Plan and design the network for reintegration of persons subject to measures of judicial authority July, 1st 2014

FEBRUARY 14, 2005 …REGIONAL LAW N. 8…. The region promotes actions aimed at favoring the lower possible to measures involving deprivation of liberty, as well as the recovery and reintegration into society of people subjected to such measures; the region involved for this purpose: ASL, the Local Bodies, the third sector and volunteering. The region supports and enhances the integrated social planning, particularly in the context of the plans of the area, in order to protect the dignity of the people, with the aim of recovering the individual qualities undermined by social maladjustment and reduce the risk of recurrence.

REGIONAL LAW, FEBRUARY 14, 2005 N. 8 The purpose: Encourage every possible interinstitutional coordination, to establish good practices in favor of a population at risk of social exclusion, and to ensure their citizenship rights offered to the general population

DGR 9502/2009 OBJECTIVES Support a greater and more effective coordination: designs until now financed suffered from the difficult integration with spatial planning, despite important interventions have been sustained and meaningful in terms of resources and results; The inevitable consequence of the above point is represented by the difficult transition from a design logic to an opening-up of services to the population in criminal execution; Financial resources called the need to "unite“ different forces around a single objective INSTRUMENT The intervention plans must be maximum 6 macro projects and must be presented by ASL, in accordance with the Offices of the Plan, the facilities of the Penitentiary Administration and juvenile justice

CRITICAL POINTS  The planning is not integrated, it is the sum of several actions: some actions of intervention are likely to overlap with actions already carried out by Local Services. In this sense, it should be better coordination between the referrer and the Territorial Services.  Needs analysis and planning: is the need to better coordinate the timing of the trial process with the times of individual reintegration projects and/or access to alternative measures  Ongoing evaluation: defining a time for verifying that it is able to guarantee a possible modification of the project  Generate replicable good practices: sharing, collaboration and joint evaluation

STRENGHTS  connotation of a system, and demonstrated ability to operate synergistically partnership, both for the hard-hitting action of awareness that made it a system known at territorial level  As considerable intervention in the territorial policies, thanks to the numbers achieved, stepping definitely away from the logic of the experimental little projects which created models based on the sample extremely limited as regards interventions (the quantity is in itself a quality intervention)  generated a series of cooperation protocols in both operational and organizational

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES Process: innovation, by method, on organization level Testing and evaluation: identify best sustainable practices Community Empowerment: development of strategies for collaboration between the resources in the area, through the development of partnerships, both in terms of resources and expertise Comparison / Sharing and Partnership: creation of opportunities for exchange of experience which brings together the experience of those who participate in the activities eligible for funding. Respect for each other's roles and attention to the added value Sustainability: Research of conditions which enable partnerships to strengthen their ties and to give continuity to actions which have been positively evaluated

THE NETWORK AS A RESOURCE The organization of a network system is inscribed primarily in existing networks in the local community for the creation of forms of co- planning and co-programming centered on an overall project of social inclusion (social health )

STRATEGIC LINES CO-DESIGN CREATION OF A TERRITORIAL GOVERNANCE SUSTAINABILITY RESULT ORIENTATION INTEGRATION Coordination between institutions and direction

OBJECTIVES Operare per il sostegno e la messa a sistema di un coordinamento stabile sia a livello regionale che a livello territoriale Working for the support and the development of a stable coordination system both at regional and local level Operare per il sostegno e la messa a sistema di un coordinamento stabile sia a livello regionale che a livello territoriale Enhance, support and develop activities to promote the permanence, the return of persons, adults and minors, in the context of life, with particular attention to the discharge phase, supporting the creation of paths in outdoor detention measure, especially for young people at the first offence and/or offences low hazard and entities

GOVERNANCE REGIONAL LEVEL Regional table The table coordinated by DG Family, Solidarity and Volunteer will involve other concerned Regional Directorates-General and representatives of the Regional Superintendency of Prison Administration Comparison and monitoring of interventions Ensure interventions and program’s integration LOCAL LEVEL Inter-Institutional Local Group It is composed by: 1 person representative of the Office of Ground 1 person representative of the Province 1 person representative of IP 1 person representative of UEPE 1 person representative of USSM For Milan’s ASL the group will be supplemented by 1 reference CGM 1, 1 referent CPA, 1 IPM coordinator of Beccaria and 2 USSM representatives of Milan. For Mantova’s ASL the group will be supplemented by 1 reference OPG and the Department of mental health

GUIDELINES OF THE INTERVENTION WORK AND TRAINING 1. Basic services 2.Orientation and reception 3. Skills reinforcement 4. Training 5.Internship WORK AND TRAINING 1. Basic services 2.Orientation and reception 3. Skills reinforcement 4. Training 5.Internship STRENGHTHENING AND CONTINUITY OF THE SOCIAL REINSERTIONS AND ACCOMPANIMENT PATHWAYS FAMILY AND PARENTING HOUSING AND EMERGENCY SERVICES SITUATIONS OF VULNERABILITY RESTORATIVE JUSTICE REINFORCEMENT OF THE TERRITORIAL NETWORKS

SOME KEY STEPS IN PLANNING A multidimensional approach Encourage integrated territorial networks Ensure taking charge of the family the process: a structured set of paths where the person fits from the need detected Definition of priorities/ needs analysis Integration of tools and resources

PLANNING PLACES

Network planning: six months later Resistance to change self-reference Organizational problems, from performance to design Coordination “Public function” Continuing gap between the view held about the necessity of co-partecipating the process…activation of mechanism of delegation

The ability to handle the problems related to the social integration of prisoners is closely connected with the representations disseminated in the territory, with what is expected in that area from which services can interact Social fragmentation (programming plan) Complementary design thinking as a wide-ranging design, which involves all, break the logic of "every man for himself" and multiply instead of dispersing, the forces engaged on that front From annuality to biennal scheduling: territorial planning that interacts with other operating systems

Complementary projects between ASL n.3/29 Operating protocols subscriptions Enhancement of Macro Projects : from needs to complementarity of actions n. 16/29 Some experimental processes stabilization Enhancement of the network path from the programming phase

The network exists if it is powered Integrated training program Evaluation shared path Resumption of systematic and continuous work on the territories Towards a modeling of intervention through the definition of types of services/duration/cost