NATIONAL ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (NAIS) 1.Why is identification important? 2.Why is speed and accuracy crucial? 3.What is current status? 4.What is.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MENTORE: PILOT 2 – Tracking & Tracing Services for Livestock Transport Management MENTORE Event, 25 th November 2008 Galileo & EGNOS for Public Interest.
Advertisements

IDINFO EXPO 2006 Westin Crown Center, Kansas City, MO. National Animal Identification System Cattle Industry Work Group Report John Adams Gary Wilson Members.
Cervidae Industry Implementation. Implementation Guidelines Producers data/information will be kept confidential/exempt from current Freedom of Information.
Sheep Working Group Update June 2006 August 2006.
Equine Species Working Group Update: Equine Identification in the U.S. Amy Mann American Horse Council August, 2006 ID INFO EXPO.
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Compensation for Livestock Diseases in the United States Steve Weber.
Trace concepts & EMRS Fred Bourgeois EMRS National Coordinator Mark Schoenbaum Regional EPI.
Bovine Tuberculosis Dr. Rick Smith Assistant State Veterinarian over Ruminant Programs Bovine TB Program Coordinator MDARD.
United States Department of Agriculture Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service Plant Protection and Quarantine PCIT and PExD Update Michael Perry Export.
Ag Fact! 5/1 More beef is consumed on ______________ than any other day of the year (___________ and _____________ tie for second)!
4 th Global Agenda of Action in Support of Sustainable Livestock Development Susanne Thalwitzer – October 2013, Ottawa, Canada CHALLENGES FOR SUSTAINABLE.
Animal identification and traceability
Regionalization and risk assessment: Tools for Decision-Making in a Global Market Lisa Ferguson, DVM National Director, Policy Permitting and Regulatory.
EU legislation regarding control measures ”Red alert”, Suceava, 7-10 September 2009 DVM, MVPH Maren Holm Johansen Head of section of Animal Health Danish.
Dr. Patrick Webb Pre-Harvest Traceability in the Pork Industry.
Application of risk assessment to access agricultural markets Example: Madagascar Katharina Stärk Swiss Federal Veterinary Office.
Branding Review. Issue #1: NAIS National Animal Identification System Animal Science Principles of Industry Issues in Animal Agriculture.
National Animal Identification Working Together to Address Implementation Challenges Chelsea Good, LMA VP of Government and Industry Affairs NIAA Annual.
Dr. Michelle Arnold, DVM DABVP (Food Animal) Ruminant Extension Veterinarian University of Kentucky Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory ADT-Animal Disease.
Continuity of Business Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Continuity of Business (2013)
National Traceability NAIS-Update “Protecting Animal Agriculture”
Foreign Animal Disease Angie Dement Extension Associate for Veterinary Medicine Texas AgriLife Extension Service College of Veterinary Medicine and Biomedical.
Michael VanderKlok DVM Michigan Department of Agriculture and Rural Development Animal Industry Division BOVINE TUBERCULOSIS IN MICHIGAN CATTLE.
Harvard Center for Risk Analysis Evaluation of the Potential for BSE in the United States Joshua T. Cohen Keith Duggar George M. Gray Silvia Kreindel Harvard.
Certificate of Veterinary Inspection: A Disease Management Tool Kentucky Department of Agriculture Richie Farmer, Commissioner Robert C. Stout, DVM State.
1 Animal Disease Traceability (ADT) April Full Traceability (Pre-harvest) Birth Premises Slaughter Full Traceability All Production and Points.
Effects Of Animal Identification On Cattle Market Structure Prepared by: Darrell R. Mark, Ph.D. Asst. Professor & Extension Livestock Marketing Specialist.
Greater Yellowstone Area Brucellosis Situation Myles Watts Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics Montana State University November 14, 2008.
Program Update: MPC Fall Meetings October 2013 Jeff Clark Manager, PigTrace Canada.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Tracing and Additional Operational Procedures Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
Animal, Plant & Soil Science
