Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2014 Report April 14, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Department of Corrections Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission “Prison Bound Offenders” Appropriations Act Item 387 D September 8, 2008.
Advertisements

JUDICIAL CONCURRENCE Preliminary FY2007. Preliminary FY2007 Guideline Worksheets Keyed as of 3/5/07 (N=10,715)
Proposed Topics for Possible Guidelines Revisions September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Sentencing Structure Comparisons Barb Tombs July 16, 2007 Presentation to the CT Sentencing Task Force Subcommittees.
Project Director: Brian Ostrom, Ph.D. National Center for State Courts Assessing Consistency & Fairness in Sentencing: A Comparative Study in Three States.
Offender Population Forecasting in Virginia. 2 Background - Studies by JLARC in 1980s  Staff of the Joint Legislative Audit & Review Commission (JLARC)
Possible Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions November 5, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Line Efficiency     Percentage Month Today’s Date
Drug Offender Sentencing Alternative (DOSA): Treatment and Supervision
Virginia’s Sentencing Guidelines
Study of Virginia’s Parole- Eligible Inmate Population.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission November 6, 2013.
Sentence Credits and Inmate Release
CHAPTER EIGHT SENTENCING.
June 9, 2014 Two Decades of Truth-in-Sentencing in Virginia VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Sentencing and Punishment
Sentencing Unit 2 Chapter 11.
Re-validation of the Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instrument: Preliminary Findings.
Larceny and Fraud Study Proposed Methodology.
Proposed Study: Probation/Suspended Sentence Violations Scored on the Felony Sentencing Guidelines.
Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2013 Report June 10, 2013.
September 8, 2014 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION Two Decades of Truth-in- Sentencing in Virginia Update.
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2009 General Assembly.
November 5, 2014 New Nonviolent Offender Risk Assessment Instruments – Status Update VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Guidelines Research Proposals. 2 Felony Child Abuse and Neglect  Focus: Convictions under § (A) between FY03 and FY07 Any parent, guardian.
Use of Offender Risk Assessment in Virginia Presentation at the 2012 NASC Conference Meredith Farrar-Owens Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions November 6, 2013.
ANALYSIS OF LOUISIANA PRISON SYSTEM 1 Main Office: 720 Kearney St. Denver, CO Ph Wendy Naro-Ware October2012.
Larceny and Fraud Study Update. Background.
Crime and Criminal Justice Trends in Virginia Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission September 21, 2015.
Comparative Perspectives on Sentencing Severity and Sentencing Alternatives Richard S. Frase University of Minnesota Symposium on Alternatives to Incarceration.
Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.
What’s New 2015 Virginia’s Sentencing Guidelines.
1 Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2005 Virginia General Assembly.
Project Director: Brian Ostrom, Ph.D. National Center for State Courts Assessing Consistency & Fairness in Sentencing: A Comparative Study in Three States.
Juveniles Convicted in Circuit Court FY2001 – FY2008.
What’s New 2011 Virginia’s Sentencing Guidelines.
MINNESOTA SENTENCING GUIDELINES COMMISSION MEETING OUTCOMES: FIRST- AND SECOND-DEGREE CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE OFFENDERS April 18, 2013.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
What’s New 2012 Virginia’s Sentencing Guidelines.
Legislative Impact Analysis for the 2008 General Assembly.
Judicial Concurrence with Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2009.
Proposed Topics for Possible Guidelines Revisions September 21, 2015 VIRGINIA CRIMINAL SENTENCING COMMISSION.
Training Update| User Comments | Possible Revisions Administration TopicsAdministration Topics.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure – Data Analysis.
HB 3194 CRAIG PRINS3/5/14 OREGON CRIMINAL JUSTICE COMMISSION NEVADA ADVISORY COMMISSION ON THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE.
Larceny and Fraud Study Update. Embezzlement Study The Commission conducted a study of felony embezzlement cases to examine the.
Review of Guidelines Worksheet Structure - Research Proposal.
Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.
Proposed Recommendations for Guidelines Revisions.
JUDICIAL CONCURRENCE WITH SENTENCING GUIDELINES July 1, 2006 – June 30, 2007 (Preliminary)
Muskie School of Public Service 2008 Maine Crime and Justice Data Book March, 2009.
2013 MONITORING DATA: SENTENCING PRACTICES DATA SUMMARY Minnesota Sentencing Guidelines Commission September 18, 2014.
Crime Any act that is labeled as such by those in authority, is prohibited by law, and is punishable by the gov’t.
Sentencing and the Correctional Process
State and Federal Court Systems. Dual Court System There are separate state and federal court systems Federal courts deal with matters of federal law.
Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2015 Report June 8, 2015.
Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2013 Report September 9, 2013.
VIII. DEATH PENALTY CONSIDERATIONS
Imposing the ‘Sentence’
Chapter 5 Criminal Law.
PART 1 UNIFORM CRIME REPORT
Sentencing Commission Updates Southern District of Ohio
Calendar Year 2009 Insure Oklahoma Total & Projected Enrollment
Sentencing Guidelines/Mandatory Minimums and Charging
Text for section 1 1 Text for section 2 2 Text for section 3 3
Washington State Three Strikes Law
A brief overview of the Act’s impact on federal criminal defendants.
Presentation transcript:

Virginia Sentencing Guidelines Preliminary FY2014 Report April 14, 2014

FY Cases Coded and Keyed* JAN 1184 FEB 34 MAR 0 APR 0 MAY 0 JUN 0 JUL2135 AUG1983 SEP1983 OCT2156 NOV1695 DEC1491 TOTAL *Keyed as of March 13, 2014

Preliminary FY2014 Report: General Compliance 3

Preliminary FY2014 Report Judicial Agreement with Guideline Recommendations General Compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the overall guidelines recommendation. 4 N=12,661

Preliminary FY2014 Report Judicial Agreement with Type of Recommended Disposition ACTUAL DISPOSITION Dispositional Compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the type of sanction recommended. 5 N=12,661

Preliminary FY2014 Report Judicial Agreement with Sentence Length Durational Compliance: The degree to which judges agree with the sentence length in cases in which defendants are recommended for jail/prison and receive at least one day incarceration. Median 9 months below midpoint 6 N=9,070

Preliminary FY2014 Report: Departure Reasons 7

Aggravation (n=1351) Plea agreement 373 (28%**) Flagrancy of offense/facts of case 222 (17%**) Severity/type of prior record194 (14%**) Multiple counts involved in event 86 (6%**) Poor rehabilitation potential 73 (5%**) SG Recommendation too low 68 (5%**) Recommendation of jury 67 (5%**) Offense involves drugs 48 (4%**) n=197 (15%) missing a departure reason Mitigation (n=1407) Plea agreement525 (37%*) Judicial discretion 125 (9%*) Cooperated with Authorities120 (9%*) Facts of the case112 (8%*) Sentenced to alternative 111 (8%*) Recommendation of CA 88 (6%*) Court Proceeding: Serve sentence in other case100 (7%*) n=233 (17%) missing a departure reason Preliminary FY2014 Report Most Frequently Cited Departure Reasons * Of mitigating cases requiring departure reason** Of aggravating cases requiring departure reasons 8

Preliminary FY2014 Report: Compliance by Circuit 9

Preliminary FY2014 Most cases received: -Circuit 15 (Fredericksburg Area) -Circuit 13 (Richmond) -Circuit 2 (Virginia Beach) -Circuit 26 (Harrisonburg Area) 10

Preliminary FY2014 Most cases received: -Circuit 15 (Fredericksburg Area) -Circuit 13 (Richmond) -Circuit 2 (Virginia Beach) -Circuit 26 (Harrisonburg Area) Highest compliance: -Circuit 20 (Loudoun Area) 87.2% Lowest compliance: -Circuit 13 (Richmond City) 71.0% 11

12 Preliminary FY2014 Most cases received: -Circuit 15 (Fredericksburg Area) -Circuit 13 (Richmond) -Circuit 2 (Virginia Beach) -Circuit 26 (Harrisonburg Area) Highest compliance: -Circuit 20 (Loudoun Area) 87.2% Lowest compliance: -Circuit 13 (Richmond City) 71.0% Highest aggravation: -Circuit 30 (Lee Area) 19.2% Highest mitigation: -Circuit 13 (Richmond City) 20.2%

Preliminary FY2014 Report: Compliance by Offense Type 13

Preliminary FY2014 Report Compliance by Type of Offense 3, , , Larceny Drug-Oth Fraud Traffic Drug-I/II Misc-Oth Assault Weapon Burg-Oth Rape Sex-Asl Kidnap Burg-Dwel Misc-PP Robbery Murder 14

Preliminary FY2014 Report: Additions/Changes Effective July 1,

Preliminary FY2014 Report Nonviolent Risk Assessment Replace the nonviolent offender risk assessment instrument, used in conjunction with the guidelines for fraud, larceny and drug offenses, with risk assessment instruments developed based on the results of the Commission’s recent study of felony recidivism. 16

