Domain Scoring Guide groupNon-Scoring Guide group ICC(95% C.I.)p-valueICC(95% C.I.)p-value Domain 1 0.821(-0.303~0.995)0.043-0.333(-0.806~0.966)0.512 Domain.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Methods Chapter 2 Gillian Booth, Alice YY Cheng Canadian Diabetes Association 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Advertisements

General Analysis of the (European) Questionnaire Jorun Poettering Consultant WHC.
Part II Knowing How to Assess Chapter 5 Minimizing Error p115 Review of Appl 644 – Measurement Theory – Reliability – Validity Assessment is broader term.
AGRISCIENCE CURRICULUM REVIEW Ginnie Bushong A ED 615 Investigations and Studies in Applied Research.
| ICD-11 Ch. 23 FT pilot phase Meeting, March 2013, Seoul, Korea 1 |1 | ICD-11Chapter 23 Field Trial pilot phase Nenad Kostanjsek Classifications,
Evidenced Based Practice; Systematic Reviews; Critiquing Research
Dissemination and Critical Evaluation of Published Research Peg Bottjen, MPA, MT(ASCP)SC.
Research Proposal Development of research question
In the name of Allah. Development and psychometric Testing of a new Instrument to Measure Affecting Factors on Women’s Behaviors to Breast Cancer Prevention:
Authors: Sujai M. Parker, Gunjan N. Jodi, Jalak Jani
Biomedical research methods. What are biomedical research methods? An integrated approach using chemical, mathematical and computer simulations, in vitro.
SAS No. 70 BADM 559 Jong Choi. Overview of SAS 70 Definition ▫SAS 70 helps service auditors to assess operational and technical controls of a service.
From Evidence to EMS Practice: Building the National Model Eddy Lang, MD, CFPC (EM), CSPQ SMBD-Jewish General Hospital, McGill University Montreal, Canada.
Critical Appraisal of Clinical Practice Guidelines
RESEARCH FRAMEWORK Yulia Sofiatin Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics 2012 YS 2011.
1 Rachel Torres, MPH, CHES Department of Health & Behavior Studies Teachers College, Columbia University Relationships between Health Literacy, Self- efficacy.
Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Wellington School of Medicine and Health Sciences Outcome measures in psoriatic arthritis Preliminary identification.
COMPREHENSIVE SEARCH Literature searched: List of established guideline websites, list of specialty websites related to the topic, Google, Ovid MEDLINE,
Applicability of the AGREE II Instrument in Evaluating the Development Process and Quality of Current National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Guidelines.
Research Techniques Made Simple: Evaluating the Strength of Clinical Recommendations in the Medical Literature: GRADE, SORT, and AGREE Mayra Buainain de.
Education Program Experience for the Appraisers of Guidelines using AGREE II Scoring Guide in Korea Sung-Goo Chang 1) 6), Ein-Soon Shin 2), Ji-Eun Jang.
The system development of quality management for Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea Dong Ik Kim, Sung-Goo Chang, Heui Sug Jo, Ein Soon Shin, Moo Kyung.
HERU is supported by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Executive Health Department. The author accepts full responsibility for this talk. Economic.
Dr Opio C K (TM) Quality assurance at FOM Quality assurance committee.
T. Brzostek 1, L. Przewoźniak 1, P.Brzyski 1, M. Kózka 1, K.Gajda 1, M.Cisek 1, L. Aiken 2, W. Sermeus 3 1.Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow,
TEACH LEVEL II: CLINICAL POLICIES AND GUIDELINES STREAM Craig A Umscheid, MD, MSCE, FACP Assistant Professor of Medicine and Epidemiology Director, Center.
1 Review of current assessment instruments in Northern Ireland Introduction Aims/Objectives Methods –Instrument collection 11 Trusts –Instrument analysis.
BMH CLINICAL GUIDELINES IN EUROPE. OUTLINE Background to the project Objectives The AGREE Instrument: validation process and results Outcomes.
 Despite the greater attention in CPGs, It’s adoption and utilization by practicing clinicians are not high There remains the gap between the development.
Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation Using the AGREE¹ Instrument CAN-IMPLEMENT Toolkit Version 1.0 April 2010 Modified from:
Prevalence of Dry Eye Disease among Elderly Korean Population Sang Beom Han, MD, 1 Joon Young Hyon, MD, 1 Won Ryang Wee, MD, 2,3 Jin Hak Lee, MD, 1, 3.
