DETERMINING REGIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS UNDER VARIABLE FIRE REGIMES IN CENTRAL SIBERIA D.J. McRae 1, S.G. Conard 2, G.A. Ivanova 3, S.P. Baker 4, A.I. Sukhinin.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
An example of a large-scale interdisciplinary carbon problem Multidecadal climate variability Atmospheric evidence Ocean source? (upwelling, biological.
Advertisements

Michael B. McElroy ACS August 23rd, 2010.
Canadian Wildland Fire Information System Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Ressources naturelles Canada Service canadian des forêts.
Reserves and Density of Organic Carbon in Russian Forests Anatoly Utkin, Dmitry Zamolodchikov, Georgy Korovin and Olga Chestnykh 4. C phytomass and forest-forming.
The Alaska Forest Disturbance Carbon Tracking System T. Loboda, E. Kasischke, C. Huang (Univ. MD), N. French (MTRI) J. Masek, J. Collatz (GSFC), D. McGuire,
National Assessment of Ecological C Sequestration and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes – the USGS LandCarbon Project Zhiliang Zhu, Project Chief, What.
Canadian Wildland Fire Information System Natural Resources Canada Canadian Forest Service Ressources naturelles Canada Service canadian des forêts.
Climate Change and Forest Fire Activity in Canada B.J. Stocks, M.D. Flannigan, B.M. Wotton, B.D. Amiro, and J.B. Todd Natural Resources Canada – Canadian.
A Synthesis of Terrestrial Carbon Balance of Alaska and Projected Changes in the 21 st Century: Implications for Climate Policy and Carbon Management To.
GISP 2003 / Khon Keaen, Thailand1 Summary and Follow on of GAME- Siberia Activity Takeshi OHTA Nagoya University, JAPAN FORSGC, JAPAN.
Wildland Fire Today and in the Coming Decades: What Might We Expect? Scott Stephens ESPM - Division of Forest Science University of California, Berkeley.
Climate change, fires, and carbon aerosol over N. America with preliminary detour to discuss GCAP model development (GCAP= Global change and air pollution)
Carbon Sequestration Akilah Martin Fall Outline Pre-Assessment  Student learning goals  Carbon Sequestration Background  Century Model Overview.
Princeton University Global Evaluation of a MODIS based Evapotranspiration Product Eric Wood Hongbo Su Matthew McCabe.
F.O.F.E.M. 5 First Order Fire Effects Module Adapted from: Missoula Fire Sciences Laboratory Systems for Environmental Management.
MET 12 Global Climate Change – Lecture 8
Climate Chapter 14.
Measurement of the Aerosol Optical Depth in Moscow city, Russia during the wildfire in summer 2010 DAMBAR AIR.
Anthropogenic Influences on the Global Carbon Cycle and its Implications for the Future Abstract Carbon makes up approximately 50% of the dry weight of.
Fuel treatment effects on forest carbon and wildfire Malcolm North, Sierra Nevada Research Center,
Ecosystem processes and heterogeneity Landscape Ecology.
(events related to Earth science). Global Warming Global Warming – is the increase of Earth’s average surface temperature due to effect of greenhouse.
Causes Effects Solutions
Fire Prevention as a GHG Mitigation Strategy Presented by Robert Beach, RTI International Brent Sohngen, The Ohio State University Presented at Forestry.
1 Fire Weather Science Fire Weather System Project EcoConnect-Fire Implementation, June 2013 April 2011.
FAO Committee on Forestry 2009 Special Event Climate Change and Fire 18 March 2009 Vegetation Fires and Climate Change Interactions Global Fire Monitoring.
Mapping Forest Canopy Height with MISR We previously demonstrated a capability to obtain physically meaningful canopy structural parameters using data.
Assessment of Regional Vegetation Productivity: Using NDVI Temporal Profile Metrics Background NOAA satellite AVHRR data archive NDVI temporal profile.

4 Forest Restoration Initiative Overview of Vegetation Data, Modeling and Strategies Used to Develop the Proposed Action Neil McCusker Silviculturist 4FRI.
Drivers of Global Wildfires — Statistical analyses Master Thesis Seminar, 2010 Hongxiao Jin Supervisor: Dr. Veiko Lehsten Division of Physical Geography.
Fire Ecology and Fire Regimes in Boreal Ecosystems Oct 19, 2010.
Scientific Plan for LBA2 Changing the principle… LBA1 – structure by disciplines LBA2 – structure by issues –Foster integrative science and avoid the dicotomy.
By: Kelsey Lewis, Kimmy Parks, Tyler Tucker, Ashley Sun.
Lindsay Hutley (CDU) Jeremy Russell-Smith (NTG)
The impacts of land mosaics and human activity on ecosystem productivity Jeanette Eckert.
