Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee (http://www.fnal.gov/directorate/Fermilab_AAC_mtgs.htm) May 10-12, 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Continuing Role of SRF for AARD: Issues, Challenges and Benefits SRF performance has been rising every decade SRF installations for HEP (and other.
Advertisements

Beyond the ALCPG David B. MacFarlane Associate Laboratory Director for PPA.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Project X RD&D Plan Conventional Facilities (Civil Construction) Russ Alber AAC Meeting February 3, 2009.
SCRF ACCELERATOR INDUSTRY STEWARDSHIP OUTLOOK Ken Olsen SPAFOA Fermilab Meeting Nov. 13, 2012.
1 Albrecht Wagner, Snowmass 0805 Albrecht Wagner DESY and Hamburg University Challenges for Realising the ILC.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
M W PooleJoint DL-RAL Accelerator Workshop Jan 09 Introduction to ASTeC Programmes M W Poole Director.
The Fermilab Research Program Michael Witherell Users’ Meeting June 8, 2005.
Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
International Linear Collider The ILC is the worldwide consensus for the next major new facility. One year ago, the choice was made between the two alternate.
F Project X Overview Dave McGinnis October 12, 2007.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
Contractor Assurance System Peer Review April Page 1 NSTAR 2011 May 16, 2011 Jefferson Lab Hugh Montgomery.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Proton Study Meeting 4/19/05 Eric Prebys 1 Proton Plan Stage I Eric Prebys.
ILC in Japan A 10 minute introduction H.Weerts Argonne National Lab March 24, 2014 University of Chicago.
24-Aug-11 ILCSC -Mumbai Global Design Effort 1 ILC: Future after 2012 preserving GDE assets post-TDR pre-construction program.
FALC Technology Benefits study P. Grannis Beijing GDE meeting Feb. 7, 2007 FALC = Funding Agencies for Large Colliders is composed of representatives from.
F Proton Plan Eric Prebys, FNAL Accelerator Division.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa ILCSC Chair LCWS06 at IISc Bangalore March 9, 2006.
Report from ILCSC Shin-ichi Kurokawa KEK ILCSC Chair GDE meeting at Frascati December 7, 2005.
1 ILC Internal Cost Review Major Points from External Reviewers T. Elioff, J. Marx, V. Soergel, M. Yoshioka, and A. Yamamoto, (C. Wyss, absent) To be presented.
SMTF Collaboration Meeting Fermilab April 29 th, 2005 Helen Edwards and Nigel Lockyer.
Report from Fermilab Presentation to ICFA Symposium Daegu, Korea September 2005 Pier Oddone.
1 SPAFOA Capitol Hill Briefing December 2013 Harry Weerts International Linear Collider - progress & status SPAFOA meeting, Dec 11, 2013, H.Weerts.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 International Linear Collider In August 2004 ICFA announced their technology selection for an ILC: 1.The.
Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy 1 ILC R&D Program Dr. David Sutter, Senior Program Manager Office of High Energy Physics Office of Science.
Status of the International Linear Collider and Importance of Industrialization B Barish Fermilab 21-Sept-05.
PIP-II: Why a new accelerator? Paul Derwent Fermilab Community Advisory Board 23 July 2015.
International Design Study for a Neutrino Factory in the 5 Year Plan A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, A. Bross NFMCC CM January 15, 2009.
Muon Collider R&D Plans & New Initiative 1.Introduction 2.Muon Collider Schematic 3.Conceptual Breakthrough 4.Ongoing R&D 5.Muon Collider Task Force 6.Muon.
