The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer 1 has ~355,000 drift tubes installed into 1200 precision Monitored Drift Tube (MDT) tracking chambers arrayed over a 22 m high,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GEM Chambers at BNL The detector from CERN, can be configured with up to 4 GEMs The detector for pad readout and drift studies, 2 GEM maximum.
Advertisements

Calibration of a Modular Straw-Tube- Tracker for the COSY-TOF Experiment Sedigheh Jowzaee 3-6 June 2013, Symposium on Applied Nuclear Physics and Innovative.
CSC Test Beam Data Analysis Alexander Khodinov and Valeri Tcherniatine.
ATLAS Tile Calorimeter Performance Henric Wilkens (CERN), on behalf of the ATLAS collaboration.
TRACK DICTIONARY (UPDATE) RESOLUTION, EFFICIENCY AND L – R AMBIGUITY SOLUTION Claudio Chiri MEG meeting, 21 Jan 2004.
D. Peterson, Muon Spectrometers at ATLAS and CMS, presentation to LEPP 19-Nov  spectrometers at ATLAS and CMS Our charge: Survivability Resolution.
Christine KOURKOUMELIS University of Athens ATLAS Muon Chamber construction in Greece and alignment studies for H  ZZ  4μ decay Como, 8/10/03.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
Y. Karadzhov MICE Video Conference Thu April 9 Slide 1 Absolute Time Calibration Method General description of the TOF DAQ setup For the TOF Data Acquisition.
Octal ASD Certification Tests at Michigan J. Chapman, Tiesheng Dai, & Tuan Bui August 30, CERN.
1 Cluster Quality in Track Fitting for the ATLAS CSC Detector David Primor 1, Nir Amram 1, Erez Etzion 1, Giora Mikenberg 2, Hagit Messer 1 1. Tel Aviv.
Forward Detectors and Measurement of Proton-Antiproton Collision Rates by Zachary Einzig, Mentor Michele Gallinaro INTRODUCTION THE DETECTORS EXPERIMENTAL.
LNF, 20 febbraio R(t) Relations from inclusive MDT tubes drift time distributions M. Barone Software and Analysis Meeting ATLAS/Frascati.
The Transverse detector is made of an array of 256 scintillating fibers coupled to Avalanche PhotoDiodes (APD). The small size of the fibers (5X5mm) results.
RPC Cosmic Rays Test in Naples Paolo Iengo Atlas RPC Group Napoli ( M. Alviggi, V. Canale, M. Caprio, G. Carlino,R. de Asmundis, M. Della Pietra, D. della.
PERFORMANCE OF THE MACRO LIMITED STREAMER TUBES IN DRIFT MODE FOR MEASUREMENTS OF MUON ENERGY - Use of the MACRO limited streamer tubes in drift mode -Use.
Ivan Vitev & E906 Muon Identifier Status Patrick McGaughey and the muon radiography team E866 Meeting at FNAL June 20-21, 2007 Large Muon Tracker at LANSCE.
Gas Studies with H8 Water Contamination and Series Effect Flow rate effects Changes in CO2 percentage Air Contamination (2001 measurements)
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Susanne Mohrdieck Max-Planck-Institut f. Physik, Munich for the ATLAS Muon Collaboration Abstracts:
PHENIX Drift Chamber operation principles Modified by Victor Riabov Focus meeting 01/06/04 Original by Sergey Butsyk Focus meeting 01/14/03.
Manoj Kumar Jha INFN – Bologna On Behalf of ATLAS Muon Calibration Group 20 th October 2010/CHEP 2010, Taipei ATLAS Muon Calibration Framework.
DC12 Commissioning Status GOALS: establish operating conditions, determine initial calibration parameters and measure operating characteristics for the.
Simulating the Effects of Wire Sag in ATLAS’s Monitored Drift Tubes Ashley Thrall, Vassar College ‘04 Dan Levin, Mentor REU Presentations August 5, 2004.
