Threat and Error Management. What is TEM?  “Defensive flying”

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Crew Compliment. OBJECTIVES The importance of Safety & the effects of reduce crew.
Advertisements

The LOSA Archive: The data and how it can be used
Captain Dan Maurino Flight Safety and Human Factors – ICAO
TEM & LOSA: The State of Affairs
Robert L. Helmreich, Ph.D. FRAes The University of Texas
Normal Operations Data: Air Traffic Facility Evaluations and NOSS
TEM as an Analytical Tool
“Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA)”
A Glimpse at Archie: The LOSA Archive
NOSS: The Methodology and Early Findings
A Glimpse at Archie: The LOSA Archive
ICAO Global TEM & NOSS Symposium EUROCONTROL IANS Luxembourg November 9, 2005 Threat and Error Management Training for Air Traffic Control Officers Greg.
TEM as an Analytical Tool
Threat & Error Management
Incident Review Meeting Guidance Material & Presentation Template
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
An Introduction to Threat and Error Management 1.
P-2028 Minnesota Wing Aircrew Training: Tasks P-2028 Crew Resource Management.
Human Factors for Part 135 Air Operators
Incident Review Meeting 1 [insert title of event].
17-MAR-2010 Meeting SMS Goals Through AQP and Risk Management John Ross CEO OK3 Group Inc. The Spectrum Group Civil Aviation Team Associate.
Aviation Safety Inspector
Executive Briefing This briefing is designed as a stand alone briefing for Airline Senior Executives / CEOs. Minor text amendments following review at.
FAA Industry Training Standards FITS Overview. 2 Outline FAA Industry Training Standards Problems with Current Training FITS Flight Training Scenario.
Using Situational awareness and decision making
Best Practices for Taxi Operations at Towered & Non-Towered Airports
Threat and Error Management Flight Safety Foundation
Q-Pulse is a registered trademark of Gael Products Ltd. All rights reserved worldwide. Copyright © 2012 Gael Ltd.All rights reserved worldwide. Copyright.
Incident Review Meeting Example  The next slides are an example of how to complete the template and identify latent conditions, threats, errors, UAS and.
Mission Aircrew School Chapter 14: Crew Resources Management (March 2011)
Error Management OGHFA 1_HP_06_VIS_Error Management 1.
Monitoring Normal Operations and the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA): The Perspective of ICAO Captain Dan Maurino Captain Dan Maurino Flight Safety.
Threat and Error Management in Aviation
Mission Pilot Skill Set
Returning to the Core Principles of Proactive Safety Management…
01-1-S230-EP Unit S230-EP S230-EP Unit 1 Objectives Describe the values and principles of operational leadership. Identify the qualities.
Intro to Threat & Error Management
Slide 1Lesson 14: Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program Fundamentals of the CAP Flying Safety Program.
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS)
SMS Planning.  Safety management addresses all of the operational activities of the entire organization.  The four (4) components of an SMS are: 1)
Definitions What it’s about Teaching it Assessing it.
Lecture 9 Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS) Radio Aids & Navigational System.
Gretchen Haskins Chief Exec. Safety Through Collaboration What is HeliOffshore? An alliance of global Helicopter Operators & their stakeholders. Committed.
Instructor Seminar October 11th 2011
Human Factors An Overview
Bridge Resource Management
1 Controller feedback from the CoSpace / NUP II TMA experiment ASAS-TN, April 2004, Toulouse Liz Jordan, NATS, U.K. Gatwick approach controller.
Brendon Bourne Northern Region Flight Examiner. CAA Flight Tests Standards Guide Threat and Error Management The candidate exhibits a high level of situational.
AVIATION HUMAN FACTOR LECTURE 1: INTRODUCTION TO HUMAN FACTOR
Lecture 9: Ground Proximity Warning System (GPWS).
Error.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
UA Road Transport Safety Forum Hazard & Effects Management Program
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
NBAA Single Pilot Working Group
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Case Study Title CRM CASE STUDY.
Aviation Safety Inspector
Presentation transcript:

Threat and Error Management

What is TEM?  “Defensive flying”

ICAO and FAA  In 2000, LOSA baseline results showed that error management had been incorporated into everyday operations.  Improved checklist usage and a 70% reduction in non-stabilised approaches.  ICAO made LOSA the central focus of flight safety and human factors programmes.  TEM and LOSA recognised Worldwide.

TEM Philosophy  Three basic concepts: -Anticipation -Recognition -Recovery  Recover first, analyse the cause later.

Threats  May be internal or external.  They are not caused by the crew.  They increase the operational complexity of a flight.  Require crew attention and management if safety margins are to be maintained.

What is a latent Threat? A threat that is not directly obvious to flight crew. A threat that is not directly obvious to flight crew. Equipment design. Equipment design.

Threat Management - GPS  Threats & errors -Poor standardisation of GPS receivers -Poor integration with AP -Mis-interpretation of HSI Management Obtain training & practice (VMC) with make & model Use HDG mode when changing any detail In non-integ. cockpit, double-check mode

Errors  Error is a crew action or inaction that leads to a deviation from crew or organisational intentions or expectations.  Put simply: threats come “at” the crew, while errors come “from” the crew.  An Error that is detected and effectively managed has no adverse impact on the flight.  An error that is not detected cannot be managed.

Flight Crew Errors Can be divided into three types:  Aircraft Handling  Procedural  Communication Errors.

Consequence of Error  The very same error can have completely different consequences, depending on the factors involved.  Error : setting the flaps correctly for landing is forgotten. -Aircraft type and performance -Actual landing weight -Runway length and obstructions ahead

Undesired Aircraft State (UAS)  A UAS is defined as a position, speed, attitude or configuration of an aircraft that: -Results from flight crew error, actions or inaction -Clearly reduces safety margins  UAS can be managed effectively or mismanaged, leading to an additional error, UAS, an incident or accident.

 A Decision MUST be made

Identify the Threats?

TEM Application  TTerrain  WWeather  OOperational  PPlan

TWO-P  Terrain old  Terrain new  Weather good  Weather bad  Operational in  Operational out

TWO-P  Assessing threats does not make them go away.  A threat briefing must contain effective strategies.  There must be a plan.

Levels of Situational Awareness  Level One:Perceive  Level Two:Comprehension  Level Three:Projection Understand Notice Think Ahead NUTA

The NUTA/TEM Links Situation Awareness Threat Management NoticeUnderstandThink AheadMitigateTrapAvoid

Countermeasures  Anticipation builds vigilance.  Recognition leads to recovery.  Recover first, analyse causes later.  Planning.  Execution.  Review or modify.

What is an Unexpected Threat?

Just because you deal with a situation everyday does not mean that it is not a threat.

Discussion Time