Preliminary FY2014 Report Nonviolent Risk Assessment 17 Virginia Code § Develop an offender risk assessment instrument for use in all felony cases, based on a study of Virginia felons, that will be predictive of the relative risk that a felon will become a threat to public safety. 6. Apply the risk assessment instrument to offenders convicted of any felony that is not specified in (i) subdivision 1, 2 or 3 of subsection A of § or (ii) subsection C of § under the discretionary sentencing guidelines, and shall determine, on the basis of such assessment and with due regard for public safety needs, the feasibility of achieving the goal of placing 25 percent of such offenders in one of the alternative sanctions listed in subdivision 4. If the Commission so determines that achieving the 25 percent or a higher percentage goal is feasible, it shall incorporate such goal into the discretionary sentencing guidelines, to become effective on January 1, If the Commission so determines that achieving the goal is not feasible, the Commission shall report that determination to the General Assembly, the Governor and the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Virginia on or before December 1, 1995, and shall make such recommendations as it deems appropriate. Effective July 1, 2004 Score 35  38

Preliminary FY2014 Report Nonviolent Risk Assessment Risk assessment applies in drug, fraud, & larceny cases Offender must meet eligibility criteria −Recommended for incarceration −No current or violent felony conviction −Did not distribute an ounce or more of cocaine −Not convicted of crime requiring mandatory minimum term of incarceration Purpose: To recommend alternative sanctions for offenders who are statistically less likely to recidivate Type of alternative at discretion of judge 18

Drug/Schedule I/II or Drug Other Fraud and Larceny 19

Preliminary FY2014 Report Nonviolent Offenders Eligible for Risk Assessment by Type of Offense 8,385 Drug, Fraud & Larceny Cases - 5,454 Excluded: Ineligible, Errors, 1090 Missing 2,931 Analyzed Larceny 37.3% Fraud 12.4% DrugOther 8.8% 20

Preliminary FY2014 Nonviolent Offenders Eligible for Risk Assessment Fraud Larceny All Risk Cases7% 8% 11% Drug6% 18% 8% 22% 25% 68% 79% 63% 60% 7% 6% 4% 9% 2,931 1, ,401 OffenseMitigation Compliance Aggravation Number of Cases AlternativeTraditional 86% 87% 85% 21

Recommended and Received an Alternative17.8%n= 523 Recommended and Incarcerated30.2%n= 886 Not Recommended and Received Alternative13.3%n= 390 Not Recommended and Incarcerated38.6%n= 1,132 Preliminary FY2014 Nonviolent Offenders Eligible for Risk Assessment 22

Preliminary FY2014 Report Mandatory Minimum Factor Revise several guidelines worksheets to ensure that the recommended sentence exceeds six months of incarceration when the primary offense is accompanied by an offense that requires a mandatory minimum sentence of at least six months. 23

Burglary Dwelling Burglary Other Structure Drug Other Miscellaneous - Other Miscellaneous – Person/Property Murder Weapon/Firearm 24 Worksheets Modified:

Offense Worksheet ComplianceMitigationAggravation Burglary Dwelling (n=22)68.2%9.1%22.7% Burglary Other Structure (n=2)100%0% Drug Other (n=10)90.0%0%10% Miscellaneous - Other (n=2)50%0%50% Miscellaneous – Person/Property (n=4)50% 0% Murder (n=25)72%8%20% Weapon/Firearm (n=110)79.1%3.6%17.3% Preliminary FY2014 Report New Mandatory Minimum Factor Added Effective July 1, cases: Points on section A added for the new mandatory minimum factor 25

Preliminary FY2014 Report Burglary With Murder or Malicious Wounding Revise the sentencing guidelines for a completed act of burglary with a deadly weapon to increase the prison sentence recommendation for offenders who have an accompanying offense of murder or malicious wounding. 26

27

Offense Worksheet ComplianceMitigationAggravation Burglary of a Dwelling (n=2)50.0%0.0%50.0% Preliminary FY2014 Report New Factor for Additional Offense of Murder or Malicious Wounding Added Effective July 1,

Preliminary FY2014 Report Vehicular Involuntary Manslaughter Amend the Murder/Homicide sentencing guidelines for vehicular involuntary manslaughter associated with driving under the influence ( § (A)) to more closely reflect judicial sentencing practices for this offense. 29

30 1

Offense Worksheet ComplianceMitigationAggravation Vehicular Involuntary Manslaughter (n=12)33.3%16.7%50.0% Preliminary FY2014 Report Vehicular Involuntary Manslaughter Modified Effective July 1, 2013 Probation n=216.7%* Jail n=216.7% Prisonn=866.7% * May include offenders sentenced to time served 31

Preliminary FY2014 Report Larceny With Intent to Sell Amend the Larceny sentencing guidelines to add larceny of property with a value of $200 or more or an aggregate value of $200 or more with the intent to sell or distribute as defined by §

33

OffenseComplianceMitigationAggravation Larceny with intent to sell, $200 or more (n=60)71.7%5.0%23.3% Larceny with intent to sell, Aggregate value $200 or more(n=10)70.0%0%30% Preliminary FY2014 Report New Larceny Offenses Added Effective July 1,

35