Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

CHAZ GF Partnership Forum GF Partnership Forum New Funding Model (NFM) Experiences 5 th to 8 th May 2015 Presented by: Michael M. Kachumi – Director Grants,

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "CHAZ GF Partnership Forum GF Partnership Forum New Funding Model (NFM) Experiences 5 th to 8 th May 2015 Presented by: Michael M. Kachumi – Director Grants,"— Presentation transcript:

1 CHAZ GF Partnership Forum GF Partnership Forum New Funding Model (NFM) Experiences 5 th to 8 th May 2015 Presented by: Michael M. Kachumi – Director Grants, Compliance & Procurement, CHAZ

2 Preparing for the New Funding Model “He sent them to preach the Kingdom of God and heal the sick” Luke 9:2 Introduction Major Timelines Know the Epidemic & Work on Qualitative Factors Revise NSP or Develop Investment Case Concept Note Development 1 2 3 4 5

3 CHAZ Supports 151 Members, had 141 SRs under SSF and 200+ SSRs Hospitals RHCs & 9 Training Schools CBOs “He sent them to preach the Kingdom of God and heal the sick” Luke 9:2 + Provincial Offices: M&E – Grants

4 NFM Timelines for Zambia CN “He sent them to preach the Kingdom of God and heal the sick” Luke 9:2 1 Ongoing Country Dialogue Develop Concept Note Allocation available in March 2014 Sep- Dec Jan- Apr Analyse epidemic Identify targets, costs and resources for full response over application period Detail programmatic and financial gaps Demonstrate willingness to pay Prioritise Revise NSP and/or develop investment case May Submit Concept Note

5 Timeline Continued “He sent them to preach the Kingdom of God and heal the sick” Luke 9:2 1.51.5 TRP and GAC review Concept Note GAC sets budget ceiling Allocation, incentive, unfunded quality demand Signature ready grant documents submitted to GAC GAC gives final recommendation to Board Ongoing Country Dialogue Grant Implement ation 3 years or less Nov TRP & GAC 2 nd GAC BOARD Board approves funding Grant signature takes place Au g- Sep Finalize grant documents in accordance with GAC and TRP recommendations Jun - July Oct

6 Revise NSP or Develop Investment Case, Analyze Gaps “He sent them to preach the Kingdom of God and heal the sick” Luke 9:2 4 Financial Gap Programmatic Gap Implementation Arrangement Targets PRs / SRs Costing Full Expression of Demand

7 Concept Note Development “He sent them to preach the Kingdom of God and heal the sick” Luke 9:2 4 Concept Note Full expression of Demand: Renewals (if applicable) Indicative allocation Incentive funding Incentive funding: (Amount not known - up for competition) Awarded by GAC to quality demand based on: robust national strategies and high impact, well-performing programs, increasing domestic financing Unfunded Quality Demand: Amount left-over for next funding opportunity Indicative allocatio n Above indicativ e allocatio n Indicative allocation: (Amount known ahead of submission of Concept Note): Amount allocated to each country will be announced in March 2014. Funding of activities aligned to national priorities and identified needs Includes 2014 Renewals amounts (e.g CHAZ HIV) Robus t NSP or invest ment case 7 A robust NSP or investment case provides a greater prospect of incentive funding NSP or Investment Case

8 “He sent them to preach the Kingdom of God and heal the sick” Luke 9:2 PR demonstrates effective management structures and planning PR has the capacity & systems for effective management & oversight of SRs Data-collection capacity and tools are in place to monitor program performance Functional routine reporting system with reasonable coverage to report program performance CCM actively oversees the implementation of the grant, & intervenes where appropriate 12 No conflict-of-interest for the selection of the PR(s) & SRs Program implementation plan provided in the funding request is sound 3 4 Internal control system of PR is effective to prevent & detect misuse or fraud The financial management system of the PR is effective & accurate 56 Central & regional warehousing have capacity, & aligned with good storage practices Distribution systems & transportation arrangements are efficient to ensure secure and continued supply 7 8 9 Implementers have capacity to comply with quality requirements & monitor product quality throughout the in- country supply chain 5 Minimum Standards express the Global Fund’s expectations of PR performance Minimum Standards form the basis of implementer assessments carried out by the Global Fund Implementation Arrangements

9 “He sent them to preach the Kingdom of God and heal the sick” Luke 9:2 IMPLEMENTATION ARRANGEMENTS Timely PR and SR Selection KEY MESSAGES -Start Dialogue Early -Plan ahead for the Grant making Process -Understand Grant signing requirements -Document all processes, Encourage Transparency -CCM to manage Expectations -Prepare IMs during CN -Allow P imp. to continue. -Involve Key partners both local and international -Agree IC costs well in advance 12 Manage Conflict-of-interest in selection Process Program Implementation Suffers – Should not lose sight of our goals 3 4 TEMPLATES Rigid, not too user friendly, password protected. Work with GF Team for orientation 56 Ensure all activities, programs, priorities are included in the Modular template Reconcile Modular template with what is in the CN 7 8 5 Key Issues To Manage Allocation Split by thematic areas – Should be based on gaps -NSP or Investment Case? -Clear identification of Team Leaders, -inclusive writing team -All Inclusive Dialogue needs to be managed -Manage expectations and incentive Funds KEY AREAS of TENSION 11 1 1

10 Questions & Clarifications


Download ppt "CHAZ GF Partnership Forum GF Partnership Forum New Funding Model (NFM) Experiences 5 th to 8 th May 2015 Presented by: Michael M. Kachumi – Director Grants,"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google