CES 20th Annual Conference Keun-bok Kang (CNU) & Chan-goo Yi (ETRI) ; Taejon, Korea A DESIGN OF THE METAEVALUATION MODEL A DESIGN OF THE METAEVALUATION.
ACCEPTABLE METHODOLOGY AND STANDARDS Carey Edwards CRM Advisory Panel.
Adapting Guidelines for Local Implementation: Fusion Cuisine or Fast Food Leftovers Eddy Lang MDCM CCFP(EM) Head Department of Emergency Medicine Senior.
Reliability and Validity of the Intensive Care Delirium Screening Checklist in Turkish Gulsah Kose, Abdullah Bolu, Leyla Ozdemir, Cengizhan Acikel, Sevgi.
RARE BEST PRACTICES COURSE ROMA (Feb ) Euro-HSP Madrid 2015 May 30 Jean Bénard May 31, GA 2015 Madrid.
RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute Nancy Berkman, PhDMeera Viswanathan, PhD
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
The Oral Health Status and Knowledge of the Elementary Students of AIM Christian Learning Center, Sampaloc, Manila SEMINAR 40 Bautista, Kamille Joanna.
School of Nursing Health Literacy Among Informal Caregivers of Persons With Memory Loss Judith A. Erlen, PhD, RN, FAAN; Jennifer H. Lingler, PhD, RN; Lisa.
Emergency Health Services Translating Research Into Practice Andrew Travers MD MSc FRCPC Staff Physician, QE-II Emergency Provincial Medical Director Emergency.
Grant Writing: Specific Considerations in Clinical Studies Ravi Retnakaran MD MSc FRCPC Leadership Sinai Centre for Diabetes, Mount Sinai Hospital University.
Monday, June 23, 2008Slide 1 KSU Females prospective on Maternity Services in PHC Maternity Services in Primary Health Care Centers : The Females Perception.
LEARN. CARE. COMMUNITY. PNWU.edu Figure 1: Concept Map for IPE Fidelity 1.Determine the rubric score that represents high, medium, and low fidelity. 2.Identify.
International Neurourology Journal 2015;19: Knowledge and Practice Behaviors Regarding Urinary Incontinence Among Korean Healthcare Providers in.
Critiquing Quantitative Research.  A critical appraisal is careful evaluation of all aspects of a research study in order to assess the merits, limitations,
EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE ATHANASIA KOSTOPOULOU ERASMUS IPs
Policies & Procedures 10/23/2012. Background:  To match with new strategic plan and based on the recommendations of the midterm evaluation.
Assessing Quality of Pathology Reporting: The Case of Tongue Cancer Lihua Liu 1, PhD Wesley Y. Naritoku 2, MD, PhD Juanjuan Zhang 1, MS Lenard Berglund.
DEVELOPING AND TESTING THE STANDARD OF PRACTICE AND EVALUATION OF CRITICAL-CARE-NURSING TOOL (SPECT) FOR GRADUATES OF CRITICAL CARE NURSE EDUCATION PROGRAMS.
OBJECTIVE INTRODUCTION Emergency Medicine Milestones: Longitudinal Interrater Agreement EM milestones were developed by EM experts for the Accreditation.
Valerie Smith, Kathryn Muldoon, Linda Biesty School of Nursing & Midwifery Trinity College Dublin Student Midwives’ attitudes towards the Objective Structured.
Title of the Change Project
Building an Evidence-Based Nursing Practice
An Alternative Certification Examination “ACE”, to assess the domains of professional practice.  Morris M1*, Gillis AE2, Smoothey CO3, Hennessy M1, Conlon.
Title of the Change Project
Research Problems, Purposes, & Hypotheses
Preventing HCAI’s through an education programme for nurses
Background Non-Formal Education is recognized as an important sub-sector of the education system, providing learning opportunities to those who are not.
Evidence-based Medicine
International Neurourology Journal 2013;17:
AXIS critical Appraisal of cross sectional Studies
NR 505Competitive Success/tutorialrank.com
NR 505 Education for Service-- tutorialrank.com. NR 505 Analysis and Application of Clinical Practice For more course tutorials visit
education and training systems (UOE)
What defines an international statistical standard and other types of international statistical publications in economic statistics? Second Meeting of.
Assessing Academic Programs at IPFW
Fig. 2. Change in mean International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) scores from preoperative (preop) visit to postoperative 2-year visit for all patients.
