Purpose : Discuss the use of HSTW/MMGW Key Practices and their link to High Performance Beliefs and Foundations in creating High Performing Schools and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

Title I Directors Conference October 23-25, 2007 Waterfront Place Morgantown, WV Reading the Fine Print Monitoring K-3 Reading Programs Presenter: Pat.
Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
Accelerated Schools Will the Missouri Accelerated Schools project suit Central Middle School to a ?
Literacy in the middle years of schooling focusing on Aboriginal Students.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Your Local School District District Team Orientation Date Time.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Understanding your District’s Plan Colleen Miller, Director of Leadership Development.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
Pioneer High School Our Journey: Becoming and Sustaining a Professional Learning Community.
TRMS ACTION PLAN Goal #1 O Throughout the school year, core content teams will develop pedagogy and strategies to integrate Common.
HSTW MMGW/TCTW Southern Regional Education Board SREB Services for TCTW Sites: The Technical Assistance Visit Lois Barnes
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
The School Counseling Program at {Your School Name}
OIP Resources and Training Documents Used in This PowerPoint
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Meeting of the Staff and Curriculum Development Network December 2, 2010 Implementing Race to the Top Delivering the Regents Reform Agenda with Measured.
GUIDANCE SYSTEM OF SUPPORT COLLEGE AND CAREER READY FOR ALL Guidance and Counseling Fall 2011.
HARRISFIELD PRIMARY SCHOOL NATIONAL PARTNERSHIPS SCHOOL’S FORUM 2011.
WELCOME. AGENDA  LCFF/LCAP Review  LCAP Process  Community Input/Findings  2014/15 LCAP  Plan Alignment- LEAP/LCAP/SPSA  Planning and Input.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW An Integrated and Embedded Approach to Professional Development and School Improvement Using the Six-Step Process.
Southern Regional Education Board Welcome What Does Academic Integration Really Mean in the Career-Technical Classroom? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Ohio HSTW/MMGW: The Positive Impact!. What is High Schools That Work?  An initiative of the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB)  The nation’s largest.
1 Adopting and Implementing a Shared Core Practice Framework A Briefing/Discussion Objectives: Provide a brief overview and context for: Practice Models.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Secondary Experience and Achievement TASK FORCE Staff Leads: Matt Duffy, Brigitte Marshall, Alison McDonald.
Performance and Development Culture Preparing for P&D Culture accreditation April 2008.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Marietta Rives, DE Consultant, Co-Chair of Instruction & Assessment Team Jan Norgaard, AEA 13 Associate Director, Network Team Member Deb Johnsen, AEA.
ExCEL Academic Liaison Meeting Elementary- January 8, 2015 Middle/High School – January 15, 2015.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
Questions to Consider  Why are students leaving our district?  Are we meeting the individual needs of our students?  How can we best serve our students.
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012.
How to Prepare for an Ohio Technical Assistance Visit.
Effective Coaching for Success Presenter: Dr. Wendy Perry 2015.
“Lessons learned” regarding Michigan’s state-wide implementation of schoolwide behavior and reading support Margie McGlinchey Kathryn Schallmo Steve Goodman.
1 PLCi Common Core Standards Initiative (CCSI) Oakland PLCi November 1, 2012.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teresa K. Todd EDAD 684 School Finance/Ethics March 23, 2011.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
A Mission of Restoration
High Schools That Work (HSTW) A Collaborative Effort of The Southern Regional Education Board & The Georgia Department of Education.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
High Schools That Work An evidence-based design for improving the nation’s schools and raising student achievement.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
PARTNERS IN CHANGE CII DESE. Missouri’s Little Engine That Could: A School Improvement Journey.
Southern Regional Education Board High Schools That Work Jo Kister, SREB Consultant Archived Information.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
Southern Regional Education Board TCTW Intro to TCTW TCTW 1 Technology Centers That Work: College and Career Ready in the 21 st Century.
The Pathway Leadership Team’s Role Kathleen Harris, Director Technical Assistance and Coaching
1 Introduction Overview This annotated PowerPoint is designed to help communicate about your instructional priorities. Note: The facts and data here are.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Breaking Ranks II: Leading and Supporting High School Reform Rosa Aronson Director, Office of Advocacy Archived Information.
K-12 School Counseling Program Review
CCRS Implementation Team Meeting November, 2013
Results of Survey on Level Organization June 2012
Implementing Race to the Top
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

Purpose : Discuss the use of HSTW/MMGW Key Practices and their link to High Performance Beliefs and Foundations in creating High Performing Schools and Classrooms Agenda: What is HSTW/MMGW? HSTW/MMGW Key Practices Discussion Starter What HSTW/MMGW Key Practices apply? Classroom and school examples Beliefs and foundations of HP Organizations Do They link to the HSTW/MMGW Key Practices? Limit: 50 Minutes 1

What is HSTW / MMGW ? Results Focused Data Driven Action Research Based Continuous Improvement Model (A journey not a destination) Collaboration and engagement of teachers, administrators, and students Team Based approach to goal setting, action planning and achievement Aligned with building and district culture 2

What is HSTW / MMGW ? Aligned with Ohio Priorities Core Curriculum Middle to High School Transition Assessment High School to Post Secondary Transition Supported by resources Coaches / consultants Site Review Process 10 Key Practices Professional development Action based data and research Ohio HSTW website Clusters (Networks) Funding 3

