As you take your seats… Think about a positive experience you have had as an adult learner. What aspects of the experience made it so positive? 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ohios Educator Standards. Ohios Standards for the Teaching Profession.
Advertisements

WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Elementary School Counselor
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
A relentless commitment to academic achievement and personal growth for every student. Redmond School District Graduates are fully prepared for the demands.
Title I Schoolwide Providing the Tools for Change Presented by Education Service Center Region XI February 2008.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
August 2006 OSEP Project Director's Conference 1 Preparing Teachers to Teach All Children: The Impact of the Work of the Center for Improving Teacher Quality.
Project Team MSBA – local school board members MASA – local school superintendents and other stakeholders MSBA/MASA.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
LAKE COUNTY SCHOOLS System Accreditation Overview of Standards March 3-6, 2013 Susan Moxley, Ed.D. Superintendent Hugh Hattabaugh Chief Academic Officer.
Central Office Administrator Development and Evaluation Adaptations for Central Office Administrators.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
The Nuts and Bolts The Role of the District Professional Development Coordinator Kentucky Department of Education Office of Next Generation Learners Division.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
1 Professional Development Planning and Needs Assessment Regional Trainings Spring 2006.
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
DRAFT Building Our Future 2017 Fulton County Schools Strategic Plan Name of Meeting Date.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Comprehensive Guidance and Counselling South Shore Regional School Board May, 2010.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Federal Program Directors’ Workshop June 18-19, 2012 Linda Bragg Division of Educator Quality and System Support Effective Professional Development Decisions.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California P-16 Council Recommendations The State’s Transformational.
The revised Common Inspection Framework for further education and skills Charlie Henry HMI Principal Officer Special Educational Needs and Disability Natspec.
MASTERY-BASED LEARNING June 3, 2015 CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
EARLY LEARNING COUNCIL AND SICC COLLABORATION: Addendum to September 30, 2012 Report on EI/ECSE Unique Complexities and Recommendations to Improve Service.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Polk Pre-Collegiate Academy April 16– 17, 2014.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Australian Teacher Performance and Development Framework Consultation proposal.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District School Facilitator Training October 7, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
SEPTEMBER 10, 2012 A REPORT TO THE ARKANSAS JOINT EDUCATION COMMITTEE.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Welcome We have a lot to celebrate!. Today’s Readers…Tomorrow’s Leaders Implementing High Quality Early Literacy Instruction Through Collaborative Practice.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
The Equity Business Case Why Workforce Equity is Good for Business
Accreditation External Review
February 21-22, 2018.
Troy School District External Review Exit Report April 21-24, 2013.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Response to Intervention in Illinois
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY12-13
Presentation transcript:

As you take your seats… Think about a positive experience you have had as an adult learner. What aspects of the experience made it so positive? 1

Rethinking Professional Learning Systems in Connecticut February 26, 2015 Kimberly Audet Associate Education Consultant Connecticut State Department of Education (CSDE) Linette Branham Director, Policy, Reach, & Reform Connecticut Education Association (CEA) Carole Clifford Professional and Educational Issues Coordinator American Federation of Teachers – Connecticut (AFT-CT) 2

Session Outcomes Participants will learn: – about Connecticut’s System for Professional Learning. – about Connecticut State Department of Education’s Proposed Definition of Professional Learning and Standards for Professional Learning. – how a broad-based stakeholder group has worked together to develop and expand CT’s vision for professional learning. – how professional learning can be used to support educator growth and development. – guidance for designing a high-quality professional learning system. 3

Poll Everywhere 4 Using a laptop or tablet? Go to: PollEv.com/kimberlyaudetPollEv.com/kimberlyaudet Using your phone? Send response to Text then your message.

