Performance Review Institute Qualified Products Listing

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
GIS Executive Council and Advisory Committee Update November 2010.
Advertisements

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Reliability Center Data Request Task Force Report WECC Board Meeting April 2009.
2012 State Board of Directors Orientation “Its good business to do business with an AGC member”
MODULE B - PROCESS B1. ASME Organizational Structure B2. Standards Development: Staff and Volunteer Roles and Responsibilities B3. Conformity Assessment:
Ensure Vendor/Engineer of Choice Product Quality
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop San Diego, CA January 20, AS9104/2 Oversight Process.
Accreditation 1. Purpose of the Module - To create knowledge and understanding on accreditation system - To build capacity of National Governments/ focal.
QUALITY ASSURANCE AND IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (QAIP)
How to Document A Business Management System
Conformity Assessment Practical Implications InterAgency Committee on Standards Policy June 2007 Gordon Gillerman Conformity Assessment Advisor Homeland.
Performance Review Institute
IT Governance and Management
Quality Management Systems
Purpose of the Standards
UNLV Data Governance Executive Sponsors Meeting Office of Institutional Analysis and Planning August 29, 2006.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) The OP Assessor Process San Diego, CA January 19, 2012 Melvin L. Jeppson ATK Propulsion Systems.
Change Advisory Board COIN v1.ppt Change Advisory Board ITIL COIN June 20, 2007.
Aerospace and Ground Vehicle Standards Committee Members June 2009 Volunteer Training Module.
1 Performance Review Institute Annual Leadership Seminar January 24-25, 2002.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
The OP Assessor Process
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Buck Crenshaw, Program Element Manager, NASA-Wide.
Supplier Introduction & Tutorial 17 February 2009 Presenter David Michaud, SSC LT Chair.
GE Aviation. 2 Overview GE - Aviation GE Aviation A leading manufacturer of jet engines for civil and military aircraft and global provider of maintenance.
Compliance Issues for Medical Research at Healthcare Systems Jerry Castellano, Pharm.D., CIP Corporate Director Institutional Review Board Christiana Care.
WORKING WITH SPO AND IAO Lynne HollyerNoam Pines Associate Director Research Administrator Industry Alliances OfficeSponsored Projects Office
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee 1 Completing Independent Assessments Robert Flaharty & John Horan January 17, 2013 OP Assessor Workshop.
Best Practices: Financial Resource Management February 2011.
Certification and Accreditation CS Phase-1: Definition Atif Sultanuddin Raja Chawat Raja Chawat.
Page 1/18 October 15, 2004Beijing General Assembly Forum IAQG Expectations Kinsuke Hara Director - Quality Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd Nagoya Aerospace.
Environmental Management System Definitions
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
31-May-16 chart 1 International Aerospace Quality Group Registrar Management Schemes SEPTEMBER 2002 Barb O'Dell.
Paul Hardiman and Rob Brown SMMT IF Planning and organising an audit.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) AS9104/2A Presentation San Diego, CA January 17, 2013 Tim Lee The Boeing Company 1 Other Party.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July Supplemental Oversight AS9104/2A & Special.
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
1 ACHIEVEMENTS from the Executive Meeting IEC CAB – ILAC - IAF By Pierre de Ruvo Head of the CAB Delegation.
TNI Advocacy Program Update AURORA SHIELDS. ADVOCACY COMMITTEE  Judy Duncan  Marlene Moore  Kenneth Jackson  Barbara Finazzo  Kevin Coast  Lara.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee RMC Auditor Workshop Charleston, SC July 2015 The OASIS Feedback Process Empowering Communication.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Electronic Enterprise Integration Committee Overview of Aerospace Industry IUID Data Exchange Guideline December 14, 2005 Bill Zirkel, Northrop Grumman.
Page © ASME 2015 Module B – Process B4.Initiating and Terminating Standards Projects Standards and Certification Training.
Oklahoma Small Business Manufacturing for Aviation Conference Presentation - Subcontracting August 10, 2005 Nathaniel Stevens Sr. Systems Engineer.
DoD Qualification Automation Update 2006 DoD Standardization Conference May 25, 2006 Briefer: Donna McMurry, DSPO.
Registration Management Committee (RMC) Other Party Assessor Workshop January 16, 2009 – Orlando, Florida AS/EN/SJAC Oversight Process Tim Lee The.
Nadcap TASK GROUPS Special Processes – Nondestructive Testing (NDT) Chair: David Royce, Pratt & Whitney – Materials Testing Laboratories (MTL) Chair:
1 IAQG Oversight Team Report (Other Party Management Team) (Abridged Version - mcr) Amsterdam – April 27 th, 2005 Julio Perez Caballero IAQG OPMT Chair.
Company Confidential Registration Management Committee (RMC) Independent Oversight Assessments 1 Other Party (OP) Assessor Workshop Palm Beach Gardens,
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits ISA Standards for Automation An Overview.
Harmonised use of accreditation for assessing the competence of various Conformity Assessment Bodies Dr Andreas Steinhorst, EA ERA workshop 13 April 2016,
GCOOS Governance Team Andrew Clark, Harris Corporation Cortis Cooper, ChevronTexaco Ann Jochens, Texas A&M University Buzz Martin, Texas General Land Office.
Software Quality Control and Quality Assurance: Introduction
ISO/IEC
Michel BRENON IEC ExTAG Secretary
Quality Management Systems
Standards and Certification Training
Research Program Strategic Plan
Sourcing and Qualifications Division DLA Land and Maritime - VQ
PRI is led by a Board of Directors whose constituents are representatives from the global aerospace industry. The representation is roughly proportionate.
PRI is led by a Board of Directors whose constituents are representatives from the global aerospace industry. The representation is roughly proportionate.
On this slide you can see the organisation structure.
At the very top level (the PRI Board of Directors), regional representation is roughly proportionate to the Nadcap activity in those sectors.
PRI is led by a Board of Directors whose constituents are representatives from the global aerospace industry. The representation is roughly proportionate.
The Value of Accreditation
On this slide you can see the organisation structure.
PRI is led by a Board of Directors whose constituents are representatives from the global aerospace industry. The representation is roughly proportionate.
In 1985, a conference in the USA brought together government and industry to discuss supplier quality. They recommended a more efficient, consensus solution.
Presentation transcript:

Performance Review Institute Qualified Products Listing January 30, 2014

Definitions QUALIFIED PRODUCTS LIST (QPL): A listing of products from manufacturers who have received a PRI product qualification to a specific aerospace standard for specific product designations and plant locations. QUALIFIED PRODUCT GROUP (QPG): A committee mandated by the QPMC responsible for assessing whether manufacturer's products comply with the relevant aerospace standard. The committee is composed of members from Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) and Government Agencies. QUALIFIED PRODUCT MANAGEMENT COUNCIL (QPMC): The committee that manages the Qualified Product Process/Program. 2

PRI QPL Program Background QPL - A document which lists qualified manufacturers who have met the product qualification test requirements to a specified industry standard for specific part numbers and plant locations 1998 1996 2014 Pilot program Industry Managed PRI QPL Program PRI championed pilot program, with organizational concept SAE committee volunteers Pilot program success PRI QPL program formally established Standard Development Organization (SDO) guidelines created and approved by SAE Aerospace Council - 1999 TODAY. . . DoD Acquisition Reform Military specifications with QPL’s posed a problem for non-government standards to convert Preserve value-added aerospace specification requirements More than 30,000 products/parts 8 active Qualified Product Groups 3

Purpose of the Aerospace QPL Program Maintain a list of manufacturer’s critical products where those products have been qualified as meeting specific industry standards. To manage the review process of submitted data and other materials reviewed by the QPG. 4

Motivation Users (OEMs/Government/Airlines) Collaboration with other OEMs/Government/Airlines Reduce costs by reduced need for in-house/outside lab testing Uses consistent qualification procedures/standards Maximize competition without the loss of quality Avoid cost associated with maintaining User QPLs (testing, qualification, administration) Suppliers Typically lower costs than when qualifying products to User standards/specifications Utilize initial qualification data to a wider industry base Eliminate redundant testing and qualification processes Ensure fairness among suppliers Utilize consistent approach to qualification of product 5

