Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov. 5 2006 CMAQ O 3 Prediction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Running CAMx. 1. Emissions Acquire appropriate information to get emissions inputs that are:  Representing the mobile, area, and biogenic emissions 
Advertisements

Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory, Atmospheric Modeling and Analysis Division Changes in U.S. Regional-Scale Air.
VISTAS Modeling Overview May 25, 2004 Mt. Cammerer, Great Smoky Mtns. National Park.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of CMAQ with FAQS Episode of August 11 th -20 th, 2000 Yongtao Hu, M. Talat Odman, Maudood Khan and Armistead.
1 AirWare : AirWare : C OMPREHENSIVE A IR QUALITY M ODEL WITH E X TENSIONS VERSION 4.30, PBM DDr. Kurt Fedra Environmental Software & Services GmbH A-2352.
Paul Wishinski VT DEC Presentation for: MARAMA-NESCAUM-OTC Regional Haze Workshop August 2-3, 2000 Gorham, New Hampshire LYE BROOK WILDERNESS CLASS I AREA.
Andrea Fraser – October 2011 Andrea Fraser, Geoff Dollard, Paul Willis, Trevor Davies, Justin Lingard UK Air Quality Forecasting of Particulate Matter.
Climate, Fire and Air Quality Climate Impacts Group June 1, 2006.
CENRAP Modeling Workgroup Mational RPO Modeling Meeting May 25-26, Denver CO Calvin Ku Missouri DNR May 25, 2004.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Working together for clean air Puget Sound Area Ozone Modeling NW AIRQUEST December 4, 2006 Washington State University Puget Sound Clean Air Agency Washington.
Regional Air Quality Modeling: Long Range Global Change Simulations.
The AIRPACT-3 Photochemical Air Quality Forecast System: Evaluation and Enhancements Jack Chen, Farren Thorpe, Jeremy Avis, Matt Porter, Joseph Vaughan,
Evaluation of the AIRPACT2 modeling system for the Pacific Northwest Abdullah Mahmud MS Student, CEE Washington State University.
Transitioning CMAQ for NWS Operational AQ Forecasting Jeff McQueen*, Pius Lee*, Marina Tsildulko*, G. DiMego*, B. Katz* R. Mathur,T. Otte, J. Pleim, J.
Adaptive air quality management through operational sensitivity forecasting Amir Hakami and Matthew Russell 3 rd IWAQFR Workshop December 1, 2011.
Next Gen AQ model Need AQ modeling at Global to Continental to Regional to Urban scales – Current systems using cascading nests is cumbersome – Duplicative.
CMAQ (Community Multiscale Air Quality) pollutant Concentration change horizontal advection vertical advection horizontal dispersion vertical diffusion.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
©2005,2006 Carolina Environmental Program Sparse Matrix Operator Kernel Emissions SMOKE Modeling System Zac Adelman and Andy Holland Carolina Environmental.
Performance of the National Air Quality Forecast Capability, Urban vs. Rural and Other Comparisons Jerry Gorline and Jeff McQueen  Jerry Gorline, NWS/OST/MDL.
University of California Riverside, ENVIRON Corporation, MCNC WRAP Regional Modeling Center WRAP Regional Haze CMAQ 1996 Model Performance and for Section.
The Projection of Future Air Quality for Regional scale considering Climate Change Scenarios Nankyoung Moon 1, Sung-You Hong 2, Soontae Kim 3, Jung-Hun.
Clinton MacDonald 1, Kenneth Craig 1, Jennifer DeWinter 1, Adam Pasch 1, Brigette Tollstrup 2, and Aleta Kennard 2 1 Sonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma,
The Impact of Biogenic VOC Emissions on Tropospheric Ozone Formation in the Mid-Atlantic Region Michelle L. Bell Yale University Hugh Ellis Johns Hopkins.
Combining HYSPLIT and CMAQ to resolve urban scale features: an example of application in Houston, TX Ariel F. Stein (1), Vlad Isakov (2), James Godowitch.
Ozone MPE, TAF Meeting, July 30, 2008 Review of Ozone Performance in WRAP Modeling and Relevance to Future Regional Ozone Planning Gail Tonnesen, Zion.
Supermodel, Supermodel, Can I Breathe Tomorrow? Talat Odman* and Yongtao Hu Georgia Institute of Technology School of Civil & Environmental Engineering.
Fine scale air quality modeling using dispersion and CMAQ modeling approaches: An example application in Wilmington, DE Jason Ching NOAA/ARL/ASMD RTP,
On the Model’s Ability to Capture Key Measures Relevant to Air Quality Policies through Analysis of Multi-Year O 3 Observations and CMAQ Simulations Daiwen.
A comparison of PM 2.5 simulations over the Eastern United States using CB-IV and RADM2 chemical mechanisms Michael Ku, Kevin Civerolo, and Gopal Sistla.
Georgia Environmental Protection Division IMPACTS OF MODELING CHOICES ON RELATIVE RESPONSE FACTORS IN ATLANTA, GA Byeong-Uk Kim, Maudood Khan, Amit Marmur,
Preliminary Study: Direct and Emission-Induced Effects of Global Climate Change on Regional Ozone and Fine Particulate Matter K. Manomaiphiboon 1 *, A.
