1 Phase 2 Grant Renewals - March

2 A- Overview A.1- Performance-based Funding Y1Y2Y3Y4Y5 Proposal Initial Grant Agreement(s)Extension of Grant Agreement(s) Phase 1 Phase 2  Funding beyond Phase 1 is based on: –Performance during Phase 1 and contextual considerations; –Availability of resources.  Proposals are approved for up to a 5 year term  However, Global Fund initially commits funds for only years 1 and 2 – “Phase 1”  Performance assessment builds on periodic reviews throughout Phase 1 (quarterly/semi-annual Disbursement Requests/Progress Updates), complemented by an Annual Review and an Audit Report

3  The Phase 2 review process is a multi-layer process involving different actors within and outside the Secretariat; and is designed to assure the quality and robustness of the Secretariat’s recommendation to the Board: A- Overview A.3- Phase 2 Review and Decision-making Process

4 A- Overview A.4- Key Success Factors for CCMs The first wave of Phase 2 Renewals has enabled the Secretariat to identify “key success factors” that CCMs should endeavor to address in their Requests for Continued funding 4.Ensure that all information and documentation necessary for the Phase 2 decision-making are submitted on time to the Secretariat (with the right level of completeness and quality). Incomplete and/or late information is likely to jeopardize the success of the Phase 2 Grant Renewal. 4.Ensure that all information and documentation necessary for the Phase 2 decision-making are submitted on time to the Secretariat (with the right level of completeness and quality). Incomplete and/or late information is likely to jeopardize the success of the Phase 2 Grant Renewal. 1.Ensure that any shortcomings, weaknesses and issues identified during Phase 1 are addressed on a continuous basis (and not in the last remaining weeks before Phase 2 Grant Renewal decision-making). The Phase 2 Grant Renewal review process appraises performance throughout the initial Phase 1 period, and not only achievements in the last reporting period. 1.Ensure that any shortcomings, weaknesses and issues identified during Phase 1 are addressed on a continuous basis (and not in the last remaining weeks before Phase 2 Grant Renewal decision-making). The Phase 2 Grant Renewal review process appraises performance throughout the initial Phase 1 period, and not only achievements in the last reporting period. 2.Ensure that the Phase 2 Request includes an objective “self-assessment” of the program and takes into account “lessons learned” from Phase 1 (especially in cases of sub-optimal performance, as well as changing programmatic and epidemiological context). The CCM is encouraged to address any reprogramming considerations and to request a reasonable Phase 2 amount. 2.Ensure that the Phase 2 Request includes an objective “self-assessment” of the program and takes into account “lessons learned” from Phase 1 (especially in cases of sub-optimal performance, as well as changing programmatic and epidemiological context). The CCM is encouraged to address any reprogramming considerations and to request a reasonable Phase 2 amount. 3.Ensure that the preparation of the Phase 2 Request involves the strong participation of the entire CCM. KEY SUCCESS FACTORS

5 B- Phase 2 Grant Renewal Review Criteria B.1- Grant Performance during the initial grant period (1/2) The Global Fund evaluates programmatic achievement measured as cumulative up-to-date results against agreed-upon targets, together with self-assessment of performance. The evaluation of performance focuses on coverage indicators (1- people trained, 2-service points set- up or enhanced, 3- people reached). It considers people reached as the highest level.  In order for the Global Fund to take into account latest available programmatic information, CCMs should make sure that the latest Progress Update is submitted as scheduled (i.e., typically month 15 for Quarter 5). ILLUSTRATION

6 B- Phase 2 Grant Renewal Review Criteria B.1- Grant Performance during the initial grant period (2/2) The Global Fund also considers disbursement history and expenditures in light of the 2-year Budget (i.e., the Phase 1 Grant Amount). Where necessary, the Secretariat will take into account information on expenditures and expected remaining cash balance at the end of Phase 1 (at the PR level). The evaluation of performance also includes reviewing disbursement history, notably in light of programmatic results. ! ILLUSTRATION

7 B- Phase 2 Grant Renewal Review Criteria B.2- Contextual Considerations (1/2) As part of its evaluation, the Secretariat considers contextual information in its review of Phase 2 Grant Renewals. Contextual Considerations Have there been significant adverse external influences (force majeur)? And if yes, can they be alleviated? Are there any unresolvable internal issues? Are there any financial and program management issues (e.g., slow or incomplete disbursements to sub- recipients or issues with the PR)? Are there any systemic weaknesses in:- Monitoring and evaluation? - Procurement and supply management? - Any other areas? Are there any systemic weaknesses in:- Monitoring and evaluation? - Procurement and supply management? - Any other areas? Are there any material issues concerning the quality or validity of data?