J. Corlett. September 24, 2007 Report of the Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee on the Fermilab Steering Committee Report P5 Meeting Fermilab September.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
News Y2K June 25, Summary of June 12 Face-to-Face Meeting.
Fermilab Accelerator R&D Strategy Steve Holmes URA Visiting Committee May 8, 2006.
Industrial Participation & SRF Infrastructure at Fermilab Phil Pfund with input from Harry Carter, Rich Stanek, Mike Foley, Dan Olis, and others.
Proton Driver Resources & Schedule (R&D Plan) Rich Stanek May 10, 2005.
Management February 20, Annual Review of the Muon Accelerator Program (MAP) Subcommittee members: Ron Prwivo, Ron Lutha, and Jim Kerby.
Budget Outlook Glen Crawford P5 Meeting Sep
Global Design Effort Main Linac Technology System Kick-off Meeting Cavity Summary 20 Sept 2007 DESY Marc Ross.
Users' Mtg - 4 Jun 08 FNAL Accelerator Complex Status Ron Moore Fermilab – AD / Tevatron Dept.
F A Fermilab Roadmap Dave McGinnis May 28, f Fermilab Roadmap - McGinnis Timelines  Divide the road map into three parallel paths  ILC - Energy.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
High Intensity Neutrino Source Program Overview for CD Controls Management Meeting Bob Webber October 6, 2006.
Presentation of Charge and Overview of Fermilab R&D Programs Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee Meeting (
Project X Collaboration Plan Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee Meeting May 6-8, 2008.
EU accelerator contributions to the IDS … R. Garoby ISS meeting RAL 28/04/2006.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
The categories for ILC budget planning are: R&D – work done in laboratories to develop and verify subsystem components. This supports the cost reduction.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
P5 Potential US Accelerator Collaboration with the ILC-in-Japan Mike Harrison Mike Harrison.
The Linear Collider Roadmap IWLC2010 CERN October 18, 2010 Rolf-Dieter Heuer CERN.
Fermilab SRF Linac Development Steve Holmes Workshop on High Intensity Proton Accelerators October 19, 2009.
1 Comments concerning DESY and TESLA Albrecht Wagner Comments for the 5th meeting of the ITRP at Caltech 28 June 2004 DESY and the LC What could DESY contribute.
The Fermilab Roadmap, Project X, and Muon Facilities Steve Holmes NFMCC Meeting March 17, 2008.
ILC MAC April 07 Global Design Effort 1 European Regional R&D plan Brian Foster (Oxford & GDE) MAC Meeting.
Project X/ILC/SRF Integrated Plan Steve Holmes Fermilab DOE Annual Science & Technology Review July 12-14, 2010.
Fermilab-India Agreements and Collaboration Shekhar Mishra Project-X, International Collaboration Coodinator Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Batavia,
19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting 1 S2 Task Force Status (String test definition) Tom Himel.
Steve Holmes DNP Meeting/Santa Fe November 6, 2010 Project X: A Multi-MW Proton Source at Fermilab.
FNAL SCRF Review R. Kephart. What is this Review? FNAL has argued that SCRF technology is an “enabling” accelerator technology (much like superconducting.
Jefferson Lab Overview
Introduction to ASTeC Programmes
ICFA Report to ICHEP 2016 August 2015 to August 2016 J. Mnich (DESY)
Process of the 2nd update of the European Strategy for Particle Physics FCC week, 29 May 2017, Berlin Sijbrand de Jong, President of the CERN Council (slides.
LCLS Linac Technical Design Review Charge
Prospect of Indo-US Collaboration
Presentation transcript:

Welcome and Presentation of Charge Steve Holmes Accelerator Advisory Committee ( May 10-12, 2005

S. Holmes, Page 2 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape: Update Since November 2004 Meeting Run II –Completed 2004 shutdown and initiated FY2005 run.  FY2005 luminosity goals established at 480 pb -1 (design) and 370 pb -1 (base)  Many stores above >1  cm -2 sec -1 (  20 running average at 9.5  )  ~10 days ahead of “design” projection  Operating in combination (Accumulator+Recycler) mode –Initiated electron cooling commissioning after the 2004 shutdown  Full energy (4.5 MeV) operation of the Pelletron established  Electron beam through the Recycler cooling section  Integration in FY2006 run Neutrinos –MiniBoone FY2004 run surpassed 5.0E20 protons on target on April 3. –NuMI operations initiated in February  Target water leak took us off the air for ~1 month

S. Holmes, Page 3 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape Initial Luminosity (through 5/1/05)

S. Holmes, Page 4 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape: Update Since November 2004 Meeting The Future –BTev cancellation  Tevatron operations cease end of FY2009 –SMTF proposal received and under evaluation at Fermilab –Proton Driver Director’s Review in March Changes in Accelerator Advisory Committee Membership –Sami Tantawi sitting in for Ron Ruth at the meeting –Gunther Geschonke, Kwang-Je Kim, and Tor Raubenheiemer sitting in as part of the incoming rotation for the November meeting –Hasan Padamsee part of the incoming rotation but here as advisee, not advisor

S. Holmes, Page 5 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape: Fermilab View of SMTF Fermilab Long Range Plan: –Compete to host the ILC –If delayed or constructed elsewhere mount a world-best neutrino program SMTF program will move forward most expeditiously if we package those elements of direct interest to Fermilab and DOE/OHEP: –ILC –Proton Driver SCRF Goals: –Develop US capability in cavity and cryomodule fabrication in support of a potential ILC decision to construct in (Plan A) –Develop capability to initiate Proton Driver construction near the end of the decade. (Plan B) –(First branch point is ILC CDR, months out.) Timeframe: FY

S. Holmes, Page 6 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 The Current Landscape: Fermilab View of SMTF Fermilab organizational approach –Two facilities  Superconducting Module Test Facility  Cavity/Cryomodule Fabrication Facility –Two customers  ILC  Proton Driver –One hybird  Photoinjector

S. Holmes, Page 7 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 Charge to the Committee (Rev. 4) Fermilab has received a proposal for the construction and operation of a Superconducting Module Test Facility at Fermilab. The associated development and testing program would support the International Linear Collider and Proton Driver R&D programs, both of direct interest to Fermilab, and other superconducting rf based programs of potential interest within the DOE and NSF. Fermilab is currently evaluating this proposal with a goal of forwarding to the funding agencies a specific proposal for support of the ILC and Proton Driver programs. Such a proposal needs to reflect the interests and goals of Fermilab, the collaborating institutions, the ILC Global Design Effort, and the agencies. The May 2005 AAC meeting will concentrate on evaluation of the goals, scope, and planning for the ILC and Proton Driver programs within the SMTF context. The Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee is asked to review, comment on, and offer recommendations as appropriate with particular attention in the following areas:

S. Holmes, Page 8 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 Charge to the Committee (Rev. 4) International Linear Collider Review the goals of the ILC component of SMTF. As presented do the elements form the basis of a program which will allow the U.S. to establish the technical capabilities in SCRF required to support a bid to host the ILC? Please also consider the following areas and offer comment as appropriate: –The “deliverables” that the ILC GDE can expect to receive from this program and their projected influence on the ILC design and/or preparations for construction. –The strategic approach outlined for cryomodule production and testing in view of the existing capabilities within the national laboratories and universities, and the adequacy of the proposed supporting infrastructure and resources. –The relationship between the SMTF plan and a more comprehensive U.S. industrialization plan in support of ILC construction. –The role of the photoinjector and its upgrades within the ILC program.

S. Holmes, Page 9 AAC Meeting, May 10-12, 2005 Charge to the Committee (Rev. 4) Proton Driver Review the goals of the Proton Driver component of SMTF. Identify elements that form the core of a program which would allow Fermilab to establish the technical basis required for a construction start near the end of the decade. Comment on the strategic approach outlined and the adequacy of the proposed supporting infrastructure and resources. Fine Print As usual the committee is invited to issue comments or suggestions on any aspect of the programs discussed beyond those specifically included in this charge. It is requested that a concise report responsive to this charge be forwarded to the Fermilab Director by June 17, Thank you.