LRT2004 Sudbury, December 2004Igor G. Irastorza, CEA Saclay NOSTOS: a spherical TPC to detect low energy neutrinos Igor G. Irastorza CEA/Saclay NOSTOS.
Muon Detector Jiawen ZHANG Introduction The Detector Choices Simulation The structure and detector design The Expected performance Schedule.
NanoPHYS’12 – December 17-19, 2012 K. Nakano, S. Miyasaka, K. Nagai and S. Obata (Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology) Drift Chambers.
LNF, 26 gennaio Test Beam 2003 Data Analysis and MonteCarlo Studies M. Barone Software and Analysis Meeting ATLAS/Frascati.
BOS Testbeam Results in 2001 MPI & LMU, Munich 1. Drift time spectra 2. RT-relation 3. Resolution - HV & threshold dependance -Comparison with the 1999.
A Study of Back Diffusion in the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Gas System Gordon Berman University of Michigan Advisors: Bing Zhou, Dan Levin, and Zhengguo Zhao.
IEEE 2011 NSS-MIC Valencia Yiftah Silver October 26 th 2011.
Muon-raying the ATLAS Detector
High voltage V = 300 Pixel capacitance C = 3 fF Embedded resistance R = 50K  Recovery time = 1 ns Pixel density = 10 4 cm -2 4 X estimated SLHC rate =
Experimental and Numerical studies on Bulk Micromegas SINP group in RD51 Applied Nuclear Physics Division Saha Institute of Nuclear Physics Kolkata, West.
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Calibration of the COSY-TOF STT & pp Elastic Analysis Sedigheh Jowzaee IKP Group Talk 11 July 2013.
Shashlyk FE-DAQ requirements Pavel Semenov IHEP, Protvino on behalf of the IHEP PANDA group PANDA FE-DAQ workshop, Bodenmais April 2009.
Forward Muon Installation and Commissioning Dmitri Denisov Fermilab Director’s review 7/12/1999 Plan Forward muon detectors Mini-drift tubes installation.
The Status of the ATLAS Experiment Dr Alan Watson University of Birmingham on behalf of the ATLAS Collaboration.
BES-III Workshop Oct.2001,Beijing The BESIII Luminosity Monitor High Energy Physics Group Dept. of Modern Physics,USTC P.O.Box 4 Hefei,
Luca Spogli Università Roma Tre & INFN Roma Tre
All Experimenters MeetingDmitri Denisov Week of July 7 to July 15 Summary  Delivered luminosity and operating efficiency u Delivered: 1.4pb -1 u Recorded:
2/4/2001Ludovico Pontecorvo INFN Roma1 Plans for the H8 system test: 2001/2002 Goals for the 2001/2002 Test beam Beam layout Chamber Supports 2001 Schedule.
Precision Drift Chambers for the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer
CALICE Tungsten HCAL Prototype status Erika Garutti Wolfgang Klempt Erik van der Kraaij CERN LCD International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010, October.
Measurement of the Charge Ratio of Cosmic Muons using CMS Data M. Aldaya, P. García-Abia (CIEMAT-Madrid) On behalf of the CMS Collaboration Sector 10 Sector.
Active polarimeter simulation Suguru Shimizu Osaka University Sep. 1, 2007 JPARC TREK Collaboration meeting at Saskatchewan.
2002 LHC days in Split Sandra Horvat 08 – 12 October, Ruđer Bošković Institute, Zagreb Max-Planck-Institute for Physics, Munich Potential is here...
1 DT Local Reconstruction on CRAFT data Plots for approval CMS- Run meeting, 26/6/09 U.Gasparini, INFN & Univ.Padova on behalf of DT community [ n.b.:
Single tube detection efficiency BIS-MDT GARFIELD Simulation GARFIELD Simulation Anode wire voltage as a function of the distance from the wire Electric.
