Application Training October 21, 2015 1.  AZ CSP Training: October 21, 2015  Application Due Date: December 4, 2015  Evaluation Due Date: December.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Advertisements

What it takes to sign your contract Heather Kelley Contracts & Administrative Services Manager.
Contracts (Charter School/Sponsor and Charter School/EMO) Dana C. Reed, Director of Compliance, South Carolina Public Charter School District.
Subchapter M-Indian Self- Determination and Education Assistance Act Program Part 273-Education Contracts under Johnson-OMalley Act.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Perkins Postsecondary Reserve Fund Grants WELDING PROGRAM OF STUDY.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Application Training: Round II November 7,
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Title III Application, Monitoring, and Budget: Supplement, Not Supplant.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY RENEWAL PROCESS: FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS January29, 2015.
Trini Torres-Carrion. AGENDA Overview of ED 524B Resources Q&A.
Awarded School GME Training March 28, 2013 AZ CSP FY
American Diploma Project Network A coalition of states committed to aligning high school standards, assessments, graduation requirements and accountability.
HOW TO WRITE A BUDGET…. The Importance of Your Budget Preparation of the budget is an important part of the proposal preparation process. Pre-Award and.
Emily Lynn Grant Administrator Office of Sponsored Projects and Research Administration.
CONNECTICUT STATE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION BUREAU OF EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION Laboratory School and Model Early Childhood Learning Grant
Los Angeles County Office of Education Division for School Improvement School Site Council (SSC) Training September 9 th 2008 Anna Carrasco From presentation.
Title I Technical Assistance Training Federal and State Programs.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Monitoring and Reporting 2009 CSP Grant OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Monitoring.
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Application Training: Round I August 22,  AZ CSP Training: August 22, 2013  Application Due Date: November 14, 2013  Evaluation Due Date: February.
Fall 2012 LEP Coordinator Meeting Helga Fasciano Section Chief, K-12 Programs Federal Update.
Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent “Making Education Work for All Georgians” Title IIA Guidance Teacher and Leader Keys Effectiveness.
Sponsored Programs Services (SPS) PROPOSALS. What is the PI’s role in the proposal?  Contact the central pre-award center,
SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCIL TRAINING  A group intended to represent the broad school community and those persons closest to the students who will.
NEW START-UP APPLICATION  Deadline to submit application is October 1 year prior to implementation  If proposal is ed, submit cover page.
UMASD CURRICULUM/TECHNOLOGY/STUDENT SERVICES COMMITTEE December 17, 2012.
Presented by: Office of Independent Education and Parental Choice July 2012.
Supplemental Education Service Providers Becoming a Supplemental Education Service Provider.
Gifted and Talented Education Grants Webinar April 11, 2013.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
1. 2 Department of Education Public Charter School Program  PURPOSE: To expand the number of high- quality charter schools by providing financial assistance.
What is a Charter System?
Oct. 13, 2015 Flagstaff Oct. 14, 2015 Phoenix Oct. 15, 2015 Tucson Arizona Charter Schools Program: Getting Ready for the 2016 Grant Cycle 1.
OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance 2009 CSP Grant OFFICE OF INDEPENDENT EDUCATION & PARENTAL CHOICE Budget and Finance.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 25, 2015.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 6 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
ESEA FOR LEAs Cycle 3 Monitoring Arizona Department of Education Revised October 2015.
Welcome! The webinar will begin at 3:30 p.m.. Title III Program Monitoring Tier I, Tier II, & Tier III and BAAS Documentation February 6, 2014 North Carolina.
Title III, Part A, Foundations Stacy Freeman, Title III Specialist Shyla Vesitis, Title I/III Specialist Title III University October 8, 2015.
Bobby Rykard Director of Performance Management. SCDE Funding Manual guidelines/funding-manuals/
NH Department of Education Developing the School Improvement Plan Required by NH RSA 193-H and Federal Public Law for Schools in Need of Improvement.
STEM Innovation Grant (RFP) Adaptive Math Learning Pilots April 6, 2016.
Charter School New Applicant Workshop May 2, 2016.
Gifted & Talented Students Education Program Grant Webinar April 12, 2016.
Application Tips School Leadership Program U. S. Department of Education 2005.
The Day in the Life of OFPSI staff By: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs & School Improvement (OFPSI) Petersburg City Public Schools.
Overview of the FY 2011 SPDG Competition Jennifer Coffey, Ph.D. State Personnel Development Grants Program Lead 1.
DISTRICT AUDITING UPDATE INDIRECT COST AND TIME DISTRIBUTION Melissa A. Austin, Audits Manager SC State Department of Education Office of Finance District.
Prior Approval? Is That A Fact? Attention! Uniformed Guidance Audit Anyone? $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100 $500 $400 $300 $200 $100.
NYSED Policy Update Pat Geary Statewide RSE-TASC Meeting May 2013.
U.S. Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Building the Legacy: IDEA 2004 Highly Qualified Teachers (HQT)
Federal Programs Q &A’s Presented by: Dr. Shawnrell Blackwell Director of Federal Programs and School Improvement.
Nevada Mathematics and Science (MSP) Program Grants Technical Assistance Meeting November 2014.
Breakout Discussion: Every Student Succeeds Act - Scott Norton Council of Chief State School Officers.
County Vocational School District Partnership Grant, Cohort 3 Technical Assistance Workshop January 6, 2017.
California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program (CTEIG)
American Institutes for Research
Accountability Overview Measures and Results
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
Navigating the Charter Renewal Process: Start to Finish
The CSP Grant in North Carolina
Charter School New Applicant Workshop
New Special Education Teacher Webinar Series
Presentation transcript:

Application Training October 21,

 AZ CSP Training: October 21, 2015  Application Due Date: December 4, 2015  Evaluation Due Date: December 30, 2015  State Board of Ed Award: January 25, 2016  Awardees GME Training: January 26,

 Increase the number of high quality charter schools in Arizona focusing on supporting and improving the academic outcomes for educationally disadvantaged students.  Close the achievement gaps for all educationally disadvantaged students in subgrantee schools.  Improve educationally disadvantaged high school student achievement and graduation rates in subgrantee schools. 3

 Open 30 high quality charter schools focusing on supporting and improving the academic outcomes for disadvantaged students* over a 3 year period.  28 of 30 AZ CSP schools demonstrate their disadvantaged students’* academic growth of at least an average of one grade level in mathematics and reading/language arts on the state assessment in Project Year 3.  Student academic achievement of disadvantaged students* at 80% of AZ CSP charter schools will meet or exceed the state average of students with similar student demographics on each content area on the state assessment by the end of year 2 of their grant period. 4

 The graduation rate of disadvantaged students* at 80% of AZ CSP charter schools will meet or exceed the state average graduation rate of students with similar student demographics by the end of year 2 of their grant period. *Disadvantaged students are defined in the CSP application as 1) Racially and ethnically diverse students; 2) Economically disadvantaged or neglected/homeless students; 3) Students with disabilities; 4) English Language Learners (ELL) 5

 The maximum amount for funding in one calendar year shall not exceed $250,000. Requests for awards in excess of $250,000 will not be considered.  A proven leader working with Native American student populations may receive up to $330,000 to form a school in Apache County. The definition of “proven leaders” is a developer who has significantly increased learning outcomes of Native American students to meet the academic expectations set forth in the ASBCS Academic Framework. 6

 Terms and conditions of the award will be described in the Grant Award Notification.  Awarded schools will meet and participate in Summit Conferences twice per year, one of which will align with the ADE annual Leading Change Conference.  Awarded schools will participate in ADE lead Arizona Instructional Rounds (AIR). 7

 During the period of the grant, representatives of AZ CSP will conduct multiple visits to awarded schools to monitor progress toward the application’s academic and operational goals. 8

 Monitoring visits are not audits; however, the school will be expected to provide various documents and policies related to instructional management such as: ◦ Curriculum, lesson plans and formative assessments ◦ Various policies and documents identifying effective business practice and verification of inventory. ◦ AZ CSP staff has FERPA clearance to review student records to measure program effectiveness. ◦ Contracts between the entity and contractors which describe specific service(s) performed. ◦ Verification of salary expenses in Planning phase 9

