GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK 73072 1 800 228-1766 David.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Title One Parent Involvement
Advertisements

5-Year Strategic Plan Title I Compliance. Assurances Assurances must be signed, dated and submitted to Jan Stanley, State Title I Director on or before.
Assurances are made a part of the Five-Year Plan. Assurances need not be submitted by mail to the State Title I Director.
Delaware Statewide Title I Conference 1 School Improvement – The Ever-Changing Landscape – Part I June 29, 2010 Bill McGrady U. S. Department of Education.
10 Components of School Improvement LEA School Support Team Technical Assistance Workshop Supplemental Information August 2010.
AYP Regional Meetings In Need of Improvement Schools and Districts MDE School Improvement Division and Regional Service Cooperatives August/September 2010.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Program Improvement Year 3 Corrective Action.
No Child Left Behind The New Age: No Child Left Behind.
IMPLICATIONS FOR KENTUCKY’S SCHOOLS AND DISTRICTS SUPERINTENDENTS’ WEBCAST MARCH 6, 2012 NCLB Waiver Flexibility 1.
MSDE Alternative Governance Plan Development School: James Madison Middle School January 2012.
1 Supplemental Educational Services Office of Elementary and Secondary Education June 2002.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County May 2011.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
STAR (Support through Assistance & Reforms) Report.
Our Children Are Our Future: No Child Left Behind No Child Left Behind Accountability and AYP A Archived Information.
Welcome to the Annual Meeting for Parents in a Title I Building.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
NCLB Title I, Part A Parent Notification Idaho SDE Title I Director’s Meeting September 15, 2008 Cathryn Gardner, Senior Program Advisor Northwest Regional.
A Guide to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) and Public School Choice The School District Of Palm Beach County April 2010.
Provided by Education Service Center Region XI 1 Title I, Part A Overview Provided by Education Service Center Region XI
The Basics of Title I Florida Public School Choice Consortium's Annual Conference (FPSCC) Anke Toth November 18, 2009.
A Parent’s Guide to Understanding the State Accountability Workbook.
1 Title IA Online Coordinator Training School Improvement.
Title I School Improvement Committee of Practitioners Bridgeport Conference Center June 9, 2008.
2011 School Improvement Technical Assistance Meeting Dr. Reginald Eggleston Assistant Superintendent Division of Federal and Special Programs October 27,
Guidance for No Child Left Behind Title I School Improvement Presented by: Karen Davies, Title I School Improvement Coordinator.
May 25,  MSP scores are compared against a uniform bar.  The MSP scores compared against the uniform bar are not representative of individual.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
SAISD Principal’s Meeting September 17, 2003 Office of Research and Evaluation.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
State Support System for Districts New Hampshire Department of Education.
Testing & Accountability Update TAKS, EOC, & STAAR.
Pennsylvania’s ESEA Flexibility Proposal May 23, >
Developing State Systems To Support School Improvement And Restructuring Lauren Morando Rhim Public Impact For Center on Innovation and Improvement.
No Child Left Behind Tecumseh Local Schools. No Child Left Behind OR... 4 No Educator Left Unconfused 4 No Lawyer Left Unemployed 4 No Child Left Untested.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
Iowa Support System for Schools in Need of Assistance (SINA) Overview and Audit Iowa Department of Education and AEA 267 August 2011.
Ware County High School State of the school. 12 th grade 448 students entered the 9 th grade in 2003/ students have left the county or state 243.
No Child Left Behind Application Title I, Part A Part 2.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
1 No Child Left Behind: Identification of Program Improvement (PI) Schools and Districts July 2003.
Why are we here? All Title I schools are required to hold an annual meeting for Title I parents* for the purpose of informing you of: our school’s participation.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Schoolwide Programs Under the No Child Left Behind Act David Gray Region VII Comprehensive Center University of Oklahoma
SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT SUPPLEMENT, NOT SUPPLANT TESTS District Level: Maintenance of Effort School Level: Comparability of Services Child Level: Educational.
Title I and Families. Purpose of Meeting According to the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, schools are required to host an Annual Meeting to explain.
No Child Left Behind Application 1 Title I, Part A Part 1.
1 Welcome to the Title I Annual Meeting for Parents Highland Renaissance Academy.
1 Restructuring Webinar Dr. Zollie Stevenson, Jr., Ph.D. Director Student Achievement and School Accountability Programs Office of Elementary and Secondary.
Coordinator’s Academy Local District 6 Program Improvement Thursday October 27, 2005.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Preliminary AYP Preliminary Adequate Yearly Progress Data.
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Ellie Gearhart August Campus Improvement Plan Revise plan Parents School staff LEA Outside experts.
OVERVIEW OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT – FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY BECCA MARSH, DIVISION OF SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT AND SUPPORT TEA, CHARTER SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION ©2013.
[Name of your School] Title I Annual Meeting
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Title I Annual Meeting Title I Program Overview for Schoolwide Program (SWP) Schools.
School Title I Stakeholder Meeting
Campus Improvement Planning
Schoolwide Programs.
School Improvement Grants
Chapter 8 (key issues for Special Education)
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Presentation transcript:

GUIDANCE ON SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Region VII Comprehensive Center The University of Oklahoma 555 Constitution Street Norman, OK David Gray

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center2 Presentation Purposes 1.Clarify the different stages of school improvement 2.Identify the school improvement plan requirements 3.Overview the responsibilities of the SEA and LEA for technical assistance 4.Provide participants with a resource for school improvement guidance in their states, districts, or schools

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center3 Annual Review: School Progress  Determines whether a school or LEA has made:  Adequate yearly progress (AYP)  Progress in closing the achievement gap  Helps states and LEAs develop or refine technical assistance strategies

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center4 Annual Review: Data  Student achievement in reading/language arts and mathematics  Assessment participation rates  Attendance or other measure  H.S. only: dropout rates

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center5 Annual Review: Timeline  SEA timeline must accommodate:  Time for schools to review the data that led to the determination;  The development and implementation of a school improvement plan; and  The need to provide parents with sufficient time to evaluate the public school choice and supplemental educational service options that may be available Release of State Assessment Results Start of Next School Year

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center6 Annual Review: Included Schools Title I Schools SEA reviews and rewards LEA publishes and disseminates results Non Title I Schools SEA reviews and rewards LEA publishes and disseminates results Charter Schools Chartering Authority and/or SEA reviews, rewards, and publishes and disseminates (depending on state law) For Charter School Guidance, go to: elsec/guid/cspguidance03. doc elsec/guid/cspguidance03. doc

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center7 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP)  Rewards for making AYP for 2 consecutive years:  SEA Recognition  SEA Identification as a distinguished school  Optional SEA Awards to distinguished teachers or principals  Other optional SEA rewards  Sanctions for failing to make AYP for 2 consecutive years or more:  Choice (continues)  Supplementary Services (continues)  Corrective Action  Plan for Restructuring  Restructuring

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center8 School Improvement–Year 1

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center9 School Improvement–Year 1  A school that fails to make AYP for two consecutive years, as defined by the State’s accountability system, must be identified for school improvement, year 1.  To exit from school improvement, the school must make AYP for two consecutive years.

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center10 School Improvement–Year 1  What the LEA Must Tell Parents:  What the identification means;  How their child’s school compares to others in terms of academic achievement;  The reason for the identification, e.g., Too few students assessed, One subgroup not meeting proficiency targets;  How parents can be involved in addressing the problems that led to the identification;  The parents’ option to transfer their child to another school in the LEA that is making AYP.

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center11 School Improvement–Year 1  What else must the LEA do?  Publish and disseminate to parents and the public: What the school is doing to address low achievement; What the LEA and/or SEA is doing to assist the school  The LEA must ensure that the identified school(s) receive technical assistance both during school improvement planning and implementation.  Public School Choice Non-regulatory Guidance is available online at

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center12 School Improvement Plan  A school identified for school improvement. Must develop a two-year plan that addresses the academic issues that caused it to be identified.  Must be developed within three months;  May be a new plan or a revision of an existing plan* * Note: If an old plan has failed previously to improve a school, revising that plan might not prove adequate.

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center13 School Improvement Plan  The school improvement plan must address at a minimum, the following topics:  Core academic subjects and the strategies used to teach them;  * Professional development;  Technical assistance;  Parent involvement; and,  Measurable goals * 10% of Title I funds must be allocated to professional development

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center14 1.Locate section C “School Improvement Plan” in your handout. 2.Form teams of Select a team leader 4.Leader assigns team members (and himself/herself) questions and responses from C-4 to C-20 5.Take 5 minutes to read and 5 minutes to report out to team 6.Create a check sheet that your team can use to screen school improvement plans for required plan components and assurances. Improvement Plan Jigsaw

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center15 Technical Assistance–LEA  Responsibilities of LEAs to identified schools  LEA is primary provider of TA on plans LEA can use SEA, institute of higher ed., other experienced TA providers, e.g., Comp. Centers, Labs  Assistance should focus on: Improving the school’s instructional program Issues that caused the school to be identified for improvement

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center16 Technical Assistance–LEA  LEA must assist schools in three areas: 1.Data analysis of assessments and student work 2.Identification and implementation of scientifically-based instructional strategies and methods 3.Budget analysis and reallocation of resources  LEA should tailor assistance to each school’s needs based on its comprehensive needs assessment. Avoid “one size fits all” approaches

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center17 Technical Assistance–SEA 1.Reserve and allocate Title I, Part A funds for school and LEA improvement activities  Equals 4% of the SEA’s Title I, Part A funds in fiscal  95% of this reserve must be distributed to LEAs with schools in improvement (or with the approval of the LEAs, the SEA may use the funds for school support teams or educational service agencies)  Must give priority to LEAs serving the lowest achieving schools with the greatest need and strongest commitment 2.To create and sustain a statewide system of support that provides technical assistance to schools identified for improvement