Industry-Managed QPL Structure Policy PRI Board of Directors Standards Developing Organization (SDO) Executive Leaders Legal Entity Set Policy Provide the Vision Qualified Product Management Council (QPMC) Senior Leaders & Managers Oversee Operation of QPL Program Establish & Implement Policy & Procedures QPG Coordination & Development Identify, Develop and Deploy Improvement Strategic/ Tactical QPGs Fluid Distribution Systems (G-3) Elastomer Seals (AMS CE) Sealants (G-9) Organic Coatings (G-8) Propulsion Lubricants (E-34) Propulsion Standards (E25) CACRC Advanced Composites (P-17) Technical Experts Determine Requirements Develop Documents Accepts Test Plan and Report Final Decision on QPL Listing Standard Technical Committees Technical Knowledgeable Parties With Interest Maintain Technical Standards, Recommended Practices, etc. Process responsibilities clearly defined 6

Administrator of the QPL program Role of PRI Coordinate operations/procedures of the QPMC and QPGs Coordinate activities throughout the QPG review and report processing Maintain and Control QPLs Maintain customer records during and after review Maintain confidentiality Administrator of the QPL program 7

2014 Board of Directors Ron Meester Stan Adachi Anna “Graham” Morast The Boeing Company Richard A. Amato GE Aviation Etienne Galen Snecma (Safran Group) Michael J. Hayward Northrop Grumman Aerospace Systems Mario Langlois (Chairman) Bombardier Aerospace Tony Maguire BAE Systems PLC Ron Meester Honeywell Aerospace Anna “Graham” Morast Pratt & Whitney, UTC Andy Page Rolls-Royce plc David L. Schutt SAE International Junji Tsuji Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy Industries Li Wei Aviation Industry Corporation of China Jianqiang Xu COMAC Relatively small group of executives from major OEMs and Primes who have ultimate responsibility for supplier quality. January 2014 8 5

Role of QPMC Provide direction for the administration of the PRI-QPL qualification program Provide an effective administrative structure to manage QPLs utilizing existing task groups, committee’s, etc. and provide feedback to industry in the form of guides or advisories Coordinate and communicate major QPL activities throughout the industry Ensure consistency in QPG operating procedures Resolve appeals of QPG decisions 9

Qualified Product Management Council Manuel Koucouthakis Principal Engineer Honeywell Gary Landry Program Manager, Design Systems Pratt & Whitney Carl Levandusky General Engineer Naval Air Warfare Center James Lewis (Secretariat) Program Manager Performance Review Institute Paul Wittman Certification Manager Middle River Aircraft Systems Jerry Brown Materials & Processes Engineer Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Co. Kent DeFranco (Chairman) Materials Engineer, Sr. Staff Ross Downing (Vice Chairman) Principal Engineer The Boeing Company Alan Fletcher Materials Engineer, Systems Support Div. US Air Force Robert Hainline Mechanical & Structural Engineer Tim Koczanski Defense Standardization Program Office Membership to include expertise in the following disciplines: Engineering, Quality Assurance and Standardization Accurate as of January 2014 10

Policy and Procedures PROGRAM PD2000 DOCUMENT PROGRAM PD2001 DOCUMENT GOVERNANCE AND ADMINISTRATION OF AN INDUSTRY MANAGED PRODUCT QUALIFICATION PROGRAM MANUFACTURER REQUEST FOR PRODUCT APPROVAL AND QUALIFICATION PROCESS 11

Role of Qualified Product Group Meet and review data in a timely manner as required by procedure Establish procedures for the review Review data for conformance to requirements Define and approve data sources Disposition each qualification submittal Forward evaluation reports to PRI 12

Current Qualified Product Groups Sealants * (SAE G-9) Polysulfide, Polythioether and Adhesion Promoters Commercial Aircraft Composite Repair (SAE CACRC) Composite Repair Materials, Processes and Methods Elastomer Seals * (SAE AMS-CE) O-Rings, Plate Seals, Gaskets and other Compression Seals Fluid Distribution Systems Components * (SAE G-3) Couplings, Fittings, Hose, Tubing and Installation Procedures Organic Coatings (SAE G-8) Primers, Topcoats, Specialty Coatings e.g. Fuel Tank Coatings, Rain Erosion Coatings Propulsion Lubricants (SAE E-34) Synthetic Turbine Engine Lubricants General Standards for Aerospace and Propulsion Systems (SAE E-25) Solid Film Lubricant Polymeric Advanced Composite* (SAE P-17) * Require a Nadcap Audit Note the associated SAE Committees in parenthesis. 13

