WM Hub continue to address clinical/direct care roles only? 1.Yes 2.No, it should incorporate support services 3.No, it should incorporate medical roles 4.No, it should incorporate all health and social care roles

End of Section 2

There is a range of evidence to support implementing new roles. Which is most useful? 1.Knowledge management and benchmarking data (eWIN) 2.Evaluation reports 3.Case Studies 4.Journal articles

Which additional things would you value most? 1.Consensus events 2.Benefits realisation framework 3.Senior Managers Briefings 4.Newsletters/bulletins/fact sheets 5.Webex based resources

What is the biggest barrier to collecting evidence and assessing impact for your own internal evaluation? 1.Identifying baseline information 2.Knowing what to measure/audit 3.Don’t see the need to audit 4.Isolating the impact of the new role in a team environment

Would you welcome further support with work based learning? 1.Yes 2.Yes, including stronger partnership working 3.Yes, around assessment of competency 4.Yes, around mentor preparation 5.No, thank you