Translation to the New TCO Panel Beverly Law Prof. Global Change Forest Science Science Chair, AmeriFlux Network Oregon State University.
Michigan Tech Research Institute (MTRI)  Michigan Technological University 3600 Green Court, Suite 100  Ann Arbor, MI (734) – Phone 
DATA ANALYSIS PROJECT SIMONE PHILLIPS 24 APRIL 2014 EAS 4480.
Joint Canada-Mexico-USA (North American*) Carbon Program Planning Meeting January 25–26, 2007 *By North America we mean the North American land, adjacent.
Future climate change drives increases in forest fires and summertime Organic Carbon Aerosol concentrations in the Western U.S. Dominick Spracklen, Jennifer.
Investigating the Carbon Cycle in Terrestrial Ecosystems (ICCTE) Scott Ollinger * -PI, Jana Albrecktova †, Bobby Braswell *, Rita Freuder *, Mary Martin.
AAG 2010 Washington DC Savanna Vegetation Changes as Influenced by Climate in East Africa Gopal Alagarswamy, Chuan Qin, Jiaguo Qi, Jeff Andresen, Jennifer.
Terrestrial Carbon Observations TCO Previous Strategy 1- better identify the potential end users, and their requirements 2- organize and coordinate reliable.
Global Climate Change The Evidence and Human Influence Principle Evidence CO 2 and Temperature.
Variations in Continental Terrestrial Primary Production, Evapotranspiration and Disturbance Faith Ann Heinsch, Maosheng Zhao, Qiaozhen Mu, David Mildrexler,
AGU2012-GC31A963: Model Estimates of Pan-Arctic Lake and Wetland Methane Emissions X.Chen 1, T.J.Bohn 1, M. Glagolev 2, S.Maksyutov 3, and D. P. Lettenmaier.
Goal: to understand carbon dynamics in montane forest regions by developing new methods for estimating carbon exchange at local to regional scales. Activities:
Simulating global fire regimes & biomass burning with vegetation-fire models Kirsten Thonicke 1, Allan Spessa 2 & I. Colin Prentice
Scientific Plan Introduction –History of LBA Background –Definition of Amazon –7 Themes with achievements Motivation for Phase II –Unresolved questions.
Diploma thesis (Spanien – Österreich): Title of the Project: “Effect of burning of Mediterranean macchia on ecosystem nitrogen stocks and the soil-atmosphere.
1 MET 112 Global Climate Change MET 112 Global Climate Change - Lecture 12 Future Predictions Eugene Cordero San Jose State University Outline  Scenarios.
Uncertainties in Wildfire Emission Estimates Workshop on Regional Emissions & Air Quality Modeling July 30, 2008 Shawn Urbanski, Wei Min Hao, Bryce Nordgren.
Chapter 13 Section 3 Global Warming Environmental Science Spring 2011.
Metrics and MODIS Diane Wickland December, Biology/Biogeochemistry/Ecosystems/Carbon Science Questions: How are global ecosystems changing? (Question.
CMUG meeting – March 2016 Fire_cci phase 2 progress. Interactions with other ECVs Phase 2 of the Climate Change Initiative Fire_cci project Emilio.
JOINT FIRE SCIENCE PROGRAM 2015 FUNDING CALL October 9, 2014.
 The boreal forest or taiga exists as a nearly continuous belt of coniferous trees across North America and Eurasia.  Taiga is the Russian name for.
Carbon Sequestration Akilah Martin Fall 2005.
Terrestrial-atmosphere (1)
Forestry and the Carbon Cycle
Global Climate Change Visual Vocabulary.
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Arizona Western College BIO 181 USDA-NIFA (ACIS)
CH19: Carbon Sinks and Sources
Figure 1. Spatial distribution of pinyon-juniper and ponderosa pine forests is shown for the southwestern United States. Red dots indicate location of.
Mapping of Fire Areas in East Russia using AVHRR,
Models of emissions from savannas
NOVELTIS/Laboratoire d’Aérologie, Toulouse (France)
Climate.