The QPL Process 14

QPL Approval Process – Initial PRI Communicates Request for Additional Information To Supplier Yes Additional Information Requested Supplier Submits Application And Applicable Data to PRI PRI forwards Submission to QPG QPG Reviews Data No Approval Granted 15

As to the Supplier…. Obtain a copy of the applicable standard at www.sae.org Obtain a copy of the applicable Program Document at www.eAuditNet.com / Resources / Documents / Public Documents / QPL Programs Pay special attention to requirements, such as: AS/EN/JISQ9100 ISO/IEC 17025 Lab QPG witness Test plan requirements per the specification/PD document 16

And then…. Go to www.eAuditNet.com to initiate a “Project”. Instructional PowerPoint Document Resources / Documents / Public Documents / QPL Programs / “QPL User Guide – Supplier” Documents to be marked as Proprietary. 17

The Nadcap Audit Process 18

Nadcap Nadcap – The leading worldwide cooperative program of major companies designed to manage a cost effective consensus approach to special processes and products and provide continuous improvement within the aerospace and automotive industries. 19

Require a Nadcap Audit Is a Nadcap Audit required? SAE Committee determines if the Nadcap Audit is required The Nadcap Audit requirement is documented in the specification. 20

Information to Request the Establishment of a PRI QPG 21

Primes Involved in the QPG Determine the structure and relationship between SAE Committee and the yet to be established QPG [Minimum of 3 primes required] 22

Key Players SAE Committee Members Planning to Participate in the QPL Project Reviews Contact & Company Name 23

Program Information Number of Suppliers Impacted Applicable Current Specification Numbers and List of Potential Specifications Potential QPL Projects (workload) Timeline for Completion/Publication of the Specification 24

Program Information (continued) Is an AS/EN/JISQ9100 approved quality system required? Is it required to conduct the testing at an ISO/IEC 17025 accredited laboratory with applicable scope? 25

Program Information (continued) What information is required on the on-line QPL listing? Is a Nadcap Audit required for the qualification? What are the requalification/recertification/ periodic testing/sampling requirements? Will grandfathering of materials be applicable? Per PD2001 Rev B 4.2.1 – For a Grandfathered qualification in which the product is adopted from an existing OEM, government or military QPL, the manufacturer must submit official correspondence or approval letters relating to the qualification, a copy of the existing QPL and the associated qualification test reports and product drawings, if available. The QPG may request additional information as required, including the OEM verification of qualification if the QPL document is proprietary to the OEM. 26

Request for Development of a QPG Formal Letter to the QPMC Formal Presentation at the QPMC Spring or Fall Meeting Time for approval Time for implementation Previously QPMC approval was obtained immediately after the presentation was made. However, we are not sure of the time required for approval based on the preferences of a new QPMC Chairman. Regarding implementation, that is also difficult to calculate. Implementation is based on everything coming together. i.e., Specification, Nadcap Audit, does it meet grandfathering criteria, development of QPG members, etc. On the PRI Administrative side of it, there are no time constraints, 2 to 3 months. 27

www.eAuditNet.com -On-line QPL -Program Documents 28

eAuditNet.com Register in eAuditNet eAuditNet Support - +1 724-772-8679 29

On-Line QPL Under “Resources” select, “Online QPL”. 30

Select a Specific Manufacturer or SAE Standard www.eauditnet.com Select Specific QPG On-Line PRI-QPL OR Select a Specific Manufacturer or SAE Standard Click “Search” 31

Download to an Excel Spreadsheet Download Search Data Download to an Excel Spreadsheet 32

QPL Documents in eAuditNet Click as follows: Resources Documents Public Documents QPL Programs 33

PRI eAuditNet Website Link Link PRI On-Line QPL Search to SAE Standards Website Button would indicate “click here to purchase the SAE specification” Link to SAE to Purchase the Standard 34

SAE Website Link Link SAE Standards website to PRI QPL Button would indicate “PRI-QPL” Link to eAuditNet 35

CACRC QPL Search Results 36

Questions???? 37