Infrastructure and transport in the Black Sea region Opening Remarks Emmanouil Vlachogiannis First Vice President Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
European Economic and Social Committee Consultative Committee on Industrial Change "CCMI" P r e s e n t a t i o n of J á n o s T Ó T H Member of the EESC.
Advertisements

Bruselas, 11 de octubre de 2005 Iñaki Beristain Etxabe Head of the Economy & Planning PRESENT & FUTURE FOR THE OBJECTIVE OF COMPETITIVENESS & EMPLOYMENT:
Electric Vehicles Industrial Cluster - NPO IKEM Corp. (Business entity of EVIC) Changing the Government Agenda of EU's poorest countries using the power.
Roma education: the role of the Structural Funds Policy Framework.
BRIEF OVERVIEW OF TRANSPORT IN AFRICA CURRENT TRENDS.
Active employment policies IN EUROPEAN UNION AND GREECE
PARTNERSHIPS OF GOVERNMENTAL AND NON-GOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATIONS (ASSOCIATIONS) IN THE SPHERE OF TOURISM: RUSSIAN AND FOREIGN EXPERIENCE Moscow, Russian.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Public Workshop Welcome -to the -. What is the ?
United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Transport Division UNDA project on CO 2 emissions in inland transport For Future Inland Transport Systems.
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
1 SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT AL. 2 The White Paper 2001  The 2001 White paper proposed almost 60 measures designed to implement a transport system capable.
White Paper 2011 and Development Perspectives of Transport System in Latvia Guntars Jansons Manager Development Planning.
Mann, Institute for International Economics 1 Networked Readiness and Trade Competitiveness: Lessons From Global Electronic Commerce Catherine L. Mann.
Hydropower Development: Experience of Nepal
Massimiliano Di Pace1 EU TRADE POLICY Eu provides also initiatives, financing and services to support Eu companies’ efforts for internationalisation The.
Action Plan on Urban Mobility
Ari Kokko Industrial policy Why? How? Examples: EU Industrial Policy and Swedish Industrial Policy Sources
Logistics and Regions. Trends The regions are becoming integrated in large-scale network economies (new markets conditions, reliance on global supply.
ICC Ukraine Ukrainian National Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce.
How the European Social Fund can contribute to social enterprises? Workshop 7: Structural funds (ESF, ERDF) for social enterprises Strasbourg, 16 January.
Trans-European Transport Network and the Connecting Europe Facility
Transport Policy as an Enabling Framework for Green Growth in South Africa Ngwako Makaepea Department of Transport 18 May 2010.
EU Macro-regions e.g. Baltic Sea Region Macro-regions e.g. Baltic Sea Region National Regional City-regions Cluster Policy in Europe Local.
Use with Export Practice & Management Fifth Edition by Alan Branch ISBN 1–84480–081–4 © 2006 Alan Branch Chapter 3 Characteristics of international transport.
Why are economic and financial instruments needed? A presentation made by Noma Neseni, IWSD.
I NVESTMENT FOR P UBLIC S ERVICES : H OW TO B ETTER S UPPORT THE G ROWTH OF T HESE S ECTORS 21 J ANUARY 2015 Valeria Ronzitti – General Secretary.
Gzim Ocakoglu European Commission, DG MOVE World Bank Transport Knowledge and Learning Program on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITS), 24/06/2010.
Enabling Environments for Clean Energy Technology Transfer Michael Gerbis President The Delphi Group.
Vicenç Pedret Cuscó Economic Adviser European Commission – DG MOVE Future of the European Transport Policy and Green Corridors Presentation at: TransBaltic.
The Draft SADC Annex on Trade in Services UNCTAD Secretariat Sub-regional Conference on Improving Industrial Performance and Promoting Employment in SADC.
NORTH SEA INTERREG PROGRAMME – Jon Jordan UK Contact Point for the North Sea INTERREG Programme europeanpolicysolutions.
PARTNERSHIPS IN SUPPORT OF CAADP Progress Report Brief Progress Report AUC Page 1 of 14.
European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport Unit G3 – Motorways of the Sea & Intermodality EURO-MEDITERRANEAN TRANSPORT FORUM MARITIME.
EU funding Available EU Structural Funds. Objective 2 / Mål 2 Interreg 4A NORD Kolarctic ENPI CBC Northern Periphery Programme Baltic Sea programme North.
TRACECA CONSTRUCTION OF INTERMODAL TERMINAL IN THE REGION OF RUSE CITY BULGARIA Infrastructure Working Group Kiev, 11 May 2011.
MINISTRY OF TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS OF THE REPUBLIC OF LATVIA Intermodal transport between Europe and Asia: opportunities and challenges of Latvia.
EU Infrastructure charging and investment policy Christophe Deblanc DG TREN.
ETF Conference – 23 October 2003 A Trans-European Network at the service of Europe’s citizens José Papí Secretary General European Union Road Federation.
International Logistics Centres for Western NIS and the Caucasus Georgia: Areas in the vicinity of Tbilisi airport Ministry of Economy and Sustainable.
Kiichiro Fukasaku Development Centre
THE LINKS BETWEEN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL POLICIES JOSÉ ANTONIO OCAMPO UNDER-SECRETARY GENERAL ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL AFFAIRS.
United Nations Development Programme Ministry of Labour and Social Policy Local Public Private Partnerships THE BULGARIAN EXPERIENCE.
PRESENTATION TO SELECT COMMITTEE ON ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT 13 OCTOBER 2015 RATIFICATION OF THE AFRICAN MARITIME TRANSPORT CHARTER 1.
Ministry of Transport, Maritime Affairs and Communications of the Republic of Turkey Intermodality leads to Sustainability A workshop for the Working Party.
Country Partnership Strategy FY12-16 Consultations with Civil Society The World Bank Group June 2, 2011.
Facilitation of use of green transport - electromobility Ministry of Transport Ministry of environmental protection and regional development of the republic.
IFC Crisis Response in Corporate Governance May 13, 2009 Santiago de Chile.
National strategic reference framework Jela Tvrdonova.
Transport Integration of cross-border transport infrastructure TEN-T strategy on large cross- border cooperation projects Gudrun Schulze, Team leader,
C4Freight. Freight Transport Corridors  Objective Demonstrate on key pan-European corridors innovative transport technologies, systems and strategies.
European Community European Regional Development Fund Baltic Sea Region INTERREG III B Programme Area 2000 – 2006.
Natuurwetenschap & SamenlevingScience, Technology & Society Large Scale International Bio-energy Trade - Perspectives, Possibilities and Criteria; introduction.
Towards an integrated transport system in the Baltic Sea Region Presentation at the Green Corridors Stakeholders Forum, Tallinn, 14 October 2010 Wiktor.
LEGABEX 2 ND Term SY DLS – St. Benilde.
Ukrainian National Committee of the International Chamber of Commerce
An Inland Port in Salt Lake County
Business sector engagement and Consumer Awareness October 3rd, 2017
Structural Funds Programming Predeal, Romania
Overview of the New Mexican Energy Model
Supporting Investment in the Mediterranean Region
European social dialogue A new start for social dialogue
26-27 July 2018 | Novotel, Quezon City
Port Infrastructure Development for Ensuring Sustainability
Communication on the EU maritime transport strategy
27 November 2014 Mantas Sekmokas
Enabling Environments for Clean Energy Technology Transfer
Sustainable Mobility & Tourism as Drivers for Economic Development on European Islands Clemens Rosenmayr Policy Advisor, EUROCHAMBRES.
Rural Partnerships between Small Farmers and Private Sector
Marco Polo – Towards a policy revision
Presentation transcript:

Infrastructure and transport in the Black Sea region Opening Remarks Emmanouil Vlachogiannis First Vice President Thessaloniki Chamber of Commerce and Industry Thessaloniki

Why Infrastructure and Transport?

Drivers for International Trade Drivers for Economic Integration Drivers for Economic Development Drivers for Social Cohesion

Can we develop useful recommendations for the governments of the countries of the Region? Let’s try to assess.

1.The current state of affairs in infrastructure in the Black Sea Region is adequate with the needs for promoting trade and investment. There are different views by the responding members on that issue. There is no particular recommendation to be made.

2.In general, providing the adequate infrastructure facilitates trade and investment. There is a unanimous positive vote for this issue.

3.Projects in infrastructure should follow economic and business consideration. There is a strong vote for this issue.

4.Commercial networking facilitated by interventions by different institutions is more important than building infrastructure. Equal importance of commercial networking and building infrastructure is acknowledged by the responding members.

5.Projects in infrastructure should be attractive to long term investment by private funds. There is strong vote for that issue.

6.In case of private funding of infrastructure projects, remunerating revenues have to be raised by the users of respecting infrastructure. One responding member disagrees totally.

7.New infrastructure projects shall internalize external cost, meaning that the users shall bear the burden of environmental protection. There is strong vote for that issue.

8.In the long run higher costs of using modern infrastructure are offset by lower operating cost and higher flexibility to adapt to market needs. There is strong vote for that issue.

9.Intermodal transport is an effective instrument to combine transport efficiency with environmental protection. There is almost unanimous positive vote for that issue.

10.Logistic centers and/or freight villages are indispensable nodes for a system of intermodal transports. There is almost unanimous vote for that issue.

11.Green transport, involving the use of railway and shipping for short distances, is essential for the Black Sea Region. There is strong vote for that issue, but one responding member does not embrace fully the concept.

12.Transport policies should contribute to the development of an open and competitive market without exclusions and/or state interventions. There is strong vote for that issue.

Some conclusions Priority on the viability of the infrastructure projects. Criteria must include efficiency and environmental sustainability. Participation of market forces highly desirable. Involvement of private sector and distribution of risks.

Thank you for your attention