NO 2 and SO 2 Over the eastern USA: Policy relevant science Presented at the OMI Science Team Meeting by Russell R. Dickerson T. Canty, J. Hains, H. He,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LECTURE 12 AOSC 434 AIR POLLUTION RUSSELL R. DICKERSON.
Advertisements

CHEMICAL CLIMATOLOGY STUDIES: CO 2, CH 4, SO 2, PM2.5, SO 4, … Observed Changes in Greenhouse Gases Maryland Healthy Air Act and Observed Changes in Air.
Heather Simon, Adam Reff, Benjamin Wells, Neil Frank Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, US EPA Ozone Trends Across the United States over a.
NASA AQAST 6th Biannual Meeting January 15-17, 2014 Heather Simon Changes in Spatial and Temporal Ozone Patterns Resulting from Emissions Reductions: Implications.
N emissions and the changing landscape of air quality Rob Pinder US EPA Office of Research and Development Atmospheric Modeling & Analysis Division.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 1 Modeling of 1,3-Butadiene for Urban and Industrial Areas B. Rappenglück and B. Czader.
Diurnal Variability of Aerosols Observed by Ground-based Networks Qian Tan (USRA), Mian Chin (GSFC), Jack Summers (EPA), Tom Eck (GSFC), Hongbin Yu (UMD),
AIR POLLUTION IN THE US : Ozone and fine particulate matter (PM 2.5 ) are the two main pollutants 75 ppb (8-h average) 15  g m -3 (1-y av.)
Quantifying uncertainties of OMI NO 2 data Implications for air quality applications Bryan Duncan, Yasuko Yoshida, Lok Lamsal, NASA OMI Retrieval Team.
NO X Chemistry in CMAQ evaluated with remote sensing Russ Dickerson et al. (2:30-2:45PM) University of Maryland AQAST-3 June 13, 2012 Madison, WI The MDE/UMD.
Air Quality Impacts from Prescribed Burning Karsten Baumann, PhD. Polly Gustafson.
1 Progress Report to MDE June 12, 2009 Dr. Konstantin Vinnikov, Acting State Climatologist for Maryland Prof. Russell Dickerson, Department of Atmospheric.
1 Progress Report to MDE October 22, 2009 Dr. Konstantin Vinnikov, Acting State Climatologist for Maryland Prof. Russell Dickerson, Department of Atmospheric.
Transpacific transport of pollution as seen from space Funding: NASA, EPA, EPRI Daniel J. Jacob, Rokjin J. Park, Becky Alexander, T. Duncan Fairlie, Arlene.
Satellite-based Global Estimate of Ground-level Fine Particulate Matter Concentrations Aaron van Donkelaar1, Randall Martin1,2, Lok Lamsal1, Chulkyu Lee1.
1 Surface nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from Ozone Monitoring Instrument (OMI) rd GEOS-Chem USERS ` MEETING, Harvard University.
Ozone Production Efficiency in the Baltimore/Washington Urban Plume Presentation by Linda Hembeck Co-Authors: Christopher Loughner, Timothy Vinziguerra,
Objective: Work with the WRAP, CenSARA, CDPHE, BLM and EPA Region 8 to use satellite data to evaluate the Oil and Gas (O&G) modeled NOx emission inventories.
1 Progress Report to MDE June 7, 2010 Dr. Konstantin Vinnikov, Acting State Climatologist for Maryland Prof. Russell Dickerson, Department of Atmospheric.
1 Mass Flux in a Horizontally Homogeneous Atmosphere A useful tool for emissions and lifetimes. Assume an atmosphere well- mixed in latitude and longitude;
DIURNAL AND SEASONAL VARIATIONS OF SO 2 and OTHER ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTANTS OBSERVED AT PINEY RUN STATION AND ITS VICINITY Konstantin Vinnikov and Russell.
Climate Change and Ozone Observation Analysis Dr. Konstantin Vinnikov, Acting State Climatologist for Maryland Prof. Russell Dickerson, Department of Atmospheric.
The Maryland State Implementation Plan By Russell Dickerson, Tim Canty, Dan Goldberg, Xinrong Ren, Tim Vinciguerra et al., The University of Maryland 1145.
Temporal Patterns in OMI NO2 Columns Benjamin de Foy, Saint Louis University AQAST-9, Saint Louis University, 3 June 2015 Cluster 1 (Blue) shows areas.
Minnesota Air Quality and Attainment Status Frank Kohlasch Kari Palmer Statewide Travel Demand Coordinating Committee Meeting October 14, 2010.
1 Use of Satellites in AQ Analysis and Emissions Improvement.
Air Quality Impact Analysis 1.Establish a relationship between emissions and air quality. AQ past = a EM past + b 2.A change in emissions results in an.
AQUA AURA The Berkeley High Spatial Resolution(BEHR) OMI NO2 Retrieval: Recent Trends in NO2 Ronald C. Cohen University of California, Berkeley $$ NASA.
Air Pollution Control: Transboundary Air Pollutants
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