HSTW/MMGW Process Getting Started process Explore HSTW/ MMGW Develop Site Action Plan Form Teacher Teams Facilitate Team Effectiveness Develop Team Action Plans LT & Teams Assess Progress School, Ohio & HSTW/MM GW Data SRP On-going Processes PD Best Practices Sessions Coaching Networks Local, State and National Conferences Huysse & Associates Tools & Resources Review & Update Plans 4

HSTW 10 Key Practices 1. High Expectations 2. Extra Help 3. Program of Study 4. Rigorous Academic Studies 5. Students Actively Engaged 6. Work-based Learning 7. Teachers Working Together 8. Guidance 9. Career/Technical Studies 10. Culture of Continuous Improvement 5

MMGW 10 Key Practices 1. High Expectations - Extra Help 2. Aligned Academic Core 3. Engaging Classroom Practices 4. Teachers Working Together 5. Guidance/Advisement/ Parents 6. Continuous Improvement through Strong Leadership 7. Literacy Across the Curriculum 8. Use of Technology for Learning 9. Quality PD/Support Teachers 10. Intervention Program/At Risk 6

How Does this video relate to our discussion? What practices and approaches in the video can we use in creating HP Schools and Classrooms? 7

Some Key Practices/approaches we can use Clear Vision, Mission and Goal High Expectations Commitment to achieving the challenge Teamwork Planning Adapting new technologies Use of data Extra Help Effective use of technical and leadership skills Practice makes better Inspecting for outcomes 8

Beliefs and foundations of HP Organizations  Focus foremost on adding value for the customer 2. Utilize values and principles versus rules 3. Lead by example 4. Respect and expect everyone to contribute 5. Collaborate and work in teams to deliver results 6. Continuously Improve 7. Achieve data driven business results 9

Linking HSTW/MMGW Key Practices with HPO Beliefs and Foundations HSTW Key Practices HPO Beliefs and Foundations High Expectations1. Add Value to Customer/Stakeholder Extra Help2. Values and Principles vs. Rules Culture of Continuous Improvement3. Lead by Example Teachers Working Together 4. Respect & Expect all to Contribute Students Actively Engaged5. Collaborate & Work in Teams to Deliver 6. Continuously Improve 7. Achieve data driven results Program of Study1. Add Value to Customer/Stakeholder Academic & Career Tech Studies4. Respect & Expect all to Contribute Students Actively Engaged5. Collaborate & Work in Teams to Deliver Work-Based Learning6. Continuously Improve Guidance7. Achieve data driven results 10

Resource Slides 11

OH HSTW Demonstrates Evidence of Increasing Stakeholder Value SREB Data & Research Connection Funding Sites Regions 10 Key Practices Clusters Networks Ohio HSTW Web Site Superintendent Engagement Action Based Data and Research SRP Coaching PD Timely & Relevant Huysse & Associates 12/8/14 12

Case Studies New High School A school district joined High Schools That Work (HSTW) three years ago when a new Superintendent was appointed. This Superintendent understands HSTW because of a previous role as Principal of a HSTW School. Teacher Focus Teams have been up and running for about a year. The teams are working on tasks identified in a staff survey of critical needs that directly impact student achievement. The Superintendent hired a new High School principal who began work in July. The principal is aware of HSTW but has no experience working in a district that was part of HSTW. As the coach for this district, you arranged a meeting with the High School principal to discuss the school’s needs and the support you might provide. During the meeting, the principal said that primary needs are improvement in the Performance Index and overall improvement. 13

Case Studies SI HS The principal of SI High School heard about improved results being achieved at High Schools That Work (HSTW) member schools and decided to have the site explore the process. After exploration, SI High School, one of several high schools in a large district, joined HSTW several years ago. Focus Teams have been in place for about a year and members are identifying SI HS’s and their own professional development needs. Their first Site Review Process (SRP) visit is scheduled for this school year. As the school’s new HSTW coach, you attended a meeting with the principal and the ILT to discuss the school’s needs and the support you might provide. 14

Case Studies Aspire High School Aspire High School (Aspire HS) and its feeder Middle School are long-term members of Ohio HSTW/MMGW. Since joining, results have improved through focus on the 10 Key Practices development of a culture of continuous improvement. The principal and school leadership team were actively leading the improvement process. Site Coordinators and the building leadership team saw the benefits of the HSTW process and were fully involved in co-leading the site improvement plans. Aspire HS’s Performance Index and other measures of student achievement plateaued during the past few years. The focus of the school has been on implementing changes mandated under new state regulations. Additionally, the long-term principal moved out of Ohio and became superintendent of another HSTW district. A new principal joined Aspire HS last year. This principal has high expectations and aspirations for the school. Despite having no previous experience with HSTW, the principal used available data and the concepts of continuous improvement to initiate plans to improve student performance. When nearby high school ACT data was shared, teachers were surprised that Aspire HS results were lower than they thought. As the school’s HSTW coach, you met with the principal to discuss Aspire HS’s needs and the support you might provide. The principal said that the most important need is to achieve continuously increasing improvement in student performance. In response to your question about how long-term HSTW school resources are being used, the principal said that that teachers are uncertain about the value of HSTW. You observed that leadership of improvement is coming primarily from the principal and district curriculum director. 15