Presentation transcript:

DETERMINING REGIONAL CARBON EMISSIONS UNDER VARIABLE FIRE REGIMES IN CENTRAL SIBERIA D.J. McRae 1, S.G. Conard 2, G.A. Ivanova 3, S.P. Baker 4, A.I. Sukhinin 3, W.M. Hao 4, and T.W. Blake 1 For more information contact: 1 Canadian Forest Service, 1219 Queen St. E., Sault Ste. Marie, ON. P6A 2E5 Contact: Douglas J. McRae, Telephone: ; Tom W. Blake, Telephone: ; 2 USDA Forest Service, RPC-4, 1601 N. Kent St., Arlington, VA Contact: Susan G. Conard, Telephone: ; 3 V.N. Sukachev Institute of Forest Research, Akademgorodok, Krasnoyarsk Russia. Contact: Galina A. Ivanova, Telephone: ; Anatoly I. Sukhinin, Telephone: ; 4 USDA Forest Service, Fire Sciences Laboratory, 5775 US Highway 10 West, Missoula, MT Contact: Wei Min Hao, Telephone: ; Steve P. Baker, Telephone: ; Low-intensity surface fire burning in a Siberian Scots pine forest. Eighty percent of fires in a typical year burn as surface fires, which in many cases will not cause any damage to the mature trees. NASA’s Land Cover Land Use Change Program FACTS The Russian boreal forest contains up to 20% of the global terrestrial carbon storage. Wildfires affect from million ha annually in typical burning years. Fires are projected to increase in both frequency and severity across Siberia under climate change. Fire behavior and impacts are highly variable across this landscape. Information on fire severity and its effects on factors such as emissions, carbon storage, and ecosystem recovery are scarce. Carbon emissions are roughly 45-50% of the fuel consumed during a fire, which can be modeled from fire data. AGU Fall Meeting 11 December 2007 Paper Number: GC23A-0999 Results to date are: RUSSIAN FIRE BEAR (Fire Effects in the Boreal Eurasia Region) PROJECT A major goal of this project is to provide fire data and models required to estimate carbon emissions from wildfires in central Siberia. Research is being carried out in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and larch (Larix sp.) forest types, which together make up 58% of the forest area in the Asian portion of Russia. The overall objective of this research is to develop validated estimates of fire areas, fire severity, emissions, and the impact of fire on carbon balance for key forest types of central Siberia. This project is building on our past research efforts in Scots pine forests ( ), while initiating similar research in larch forests by: Quantifying and modeling effects of different severity fires on Scots pine sites to estimate effects of fire severity on carbon cycle, direct fire emissions, and forest dynamics. Developing models relating fire behavior, fire weather, and fuel condition at the time of burning to carbon emissions, energy release, and other ecosystem impacts. Evaluating the potential for estimating emissions directly from satellite infrared channels through relationships between the fire’s energy release and its emissions. 20 experimental fires have been conducted in central Siberia. Fire behavior (e.g., fire spread) models have been created. Carbon emission (i.e., from fuel consumption data) models have been created. Emissions sampling has quantified the composition of carbon and aerosols in the smoke. PROBLEMS Changes in boreal fire regimes can be expected to lead to large changes in patterns of burn severity, with attendant effects on emissions per unit burned area and on postfire vegetation recovery. Developing accurate regional to continental estimates of carbon emissions from wildfires in Siberia requires the collection of data and creation of models that will enable us to accurately quantify not only the areas that are burned annually, but the emissions per unit of burned area for fires of widely varying characteristics. Estimates of fire emissions must account for the heterogeneous nature of fire behavior. This is due to the constant changes in daily burning conditions (e.g., drought), topography, and wildland fuel types. While remote sensing has been proven in estimating burn area, the direct estimate of carbon emissions from satellite images may not be possible as fuel consumption cannot be determined. Satellite images provide an excellent means of obtaining burned area estimates. Polygon outlines represent burn areas with red shading showing locations where active fires are burning. Arrows show areas of saturation that differentiate between crown fires and surface fires. While satellite images can determine specific fire types, they cannot determine actual fuel consumption which is imperative in estimating carbon emissions. QUESTION How can accurate estimates of carbon emissions from biomass burning be made to better understand the contribution of Russian fires to greenhouse gases? 15 June 2003 APPROACH FOR ESTIMATING EMISSIONS 1. Determination of burned area through remote- sensing analysis. Red polygons indicate areas that have burned between June 6-16, Gray polygons indicate areas that have already burned in the current fire season. 2. Creation of carbon emission models from experimental fire results which documented fuel consumption (~50% carbon content). 3. Determination of the Canadian Fire Weather Index (FWI) at target sites in central Siberia coinciding with fires shown in Figure 1. Note how the location of fire hot spots, depicted in yellow from Figure 1, correlate well with the high FWI values found in this region. Estimated ranges in carbon emissions for fires burning at the different FWI in the figure are based on data from Figure Carbon emissions (t/ha) Fire Weather Index TAKE-HOME MESSAGE Remote-sensing, by itself, cannot be used to determine emissions. Carbon emission models have been created for Russian Scots pine forest types. A Russian fire danger database ( ) has been created allowing us to use our model for estimating emissions for any year, provided we have fire size and location information. The ranges of emission factors (EF) for the major carbon emission products for these fires were correlated with the FWI for each fire. Higher EF values for CO 2 and modified combustion efficiency (MCE) occurred with increasing FWI values. At the same time, EF values for CO and CH 4 were observed to decrease. Carbon emissions = (0.554*FWI) R 2 = 0.82