OThree Chemistry MM5/CAMx Model Diagnostic and Sensitivity Analysis Results Central California Ozone Study: Bi-Weekly Presentation 2 T. W. Tesche Dennis.
On using process-based statistical models of air pollutants to meet regulatory and research needs Amy Nail, Ph.D. Honestat, LLC Statistics & Analytics.
Western States Air Quality Study Background Air Quality Modeling University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON International Corporation (ENVIRON) May.
Georgia Institute of Technology Initial Application of the Adaptive Grid Air Quality Model Dr. M. Talat Odman, Maudood N. Khan Georgia Institute of Technology.
CMAS Conference, October 6 – 8, 2008 The work presented in this paper was performed by the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation with.
PM Model Performance & Grid Resolution Kirk Baker Midwest Regional Planning Organization November 2003.
Northwest-AIRQUEST & AIRPACT-3 Regional Modeling Studies Joseph Vaughan, Farren Thorpe, Ying Xie, Serena Chung, Brian Lamb and George Mount Laboratory.
© Imperial College LondonPage 1 Simulation of London air quality during June 2006 and the effects of emission control scenarios Andrea Fraser NCAS funded.
Impact of high resolution modeling on ozone predictions in the Cascadia region Ying Xie and Brian Lamb Laboratory for Atmospheric Research Department of.
Template Simulation of Wintertime High Ozone Concentrations in Southwestern Wyoming Ralph E. Morris, Susan Kemball-Cook, Bonyoung Koo, Till Stoeckenius.
Applications of Models-3 in Coastal Areas of Canada M. Lepage, J.W. Boulton, X. Qiu and M. Gauthier RWDI AIR Inc. C. di Cenzo Environment Canada, P&YR.
An Exploration of Model Concentration Differences Between CMAQ and CAMx Brian Timin, Karen Wesson, Pat Dolwick, Norm Possiel, Sharon Phillips EPA/OAQPS.
1 Impact on Ozone Prediction at a Fine Grid Resolution: An Examination of Nudging Analysis and PBL Schemes in Meteorological Model Yunhee Kim, Joshua S.
Template Reducing Vertical Transport Over Complex Terrain in Photochemical Grid Models Chris Emery, Ed Tai, Ralph Morris, Greg Yarwood ENVIRON International.
GEOS-CHEM Modeling for Boundary Conditions and Natural Background James W. Boylan Georgia Department of Natural Resources - VISTAS National RPO Modeling.
1. How is model predicted O3 sensitive to day type emission variability and morning Planetary Boundary Layer rise? Hypothesis 2.
Diagnostic Study on Fine Particulate Matter Predictions of CMAQ in the Southeastern U.S. Ping Liu and Yang Zhang North Carolina State University, Raleigh,
Seasonal Modeling of the Export of Pollutants from North America using the Multiscale Air Quality Simulation Platform (MAQSIP) Adel Hanna, 1 Rohit Mathur,
Three-State Air Quality Study (3SAQS) Three-State Data Warehouse (3SDW) 3SAQS Pilot Project Modeling Overview University of North Carolina (UNC-IE) ENVIRON.
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Peak 8-hr Ozone Model Performance when using Biogenic VOC estimated by MEGAN and BIOME (BEIS) Kirk Baker Lake Michigan Air Directors Consortium October.
AoH/MF Meeting, San Diego, CA, Jan 25, 2006 WRAP 2002 Visibility Modeling: Summary of 2005 Modeling Results Gail Tonnesen, Zion Wang, Mohammad Omary, Chao-Jung.
Operational Evaluation and Model Response Comparison of CAMx and CMAQ for Ozone & PM2.5 Kirk Baker, Brian Timin, Sharon Phillips U.S. Environmental Protection.
Impact of Temporal Fluctuations in Power Plant Emissions on Air Quality Forecasts Prakash Doraiswamy 1, Christian Hogrefe 1,2, Eric Zalewsky 2, Winston.
MRPO Technical Approach “Nearer” Term Overview For: Emissions Modeling Meteorological Modeling Photochemical Modeling & Domain Model Performance Evaluation.
Center for Environmental Research and Technology/Air Quality Modeling University of California at Riverside CCOS 2000 Model Intercomparison: Summary of.
Georgia Institute of Technology Evaluation of the 2006 Air Quality Forecasting Operation in Georgia Talat Odman, Yongtao Hu, Ted Russell School of Civil.
OThree Chemistry Refinement of the Sept ‘00 Modeling Episode: Part I--Status of Current Simulation Central California Ozone Study: Modeling Support.
CMAQ Programs and Options
CRC NARSTO-Northeast Modeling Study
Sensitivity Analysis of Ozone in the Southeast
SELECTED RESULTS OF MODELING WITH THE CMAQ PLUME-IN-GRID APPROACH
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
The Value of Nudging in the Meteorology Model for Retrospective CMAQ Simulations Tanya L. Otte NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, RTP, NC (In partnership with.
Update on 2016 AQ Modeling by EPA
Current Research on 3-D Air Quality Modeling: wildfire!
Presentation transcript:

Analysis of Ozone Modeling for May – July 2006 in PNW using AIRPACT3 (CMAQ) and CAMx. Robert Kotchenruther, Ph.D. EPA Region 10 Nov CMAQ O 3 Prediction 7/22/ Z Current AIRPACT3 12km domain

Background: The basis of the Model Runs was WSU’s AIRPACT3 air quality forecast system. * Daily 24 hour prediction of air quality (gases and aerosols). * 95 x 95 grid at 12km resolution. * CMAQ v4.4 model with SPARC99 chemical mechanism. * MM5 12km meteorological forecasts from UW. * Uses the SMOKE emissions model with emissions files developed by WSU. For this retrospective run, AIRPACT3 was used as above except: * Archived MM5 forecasts were concatenated into a continuous meteorological dataset using hours from each UW run. * The CAMx (v4.31) model was also run by converting CMAQ IC, BC, and emissions files into CAMx input format. * CMAQ and CAMx were run for the period May 8 – July 31, * First 4 days of run were removed for model spin-up. Some CMAQ and CAMx differences: * CAMx uses SAPRC99, but does not include aerosol chemistry. * Differences in formulation of chemistry numerical solvers * Differences in treatment of vertical and horizontal advection and diffusion (minor) * Differences in treatment of plume rise from elevated point sources (minor) * CMAQ and CAMx user different MM5/met pre-processors.

Background(2): The motivation for this retrospective run of AIRPACT3 was that Washington & Oregon experienced exceedances of the 8 hour ozone standard at 5 sites this summer. Provided and opportunity to explore how well AIRPACT3 is performing for O 3 Max 8hr average O 3, WA & OR sites, 2006 (ppbv) Main purpose of presentation A snapshot of current AIRPACT3 ozone performance. A lead in to a discussion of where we should place efforts to improve - our understanding of model’s current performance - where best to place efforts at improving model performance DateEnumclaw (WA) Pack Forest (WA) Issaquah (WA) Carus (OR) Turner (OR) 16-May87 26-Jun Jul Jul

WA & OR O 3 monitoring sites available for analysis This analysis will focus on the five sites with 8hr O3 exceedances:(WA Sites) ISSLKSAM ENUMUDMT PAC_FOR (OR Sites) CARUS TURNER

The plots on the following slides show daily max (and min) ozone (and temperature). The maximum 1hr average was taken for both models and monitor, unpaired in time. This example is from Enumclaw, Mud Mountain Road. Daily Max O 3, 2006 Hourly Average O 3, 2006

ENUMUDMT (WA) – Enumclaw, Mud Mountain Road* = exceedance day Plots show daily max and min ozone, 1hr average, model and monitor unpaired in time. Daily Max O 3, 2006 Daily Min O 3, 2006 * * **

ENUMUDMT (WA) – Enumclaw, Mud Mountain Road* = exceedance day Plots show daily max ozone and temp, 1hr average, model and monitor unpaired in time. Daily Max O 3, 2006 * * ** Daily Max Temp., 2006

CARUS (OR) – Carus, Spangler Rd.* = exceedance day Plots show daily max ozone and temp, 1hr average, model and monitor unpaired in time. * Daily Max O 3, 2006 Daily Max Temp., 2006

TURNER (OR) – Turner Cascade Jr. High* = exceedance day Plots show daily max ozone and temp, 1hr average, model and monitor unpaired in time. * Daily Max O 3, 2006 Daily Max Temp., 2006

PAC_FOR (WA) – Pack Forest * = exceedance day Plots show daily max and min ozone, 1hr average, model and monitor unpaired in time. Daily Max O 3, 2006 * * * ISSLKSAM (WA) – Issaquah Lake Sammamish Daily Max O 3, 2006 **

Scatter plot comparing daily 1hr ozone maximum observations and model predictions, unpaired in time. Combined data from 5 sites reporting O 3 exceedances in OR & WA.

Scatter plot comparing daily 1hr ozone minimum observations and model predictions, unpaired in time. Combined data from 5 sites reporting O3 exceedances in OR & WA.

Discussion Ideas for where to look to understand model over prediction of ozone when ambient ozone is below ~ 80 ppb and under prediction when over ~ 80 ppb? - Biases in pbl or other met variables? - Emissions inventories? - Nesting to a finer resolution? - ???? Discuss above in two contexts: - Given current available measurements. - If we begin making measurements not currently available. i.e., mobile lab to be discussed later today