A Vertically Integrated Module Design for Track Triggers at Super-LHC The environment expected at future LHC upgrades pose unprecedented challenges for.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Packaging.
Advertisements

A “BTeV” Hybrid Pixel Telescope for MTest David Christian May 4, 2007.
Track Trigger Designs for Phase II Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen, S.X. Wu, (Boston.
23 Jul 2008Paul Dauncey1 TPAC 1.1 vs TPAC2.0 vs TPAC2.1 Paul Dauncey.
1 ACES Workshop, March 2011 Mark Raymond, Imperial College. Two-in-one module PT logic already have a prototype readout chip for short strips in hand CBC.
ASIC and Sensor R&D Electronics and sensor technology is central to Particle Physics research Technology is moving very quickly – sensor arrays of unprecedented.
A Silicon Disk Tracker in forward direction for STAR News since November 2000 Physics Capabilities capabilities Requirements / Potential Technologies Possible.
The LHCb Inner Tracker LHCb: is a single-arm forward spectrometer dedicated to B-physics acceptance: (250)mrad: The Outer Tracker: covers the large.
Performance of the DZero Layer 0 Detector Marvin Johnson For the DZero Silicon Group.
Embedded Pitch Adapters a high-yield interconnection solution for strip sensors M. Ullán, C. Fleta, X. Fernández-Tejero, V. Benítez CNM (Barcelona)
VELO upgrade electronics – HYBRIDS Tony Smith University of Liverpool.
Status and outlook of the Medipix3 TSV project
The BTeV Tracking Systems David Christian Fermilab f January 11, 2001.
3D chip and sensor Status of the VICTOR chip and associated sensor Bonding and interconnect of chip and sensor Input on sensor design and interconnection.
February 19th 2009AlbaNova Instrumentation Seminar1 Christian Bohm Instrumentation Physics, SU Upgrading the ATLAS detector Overview Motivation The current.
Drift Chambers Drift Chambers are MWPCs where the time it takes for the ions to reach the sense wire is recorded. This time info gives position info:
The SLHC and the Challenges of the CMS Upgrade William Ferguson First year seminar March 2 nd
David L. Winter for the PHENIX Collaboration PHENIX Silicon Detector Upgrades RHIC & AGS Annual Users' Meeting Workshop 3 RHIC Future: New Physics Through.
Ronald Lipton, ACES March 4, Application of Vertically Integrated Electronics and Sensors (3D) to Track Triggers Contents Overview of 3D Fermilab.
MonolithIC 3D Inc., Patents Pending MonolithIC 3D ICs RCAT approach 1 MonolithIC 3D Inc., Patents Pending.
3D Vertex Detector Status The requirement for complex functionality in a small pixel led us to investigate vertically integrated (3D) processes. Developed.
Si Pixel Tracking Detectors Introduction Sensor Readout Chip Mechanical Issues Performance -Diamond.
Fabian Hügging – University of Bonn – February WP3: Post processing and 3D Interconnection M. Barbero, L. Gonella, F. Hügging, H. Krüger and.
From hybrids pixels to smart vertex detectors using 3D technologies 3D microelectronics technologies for trackers.
1 Digital Active Pixel Array (DAPA) for Vertex and Tracking Silicon Systems PROJECT G.Bashindzhagyan 1, N.Korotkova 1, R.Roeder 2, Chr.Schmidt 3, N.Sinev.
High-resolution, fast and radiation-hard silicon tracking station CBM collaboration meeting March 2005 STS working group.
CMS Phase 2 Tracker R&D R. Lipton 3/27/2014 Module R&D Allocation: Requested ~ $320k, received ~160k – Eliminate VICTR testing (continue with FNAL funds.
Phase 2 Tracker R&D Background: Initial work was in the context of the long barrel on local tracklet- based designs. designs of support structures and.
Pixel 2000 Workshop Christian Grah University of Wuppertal June 2000, Genova O. Bäsken K.H.Becks.
Module Development Plan I believe that we are ready to proceed to a program to demonstrate a PS module based on “2.5 D” interconnections. This is based.
VIP1: a 3D Integrated Circuit for Pixel Applications in High Energy Physics Jim Hoff*, Grzegorz Deptuch, Tom Zimmerman, Ray Yarema - Fermilab *
