Pretest Workshop February, 2007 Scott Norton Louisiana Department of Education.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Learning and Accountability College- and Career- Ready Standards A Balanced Assessment System A New School Accountability Model.
Advertisements

RIDE – Office of Special Populations
Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Presentation to DPAS-II Student Growth Measures Working Group July 14, 2010 Dr. Michael Stetter, Acting Director Accountability Resources Director, Curriculum,
Teacher Evaluation and Pay for Performance Michigan Education Association Spring 2011.
Introduction to Creating a Balanced Assessment System Presented by: Illinois State Board of Education.
ASSESSMENT & ACCOUNTABILITY Luci Willits Chief of Staff.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems Alignment of State and Federal Requirements SB 290 ESEA Waiver Oregon Framework.
2 EOC Graduation Policy High Stakes Policy District Test Coordinator Spring 2010 Pretest Workshop.
(337) Agenda End of Course (EOC) high stakes testing Final exam schedule for ECA and SLCC courses PLAN results ACT …
Understanding Changes to Assessments for APPR Purposes Theresa L. Gray, Coordinator Integrated Education Services (IES) Erie 2-Chautauqua-Cattaraugus BOCES.
Targeted Efforts to Improve Learning for ALL Students.
How do we document evidence of student growth in Healthful Living?
Principal Performance Evaluation System
Leader & Teacher SLTs 2014 – ComponentEvaluation for TeachersEvaluation for School Leaders Setting GoalsTeachers set two SLTs in collaboration with.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
DATAG, December 2010 Data Update 1. Initial teacher/course data Unique teacher identifier Course code and enrollment for those courses associated with.
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
STAAR & STAAR EOC Presented by: Jamie Hicks & Christina Trotter Humble ISD Coordinator of Student Assessments Updates for ELL’s.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
Measuring Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Name of School.
Implementing Formative Assessment Online Professional Development What Principals Need to know.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
MARCH & APRIL 2012 TEST ADMINISTRATIVE ERRORS. LPSS TESTING JUST LIKE LPSS TURNAROUND WE ARE GOOD IN SOME SPOTS…NOT SO GOOD IN OTHERS… WE ARE WORKING.
Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.
School Accountability Update July 2005-March 2006.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
1 East Baton Rouge Parish School System September 2013 Committee of the Whole Presented by Liz Frischhertz Accountability, Assessment & Evaluation Eleventh.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Fall District Test Coordinators Meeting Alexandria, LA November, 2005.
2 Louisiana Believes Objective: The Department is providing districts increased support in preparation for the school year. As districts plan for.
Phase 2 Recommendations Recommendation 1  Increase the Graduation Requirements Require a 4 th year of math for all students Highest level of math attainment-strongest.
Race to the Top Assessment Program: Public Hearing on High School Assessments November 13, 2009 Boston, MA Presenter: Lauress L. Wise, HumRRO Aab-sad-nov08item09.
OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION COSA PRINCIPAL’S CONFERENCE 2015 ODE Update on Educator Effectiveness.
State Support for Classroom Assessment Fen Chou, Ph.D. Louisiana Department of Education National Conference on Student Assessment June 27, 2012.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
School Accreditation School Improvement Planning.
Moving Forward With Assessment and Accountability August 2011 High School.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Dr. Kenyae L. Reese HHS Academy Principal, IB Diploma Programme November 19, 2015.
School Accountability Update September 2006 – April 2007.
SASIT Thomas E. Gluck, Acting Secretary of Education Amy Morton, Deputy Secretary, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education Ed Vollbrecht, Ph.D., Director,
End-of-Course (EOC) Tests 9 th grade of
Teacher Incentive Fund U.S. Department of Education.
Accountability Updates Sound Check: Can you hear me now?
Proposed End-of-Course (EOC) Cut Scores for the Spring 2015 Test Administration Presentation to the Nevada State Board of Education March 17, 2016.
FIRST CHOICE ALABAMA HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES OF THE FUTURE Curriculum and Instruction Alabama Department of Education FIRST CHOICE ALABAMA HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATES.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP TEAM CAMPUS IMPROVEMENT PLANNING MARCH 3, 2016.
Goals Increased Student Achievement Balanced Assessment System Summative Formative Assessment for Learning.
» Students who meet the passing standard on STAAR must still meet all promotion requirements outlined in the district policy. We will review.
Kristen A Condella MCSD Mathematics Coordinator. Mathematics Formative Assessment System (MFAS) Formative assessment is a process used by teachers and.
Policy IG Curriculum Development, Adoption, and Review …[D]esign a curriculum to carry out the instructional goals of the district. The curriculum will.
1 Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Annual Title 1 Parent Meeting Wilson Elementary School.
Value-Added Calculation
American Institutes for Research
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Five Required Elements
Federal Policy & Statewide Assessments for Students with Disabilities
Kansas Leads the World in the Success of Each Student.
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
NCSA 2016 Presentation June 22, 2016
EOCT BACKGROUND SPRING 2012
Illinois Performance Evaluation Advisory Council Update
Discussion on Virginia’s State Assessment Program
Presentation transcript:

Pretest Workshop February, 2007 Scott Norton Louisiana Department of Education

High School Redesign  Recommendations Increase Graduation Requirements Implement LA Core for Freshman Class of Strengthen the Career-Technical Endorsement Replace the GEE with End of Course Tests (EOC) for the Freshman Class of Modify the Graduation Index to better align high school accountability with the goals of high school redesign Support Drop Out Prevention and Recovery

End of Course (EOC) Tests: Recommendations  Beginning with the freshman Class of , replace the GEE with End of Course Tests  To graduate, a student would have to have a “verified credit” in English and Math and either Science or Social Studies  The state will offer at least 2 EOC tests in each of the core subject areas  The EOC test will count as part of the student’s grade, with BESE establishing a minimum percent  The Accountability Commission needs to recommend how to integrate EOC tests into high school accountability  Funding Request: Test Development and Administration O n-line tutorial for students Professional development for teachers Technology funds for high schools

High School Redesign  Next Steps High School Summit March 2, 2007 Marriott Hotel, Baton Rouge BESE Approval of Recommendations: April 2007 and beyond Algebra I Field Test, Spring 2007

Assessment Types  Formative Assessment Formative assessment is a process by teachers and students during instruction that provides feedback to adjust ongoing teaching and learning to improve students’ achievement of intended learning outcomes.  Interim (Benchmark) Assessment Periodic assessments May be used in a formative or summative manner  Summative Assessment Accountability testing (like LEAP/GEE) End-point evaluation

Rationale for EAGLE program  Local requests for state assessment reports at the sub-strand level  Challenges in meeting the request with accountability tests  Development of EAGLE concept system that provides detailed information about student learning on-demand environment  Classroom formative assessment for learning

EAGLE – Vision  System that provides teachers with access to appropriate items  System can be used at any time  System provides evidence about student achievement to make instructional decisions  System that teachers can assess student learning continuously  System that helps students to evaluate their learning

USDE Peer Review  NCLB establishes Standards and Assessment criteria  Each state must be approved in order to receive certain federal funding  About 20 states are approved, to date  Louisiana is “Approval Expected” Pending issues: LAA 1, Migrant

LAA 1  Assessment has not been revised  Achievement levels established, based on student growth Substantial Growth Moderate Growth Minimal Growth No Measurable Growth  SPS and subgroup will be based on growth  Needs USDE approval

Migrant  Data for migrant students must be collected and reported  COE on file for Migrant Student COE is the official paperwork that makes the student "migrant."  Before testing begins, the principal should code this section on hand-coded answer documents.  For the precoded students, the data will be pulled from the state data base.  This field should be coded only for students who have an approved certificate of eligibility (COE) on file, not for students who may be migrant but do not have a COE on file.