Special Education Compliance Monitoring. 3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results.
Advertisements

NCLB Consolidated Monitoring Integrated Approach to Title III Monitoring.
Compliance Monitoring Orientation. Monitoring Components Focus Site Review/Fiscal Monitoring SPAM.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
A Multi-Year Improvement System and Schedule
MN CIMP 2012 COMPLIANCE FOR PARTS OF THE IEP. Compliance Self-Check.
ESEA Program Review Russ Sweet Preparing for ESEA Program Reviews of Titles I-A, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2014.
Special Education Compliance Monitoring Cohort 3 Onsite monitoring
1 Audits of State Compliance Monitoring Systems Presented by Thomas Murphy, State Representative, OJJDP.
How to Prepare for a FTCA Site Visit Office Hours
Special Education Accountability Reviews Let’s put the pieces together March 25, 2015.
On-Site School Review All-Staff Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY14) February 24, 2015 Office of Educator Effectiveness Aviva Baff Isadora Choute Cynthia Mompoint Deborah.
Disciplining Students with Disabilities Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013 Monitoring and Program Effectiveness.
Tennessee Department of Education Compliance Training February 2012 Department of Exceptional Children.
Verification Visit by the Office of Special Education Programs (OSEP) September 27-29, 2010.
Planning Interview Process March 2011
Intro to Positive Behavior Interventions & Supports (PBiS)
Writing Compliant ETRs State Approved Training Module
Overview Continuous Improvement & Focus Monitoring.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
On-Site School Review Leadership Meeting An asset-building model of school improvement... Presenters: ___________________________ The High-Performing School.
CIMP & DUE PROCESS POINTERS It’ that time again… Anoka-Hennepin participates in the Continuous Improvement Monitoring Process supported by.
All students shall be reading on grade level by the end of second grade. Reading and Math proficiency shall increase a minimum of 5 percentage points.
SPR&I: Changes, New Measures/Targets, and Lessons Learned from Focused Monitoring Visits David Guardino, SPR&I Coordinator Fall 2009 COSA Conference.
Monitoring for Equal Opportunity and Compliance Evelyn Rodriguez EO Officer, Washington State Employment Security Valerie E. Kitchings EO Officer, District.
An Introduction to the State Performance Plan/Annual Performance Report.
Letter of Explanation Copy of Data Disproportionality Initial Eligibility 60-day Timeline Early Childhood Transition Secondary Transition Corrected and.
Ed Palmisano 06/2005 Evaluation Procedures An Introduction for New School Psychologists and Members of the M- Team.
Complaints Information Santina Thibedeau March 5, 2009.
Results-based Monitoring Webinar – Impacted LEAs September 17, 2015.
Learning Objectives Conducting an On-Site Monitoring Review FPO calls the Grantee: “As you know, we’re a little more than nine months into your 24 month.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa. us Compliance Monitoring for Gifted Education COMPLIANCE MONITORING.
Consolidated District Reviews and Monitoring Preparing for Desk Monitoring of Titles I-A, I-D, II-A, VI-B (REAP), and X Summer 2013.
BPHC Infectious Disease Bureau, Education & Outreach Site Visit.
Improvement Planning Mischele McManus Infant/Toddler and Family Services Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services July 20, 2007
Procedures for ESEA Consolidated Monitoring Effective July 1, 2011 – June 30, 2014 Monitoring For Results Reviewed & Revised with COP April 2011.
1 Coordinated Program Review: School Staff Overview Sutton Public Schools Frequently Asked Questions: Faculty Information
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
Cyclical Monitoring Presented to State and Local Task Force.
March’s Special Education Coordinator Meeting March 12, 2013.
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting.
On Site Review Process. 2 Overview of On Site Review Materials and Process.
The Nebraska Frameworks External Visitation Team Exit Report.
In accordance with the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act and Chapters 14 and 15 of the State Board Regulations, PDE provides general supervision.
Individualized Education Plans SPED 461 4/4/11. IEP Components Current performance Goals Special education and related services Accommodations and Modifications.
Procedural Safeguards for Parents What Educators Should Know Michelle Mobley NELA Cohort III.
MODULE 3 Policies, Procedures & Supervisor Responsibilities.
Exceptional Children Program “Serving Today’s Students” Student Assistance Team.
Special Ed Reporting 101 An Introduction to Special Education Data Reporting Greg Hess / Candice Schuld.
March 23, SPECIAL EDUCATION ACCOUNTABILITY REVIEWS.
SPECIAL EDUCATION PROCEDURES TO ADDRESS NON-COMPLIANT FINDINGS RELATED TO CHILD FIND Presenter Jim Kubaiko, Director Special Education.
Special Education News to Know for Building Administrators and Counselors Child Find.
Subsidy Monitoring Visits Tony Turner. 6/24/20162 Purpose: Ensure compliance with grant rules and approved application Provide technical and programmatic.
Department of Child Support Services OFFICE OF AUDITS AND COMPLIANCE.
Special Education District Validation Review (DVR) Team Member Training and School Preparation Information.
District Validation Review (DVR) Nonpublic School Preparation Information Division of Special Education.
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15) November 9, 2015 Deborah Walker Meagan Steiner David LeBlanc.
POLICIES AND PROCEDURES FOR PARENT REQUESTS
Administrative Reviews at the District Level
Compliance Monitoring
How to navigate Special Education
Preparing for Title IIA Monitoring Review (FY15)
Update on the TEA Sped corrective action plan
Brielle Elementary School Special Education Monitoring Summary
TEXAS DSHS HIV Care services group
Special Ed. Administrator’s Academy, September 24, 2013
Presentation transcript:

Special Education Compliance Monitoring

3 Phases of Compliance Monitoring Review Pre-Site phase Pre-Site phase On-Site phase On-Site phase Post-Site phase Post-Site phase

Pre-Site Phase District will receive letter in advance from EED with date of visit and request for information District will receive letter in advance from EED with date of visit and request for information Phone conversation - EED Program Manager will offer technical assistance Phone conversation - EED Program Manager will offer technical assistance Review/ verify information needed before on-site visit (listed in Part X – Section 1 of the Handbook) Review/ verify information needed before on-site visit (listed in Part X – Section 1 of the Handbook)

Prior Information to be sent List of special education teachers, administrators, related service providers and interpreters for the deaf List of special education teachers, administrators, related service providers and interpreters for the deaf (4AAC )* Behavioral Data - # of in-school suspensions, out of school suspensions, expulsions, manifestation determination meetings & referrals to law enforcement experienced by the student* Behavioral Data - # of in-school suspensions, out of school suspensions, expulsions, manifestation determination meetings & referrals to law enforcement experienced by the student* Due Process - an indication of whether the student’s educational program was the subject of a complaint, mediation/due process hearing over the past 5 years* Due Process - an indication of whether the student’s educational program was the subject of a complaint, mediation/due process hearing over the past 5 years* *Excel format

Information needed PRIOR to review (cont’d) A list of schools within your district that includes daily time schedules for each school A list of schools within your district that includes daily time schedules for each school List of private schools, charter schools, correspondence schools, juvenile detention facilities, adult correctional facilities, community transition agencies (childhood and secondary transition) in the District with the addresses and phone numbers of each List of private schools, charter schools, correspondence schools, juvenile detention facilities, adult correctional facilities, community transition agencies (childhood and secondary transition) in the District with the addresses and phone numbers of each

What occurs during the On-Site visit?

Entrance Interview Introductions Introductions Team Leader - Team Members Team Leader - Team Members Program Manager’s explanations Program Manager’s explanations Review weekly schedule Review weekly schedule

Administrative Review Each district should have an Administrative Binder The binder should contain all admin standards coded by number The binder should contain all admin standards coded by number For standards that do not apply, include a note on district letterhead stating why it does not apply For standards that do not apply, include a note on district letterhead stating why it does not apply Handbook Part X, Section 6

Student File Reviews 15 or more complete files 15 or more complete files Other files: Other files: Targeted areas- transition, ESER’s Targeted areas- transition, ESER’s Any area(s) of “systemic concern” Any area(s) of “systemic concern” Files are selected to represent a sampling of all disability areas, race/ethnicity, age levels, and school locations Files are selected to represent a sampling of all disability areas, race/ethnicity, age levels, and school locations Handbook Part X, Section 5

What Else Happens? School site visits School site visits Parent meeting Parent meeting Staff meeting Staff meeting Draft Report of findings Draft Report of findings SpEd Director meeting SpEd Director meeting Exit interview Exit interview

Focused Monitoring Component Review District Data Profile Review District Data Profile How monitoring connects How monitoring connects Review District Determination status Review District Determination status Needs Assistance Needs Assistance Needs Assistance 2 Needs Assistance 2 Needs Intervention Needs Intervention If on Corrective Action Plan -- review If on Corrective Action Plan -- review

Exit Meeting Commendations Commendations Draft monitoring compliance review results Draft monitoring compliance review results Draft Plan of Improvements for student files and administrative standards Draft Plan of Improvements for student files and administrative standards

Post-Site Phase: Compliance Monitoring Written Report The Written Report includes: Commendations Commendations Findings & citations Findings & citations Plan of Improvement Plan of Improvement - Upon receipt of the Final Report, districts have 60 days to complete the Plan of Improvement - Upon receipt of the Final Report, districts have 60 days to complete the Plan of Improvement

What is Due When? 1. The Plan of Improvement projected dates of completion is due 60 days from the Final Report date 2. All of the documentation on the Plan of Improvement is due 3 to 6 months after the monitoring visit

Then What? Following submission and approval of all documents, EED will send District a “Close-Out” letter stating all corrective action is complete. Following submission and approval of all documents, EED will send District a “Close-Out” letter stating all corrective action is complete.

For Question’s Who do you contact? 1 st - The lead monitor for your visit 2 nd - Your department contact

Intensive Monitoring 1. Will be conducted at a separate time than monitoring 2. For intensive claims over 15 students: Intensive monitored is conducted on-site 3. For intensive claims under 15 students: IEP’s will be sent to EED for review

You’re DONE! Yippee!