Tezzaron Semiconductor 04/27/2015 New Trends in Advanced 3D Vertical Interconnect Technology 1.
Design and development of micro-strip stacked module prototypes for tracking at S-LHC Motivations Tracking detectors at future hadron colliders will operate.
EUDET JRA3 ECAL and FEE C. de La Taille (LAL-Orsay) EUDET status meeting DESY 10 sep 2006.
1 FNAL Pixel R&D Status R. Lipton Brief overview due to 3 failed MS Powerpoint versions –3D electronics New technologies for vertical integration of electronics.
Phase 2 Tracker R&D Background: Initial work was in the context of the long barrel on local tracklet- based designs. designs of support structures and.
Thin Silicon R&D for LC applications D. Bortoletto Purdue University Status report Hybrid Pixel Detectors for LC.
The CMS detector as compared to ATLAS CMS Detector Description –Inner detector and comparison with ATLAS –EM detector and comparison with ATLAS –Calorimetric.
The BTeV Pixel Detector David Christian Fermilab June 17, 2010.
Total Cross Section, Elastic Scattering and Diffraction Dissociation at the LHC January 17, 2003TOTEM plenary meeting -Marco Bozzo1 CSC detectors for T1.
p-on-n Strip Detectors: ATLAS & CMS
Special Focus Session On CMOS MAPS and 3D Silicon R. Yarema On Behalf of Fermilab Pixel Development Group.
Hybrid circuits and substrate technologies for the CMS tracker upgrade G. Blanchot 04/MAY/2012G. Blanchot - WIT
Jonathan BouchetBerkeley School on Collective Dynamics 1 Performance of the Silicon Strip Detector of the STAR Experiment Jonathan Bouchet Subatech STAR.
Leo Greiner IPHC1 STAR Vertex Detector Environment with Implications for Design and Testing.
Phase 2 Tracker Meeting 6/19/2014 Ron Lipton
The SLHC CMS L1 Pixel Trigger & Detector Layout Wu, Jinyuan Fermilab April 2006.
RD program on hybrids & Interconnects Background & motivation At sLHC the luminosity will increase by a factor 10 The physics requirement on the tracker.
SiD Tracking in the LOI and Future Plans Richard Partridge SLAC ALCPG 2009.
Organization, Proposal and Funding We hope to finish the revised proposal this week Need some cleanup I added a section on simulation needs – should be.
SPHENIX Mid-rapidity extensions: Additional Tracking system and pre-shower Y. Akiba (RIKEN/RBRC) sPHENIX workfest July 29,
Simulation Plan Discussion What are the priorities? – Higgs Factory? – 3-6 TeV energy frontier machine? What detector variants? – Basic detector would.
PACKAGE FABRICATION TECHNOLOGY Submitted By: Prashant singh.
The medipix3 TSV project
August 24, 2011IDAP Kick-off meeting - TileCal ATLAS TileCal Upgrade LHC and ATLAS current status LHC designed for cm -2 s 7+7 TeV Limited to.
The BTeV Pixel Detector and Trigger System Simon Kwan Fermilab P.O. Box 500, Batavia, IL 60510, USA BEACH2002, June 29, 2002 Vancouver, Canada.
B => J/     Gerd J. Kunde PHENIX Silicon Endcap  Mini-strips (50um*2mm – 50um*11mm)  Will not use ALICE chip  Instead custom design based on.
Low Mass, Radiation Hard Vertex Detectors R. Lipton, Fermilab Future experiments will require pixelated vertex detectors with radiation hardness superior.
Off-Detector Processing for Phase II Track Trigger Ulrich Heintz (Brown University) for U.H., M. Narain (Brown U) M. Johnson, R. Lipton (Fermilab) E. Hazen,
VICTR Vertically Integrated CMS TRacker Concept Demonstration ASIC
Dear Colleagues, In agreement with the CMS Upgrade Managers, the Tracker will hold a review of R&D activities related to outer tracker modules on.
Detector building Notes of our discussion
IOP HEPP Conference Upgrading the CMS Tracker for SLHC Mark Pesaresi Imperial College, London.
Hybrid Pixel R&D and Interconnect Technologies
Silicon Pixel Detector for the PHENIX experiment at the BNL RHIC
Vertex Detector Mechanical R&D Design Questions and Issues
Adapting the via last Design
TK Upgrade report.
Track Trigger Meeting 1/17/2013
Presentation transcript:

A Vertically Integrated Module Design for Track Triggers at Super-LHC The environment expected at future LHC upgrades pose unprecedented challenges for particle detector systems. Although the details of the future path of the experiments is uncertain, it is clear that they must be prepared for very high data rates cm -2 s

Proposal Information Proposals are for “generic” R&D, essentially defined as post-phase 1 for LHC Funding for all proposals is $3M for FY11 $625k each taken from CMS, ATLAS this year -> $1.25M next year Letters of intent (not mandatory) due mid-Feb, full proposals due March 19 Both CMS and ATLAS have decided to submit a single proposal each – with details in the appendices – track trigger will be a high priority piece of the CMS proposal Funding will be supplemented by FNAL generic R&D funds as well as international collaborators We have now heard that some CMS/ATLAS bridge funding should be available for phase 2 projects.

Physics Reach Much of the discussion has been aimed at retaining trigger capabilities at sLHC, but we need more than that. This work is intended for an era when the LHC has presumably discovered new physics and the experiments will need to make precise measurements of supersymmetric states, Higgs, KK modes, black holes … Much of the new physics is expect to couple to heavy states, b, t – tracking is crucial. The new physics could be very complex – supersymmetric states with cascade decays, missing energy … we will need more powerful tools at the trigger level We need to think about qualitatively new capabilities, exemplified by a L1 tracking trigger This is not an immodest proposal – we are trying to transform the way trackers and triggering systems are integrated

Tracking Triggers Current tools are limited – calorimeter triggers cannot select individual primary vertices, have poor hadronic energy resolution, depend on isolation – Muon triggers limit the physics reach, especially for complex, multi-object topologies. A track-based trigger can provide transformational capabilities – Selection of a parent primary vertex (z resolution) – Excellent momentum resolution – providing an initial particle flow basis for triggering – Ability to provide isolation cuts – Excellent matching to calorimeter and muon objects – Access to detailed event topology information. It has been done in drift chambers (CDF) and fibers (D0) – can it be done in silicon with much higher granuarity (10x) and event rates (12x)

The Trigger Problem CMS upgrade “strawman” design: >150 m 2 of silicon, >50 M pixel channels, 86 M “strip” channels. Raw hit data (20bits/hit) rate at 40 Mhz crossings, 200 interactions/crossing, 14 TeV 2.75x10 13 bits/second of hits in the tracker – we want to use this information to make a decision on whether an event is “interesting” Equivalent to 2x the 2009 US internet bandwidth Can only record ~1x10 5 /40x10 6 events/sec ~1/400 crossings 3.2  s decision time

Track Triggering We are interested in triggering on high transverse momentum (stiff) tracks These have least curvature in the 4T CMS magnetic field. Filter out and cluster data from low Pt tracks-reduce data by >20 Curvature information can be analyzed locally – minimal data transfer and associated power – Stacked layers ~ 1mm apart – Local processing and local hit correlation

The 3D Solution The vertical interconnection ability available in 3D seems to be an optimal solution to this problem A single chip on the bottom tier can connect to both top and bottom sensors – locally correlate information Analog information from the top sensor is passed to ROIC through the interposer One layer of chips No “horizontal” data transfer necessary – lower noise and power Fine Z information is not necessary on the top sensor – long (~1 cm vs ~1-2 mm) strips can be used to minimize via density in the interposer

Double Stack Concept 8 Ronald Lipton, SLAC Inst. Seminar 1/13/ Spreadsheet estimate Data flow: Hit information flows from top to bottom tier Bottom (master) tier looks for local correlations, filters clusters, and sends data off-module Stubs are sent off the rod to a processor which forms local tracks (tracklets) and tracks. ?

Thrusts 1.The development and demonstration of techniques to fabricate robust vertically integrated assemblies of sensors and readout chips. 2.The development very high speed, fault tolerant, designs and associated ICs for transmitting sparse data on a readout module. 3.Mechanical design of a module and it’s associated support. 4.Development of a low mass bump bonded interposer which must carry all of the module electrical signals, space the sensors by ~1mm, and carry the analog signals 5.Development of processes and techniques to produce large area, fully sensitive, sensor/ROIC arrays with minimal dead area, high yield and low cost.

Ingredients Vertical interconnection of top and bottom sensors through ROIC – Provided by TSVs and thinning (also possible with SOI, MAPS) – Tezzaron/Chartered run Low mass interposer – Silicon or PCB based technology, etched voids, sensors need to be separated by ~1-2 mm Robust, fine pitch sensor-detector interconnection which can expose the topside TSVs – Direct Oxide Bonding (DBI) by Ziptronix Cu-Cu bonding by Tezzaron SOI-based sensors High speed, low power data communication using micropipelines Low cost, industrial scale fabrication (150 m 2 )