Presenter Name Credentials Organization
Presentation transcript:

Domain Scoring Guide groupNon-Scoring Guide group ICC(95% C.I.)p-valueICC(95% C.I.)p-value Domain (-0.303~0.995) (-0.806~0.966)0.512 Domain (-0.675~0.994) (-0.679~0.994)0.069 Domain (0.394~0.954) (-0.710~0.871)0.155 Domain ( ~0.941) (-6.260~0.975)0.422 Domain (0.431~0.992) (-2.696~0.950)0.312 Domain (-4.814~1.000) (-2634~1.000)0.116 Overall 0.869(0.753~0.939)< (0.362~0.841)<0.001 Domain Scoring Guide groupNon-Scoring Guide group ICC(95% C.I.)p-valueICC(95% C.I.)p-value Domain (-0.344~0.995) (-1.307~0.992)0.116 Domain (-3.137~0.986) ( ~0.955)0.595 Domain (0.175~0.938) (-0.565~0.882)0.121 Domain (-1.048~0.993) (-8.411~0.967)0.503 Domain (-1.925~0.960) (-2.693~0.950)0.312 Domain ( ~0.999) ( ~0.999)0.391 Overall 0.826(0.671~0.918)< (0.395~0.850)<0.001 Statistics To identify the distribution Descriptive analysis (Domain specific) To evaluate the reliability Intra-class correlation (Domain specific) To evaluate the consistency Association among appraisers (Each items) Study design I. Background and Purpose IV. Discussion Scoring guide reduce the inter-rater disagreemet and improve the overall reliability of the K-AGREE II instrument.  Those effects remarkable in low level CPGs development  Inter-rater disagreement reflects the healthcare environment characteristics II. Methods Table 1. Inter-rater reliability of K-AGREE Ⅱ domain scores in CPG A Effects of Korean-AGREE Ⅱ Scoring Guide on Improving the Reliability of the Scores Reliability Higher ICC in SG  Observed in almost domain and stastically significant in overall assessment Moo-Kyung Oh 1, Heuisug Jo 1,2,3, Youkyoung Lee 3,4,5 1 Department of Preventive Medicine, Kangwon National University Hospital, Chuncheon, Korea 2 Department of Health Management and Policy, Kangwon National University School of Medicine, Chuncheon, Korea 3 Executive Committee for clinical practice guideline, The Korean Academy of Medical Sciences 4 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University Bucheon Hospital, Bucheon, Korea 5 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Genetics, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Cheonan, Korea Table 2. Inter-rater reliability of K-AGREE Ⅱ domain scores in CPG B Appraiser Fig. 1. Distribution of K-AGREE Ⅱ domain scores according Scoring Guide users in CPG A Scope and Purpose Stake involve- ment Rigour develop -ment Clarity and Presen- tation Applica- bility Editorial Indepen -dence Domain Scores Scope and Purpose Stake involve- ment Rigour develop -ment Clarity and Presen- tation Applica- bility Editorial Indepen -dence Fig. 2. Distribution of K-AGREE Ⅱ domain scores according Scoring Guide users in CPG B III. Results Distribution Higher Scores and higher variability in Non-SG  Distinctive in domain 2, 3, and 5 Consistency Higher association in SG  Association improve in SG, especially distinctive in CPG B Table 3. Association of SG in CPG A Table 4. Association of Non-SG in CPG A Table 5. Association of SG in CPG B Table 6. Association of Non-SG in CPG B Appraiser Appraiser Appraiser Stakeholder involvement Applicability DomainLimitationScoring Guide Providing clear standards regarding the stakeholder and the level of participation Providing clear standards regarding the stakeholder and the level of participation Providing clear definition of implementation Providing the methodologies and resources in detail Providing clear definition of implementation Providing the methodologies and resources in detail Lack of experience in stakeholder involvement Different understanding of stakeholder Low level of CPGs implementation Confuse implementation with dissemination Current status of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Korea This study aim to examine the effects of the K-AGREE II scoring guide to reduce inter-rater differences. This study aim to examine the effects of the K-AGREE II scoring guide to reduce inter-rater differences. Korean medical guideline information center (KoMGI) A couple of CPGs development handbook More than 100 of guidelines of the last decade Korean AGREE II instrument Web-based evaluation systems KoMGI Development Dissemination Implementation Approval Appraisal Inter-rater disagreement A lack of experiences in evaluation of CPGs Differences of healthcare environments Scoring Guide