Discussion Issues for IIB Presented by Steve Browdy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
March 28-29, AIP-6 Data Sharing Working Group Breakout Steven F. Browdy OMS Tech, Inc. IEEE.
Advertisements

GEOSS Data Sharing Principles. GEOSS 10-Year Implementation Plan 5.4 Data Sharing The societal benefits of Earth observations cannot be achieved without.
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs
Standards and Interoperability Forum: Status, Issues & Plans GEO Architecture and Data Committee Kyoto, Japan 9 February 2009 Siri-Jodha Singh Khalsa.
Digital Earth Communities GEOSS Interoperability for Weather Ocean and Water GEOSS Common Infrastructure Evolution Roberto Cossu ESA
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
AIP Data Sharing investigations for GEOSS Summary of AIP-3 Data Sharing Guidelines Working Group George Percivall AIP Task Leader Open Geospatial Consortium.
ADC Meeting ICEO Standards Working Group Steven F. Browdy, Co-Chair ADC Workshop Washington, D.C. September, 2007.
Report of the Science and Technology Committee GEO Plenary VIII Istanbul, Turkey 16 November 2011.
1 SIF Interoperability Assessment Presented by Steve Browdy.
Registration and Harvest IIB Presentation May 1,
ID-01 report 17 September 2014 IDIB meeting, Enschede Michel Schouppe
Vision and architecture of GEOSS Information System GEOSS Design and Evolution George Percivall The Open Geospatial Consortium (OGC) GEO Task IN-05 coordinator.
AIP-2 Kickoff Workshop End-to-end use case: Discovery, access, and use with variations Doug Nebert GEOSS AIP-2 Kickoff September 2008.
ENV proposal meeting, Geneva, Sep. 24, GCI Presentation Joost van Bemmelen, ESA
THEME[ENV ]: Inter-operable integration of shared Earth Observation in the Global Context Duration: Sept. 1, 2011 – Aug. 31, 2014 Total EC.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-03: Science and Technology in GEOSS ID-03-C1: Engaging the Science and Technology (S&T) Community in GEOSS Implementation.
® QUAlity aware VIsualisation for the Global Earth Observation system of systems Workshop Making GEOSS a quality immersed system of systems February 18th,
SIF Status to ADC Co-Chairs Siri Jodha S. Khalsa Steve Browdy.
Linking Tasks, Data, and Architecture Doug Nebert AR-09-01A May 2010.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2014 Data Management Task Force.
WGISS-39, Tsukuba, Japan, May 11-15, 2015 GEO Community Portals Ken McDonald/NOAA CWIC Session, WGISS–39 May 13, 2015.
GEO Work Plan Symposium 2012 ID-01 Advancing the GEOSS Data Sharing Principles.
Mapping (EGIDA/GEOSS) Stakeholders and STC Road Map Hans-Peter Plag Michael Nyenhuis.
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop November 12-13, Introduction to the SIF Steven F. Browdy, IEEE
Alan Edwards Co-chair / European Commission On behalf of the Data Sharing Task Force 21 st Meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland
® GEOSS AIP 5 Water SBA Update HDWG June 2012 Matt Austin NOAA Stefan Fuest KISTERS Jochen Schmidt NIWA.
DRAFT EDMC Procedural Directives NOAA Environmental Data Management Committee 12/3/2015 1
Task ID_01 “Advancing GEOSS Data Sharing Principles” The Group on Earth Observations Data Sharing Activities for 2013 Reported by Lerato Senoko 29 th EXCOM:
A GEO Label: Scope of Review Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
A GEO Label: Scope of Review Hans-Peter Plag IEEE University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, USA;
Introducing the Science and Technology Roadmap 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Introduction Geospatial users workflow and needs Problem and research goals Contribution Publication Service: GEOSS Service Factory Prototype assessment.
GEO Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF First Organizational Meeting 27 July 2007 Barcelona, Spain.
ADC Portal & Clearinghouse GEO Architecture and Data Committee 2-3 March 2006 George Percivall OGC Chief Architect
® Sponsored by GeoViQua User Feedback on Data Quality 90th OGC Technical Committee Washington, DC Joan Masó 25th March 2014 Copyright © 2014 Open Geospatial.
Report of the Architecture and Data Committee (ADC) R.Shibasaki (ADC, Japan)
Data Sharing Task Force Update Ivan DeLoatch, USGS, ADC Co-chair Alan Edwards, EC, DSTF Co-chair ADC/CBC Joint Committees Meeting Sao Paulo, Brazil 28.
An orientation about the activities of ST related to “GEO label” and Data Citation Standard by Bente Lilja Bye and Hans-Peter Plag on behalf of GEO.
Task XX-0X Task ID-01 GEO Work Plan Symposium April 2014 Task ID-01 “ Advancing GEOSS Data Sharing Principles” Experiences related to data sharing.
Architecture Task AR Status Presented to the July Meeting of the GEO and Architecture and Data Committee Dr. Thomas C. Adang AR Point.
The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.
Standards and Interoperability Forum SIF Update and Status Steven F. Browdy, Chair.
Science and Technology Roadmap - current progress 1 st GEO/EGIDA Workshop Bonn, Germany, May 09 th - 11 th, 2011.
Implementing GEOSS architecture with-and-for Users George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium Task lead AR-09-01B.
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOSSIW - November, 2008 GEOSS “Interoperability” Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
ISWG / SIF / GEOSS OOS - August, 2008 GEOSS Interoperability Steven F. Browdy (ISWG, SIF, SCC)
GEOSS Future Products Workshop: Session 5 – Interoperability and Resource Discovery NOAA, Silver Spring, MD 27 March 2013 Moderator: Steve Browdy Rapporteur:
GCI Overview Steve Browdy with input from Doug Nebert May 2012.
The GEO-Label: a Service for Data Users and a Tool for Facilitating Societal Benefits of Earth Observations Hans-Peter Plag University of Nevada, Reno,
ID-03 Science and Technology in GEOSS Agenda 1 Acceptance of the Agenda 2 Overview of Task Team membership, Work Status and Commitment to Task Activities.
GCI Architecture GEOSS Information System Meeting 20 September 2013, ESA/ESRIN (Frascati, Italy) M.Albani (ESA), D.Nebert (USGS/FGDC), S.Nativi (CNR)
OGC’s role in GEO: Results from the Architectural Implementation Pilot (AIP) George Percivall Open Geospatial Consortium GEO Task IN-05 Coordinator
Page 1 CSISS Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems IIB and GCI Meeting CSR Architecture and Current Registration Status Prof. Liping Di Director.
GEOSS Component and Service Registry (CSR)
Paul Eglitis [IEEE] and Siri Jodha S. Khalsa [IEEE]
GEOSS Interoperability Workshop
DMP GEO Label from self assessment to certification Joan Masó
Brokering Agreement process Stefano Nativi and Mattia Santoro ESSI-lab of CNR-IIA San Petersburg (Russia), 07 Nov 2016.
Registration Process and Yellow Pages «1st Data Providers workshop»
The Standards and Interoperability Forum
1st Data Providers Workshop Side event GEO Secretariat Opening
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
Identifiers Answer Questions
Data Sharing Guidelines
Community Portal Interactions with GEOSS GEO-XII Plenary November 9, 2015 Ken McDonald/NOAA
GEOSS Community Portal Recommendations AIP-7 Results Session, GEO Plenary XI November 12, 2014 Ken McDonald/NOAA
GEOSS AIP-5 Data Sharing Working Group
WGISS Connected Data Assets Oct 24, 2018 Yonsook Enloe
A Case Study for Synergistically Implementing the Management of Open Data Robert R. Downs NASA Socioeconomic Data and Applications.
Presentation transcript:

Discussion Issues for IIB Presented by Steve Browdy

GEO Label What it is –a data documentation mechanism –is a graphical representation of metadata completeness –is a representation of user experience 3 user studies to: –identify the informational aspects of geospatial datasets upon which users rely when assessing dataset quality and trustworthiness –elicit initial user views on the concept of a GEO label and its potential role as a solution to the stated problem –evaluate prototype label visualizations

GEO Label – what it looks like

GEO Label – what it means Producer profile: facet conveys availability of information about the producer of the dataset, e.g., organization or individual who produced the dataset, their contact information, etc. Lineage information: facet conveys availability of lineage/provenance information, e.g., processing applied to data and number of process steps. Producer comments: facet conveys availability of any informal comments about the dataset quality as provided by the dataset producer, e.g., any identified problems, suggested use, etc. Compliance with standards: facet conveys availability of information about dataset’s compliance with international standards, e.g., compliance with ISO 19115, Dublin Core, etc.

GEO Label – what it means Quality information: facet conveys availability of formal quality measures of the dataset, e.g., uncertainty measures recorded in UncertML, errors, accuracy information, etc. User feedback: facet conveys availability of feedback, comments and ratings provided by the users of the dataset, e.g., general comments on dataset quality, identified problems, suggested use for the dataset, etc. Expert reviews: facet conveys availability of domain experts’ comments on dataset quality, e.g., results of formal quality checks, expert suggestions on the dataset applications, etc. Citations information: facet conveys availability of citations where the dataset was used and cited, e.g., formal reports on dataset quality checks, journal articles, etc.

GEO Label How it is used –the GEO label can be created automatically by a web service. –it uses a RESTful API that allows sending a producer metadata URL and a user feedback items collection URL How it interoperates with the GCI –the GEO label service is able to retrieve metadata directly from the Discovery and Access Broker –the GEO label can be easily integrated into the GEOSS Web Portal Proof of concept –demonstrated in the GeoViQua project –live demonstration during the GEO-X Ministerial Week, utilizing test implementations of the DAB and GWP

GEO Label Support –STC (ST-09-02) proposed to establish a GEO label, "a label to recognize the scientific relevance, quality, acceptance and societal needs for activities in support of GEOSS.“ –Some support from ID-03, but not unanimous concerns about branding concerns about decisions on data documentation being taken out of the hands of data providers

GEO Label SIF Position –considers the methodology and principles used to design the GEO label appropriate and in line with the former Science and Technology Committee's initial aims –considers the GEO label an important contribution to enhance the user experience during data discovery –the SIF and 52North are willing to technically assist in the integration process The SIF, therefore, recommends that the GEO label be made operational in the GCI –some modifications may be deisrable See Nomination Letter

Use Metrics Collected from data providers and GCI: –provider name –Data resource accessed –date/time of access –specify which "tags" were associated with the data (geossDataCore, geossAttribution, etc.) –was a license involved and which one –was cost involved and how much –optional additional information

Use Metrics GEO DABGWP Data Provider App Provider Data Provider App Provider GCI / GEOSec Component Use Metrics Service

Authentication & SSO AIP-6 Success –SAML-to-SAML –OpenID-SAML Issues –SAML-to-OpenID –SAML-to-SAML –OpenID

Authentication & SSO