11 11 Readout IC wafer with TSV from foundry Sensor DBI bond Oxide bond diced ROIC to sensor Wafer. Flip, thin to expose TSV Sensor Contact lithography provides Access to topside pads for vertical data path Sensor Thin to expose TSV Interposer Test, assemble module with interposer Sensor Bump Bond module Sensor 3D Doublet Layer Construction

Oxide Bonding Ziptronix Direct Bonded Interconnect (DBI) based on formation of oxide bonds between activated SiO 2 surfaces with integrated metal – Silicon oxide/oxide inital bond at room temp. (strengthens with 350 deg cure) – Replaces bump bonding – Chip to wafer or wafer to wafer process – Creates a solid piece of material that allows bonded wafers to be aggressively thinned – ROICs can be placed onto sensor wafers with 10 µm gaps - full coverage detector planes – ROICs can be placed with automated pick and place machines before thermal processing - much simpler than the thermal cycle needed by solder bumps Initial studies at Fermilab using BTeV ROICS

Wafer Bonding/Tiling Will be used for bonding Tezzaron 3D ICs to sensors Discussed in detail with Ziptronix

VICTR Chip Intended to demonstrate the ingredients of of a 3D- based track trigger – 3D chip with TSVs – Silicon and kapton-based interposers – DBI oxide bonding and thinning – Bump bonded assembly – Simple top-bottom tier direct coincidence Short Strip TierLong Strip Tier Front end from ATLAS 3D FEI4

Demonstration Module Long strip (5mm) sensor Short strip (1mm) sensor Interposer Short strip DBI bonds Bond pad redistribution ROIC.5 mm 8 mm

Current Status 2D wafers completed – being bonded together to 3D wafers 2D test wafer (short strip tier) being tested now First set of sensors complete – Planarity tested at Ziptronix – Sensors available for bond and quality tests Second set complete to last metal – Last metal changes to reflect Ziptronix requests for bond topology layout changes being completed Silicon interposers produced – some problems with continuity Full sized PCB interposer produced – initial lot had poor yield. Second lot underway. – Use to develop full module design and fabrication Readout electronics concept defined – Plan to validate design concepts through 1) simulation and 2) test chips

Phase II In-chip Logic 3D design allows for local logic Each strip looks at ~ 4 neighbors – Kill all hits if cluster is too large – Central strip outputs hit information to internal logic – Interpolation to ½ strip External settings for dead or noisy strips, shift of information in phi, pt threshold Neighbor chip sends cluster information for last short strips Pipelined design: 1.Signal amplification/discrimination 2.Local cluster finding 3.Global cluster finding 4.Pt and charge outputs 5.Z clustering?

Full 10 x 10 cm Module design CF skin for module protection and mounting points Sensor Sensor with integrated ROIC Rigid/flex PC board Twisted wire interconnect Low mass spacer Bump bonds Passive components

PCB- based Interposer Data bus (2 layers) Analog via array 600 micron pitch

Additional R&D Interposer – Kapton/Kevlar-based with material removed – Group through vias to allow for voids – Etching, mechanical drilling to remove material – Planarity, bump bonding of large areas ( micron pitch) ROIC – Add functionality – trigger and readout – Understand yield issues with larger area chips – VHDL/Verilog simulation of readout/logic with GEANT input Sensor integration/DBI – DBI has tight planarity requirements – special sensor processing with thin oxide, metal – Can we post process standard sensors to add tungsten plugs and CMP – DBI yield, real costs – see later

Sensor post Processing DBI requires flat initial topography for good yield BNL sensors specially fabricated Examine using post processing with oxide deposition, tungsten sputtering, and CMP to provide wafers with acceptable topography

Yields and Large Area Arrays We are trying to build large area arrays of chips (10x10 cm) with low cost, good yield. This is the hardest part of the problem. IC Die are limited to ~2x2 cm reticules – Use known good die – implies die-to- wafer bonding. – But die-to-wafer is more costly and suffers from it’s own yield issues – Wafer-to-wafer is cheaper and should have better overall yield – but there are too many edges (lose 3x thickness for guard ring) Is there a way to combine both?

Die-based Assemblies Technology has been demonstrated (VTT, MIT-LL (FNAL), … to build edgeless sensors with DRIE (3D sensor) technology The VTT process, which involves first bonding the sensor to a handle wafer is well adapted to wafer-to-wafer oxide bonding

Edgeless chip- sensor assemblies

5-Year Plan VICTR Chip Sensor design and fab IC/Sensor bonding Interposer Bump bond and test Mechanical Studies VICTR 2 Multi chip modules Architecture and simulation Chip prototypes for high speed transmission FY2011