1 Analysis of Small RPC DHCAL Prototype Data (noise and cosmic ray) LCWA09, Albuquerque, New Mexico Friday, October 02, 2009 Qingmin Zhang HEP Division,
1 Chapter No. 17 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Measurement of Timing Properties.
Station-4 MuID System: Status Ming X. Liu Los Alamos National Lab 1/7/091E906 Collaboration Meeting.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Study of Charged Hadrons in Au-Au Collisions at with the PHENIX Time Expansion Chamber Dmitri Kotchetkov for the PHENIX Collaboration Department of Physics,
Siena, May A.Tonazzo –Performance of ATLAS MDT chambers /1 Performance of BIL tracking chambers for the ATLAS muon spectrometer A.Baroncelli,
Plots of RPC performance G. Cattani, University of Rome “Tor Vergata” & INFN Roma 2 on behalf of ATLAS Muon Collaboration.
Outline Description of the experimental setup Aim of this work TDC spectra analysis Tracking method steps Autocalibration Single tube resolution Summary.
14/02/2008 Michele Bianco 1 G.Chiodini & E.Gorini ATLAS RPC certification with cosmic rays Università del Salento Facoltà di Scienze MM.FF.NN.
Particle Identification of the ALICE TPC via dE/dx
Precision Drift Tube Detectors for High Counting Rates O. Kortner, H. Kroha, F. Legger, R. Richter Max-Planck-Institut für Physik, Munich, Germany A. Engl,
1 straw tube signal simulation A. Rotondi PANDA meeting, Stockolm 15 June 2010.
Activities on straw tube simulation
The Transition Radiation Detector for the PAMELA Experiment
Llea Nasira Samuel Benedict College Charlotte Wood-Harrington
National Technical University of Athens Faculty of Applied Sciences
ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Calibration
CMS muon detectors and muon system performance
Barrel RPC Conditions Database
Bringing the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer to Life with Cosmic Rays
Pre-installation Tests of the LHCb Muon Chambers
Resistive Plate Chambers performance with Cosmic Rays
Presentation transcript:

The ATLAS Muon Spectrometer 1 has ~355,000 drift tubes installed into 1200 precision Monitored Drift Tube (MDT) tracking chambers arrayed over a 22 m high, 45 m long barrel-shaped detector. The 2%-3% (100 GeV) momentum resolution and high efficiency of the spectrometer rests on maintaining 80 um single drift tube resolution. Significant performance degradation occurs for miscalibration of the maximum drift time of a few ns. The drift tube is the fundamental sensitive element in the spectrometer. It consists of a 3 cm diameter extruded aluminum tube, pressurized to 3 bar with 93%Ar, 7% CO 2 gas mixture. A 50  m diameter gold-plated tungsten wire stretched to 350 grams, operated at 3KV is coaxial to the tube. The operating gain is The spectrometer’s precision coordinate is the radial distance of closest approach of an ionizing particle passing through a drift tube. The spatial resolution depends critically on RT transfer function relating drift time to track impact parameter. We have constructed mini-MDT chamber employing 96 closed- packed drift tubes arrayed in two multi-layers of 3 closed-packed layers each. This chamber dedicated to online gas monitoring and calibrations, is staged at the ATLAS gas-mixing facility at CERN. It is configured with two independent gas distribution manifolds and enables simultaneous direct comparison from different input sources. It routinely samples the gas supply and return lines servicing the underground spectrometer. The chamber uses standard ATLAS muon spectrometer readout electronics and has an automated data acquisition and analysis program. Plastic scintillators trigger on cosmic ray muons at 20 Hz, two-fold coincidence. Drift times are measured and collected into drift spectra. Which are analyzed to extract the maximum drift time. The maximum drift time is sensitive to the gas composition as well as gas temperature and pressure. The gas temperature and pressure are measured by embedded sensors and collected drift times are corrected to standard conditions of 3000 mb and 20 C. After these corrections any changes to the drift spectra are attributable to changes in the gas composition. expressed