Quality Assurance in Done by :Salim Mohammed\ Muslim\ Mahmoud \Tariq E-learning.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eurosoil Freiburg 2004 – Education in Pedology E-Learning in Soil Science – What are the Perspectives? Ludger Herrmann University of Hohenheim.
Advertisements

1 The Networked Learning Environment. 2 Blackboards Product Strategy Leading institutions are harnessing the power of information networks to connect.
Open Educational Resources for Science and Engineering: Creation of Effective Educational Systems Without Compromising Quality Mangala Sunder Krishnan.
E-portfolios: National policy and local practice Phil Harley Transition Strategy Manager City of Nottingham Local Authority, UK E-portfolios: Mapping.
An ePortfolio System for Life Shane Sutherland ePortfolio Project Director University of Wolverhampton.
© Sutherland 2005 An ePortfolio System for Life Shane Sutherland ePortfolio Coordinator University of Wolverhampton An ePortfolio System for Life Shane.
Microsoft Learning Gateway for HE Rob Miles – Hull University, Lecturer Romola Ganguli – Microsoft Education Technology Advisor.
Tom Lewis Director, Academic & Collaborative Applications University of Washington.
Multilingual eLearning in LANGuage Engineering. Project Overview  Project span: Oct 2004 – Oct 2007  Kick-off meeting Oct  Project goals:
ACADEMIC INFRASTRUCTURE Framework for Higher Education Qualifications Subject Benchmark Statements Programme Specifications Code of Practice (for the assurance.
IMPLEMENTATION OF AN E-LEARNING PLATFORM USING CMS
SCORM Ahmed I. Deeb Dr. Anwar Mousa  presenter  instructor University Of Palestine-2009 Presentation about.
Asst.Prof.Dr.Surasak Mungsing. By: Akshay Kumar Sharable Content Object Reference Model.
TELEStraining Inc. The eTrainerCB: Using Instructional Templates To Create Training SCO’s Lucio Teles, Ph.D., President, TELEStraining Inc. Fuchun Xiao,
ELearning Frameworks: What, Why and Who, Where & When Daniel Rehak, Learning Systems Architecture Lab, USA Kerry Blinco, Dept. Education Science and Training,
Benefits of Blended e-Learning in Education
McWeadon Education, USA
Why E-Learning Standards?
The Q Group PLC : Handy Quartet : Quartet Online Quartet as Blended Educational System WELCOME !
1 CALL 2006, BEIJING Courseware quality control Strategies Presenter: YAO Chunzhen QQ: Research.
Software Quality SEII-Lecture 15
Technical Guidelines for Digital Learning Content: A Tool for Development, Evaluation and Selection Liz Johnson Advanced Learning Technologies Board of.
Malaysian Grid for Learning October DC 2004, Shanghai, China. © 2004 MIMOS Berhad. All Rights Reserved Metadata Management System DC2004: International.
The SABA Learning Management System
Jesuit Digital Network Supporting Sharing and Collaboration Melbourne, Australia  July 10, 2015.
Instructional System Design
1 DR. BADRUL HUDA KHAN MCWEADON EDUCATION, USA DR. BADRUL HUDA KHAN
Standards and interoperability - a Norwegian perpective Project Coordinator Tore Hoel, the Norwegian eStandard project
BRINC Personalized Learning Project DLC/TechMACC Combined Meeting March 14, 2014.
Managing Software Quality
Technologies that Facilitate Assessment: E-Portfolios AMICAL Conference, May 5, 2008 Rebecca Davis, NITLE.
An ITS initiative in association with the TSC Gathering your needs and requirements to support eLearning at Western Talk to Us!