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center18 Technical Assistance–SEA  Priorities for the system of support 1.LEAs with schools in corrective action/schools in LEAs that have not carried out their responsibilities for corrective action or restructuring 2.LEAs with schools in need of improvement 3.Title I LEAs and Schools that need additional support and assistance  System of support components  School support teams  Distinguished teachers and principals  Other experienced entities such as universities, educational service agencies, private providers, comp. centers, and labs

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center19 Technical Assistance–SEA School support team membership  Distinguished/highly qualified teachers and principals  Pupil support personnel  Parents  Representatives from institutions of higher education  Representatives of regional technical assistance centers or labs  Representatives of outside consultant groups  Other individuals that the SEA deems appropriate School support team qualifications  Skillful, credible, experienced in providing technical assistance  Knowledgeable about scientifically-based research/practice and State standards  Familiar with a variety of school reform initiatives, including Schoolwide programs Comprehensive school reform Other means of improving educational opportunities for low achieving students

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center20 Technical Assistance–SEA School support team responsibilities  Review and analyze all facets of the school’s operation, including the instructional program  Collaborate with school staff, LEA staff, and parents to design, implement, and monitor a realistic school improvement plan  Provide feedback at least twice a year to the LEA, and to the SEA when appropriate, about the effectiveness of the personnel.  Identify outstanding teachers and principals  After one year, consult with the LEA and make a “next steps” recommendation to the SEA

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center21 School Improvement–Years 2 & 3

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center22 School Improvement-Year 2  A school that fails to make AYP for three consecutive years must be identified for school improvement, year 2.  A school that makes AYP after one year in school improvement  Delays year 2 school improvement for one year  Remains in year 1 school improvement  To exit from school improvement, year 2, the school must make AYP for two consecutive years.  Schools in improvement, year 2, must implement their improvement plans and continue to receive technical assistance

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center23 School Improvement-Year 2  What the LEA Must Tell Parents:  Provide the same information as in year 1 of school improvement, including the parents’ option to transfer their child to another school in the LEA that is making AYP  Notify parents that supplemental educational services are available to eligible children  Provide a list of approved providers within the LEA or within a reasonable distance, along with a description of services, qualifications, and effectiveness. Detailed information available at

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center24 Corrective Action (Year 3)  A school that fails to make AYP for four consecutive years must be identified for corrective action.  A school that makes AYP after year 2 in school improvement  Delays year 3 school corrective action for one year  Remains in year 2 school improvement  To exit from corrective action, the school must make AYP for two consecutive years  Schools in corrective action receive more intensive technical assistance from providers

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center25 Corrective Action (Year 3)  Parent notification requirements  Explain what corrective action means and how the school’s academic achievement compares to other schools in the LEA and state.  Explain how parents can be involved in addressing the academic issues that led to corrective action.  Provide information on the parents’ option to transfer their child, as well as information that will assist parents to make an informed decision about this option  Notify parents of eligible children of their option to obtain supplementary services and provide information on providers

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center26 Corrective Action (Year 3)  LEA ensures that  All students have the option to transfer  Supplemental services are available to eligible students in the school  Technical assistance services are provided to the school  LEA takes one or more of these 7 corrective actions:  Provides scientifically-based professional development  Institutes a scientifically-based new curriculum with appropriate professional development  Extends the school year or school day  Replaces staff deemed relevant to the school not making AYP  Significantly reduces management authority  Restructures the internal school organization  Appoints an outside expert to advise the school

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center27 School Improvement–Years 4 & 5

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center28 Restructuring (Year 4)  A school that fails to make AYP for five consecutive years is identified for restructuring  In year one of restructuring, the LEA prepares a restructuring plan for the school  A school that makes AYP after corrective action  Delays restructuring for one year  Remains in corrective action  To exit from restructuring, the school must make AYP for two consecutive years

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center29 Restructuring (Year 4)  During year 1 of restructuring, the LEA creates a restructuring plan to include at least one of the following actions:  Replace staff, which may include the principal  Enter into a contract with a private management company to manage the schools  Turn the operation of the school over to the SEA  Re-open the school as a public charter school  Implement other major restructuring of the school’s governance

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center30 Restructuring (Year 4)  Parent and teacher notification requirements  Provide prompt notice of the decision to parents and teachers  Provide both parents and teachers with the opportunity to comment on the decision before restructuring action is taken  Invite both teachers and parents to participate in the development of the restructuring plan  Other parental notification requirements remain the same as for corrective action

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center31 Restructuring (Year 5)  A school that fails to make AYP for six consecutive years is identified for restructuring–year 2.  At the beginning of the school year, the school must implement the LEA’s restructuring plan  A school that makes AYP after restructuring, Year 1  Delays implementing the LEA’s restructuring plan for one year  Remains in restructuring, year 1  To exit from restructuring, the school must make AYP for two consecutive years

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center32 Restructuring (Year 5)  Year 1 restructuring requirements for LEA actions, notifications, and technical assistance remain unchanged in year 2  A school continues in restructuring, year 2 until it makes AYP for two consecutive years

4/27/2004Region VII Comprehensive Center33 “Reform is no longer about access or money. It is no longer about compliance or excuses. It is about improving student achievement by improving the quality of the education we offer American students.” Rod Paige Secretary of Education