Iowa 21 st CCLC Local Evaluations Support for Local Evaluators.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Copyright © 2010 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Washington 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation February 2011.
Advertisements

Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
Penny Milburn August 2011 How are the children? Preschool Program Reporting.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.
ESEA: Developing the Paraprofessional Portfolio Prepared by Carolyn Ellis Logan, Consultant Professional Development/Human Rights Department Michigan Education.
21 st CENTURY COMMUNITY LEARNING CENTERS 2008 BIDDER’S Workshops.
Toolkit Series from the Office of Migrant Education Webinar: SDP Toolkit August 16, 2012.
August 15, 2012 Fontana Unified School District Superintendent, Cali Olsen-Binks Associate Superintendent, Oscar Dueñas Director, Human Resources, Mark.
Copyright © 2007 Learning Point Associates. All rights reserved. TM Introduction to PPICS for Washington 21st CCLC Grantees Michael Hutson Research Associate.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved. Oregon 21st CCLC Leading Indicators Breakout Session Neil Naftzger and Deborah Moroney.
Neil Naftzger Principal Researcher Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation February 2015 Copyright © 20XX American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved.
Mathematics and Science Partnership Grant Title IIB Information Session April 10, 2006.
Webinar #1 The Webinar will begin shortly. Please make sure your phone is muted. (*6 to Mute, #6 to Unmute) 7/3/20151.
© 2014 Public Health Institute PROPOSAL WRITING.
Community Planning Training 1-1. Community Plan Implementation Training 1- Community Planning Training 1-3.
Presented by Margaret Shandorf
Title One Program Evaluation Report to the CCSD Board of Education August 20, 2012 Bill Poock, Title One Coordinator.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
©2006, Creating Change, Inc. Idaho 21 st Century Community Learning Centers Idaho 21 st CCLC Bidder’s Workshop.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Illinois State Board of Education Innovation and Improvement Division January 13, 2010 An Introduction to the 21 st Century Community Learning Center Self.
MATH/SCIENCE PARTNERSHIP BASICS The U.S. Department of Education´s Mathematics and Science Partnerships (MSP) program is administered by the Academic Improvement.
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
OFFICE OF FIELD SERVICES SPRING PLANNING WORKSHOP 2012.
Writing Your Best Perkins Grant – A Conversation on Tips and Suggestions Presented by Linda Affholder, Denise Griffey and Jim Means Annual February CTE.
Profile and Performance Information Collection System (PPICS)
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
12/07/20101 Bidder’s Conference Call: ARRA Early On ® Electronic Enhancement to Individualized Family Service Plans (EE-IFSP) Grant and Climb to the Top.
Karen Seay PARENTAL INVOLVEMENT 101 – Writing a compliant policy and compact We’re all in this together:  State Department of Education 
DPI 21 st Century Community Learning Center New Grantee Orientation: Part 2.
APR(Annual Performance Report) Reporting Packet Guide Need Help? Submit “Have a Question” in Kids Care Center.
Copyright © 2012 American Institutes for Research. All rights reserved. Oregon 21st Century Community Learning Centers Program Evaluation Mariel Sparr.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” 21 st Century Community Learning Centers Program.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
ExCEL After School Programs Elementary Lead Teacher Orientation
Blending Gifted Education and School Reform Dr. Betsy Gustafson, Assistant Superintendent Special Education Leadership Academy July 2011.
Anticipated 21 st Century Community Learning Centers – Expanded Learning Time Grant Opportunity Grant Information Webinar February 27, :30 PM – 4:00.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
KCS Strategic Plan. Graduation Rate Proficiency Rate Turnover Rate Teacher Working Conditions Survey Short Term Suspension Rate Dropout Rate Funding Strategic.
1.  Mapping Terms  Security Documentation  Predictor Table  Data Discussion Worksheet 2.
Certifying Your Data The Annual Performance Report (APR) is due each fall. Data collected in APlus will be used to generate sections of the APR for each.
Grant Application Process Maternal, Infant & Early Childhood Home Visiting Programs.
No Child Left Behind Application NCLB Application – Common Elements Virginia Department of Education.
District Leadership Team Process. Leadership Team Active Coordination FUNCTIONS Implementation support Data-based action plan Coordination Capacity building.
Suggested training for region, district, and campus professionals 9/24/2014Texas Education Agency – Student Assessment Division 1.
$7, grants awarded to 6 libraries to establish Job Centers in their library. Purpose of Grant: To provide a special collection of print and non-print.
2 ASSIST for Schools/Districts An Overview of the Framework Dr. W. Darrell Barringer.
1 Implementing the New Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Guidance Title I University Lynn Sodat, Title I Coordinator Office of Program Administration and Accountability.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Texas Regional Collaboratives for Excellence in Science Teaching Guidelines for Program Evaluation Presented by Carol L. Fletcher, Ph.D. Project Manager.
1 NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND The reauthorized elementary and secondary education act.
Copyright © 2011 American Institutes for Research All rights reserved Washington 21st CCLC Evaluation March 1 Webinar Neil Naftzger and Samantha.
Accountability & Program Assessment Governing Board Online Training Module.
Effective Committees Governing Board Online Training Module.
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD. Professional Learning Committees The purpose of our PLCs includes but is not limited to: teacher collaborationNOT-
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Iowa 21st CCLC Local Evaluation Form Training for Local evaluators
MIDDLETOWN SCHOOL DISTRICT
Thanks for coming. Introduce 21st Century and team.
Iowa 21st CCLC Local Evaluation Form Training for Local Evaluators
Washington 21st CCLC Data Collection Webinar Samantha Sniegowski
PLCs Professional Learning Communities Staff PD
Title Plans and Assurances Spoke Committee Presentation
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Summerour Middle Planning Meeting
McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Presentation transcript:

Iowa 21 st CCLC Local Evaluations Support for Local Evaluators

US DOE Charge Critical Element II: State Education Agency (SEA) Monitoring SEA uses standards, assessments, monitoring, and evaluation to hold sub- grantees accountable.

US DOE Guidelines Components of a High- Quality Evaluation Tied to State 21 st CCLC Government Performance and Results Act ( GPRA) Performance Indicators and Measures Aligned with the Principles of Effectiveness

US DOE Guidelines Principles of Effectiveness An assessment of objective data An established set of performance measures Scientifically based research on student academic achievement

Purpose of Local Evaluations 1.Report on effectiveness of after school program 2.Provide information to help improve performance of after school programs 3.Meet state requirements 4.Sustainability

Required Elements (Minimum) Overview – National Database (Pending) – Demographic Data – Activities Objectives – SMART – Methodology for ratings – Rating explanation Performance Summary Recommendations Sustainability

Required Elements (Minimum) From Guidelines for Local Evaluations Document Overview – National Database (pending) Data should be entered correctly (watch out for typos, capitalization and grammar). Data should match what is in Local Evaluation. Data should be complete and accurate. Teacher surveys should be complete.

Required Elements (Minimum) From Guidelines for Local Evaluations Document Overview – Demographic Data (Match National Database) Snapshot/summary of the Program Include services and activities. Data on – Total Population – Numbers of attendees (regular and non-regular) – Contact hours for students and parents – Numbers of meetings, training sessions, etc.

Required Elements (Minimum) From Guidelines for Local Evaluations Document Objectives – SMART Specific Measurable Attainable Relevant Time-bound

Required Elements (Minimum) From Guidelines for Local Evaluations Document Objectives – Methodology for ratings I.E. Test scores, attendance, sign in sheets, lists of activities. – Rating explanation Follows methodology.

Required Elements (Minimum) From Guidelines for Local Evaluations Document Overview – Objectives Examples Students will improve mathematics skills. Students in the 21st CCLC will improve mathematics skills. Regular attendees of the 21 st CCLC will improve mathematics skills. Regular attendees of the 21 st CCLC will pass mathematics. Regular attendees of the 21 st CCLC will pass mathematics with at least a C average.

Required Elements (Minimum) From Guidelines for Local Evaluations Document Performance Summary – Short – How did the Center perform during the year. – Anecdotal data including quotes from parents, students, teachers, etc.

Required Elements (Minimum) From Guidelines for Local Evaluations Document Recommendations – What can be done to improve performance. Are objectives appropriate or should they be changed? Was sufficient data obtained or do data collection methods need to be changed? What do stakeholders (parents, community members, teachers, students, partners) recommend?

Required Elements (Minimum) From Guidelines for Local Evaluations Document Sustainability – How to continue or expand program Funding Partnerships Local District Support Other

Other Elements Anecdotal Data – Success Stories – Quotes from parents, students, teachers, partners, etc. – Best Practices Pictures Condensed Summary (one or two pages)

The Head and the Heart The Head – Minimum Requirements – Emphasis on data and analysis The Heart – Stories – Pictures – Emphasis on success with students

How to Use Local Evaluation Post to Website per Federal Regulations( Head) URL provided for state report ( Head) Sent to Iowa SEA and state evaluators ( Head) Used for presentations to local school boards ( Head and Heart) Used for Public Relations activities (Heart). Sustainability (Head and Heart)

Local Evaluation Samples Elementary Tornado Academy (Storm Lake) Davenport Stepping Stones Rogers University St. Mark Youth Enrichment

Contact Information Ernest “Rusty” Sinclair – Dr. Ron Cravey –