 Planning and Program Design (max 18 months) occurs prior to opening of the charter school.  Implementation (max 24 months) occurs after the school opens for students. 10

 Eligible expenses are those incurred from the date of the grant award. Pre-award costs related to project outcomes incurred between the time of the grant training and the grant award are ineligible and cannot be reimbursed.  State and federal regulation do not permit Planning or Implementation Grant funds to be used for vehicles, renovation projects, construction and non institutional furniture. Moreover, establishment of petty cash funds or purchases of food and entertainment are strictly prohibited. 11

 According to Section 5204 (f)(3)(A) of the Federal CSP statute, an eligible applicant receiving a Charter Schools Program sub-grant may use the sub-grant funds only for post-award planning and design of the educational program, which may include the following: Refinement of the desired educational results and the methods for measuring progress toward achieving those results; Professional development of teachers and other staff who will work in the charter school. 12

 Planning funds can also be used for the following: Development of a marketing plan to advertise the school in the community prior to its opening. Employing staff necessary to plan the school such as a planning principal, a registrar, a secretary. Funding contracts with vendors to provide specific services for the planning of the school. Recruitment and training of teachers. Teacher training may be supported by stipends to teachers from grant funds. 13

 Planning funds may NOT be used for the following: The renovation or improvement of facilities. Facilities infrastructure. To support a CMO or vendor without a specific contract for services provided. Any other charter entity even if the entity is in the same location as the awarded entity. Salaries for school personnel that are covered by state funds once the school commences. 14

 Implementation grants are twenty-four months in length and will terminate from the date they are awarded.  Implementation begins once the entity has an approved facility and is ready to open.  Approved facility means that the school has a Certificate of Occupancy for educational use from its municipal Building Services Department and approval from the State Fire Marshall.  AHERA (asbestos) is regulated by the EPA and is beyond sponsor and AZ CSP purview. 15

 According to Section 5204 (f)(3)(B) of the Federal CSP statute, an eligible applicant receiving a Charter Schools Program grant or sub-grant may use the grant or sub-grant funds only for: informing the community about the school; acquiring necessary equipment and educational materials and supplies; acquiring or developing curriculum materials; and other initial operational costs that cannot be met from State or local sources. 16

 We will get to the application after a short break.  Now is the time to ask questions about information just presented.  Break (5 minutes) 17

 1. Do not use the application at the AZ CSP website. It is a model but not the actual application form.  Go the GME link.  3. On GME Home Page, Search/Funding Application  4. Fiscal Year 2016: Funding Application/ AZCSP

 1. This AZ CSP application is not speculative. A clear design of the school should be evident in the application.  2. The school design presented in the AZ CSP application must align with the charter application submitted for authorization.  3. Failure to align will result in subsequent cancelation of the award. 19

 You could lose your grant award from any of the following events:  1. The school leader identified in the application is no longer the school leader.  2. You fail to submit your charter application to an Arizona authorizer within your planning period.  3. Your charter application fails to meet administrative completeness review.  4. Your charter application fails to become authorized. 20

 Deadline: December 4, 2015, 5:00 pm  When you submit your application to your respective authorizer, you must notify them that you are applying for the AZ CSP grant.  a copy of that notice to 21

 End of Part I 22

 Prepare to use the following:  Application  Evaluation rubric 23

 Narrative Component Section Section A – Case Study Section B - Governance Section C - Leadership Section D - Budget Alignment (Budget Form) Section E - ESEA 5203 Compliances 24

 1. FFATA  2. School Operation Schedule  3. School Description  4. LEA Autonomy 25

 The bolded words highlight the criteria used by application reviewers to assess and score each Narrative Component.  Note: AZ CSP monitoring is directly aligned with application components. 26

Deputy Associate Superintendent Charter Schools Program: Dr. Mark S. Francis Education Program Specialist: Jane Smoudi Program Specialist: Martha Morgan