National Public Health Institute, Finland www.ktl.fi Open Risk Assessment Lecture 2: General assessment framework Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CHOOSING A RESEARCH PROJECT © LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION, KEITH MORRISON.
Advertisements

UNIT 3: MEANING OF PLANNING THEORY
Summative Evaluation The Evaluation after implementation.
Research Philosophy Lecture 11th.
OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH METHODS l How are Research Methods Important? How are Research Methods Important? l What is Descriptive Research? What is Descriptive.
Chapter 4 Understanding research philosophies and approaches
Reading Literacy l Theoretical framework » Interactive models of reading » Social models of reading.
OVERVIEW OF RESEARCH METHODS
Creating Architectural Descriptions. Outline Standardizing architectural descriptions: The IEEE has published, “Recommended Practice for Architectural.
RSBM Business School Research in the real world: the users dilemma Dr Gill Green.
McGraw-Hill © 2006 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. The Nature of Research Chapter One.
How do Scientists Think?
Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition, or past practice. The importance.
Research !!.  Philosophy The foundation of human knowledge A search for a general understanding of values and reality by chiefly speculative rather thanobservational.
Environmental and technology ethics Uncertainty, risk and precaution.
The use of risk assessment in the society Jouni Tuomisto THL, Department of Environmental Health.
06/10/2015 Presentation name / Author1 Evaluating assessment performance Mikko Pohjola, THL.
National Public Health Institute, Finland Pyrkilo – a modified risk assessment method Jouni Tuomisto National Public Health Institute (KTL)
National Public Health Institute, Finland Beneris (Benefit-risk assessment for food: an iterative value-of-information approach) ‏ Jouni Tuomisto.
Management of assessments and decision making: execution, facilitation, evaluation Mikko V. Pohjola, Nordem Oy (THL)
Shared understanding Jouni Tuomisto, THL. Outline What is shared understanding? Main properties Examples of use How does it make things different? Rules.
National Public Health Institute, Finland Open risk assessment Lecture 7: Evaluating assessment performance Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland.
Theorethical considerations about Innovation in the Public Sector - potentials, consequences and misunderstandings PhD student Laia Martinez, Institute.
After studying this chapter, you will be able to : 1.Explain the meaning and the changing role of accounting. 2.List users of accounting information and.
1 Contact: From Evaluation to Research Description of a continuum in the field of Global Education.
LEVEL 3 I can identify differences and similarities or changes in different scientific ideas. I can suggest solutions to problems and build models to.
Decision analysis and risk management: Introduction to course Jouni Tuomisto, THL.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
Notes on Research Design You have decided –What the problem is –What the study goals are –Why it is important for you to do the study Now you will construct.
Foundations of Physics Science Inquiry. Science Process of gathering and organizing information about the physical world.
Designing an Experiment Lesson 1.3 Chapter 1: Using Scientific Inquiry Interactive Science Grade 8, Pearson Education Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
Science Process Skills. Observe- using our senses to find out about objects, events, or living things. Classify- arranging or sorting objects, events,
Process & Inquiry Skills: Scientists in EC Classrooms CDAEYC Annual Meeting May 19, 2015 Albany, New York.
18/11/2015 Presentation name / Author1 Assessments – science-based decision support Mikko Pohjola, THL.
Introduction to Earth Science Section 2 Section 2: Science as a Process Preview Key Ideas Behavior of Natural Systems Scientific Methods Scientific Measurements.
National Public Health Institute, Finland Open risk assessment Lecture 4: Defining variables Jouni Tuomisto KTL, Finland.
Shared understanding Jouni Tuomisto, THL. Outline What is shared understanding? Main properties Examples of use How does it make things different? Rules.
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making Mikko V. Pohjola, Nordem Oy, (THL)
Evidence-Based Practice Evidence-Based Practice Current knowledge and practice must be based on evidence of efficacy rather than intuition, tradition,
National Public Health Institute, Finland Open risk assessment Lecture 5: Argumentation Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland.
B.A. (English Language) UNIVERSITI PUTRA MALAYSIA
Quality Assessment of MFA’s evaluations Rita Tesselaar Policy and operations Evaluation Department Netherlands Ministry of Foreign Affairs.
Lecture №1 Role of science in modern society. Role of science in modern society.
Methods of Scientific Inquiry Ch 1.3 Course Overview.
National Public Health Institute, Finland Open risk assessment Lecture 5: Argumentation Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland.
National Public Health Institute, Finland Open Risk Assessment Lecture 2: General assessment framework Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland.
Environmental Systems and Society Internal Assessment.
Management and evaluation of open policy processes Mikko V. Pohjola Nordem Oy, THL, Santasport Institute.
+ EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS An experimental investigation is one in which a control is identified. The variables are measured in an effort to gather.
Scientific Method. Scientific Method: Ask a question (or a problem) : What is it you want to find out?
Scientific approach Two forms: Discovery science (descriptive) Hypothesis-driven science (specific)
ABRA Week 3 research design, methods… SS. Research Design and Method.
Interpreting Communication Research Textual Analysis.
Sociology 12. Outcome analyze a variety of appropriate sociological research methods Describe common sociological research methods
Scientific Inquiry. The Scientific Process Scientific Process = Scientific Inquiry.
Unit : Scientific inquiry Unit : Scientific inquiry.
Decision analysis and risk management: Introduction to course Jouni Tuomisto, THL.
CHAPTER ONE EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH. THINKING THROUGH REASONING (INDUCTIVELY) Inductive Reasoning : developing generalizations based on observation of a.
DARM 2013: Assessment and decision making
Section 2: Science as a Process
Introduction to risk management
Impact assessment and decision making
Open risk assessment Lecture 5: Argumentation
الإحصاء ومنهجية البحث Statistics and Research Methodology Fall 2016
Scientific Method Definitions
Research Methods:Overview
Georg Umgiesser and Natalja Čerkasova
Steps of the Scientific Method
Steps of the Scientific Method
Scientific Method Lab Mapping.
Presentation transcript:

National Public Health Institute, Finland Open Risk Assessment Lecture 2: General assessment framework Mikko Pohjola KTL, Finland

National Public Health Institute, Finland Contents Purpose of risk assessment Societal context of risk assessment Properties of good risk assessments General assessment processes Universal assessment products Open participation in risk assessment Other important concepts

National Public Health Institute, Finland Purpose of risk assessment Ultimately: to improve societal decisions on risk related issues Two aspects of the purpose: –General purpose = to describe reality –Instrumental purpose = to answer to a specific need

National Public Health Institute, Finland Societal context of risk assessment Risk assessment is collection, synthesis and interpretation of scientific information and value judgments for use of the society

National Public Health Institute, Finland Societal context of risk assessment

National Public Health Institute, Finland Properties of good risk assessments

National Public Health Institute, Finland Properties of good risk assessments Quality of content –How good a description of the given part of reality it is? Applicability –How well does the information within the description transfer to decision making process? Efficiency –(Quality of content + Applicability)/Spent effort –How good output, given the effort, was/is produced?

National Public Health Institute, Finland General assessment processes Observation of reality Information collection Information manipulation (in undefined format) Information synthesis (to a defined format) Communication Management of assessment process

National Public Health Institute, Finland Universal assessment products Variable –A description of reality within defined scope –A falsifiable hypothesis (Popper’s falsification) Assessment –A collection of variables according to a particular need (question/problem)

National Public Health Institute, Finland Universal assessment products Context –The external factors that define the purpose of assessment and the avilable means to carry out the assessment Class –A practical (non-fundamental) object type –Collection of variables that share a property or properties

National Public Health Institute, Finland Universal assessment products Causal diagram –Means of presenting assessments (including variables)

National Public Health Institute, Finland Open participation in risk assessment Unorganized groups participate, share information, and utilise the products of others –Common target of work –Group communication & production –Independent actors – Anyone, anytime, anything Dimensions of openness –Involvement, access, influence, time, …

National Public Health Institute, Finland Open participation in risk assessment Normative & ethical reasons Instrumental & pragmatic reasons Epistemological & substantive reasons Goal: improved output of RA: –Quality of content Informativeness, calibration, relevance –Applicability Usability, availability, acceptability –Efficiency?

National Public Health Institute, Finland Other important concepts? Heande: Glossary