Algorithms and chemical data assimilation activities at Environment Canada Chris McLinden Air Quality Research Division, Environment Canada 2 nd TEMPO.
Heidy Plata 1, Ezinne Achinivu 1, Szu-Ting Chou 1, Sheryl Ehrman 1, Dale Allen 2, Kenneth Pickering 2♦, Thomas Pierce 3, James Gleason 3 1 Department of.
Presentation by: Dan Goldberg Co-authors: Tim Vinciguerra, Linda Hembeck, Sam Carpenter, Tim Canty, Ross Salawitch & Russ Dickerson 13 th Annual CMAS Conference.
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
Evaluating ammonia (NH 3 ) predictions in the NOAA National Air Quality Forecast Capability (NAQFC) using in situ aircraft measurements William Battye,
1 Ground-level nitrogen dioxide concentrations inferred from the satellite-borne Ozone Monitoring Instrument Lok Lamsal and Randall Martin with contributions.
Melanie Follette-Cook Christopher Loughner (ESSIC, UMD) Kenneth Pickering (NASA GSFC) CMAS Conference October 27-29, 2014.
Assessment of the Impacts of Global Change on Regional U.S. Air Quality: A synthesis of climate change impacts on ground-level ozone An Interim Report.
Wildland Fire Impacts on Surface Ozone Concentrations Literature Review of the Science State-of-Art Ned Nikolov, Ph.D. Rocky Mountain Center USDA FS Rocky.
AOSC 634 Air Sampling and Analysis Vertical Flux Eddy Correlation (Eddy Covariance) And Vertical Gradient Copyright Brock et al. 1984; Dickerson
Expected Ozone Benefits from EGU NOx Reductions Tim Vinciguerra, Emily Bull, Timothy Canty, Hao He, Eric Zalewsky, Michael Woodman, Sheryl Ehrman, Russell.
Presented at the AQAST 9 th Semiannual Meeting Wednesday June 3 rd, 2015 Presentation by: Dan Goldberg, Ph.D. Candidate Co-authors: Tim Canty, Tim Vinciguerra,
Evidence for an increase in the photochemical lifetime of ozone in the eastern United States Presented at the 14 th CMAS Meeting Wednesday October 7 th,
2012 CMAS meeting Yunsoo Choi, Assistant Professor Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Houston NOAA Air quality forecasting and.
Southeast US air chemistry: directions for future SEAC 4 RS analyses Tropospheric Chemistry Breakout Group DRIVING QUESTION: How do biogenic and anthropogenic.
OVERVIEW OF ATMOSPHERIC PROCESSES: Daniel J. Jacob Ozone and particulate matter (PM) with a global change perspective.
Scientific Insight from CMAQ modeling for the MDE SIP
Space-based Constraints on Global SO 2 Emissions and Timely Updates for NO x Inventories Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian Chulkyu Lee,
C. Hogrefe 1,2, W. Hao 2, E.E. Zalewsky 2, J.-Y. Ku 2, B. Lynn 3, C. Rosenzweig 4, M. Schultz 5, S. Rast 6, M. Newchurch 7, L. Wang 7, P.L. Kinney 8, and.
Chemical Condition and Surface Ozone in Urban Cities of Texas During the Last Decade: Observational Evidence from OMI, CAMS, and Model Analysis Yunsoo.
The Regional Atmospheric Measurement Modeling and Prediction Program (RAMMPP) Russell Dickerson & Jeff Stehr CICS September 8, 2010 Image taken from URF.
Air Resources Laboratory 1 Comprehensive comparisons of NAQFC surface and column NO 2 with satellites, surface, and field campaign measurements during.
Breakout Session 1 Air Quality Jack Fishman, Randy Kawa August 18.
Emission reductions needed to meet proposed ozone standard and their effect on particulate matter Daniel Cohan and Beata Czader Department of Civil and.
The 2003 Wake-up Call: Predictable? “Normal” airmass flow Stagnant airmass flow Jul29-Jul31-Jul 2-Aug 4-Aug 6-Aug8-Aug.
Pollution SO 2 Studies: Air Quality and Satellites from the Local to Regional Scale Presented at UMBC June 7, 2007 Russell Dickerson Dept. Atmos. & Ocean.
Regulatory background How these standards could impact the permitting process How is compliance with the standards assessed.
American Association of State Climatologists, 41th Annual Meeting. Santa Fe, July 1, 2016 Maryland Healthy Air Act and Observed Changes in Air Quality.
Xiaomeng Jin and Arlene Fiore
Meteorological drivers of surface ozone biases in the Southeast US
Use of Satellite Data for Georgia’s Air Quality Planning Activities Tao Zeng and James Boylan Georgia EPD – Air Protection Branch TEMPO Applications.
Quantifying uncertainties of OMI NO2 data
Modeling Ozone in the Eastern U. S
16th Annual CMAS Conference
Randall Martin, Dalhousie and Harvard-Smithsonian
Maryland's Air Quality: Nitrogen Reductions and the Healthy Air Act
Simulation of Ozone and PM in Southern Taiwan
U.S. Perspective on Particulate Matter and Ozone
2019 TEMPO Science Team Meeting
Summary: TFMM trends analysis
Presentation transcript:

NO 2 and SO 2 Over the eastern USA: Policy relevant science Presented at the OMI Science Team Meeting by Russell R. Dickerson T. Canty, J. Hains, H. He, N. Krotkov, R. Salawitch, J. Stehr, K. Vinnikov Univ. Maryland and NASA/GSFC March 11, 2014 UMD/URF Cessna Photo by J. Stehr

Overview The main air quality issues in the US are O 3, fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and haze. The main precursors are NO 2, SO 2, and VOC’s Emissions for SO 2 are monitored and well known; the lifetime (conversion to sulfate) is not. Neither emissions nor lifetimes are well quantified for NO 2 and VOC’s. Using OMI obs in combination with in situ measurements and models has led to advances in our ability to understand and improve air quality. 2

An experiment of opportunity: SO 2 In 2010, Maryland implemented the “Healthy Air Act” 3

Power Plant Emissions in Maryland and surrounding states. The Healthy Air Act

5 Aircraft profiles show great variability, but a significant SO 2 decrease.

Ambient SO 2 (ppb) at Beltsville, MD Daily cycle ~factor of two. Seasonal cycle ~factor of two. Dramatic decreases after Healthy Air Act. Maxima in mid day when PBL entrains plumes from aloft. Surface SO 2 reflects emissions reductions.

OMI SO

OMI SO

Difference in DU

Copyright © 2010 R.R. Dickerson10

Interim conclusions In situ and remote obs in agreement The good news: Local emissions reductions have an immediate and profound impact on local concentrations of SO 2. The lifetime of SO 2 can be estimated from the column content and known emissions flux. Lee, Hains, et al., JRG (2011). CMAQ (EPA regulatory model) overestimates the lifetime, but better representation of clouds improved measurement-model agreement. Loughner et al., Atmos. Environ. 2011; in review

The bad news: PM2.5 only fell modestly.

Last December, the Supreme Court heard arguments on the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, CSAPR. NASA data went into an Amicus Brief.

Ongoing projects Helping CMAQ more accurately predict ozone. Quantifying bias in OMI SO 2 from clouds. BrO over oceans. Impact of increasing oil natural gas and production (fracking). 14

Canty et al., submitted. CMAQ modeled NO 2 high in cities low in countryside. Inspired by Castellanos et al., 2011.

Ready results If CB05 is modified to shorten the lifetime of alkyl nitrates and reduce mobile source NOx emissions then CMAQ and OMI agree better.

Conclusions Air Quality managers are using satellite data including OMI! The Healthy Air Act produced 80% reductions in SO 2 emissions in Maryland starting in OMI and ambient measurements of short lived (24 ± 10hr) SO 2 showed dramatically and immediately AQ improvement. Longer lived (~10 d) PM2.5 improved much less so. Surface SO 2 is lower on overcast days than sunny days – this multiphase removal may lead to a bias in OMI obs. 17

18

Change in SO 2 column from OMI Using Fioletov’s sub-pixel resolution product. Orange ~ 0.35 DU decrease ~ 3.5 ppb in 1000 m

More SO 2 on sunny days; site at 500m. For Hao’s paper – bias? We need to compare the ratio of the ratio in situ SO2 to OMI SO2 Thanks to Jim Schwab SUNY

Is there an impact from cloud cover?

Mean, ppb STD, ppb Decay time, hours All times Night, Cold season Night, Warm season Day, Cold season Day, Warm season R(t)=exp(-t/T) - is Lag-Correlation function. t - is Lag, T - is decay time or Scale of temporal correlation.

What is the lifetime of SO 2 ? 23 The decay time (  decay ) reflects the sum of actual losses and dispersion. Using CO for dispersion time (~17 hr << chemical lifetime) we can estimate the lifetime for SO2 all losses including oxidation, wet and dry deposition. The implied lifetime for SO 2 is 24 (±10) hr at Pinnacles (elevation 500 m).

Change in SO 2 column from OMI Using Fioletov’s sub-pixel resolution product. Orange ~ 0.35 DU decrease ~ 3.5 ppb in 1000 m

Mean, ppb STD, ppb Decay time, hours All times Night, Cold season Night, Warm season Day, Cold season Day, Warm season R(t)=exp(-t/T) - is Lag-Correlation function. t - is Lag, T - is decay time or Scale of temporal correlation.

% Change