8 B- Phase 2 Grant Renewal Review Criteria B.2- Contextual Considerations (2/2) Beyond performance evaluation, the Secretariat considers contextual information in its review of Phase 2 Grant Renewals. - Continued - Has the program demonstrated significant improvements in implementation over the last 6 months? Have there been any changes in disease trends? Have there been any major changes in the program-supporting environment? (e.g., recent initiation of capacity-strengthening, support of implementation by technical partners, changes in intervention context or political commitment) Is there any information that would indicate that the program was not advancing the Global Fund’s operating principles to: Promote broad and inclusive partnership? Promote sustainability and national ownership through the use of existing systems and linkages with related strategies and programs? Provide additional resources? Contextual Considerations

9 C- Phase 2 Budget and Intended Results C.1- Phase 2 upper-limit amount The maximum amount available for Phase 2 funding is equal to the proposal budget for the full term of the program less funds disbursed to the PR in Phase 1. TOTAL ORIGINAL PROPOSAL AMOUNT - $35M - PHASE 2 UPPER- LIMIT AMOUNT - $19M - Phase 1 Grant Agreement Amount - $20M - Expected additional Phase 1 Disbursements - $6M - Actual Disbursements to date - $10M - Expected undisbursed Phase 1 Amount - $4M - Phase 2 Proposal Amount - $15M - The Phase 2 upper-limit amount is not an entitlement. In circumstances where performance has been poor and there are Phase 1 savings, the Global Fund would expect a reduced Phase 2 budget request by the CCM. It is the responsibility of the CCM to request a reasonable Phase 2 amount. ILLUSTRATION

10 C- Phase 2 Budget and Intended Results C.2- Phase 2 Budget The proposed Phase 2 Budget must be reasonable, feasible and fully justified (especially when it is equal to the Phase 2 upper-limit amount). The Phase 2 Budget submitted by the CCM must take into account: Cost efficiency and productivity gains (linked to the Phase 1 experience) ; Phase 1 programmatic performance ; Usage of funds during Phase 1 (actual and projected, including expected savings) ; Anticipated program realities for Phase 2; Absorptive capacity; and Funding availability from other sources (for the program). The Phase 2 Budget submitted by the CCM must take into account: Cost efficiency and productivity gains (linked to the Phase 1 experience) ; Phase 1 programmatic performance ; Usage of funds during Phase 1 (actual and projected, including expected savings) ; Anticipated program realities for Phase 2; Absorptive capacity; and Funding availability from other sources (for the program). The Phase 2 Budget must be fully justified especially in circumstances of: Significant under-utilization of funds in Phase 1; Under-performance in Phase 1 (in terms of programmatic results); and A Request for the entire Phase 2 upper-limit amount. The Phase 2 Budget must be fully justified especially in circumstances of: Significant under-utilization of funds in Phase 1; Under-performance in Phase 1 (in terms of programmatic results); and A Request for the entire Phase 2 upper-limit amount. PHASE 2 BUDGET ELABORATION PHASE 2 BUDGET JUSTIFICATION An inflated or inadequately justified budget request is likely to be negatively viewed by the Global Fund. !

11 C- Phase 2 Budget and Intended Results C.3- Objectives, Scope of Activities and Intended Results The intended results and scope of activity for Phase 2 must take into “lessons learned” of Phase 1. The CCM Request must include Phase 2: 1- Objectives, 2- Scope of activities; and 3- Intended results. The CCM Request must include Phase 2: 1- Objectives, 2- Scope of activities; and 3- Intended results. The CCM must make sure that the scope of activities and intended results are consistent with the original Board-approved Proposal. However, in cases of under-performance in Phase 1 or of changes in the programmatic and epidemiological context, the CCM should consider the necessity of reprogramming: - Revise the scope of activities; and/or - Adjust budgets and targets. ! ILLUSTRATION