as drift radii. Also from these drift times track are reconstructed and used to iteratively in autocalibration 1 process to extract an RT function. The primary task of the Monitor Chamber is to provide continuous recording of gas properties and to flag deviations sufficient to signal a re-determination of the RT calibration constants. A sensitive parameter to gas properties is the maximum drift time, T max. A 5 ns change in the maximum drift corresponds to ~75  m error in track drift radius- about equal to a drift tube’s intrinsic resolution. Left un-calibrated this change in T max degrades efficiency and momentum resolution by several percent 2. Drift times are affected not only by the gas composition, but also by the temperature and pressure in the monitor chamber. Corrections are computed & validated with data. ns mb C % ppm T max vs Pressure T max vs Temperature T max vs Water content T max vs % CO 2 ns CONFIGURATION Drift Time Calibration & Gas Monitoring of the ATLAS Muon Spectrometer Precision Chambers Daniel S. Levin, 1 Nir Amram 2, Meny ben Moshe 2, Erez Etzion 2, Tiesheng Dai 1, Edward Diehl 1, Claudio Ferretti 1, Jeffery Gregory 1, Mike Kiesel 1, Rudi Thun 1,Curtis Weaverdyck 1, Alan Wilson 1, Bing Zhou 1 for the ATLAS Collaboration 1 University of Michigan, Department of Physics 2 Tel Aviv University, School of Physics and Astronomy  drift spectrum from one group of 24 tubes. The rising edge and trailing edge are fit with Fermi-Dirac functions : The maximum drift time is defined : p 3 (trailing)-p 2 (leading) In normal operation:  the MDT Supply/Return gas lines are connected to the Right /Left partitions.  the gas flows at ~40 l/hr through both chamber partitions Monitor Chamber Electrons drift to anode muon Drift tube with High Voltage anode wire at center Above: drawing of chamber showing the two multi-layers. Readout electronics are hidden from view in faraday cages on the near side. The results of one week’s output is shown above. In this plot: 1)Each point represents one hour of data. Measurement error is < 1 ns. 2)The T max is computed as the difference in the tail and leading edge fit parameters 3) The difference in the gas drift time is consistent with ~50 ppm H 2 O. (Diffusion of small amounts of water through the ceramic endplugs of the drift tubes is possible) REFERENCES PERFORMANCE 1. ATLAS MUON TDR ATLAS TDR 10, CERN/LHCC/ R. Veenhof, “GARFIELD”, CERN Program Library W A. Wilson et al, “Z   ”  ATLAS Physics Workshop, Rome, (2005) After corrections to temperature and pressure the T max from a reference gas source is very stable. In plot below the dispersion over 115 hours is only 0.6 ns CONCEPT Below: Chamber in the MDT gas system. Left/Right sides receive inputs from: Fresh mix MDT gas MDT Supply gas from main trunk line MDT Return gas from trunk line Reference calibration gas Above: The variation of T max to pressure, temperature, CO 2 fraction and water are computed from the Garfield program 3 Top: Temperature and pressure diurnal variations in the monitor chamber for 1115 data run with a reference gas source. Bottom: the T max is extracted and plotted vs elapsed hours. All deviations can be attributed to the small diurnal pressure/temperature fluctuation as shown in the top plot. The bottom plot shows T max before and after the corrections are applied. MONITORING RESULTS Day/Date monitor chamber Left: Muon track reconstructed by pattern recognition algorithm which finds the line tangent to the drift radii. Drift radii are obtained from drift times with an RT function from an autocalibration 2 method. Right: Hit distribution for each tube layer of the chamber: This shows: all channels functioning high efficiency no spurious noise hits tube hits by chamber layer The results of one month (Sept 07) output In this plot: 1)Each point represents one hour of data. Measurement error is < 1 ns. 2)The T max is computed as the difference in the tail and leading edge fit parameters 3)T max from both gas lines is stable to < 1 n 4)There is a small, but easily measurable difference in the input/output T max 5)Aug 22: Argon supply flow interruption  immediate effect on drift time Day/Date