Evaluation Systems Connecticut General Statute a Effective: July 2, 2013 (a)For the school year commencing July 1, 2013, and each school year thereafter, each certified employee shall participate in a program of professional development. Each local and regional board of education shall make available, annually, at no cost to its certified employees, a program of professional development that is not fewer than eighteen hours in length, of which a preponderance is in a small group or individual instructional setting. Such program of professional development shall: (1) be a comprehensive, sustained and intensive approach to improving teacher and administrator effectiveness in increasing student knowledge achievement, (2) focus on refining and improving various effective teaching methods that are shared between and among educators, (3) foster collective responsibility for improved student performance 6

(4) be comprised of professional learning that (A) is aligned with rigorous state student academic achievement standards, (B) is conducted among educators at the school and facilitated by principals, coaches, mentors, distinguished educators, as described in section s, or other appropriate teachers, (C) occurs frequently on an individual basis or among groups of teachers in a job embedded process of continuous improvement, (D) includes a repository of best practices for teaching methods developed by educators within each school that is continuously available to such educators for comment and updating. Each program of professional development shall include professional development activities in accordance with the provisions of subsection (b) of this section. 7

PDEC – Connecticut General Statute a (b) Not later than a date prescribed by the commissioner, each local and regional board of education shall establish a professional development and evaluation committee consisting of certified employees, and such other school personnel as the board deems appropriate, including representatives selected by the exclusive bargaining representative for such employees chosen pursuant to subsection (b) of section The duties of such committees shall include, but not be limited to, participation in the development or adoption of a teacher evaluation and support program for the district, pursuant to section b, and the development, evaluation and annual updating of a comprehensive local professional development plan for certified employees of the district. 8

What is the difference? Professional DevelopmentProfessional Learning Passive ProcessActive Process Removed from Daily Work Embedded throughout Daily Work Disconnected from Student and Educator Standards Aligned to Student and Educator Standards Large Group, Formal, One-size-fits-all to Build Awareness Informal, Self-directed and Collaborative Learning to Develop, Refine and Enhance Practice Irrelevant Offerings to Educators Differentiated to Focus on Acquisition of Knowledge and Development of Skill Not Sustainable Resources are not Allocated to Support Educators Sustainable Resources – Funding, People, Time, Technology, and Resources – with Long-term Support for All Educators Outside Individuals/Organizations Deliver Trainings/Sessions Facilitated and Designed by Educators in School/District; External Sources Used When Expertise Necessary 9

Think about what your district is currently doing to support professional learning. How are educators engaged in professional learning? How is professional learning aligned to district/school goals? How has that professional learning impacted your practice and student outcomes? 10

Transforming Professional Learning in Connecticut Phase 2Phase 3 Educator Evaluation Professional Learning CT Student & Educator Standards Educator Evaluation Professional Learning CT Student & Educator Standards CT Standards for Professional Learning, High- quality Professional Learning Plan, Professional Development and Evaluation Committee (PDEC) Phase 1 11

CT Academy for Professional Learning Diverse group of stakeholders Align the vision for professional learning Professional Learning Advisory Committee (PLAC) Subcommittee of the Academy Draft Definition and Standards Transforming Connecticut’s System of Professional Learning 12

Stakeholder Involvement American Federation of Teachers Connecticut (AFT-CT) Area Cooperative Educational Services (ACES) Capitol Region Education Council (CREC) Center for School Change Connecticut Council of Education Reform (CCER) Connecticut Association of Boards of Education (CABE) Connecticut Association of Public School Superintendents (CAPSS) Connecticut Association of Schools (CAS) Connecticut Education Association (CEA) Connecticut Federation of School Administrations (CFSA) Connecticut Teacher of the Year (CT TOY) Cooperative Educational Services (CES) EASTCONN EDUCATION CONNECTION Institutions of Higher Education LEAD Connecticut LEARN State Education Resource Center (SERC) Connecticut Office of Early Childhood: Division of Early Care and Education CT State Department of Education: Academic Office CT State Department of Education: Office of Student Supports & Organizational Effectiveness CT State Department of Education: Talent Office 13

Focus of a High-Quality Professional Learning System Build educator capacity as a result of professional learning. Create, promote, and sustain purposeful, self-directed and collaborative educator support that results in educator growth and increased student learning. Differentiate support that is critical to training new and developing educators, retaining strong educators, and enhancing practice in all schools. 14