A learning platform brings together hardware, software and supporting services to enable more effective ways of working within and outside the classroom.
24 August 2011 Dr JC Henning Technology based Quality Evaluation Instrument for Teaching and Learning: UNISA Library Services.
Computer-Based Training Methods
Slide 1 Atracore eLearning Offer Knowledge is a treasure.
Q&A Anytime, any place, any pace learning in TAFEVC and Moodle Mary Schooneveldt And you.
LOGO Distance Learning System «Kherson Virtual University» prof. Alexander Spivakovsky First Vice-Rector of Kherson State University Kherson, Ukraine.
Strathmore University Learning Management System Dr Joseph Sevilla Workshop at Kigali Institute of Science and Technology Kigali 29th November 2007.
E-Learning, a Summary  VLE/ MLE ’ s  Learning Platforms  SCORM  e-portfolio ’ s.
E-Learning standards and meta-data: Case study ดร. น้ำทิพย์ วิภาวิน Sripatum University Library.
The E-Learning Revolution Chapter 10. The Nature & Methodology of E-learning Programs Defining E-Learning: 1.Instructional content or learning experiences.
RESEARCH & MILITARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT ADL FROM THE POLISH PERSPECTIVE ALEKSANDER SKRZYPEK tel. (+48)
MEDIU Learning for HE Ahmad Nimer | Project Manager.
Delivering e-Security Education through e-Learning V.K.Sharma Lakshmi Kalyani CDAC, Noida.
EPORTFOLIO SYSTEMS J. ELIZABETH CLARK LAGUARDIA COMMUNITY COLLEGE 14 AUGUST 2012.
Instructional Technology Master of Education 1. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1) Explain what an LMS is. 2) Differentiate between some types of LMS. 3) Identify.
Learning Object Metadata Application Profiles: Lithuanian Approach E. Kurilovas S. Kubilinskienė Centre for IT in Education, MoE Lithuania.
Teaching at the University of Luxembourg: Organization, quality assurance and evaluation of student achievements
Investigating the Impact of Vocabulary Strategy Training and E-Portfolios on Vocabulary Strategy Use and the Acquisition of Academic Vocabulary by Saudi.
Betim ÇIÇO, South East European University (Republic of Macedonia) Marco University of Pavia (Italy)
Novel content sourcing: Reframing curriculum for the 21 st Century Moses Wolfenstein Danielle Herro Jill Haney Rovy Branon.
Creating a standard of excellence in e-learning ELUE meeting, ROME 31st of May 2006 George Ubachs.
1 Beyond Content Packaging: LETSI’s Open Learning Architecture Avron Barr letsi.org LETSI is an international non-profit federation committed to open standards.
Assoc Prof Dr Safiah Yusof Head of e-Learning Institute for Teaching and Learning Advancement (ITLA)
SE513 Software Quality Assurance Lecture12: Software Reliability and Quality Management Standards.
Integrating LAMS using Blackboard Building Blocks and PowerLinks James Dalziel Managing Director, LAMS International Pty Ltd & Professor of Learning Technology.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Learning Management System (LMS) /Course Management System (CMS) & Digital Portfolio.
Philip Russell Deputy Librarian, ITT Dublin CoPILOT, Glasgow, February 12 th 2014 Creating and Sharing Information Literacy OERs.
16CS202 & Software Engineering
ePortfolio for lifelong learning
Program Quality Assurance Process Validation
Software engineering Lecturer: Nareena.
Thursday’s Lecture Chemistry Building Musspratt Lecture Theatre,
DITA component-based authoring and learning design
Introduction to the CESSDA Data Management Expert Guide
for learning, teaching and assessment
Presentation transcript:

Quality Assurance in Done by :Salim Mohammed\ Muslim\ Mahmoud \Tariq E-learning

Outline E-learning ? Framework of e-learning E-Portfolio in e-learning Example QA in e-learning

WHAT IS E-LEARNING? e-Learning is the use of technology to enable people to learn anytime and anywhere.

Learning models will need to change INDUSTRIAL AGE LEARNING MODEL DIGITAL AGE LEARNING MODEL How do people learn in a digital environment? Is e-learning effective? Are learners ready? New learning model are needed

Traditional & E-learning Approach

Quality Assurance PlanningAssessmentCorrectionDevelopment CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT M e c h a n i s m s f o r Q u a l i t y A s s u r a n c e

There are number of e-Learning courses being offered at various universities, institutes etc. “How good is a course learning?” “How effective is the learning?” or ?

e-Learning environments consists of : (LMS) (CMS) Learning Management Systems Content authoring tools The Content itself. Content Management Systems

Learner is the customer who needs to be kept happy in learning environment.

The performance of the system in terms of imparting effective learning, availability of the system, durability of the content, interoperability of the systems across the platforms becomes important. To make sure that the vendors stick to some values, standards are here for e-Learning content development and e- Learning tools. These standards are driven by various organizations such as IEEE, DOD, ISO etc. IEEE’s Learning technology Standard Architecture (LTSA), DOD’s Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) standards for content: Shareable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) etc.

These standards are driven by various organizations IEEE’s Learning technology Standard Architecture (LTSA), DOD’s Advanced Distributed Learning (ADL) standards for content: Shareable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM)

The performance of the system in terms of imparting : effective learning, availability of the system, durability of the content, interoperability of the systems across the platforms becomes important

Garvin [1] has suggested some quality criteria for managing quality of any product, which are → performance, → features, → reliability, → conformance, → durability, → serviceability, aesthetics → perceived quality.

Nichols [2] has recognized five levels of e- Learning. They are: 1. Information Repository, 2.One-Way Communications, 3.Online Exercises, 4. Two- Way Communications 5.Learning Objects.

Nichols has also explained four distinct quality assurance procedures: The training process – quality assurance for e-Learning levels one to three; the consultancy and training process – for development at level four; The full project process – used in the development of major learning objects (level five) and development of courses into an RBL (resource-based learning) mode; the minor / single task project process –that ensures quality in additional activities.

A suggestive framework for Quality assurance bringing- out the e-Learning environment to be considered, parameters to be quantified for quality assurance, database for storing the quantified metrics, standards compliance testing software for content and tools, a tool for Quality Assurance aggregation and analysis which takes the inputs from various sources to generate reports on the Quality levels of the e-Learning environment is depicted in the Figure 1.

In this suggested framework of quality assurance three important aspects of quality are considered. They are given below:  Operational characteristics (such as usability, security, reliability)  Transition characteristics (such as portability, interoperability)  Revision characteristics (such as testability, modularity)

ePortfolio Defined “a collection of authentic and diverse evidence, drawn from a larger archive. representing what a person or organization has learned over time on which the person or organization has reflected, and designed for presentation to one or more audiences for a particular rhetorical purpose” * (NLII 2003 and FuturEd 2005) From previse lecture

Basic concepts Digital creation/storage and presentation Tools and services Production and “consumption” Creator and user Process and product Not just a digital CV ePortfolio” is a System of From previse lecture

Examples of ePortfolio Google sites Blogger Edublogs Wix WikiSpace s Ning Foliomaker From previse lecture

Dimensions and criteria Dimension 1: Curriculum Design Dimension 2: Management of resources Dimension 3: Effectiveness of the Teaching and Learning process Dimension 4: Evaluation

– Dimension 1: Design Curriculum – Criteria : 1.Selection and admission 2.Student Outcome Profile - Seal Telecentre.org Academies 3.Tutor Profile 4.Content and instructional design plans and programs 5.Protocols for the translation and adaptation of plans and programs 6.Credit system 7.Articulation Curriculum (courses, diplomas) 8.Advance curricular (sequential, non-sequential prerequisites) 9.Teaching and learning methodologies 10.Assessment methodologies 11.Modality 12.Number students per tutor 13.Certification

Dimension 2: Management of resources Criteria: 1. Human resource a. Expert Content - Selection of experts - Training and Habilitation - Evaluation b. Academic tutors and monitoring tutors - Selection of tutors - Training tutors and Habilitation - Teacher evaluation 2. Resources to support the process a. Hypermedial resources b. Virtual libraries 3. Technology infrastructure a. LMS b. Servers & Hosting

Dimension 3: Effectiveness of teaching and learning process Criteria : Module sizing for nivelation new students Following students ( enrollment-exit-progression-certification ) Following to tutors (interaction quality) Tutoring for lagging Support process (technical and pedagogical) Measuring results