Improvement in the Cattle Industry Stephanie Stimpson.
Protecting American Agriculture 1 The Wild Bird Population: An Early Warning System for Avian Influenza Dr. Ron DeHaven Administrator USDA Animal and Plant.
1 Animal ID: Costs and Benefits. Gary Brester and Vince Smith MSU Department of Agricultural Economics and Economics FPCC May 21, 2009 Poplar, MT.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Tracing Tracing and Additional Operational Procedures Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Surveillance, Epidemiology,
GlobalVetLink eHealth Certificates for Animal Health Regulatory Management Kevin Maher and J Amelita Facchiano GSA Contract # GS-35F-0838N.
Teaching Workshop Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (BSE)
Quarantine and Movement Control Authorities Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
BSE in the US APHIS Investigation and Response FDA TSE Advisory Committee February 12, 2004 Lisa A. Ferguson, DVM Senior Staff Veterinarian USDA, APHIS,
CANADIAN BISON Traceability – 2011 Requirements November 2009 Terry Kremeniuk Terry Kremeniuk Executive Director Executive Director Canadian Bison Association.
HPAI VACCINATION AND OTHER CONTROL MEASURES: THE NIGERIAN EXPERIENCE By Dr. Mohammed Dantani Saidu DVM,M.VSc FCVSN Deputy Director/Component Coordinator.
Finding Real World Solutions for Animal ID. NWPP Major Milestones March 2004: Cattle associations visit with Bill Hawks and Keith Collins of the USDA.
Quarantine and Movement Control Overview Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control (2014)
Biosecurity against Foreign Animal Diseases in Cow-Calf Herds Floron C. Faries, Jr., DVM, MS Professor and Extension Program Leader Texas AgriLife Extension.
Response to an Animal Disease Emergency. HSEMD, IDALS, CFSPH Animal Disease Emergency Local Response Preparedness, 2008 Steps in a Response Detection.
Minimizing Risks from Introduction of New Shrimp Species Pornlerd Chanratchakool AAHRI, Dept. of Fisheries, BKK. Thailand.
Animal ID Joe C. Paschal Livestock Specialist Texas Cooperative Extension
Mark Harmon. Joplin Regional Stockyards Located in Southwest Missouri Located in Southwest Missouri 23,000 Customer Base / serving 3.0 million cattle.
Farm Foundation Traceability and Assurance Roundtable November 19, 2003.
Importance of Agriculture. HSEMD, IDALS, CFSPH Animal Disease Emergency Local Response Preparedness, 2008.
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
AUSTRALIA INDONESIA PARTNERSHIP FOR EMERGING INFECTIOUS DISEASES Basic Field Epidemiology Session 8 – Using a field epidemiology approach to a larger disease.
GFRA 2015 HANOI, VIETNAM OCTOBER 20-22, 2015 GFRA 2015 HANOI, VIETNAM OCTOBER 20-22, 2015 FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE CONTROL OPTIONS IN PARTS OF WEST AFRICA.
Foot-and-Mouth Disease Attack on the Midwest U. S.
Safeguarding Animal Health 1 USDA APHIS Authorities and Activities Under the National Animal Identification System Advisory Committee on Biotechnology.
Country report for “Peste des Petits Ruminants(PPR).” Dr. Yousef S N S SH Al Azemi Head, Epidemiology & Zoonosis, Animal Health Department Public Authority.
Quarantine and Movement Control Movement Control, Permitting, and Personnel Adapted from the FAD PReP/NAHEMS Guidelines: Quarantine and Movement Control.
United States Department of Agriculture Food Safety and Inspection Service Uday Dessai, MS, Ph.D., M.P.H. Director, Microbiology Division Office of Public.
Alberta Agriculture, Food and Rural Development
AGR KIEV, 2 NOVEMBER 2010 Andrzej Chirkowski IDENTIFICATION, REGISTRATION AND TRACEABILITY: FROM FARM TO FORK.
Dr. Dr. h.c. Hinrich Meyer-Gerbaulet
Country Report: Camel Diseases
Foot and Mouth Disease Ministry Of Agriculture, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Content Public Health Emergencies Ebola Virus Disease: DRC
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
Structure and Terminology
Contagious Bovine Pleuropneumonia
Wudu T. Jemberu, M.C.M. Mourits, H. Hogeveen
ECONOMIC COSTS AND EFFECTS OF ACTIVITIES TO PREVENT FOOT AND MOUTH DISEASE IN DENMARK S. Denver1, L. Alban2, A. Boklund3, T. Halasa3, H. Houe1, S. Mortensen*4,
Avian Influenza: Protecting Flocks, Protecting People
Presentation transcript:

NATIONAL ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM (NAIS) 1.Why is identification important? 2.Why is speed and accuracy crucial? 3.What is current status? 4.What is being done to improve? 5.How is technology being used? 6.What are some challenges?

My actions matter “BESSIE”

A Simulated Outbreak in U.S. Begins on farm in northwest Iowa near South Dakota border. Eleven days between exposure and diagnosis.

BESSIE HAS FOOT-AND-MOUTH DISEASE (FMD)

Simulated Outbreak (continued) Intensive epidemiological investigation of farm animals and wildlife. Restricted zone (6.2 miles around the infected or presumed affected facilities).

Day 1 Total = 13

Simulated Outbreak (continued) Appraisal, depopulation, disposal of livestock. Decontamination of affected farms. Law enforcement limits livestock and human movement. Surveillance zone comprising entire state and those nearby; modified pending surveillance. Inspection visits within a four-state quarantine zone.

Quarantined States

Day 5 Detected Cases

Total = 3091 Day 25

Day 35

Day 60 Total = 5844

The Impact: 5,844 affected farms, with an average of 200 animals on each farm, within 60 days of initial detection $350 to appraise each farm ($2.04 million) $5.50 to euthanize each animal ($6.43 million) $325 in indemnity payments to farmers for each animal destroyed ($ million)

Impact (continued) $15 to dispose of each animal ($17.53 million) $8,000 to clean and disinfect each farm ($46.75 million) $3,200 further surveillance cost for each affected location ($18.71 million) Total direct cost: $ million Doesn’t include likely export losses.

Expectations With rapid response and immediate implementation, this scenario could have been brought under control much sooner, saving millions of dollars in response and recovery costs.

A simulated outbreak in U.S. Begins on farm in northwest Iowa near South Dakota border. Eleven days between exposure and diagnosis.

Challenges in Tracking Animals Animals transported great distances. Large number of movements (auction markets, video markets, private treaty, etc.). Interstate movements. Lack of unique idenification.

BESSIE THE TRAVELING COW And she travels incognito

Cattle Movement from one Nebraska Auction Market 56 sites 18 counties

What is Current Traceability Capability? Animal Health Officials must manually search through: →auction market paperwork →brand records →state health papers →interview producers Results are often inconclusive

What is Current Traceability Capability? The BSE cow in Washington (December 2003) was 1 of 81 imported: only 29 were ever identified. Texas – BSE, June 2005 – of 200 animals associated with index farm: 66 were never accounted for Your Animals. Your Livelihood. Your Future.

What is Current Traceability Capability? AL – BSE, March, 2006: No tag No tattoo No brand Red cow, 750 – 1,150 lbs., 8-12 years old Attempted DNA analysis from 37 different potential source herds – animal never identified Your Animals. Your Livelihood. Your Future.

What are we doing?

 Premises Registration and NAIS don’t change anything about the response to disease (still investigated, animals tested, etc.) EXCEPT it speeds up the response.  Increased speed allows producers to get back to normal quicker and reduces the spread/impact of a disease. How do we improve traceability?

PREMISES REGISTRATION PROVIDES A KNOWN REFERENCE OR INDEX POINT FOR ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION 30,841 premises in Nebraska 17,156 are registered as of November 9, % of premises are registered 6,623 new registrations since January % growth in registered premises

ANIMAL IDENTIFICATION Unique (tag number) Standard Format (searchable) 15 DIGIT 840 TAG Origin known (premises registered) 003DRN7 Interim Reading Sites (salebarns, feedyards etc) Retirement of Tag (slaughter, rendering etc)

MULTIPLE IDENTIFICATION SYSTEMS DIFFERENT PRIMARY USES AGE AND SOURCE VERIFICATION HERD MANAGEMENT DISEASE PROGRAMS

HARMONIZE ID PROGRAMS Promote 840 RFID tag as standard Working with Agriculture Marketing Services to promote use of 840 in Age/Source and other programs

OFFICIAL CALFHOOD VACCINATION PROJECT Over 30,000 special orange 840 RFID tags distributed 15 fee basis veterinarians participating

GOOD THINGS! First herds vaccinated and tag movements recorded. Interest by veterinarians to promote 840 RFID tags. Mobile Information Management (MIM)-PDA demo pilot program.

ADDITIONAL PROJECT DEMONSTRATION ACTIVITIES MIM – PDA – Will read Management tags – Will read other official ID – Populate and print required forms

NAIS DEMONSTRATION PURPOSE FOR MIM – PDA Demonstrate benefits of 840 RFID to: – Producer – Practitioner – Markets – Buyers – Age and Source Verification Services

TRACKING BESSIE Apply an 840 RFID tag Record the application location Record the tag location as it changes Display History of the 840 RFID tag when an event triggers the need to know Retire 840 RFID tag

BLUETOOTH

PANEL READERS ANOTHER OPTION TO READ RFID TAGS DURING WORK PROCESSES

xxxxxxxxx

XXXXX

A simulated outbreak in U.S. Begins on farm in northwest Iowa near South Dakota border. Eleven days between exposure and diagnosis.

THE RIGHT ACCESSORIES ARE ESSENTIAL