Elements of a High-quality Professional Learning System High-quality Professional Learning Plan Professional Development and Evaluation Committee (PDEC) Proposed Connecticut Standards for Professional Learning 15

A Sustainable Professional Learning System High-quality Professional Learning Plan Professional Development and Evaluation Committee (PDEC) Proposed CT Standards for Professional Learning 16

Professional Learning Definition High-quality professional learning is a process that ensures all educators* have equitable access, throughout their career continuum, to relevant, individual and collaborative opportunities to enhance their practices so that all students advance towards positive academic and non-academic outcomes. *Applies to all certified employees and can extend to all school and district staff. What are the key ideas in this definition? How does this differ from the traditional definition of professional learning? 17

Proposed CT Standards for Professional Learning Professional learning that enhances both educator practice and outcomes for each and every student… Learning Communities occurs within learning communities committed to continuous growth, collective responsibility, family and community engagement and alignment of district and school vision and goals. Leadership requires and develops leadership capacity at all levels to advocate for and create systems for professional learning. Resources requires purposeful planning for the identification, use, allocation, coordination, monitoring and evaluation of resources to support educator learning. Data requires the use of both quantitative and qualitative student, educator, and system data to plan, implement, monitor, and assess professional learning. Learning Designs integrates research on effective adult learning and uses flexible learning designs to achieve intended outcomes. Implementation applies change research and uses tools to identify and support the developmental stages of change and ensures the fidelity of implementation. Outcomes is aligned with district/school goals, relevant Connecticut standards, and other agreed-upon standards for educator practice and student growth. Equity ensures that each member of the learning community has access to the resources and opportunities necessary for professional growth that result in meaningful contributions to its students, school(s) and district. 18

Reflection Proposed Connecticut Standards for Professional Learning Learning Communities Leadership Resources Data Learning Designs Implementation Outcomes Equity Stem Statement: “ Professional learning that enhances both educator practice and outcomes for each and every student….” Directions: 1.Read the standard. 2.Discuss ways a professional learning plan would speak to this standard. 3.Discuss what this would look like in action at your district and school. 4.Discuss potential challenges when this standard is missing. 5.Be ready to share with the group. 19

Who is responsible for designing a high-quality professional learning plan? 20

Transforming Professional Learning PDECs should understand: The district’s strategic plan and key needs and issues. How PL supports district and school strategic planning. The areas in which PDEC makes decisions regarding how resources – funding, people, time technology, and materials - are identified, accessed, used and evaluated. The appropriate standards and importance of alignment with plan. Principles of developmental stages of change. PL is a series of learning experiences. How adults learn How to include all educators in planning PL at the district, school, team, and individual level. Successful district PL practices. How monitoring and evaluation of professional learning are used to review and refine practice. 21

What does a high-quality professional learning plan reflect and describe? 22

High-quality Professional Learning Plans Reflect the proposed CT Standards for Professional Learning Describe: – District vision for PL. – PL supports district & school goals, educator growth and evaluation, curriculum development & implementation, student growth and development. – Clear specific steps for implementation. – Flexible learning designs. – How all educators included in planning, implementing, monitoring, and evaluation PL. – How needs assessments and quantitative and qualitative data is used to plan, implement, monitor, and evaluate PL. – Simple methods for educators to monitor and evaluate how PL is transferred to practice. – How decisions regarding resources are made to support PL. 23

High-quality Professional Learning System 24 High-quality Professional Learning Plan Professional Development and Evaluation Committee (PDEC) Proposed Connecticut Standards for Professional Learning

High-quality Professional Learning System DevelopingImplementingMonitoringEvaluating 25

For More Information 26

Contact Information Kimberly Audet, Ed.D. Associate Education Consultant CSDE Linette Branham, Ph.D. Director, Policy, Research & Reform CEA Carole Clifford Professional and Educational Issues Coordinator AFT-CT 27