Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, 18-19 November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Simon Gooder (Ports Liaison Manager) Navigation Safety Branch Maritime and Coastguard Agency.
Advertisements

Structure of dangerous goods Maritime Office in Gdynia.
E-navigation, and IHO’s role IHO, Monaco, October 2014 John Erik Hagen, Regional Director NCA Coordinator of the completed IMO Correspondence Group on.
BE-AWARE II What are the most appropriate response and risk reducing measures to address the risk of oil pollution in 2020? Co-financed by the EU – Civil.
University of Tromsø Intervention when causalities pose threat of pollution.
Singapore’s Actions Against Oil Pollution
Overview Which IMO measure should you choose? Use of four real world examples Factors to consider in choosing an IMO measure Summary of potential difficulties.
Setting the scene: The ACCSEAS Project Dr Alwyn I. Williams ACCSEAS Project Manager ACCSEAS Conference th February 2015.
CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC PASSAGE PLANNING CANADIAN COAST GUARD AUXILIARY - PACIFIC February 2012.
An Ocean of Opportunity: An integrated maritime policy for the EU 1 Places of refuge: General legal framework and developments within IMO and the EU Alexandros.
P.P. Sinha Directorate General Of Lighthouses & Lightships Ministry Of Shipping Government Of India E-NAVIGATION: WILL IT BE AN ULTIMATE PANACEA? GEO INFRA.
HELCOM proposal on project aiming at BSAP development and implementation Baltic Sea Region Programme Conference May 2007, Hamburg HELCOM.
On board equipment for Sea traffic Management What will be needed?
FPS PUBLIC HEALTH, FOOD CHAIN SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENT « Provinciaal Hof », Bruges, Belgium October MIMAC 2006 : International conference on.
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
WP 6 Exchange of dynamic predictor Two ships operation, Tug and ship Peter Grundevik, SSPA Sweden AB.
BE-AWARE Project BONN AGREEMENT
Legal aspects of the marine environment protection and oil transportation: example of the Baltic Sea.
Global Marine ProgrammeThe World Conservation Union Proactive environmental planning for emerging shipping routes in Arctic waters Julian Roberts Programme.
W w w. b a l t i c m a s t e r. o r g WORK PACKAGE 2- FINAL RESULTS WP2 Seminar / Baltic Master II Partner Search The 19th of Dec., 2007 Prepared by Jakub.
CETMEF Common Shore-Based e-Navigation Architecture
Particularly Sea-Sensitive Areas and Marine Protection Zones. A Controversial Issue that needs Interpretation Dr. Aristotelis B. Alexopoulos BCA College.
Børge Hetland Director Sales Digital Ship Hamburg, 19 th March 2015 e-navigation from concept to reality.
Seminar K M A 12 – 13 June 2007 Christer Bergquist – Kalmar Maritime Academy1 SAFE TRANSPORTATION AT SEA A Baltic Sea perspective – Requirements on vessels.
Ice Navigation & Seamanship A tanker master’s experience
October 2009 Klaus Grensemann, Division WS 23 St. Petersburg 1 Development and Implementation of an Overall E-Navigation Strategy.
The IALA Vision for e-Navigation Nordic Navigation Conference Oslo 16 & 17 October 2007.
Enav.it Channelling Finance and Innovation to Industry Steps towards the Air Traffic Management system modernisation.
The work of the expert group Peter Stuurman chairman ad interim Saturday, 09 April 2011.
EMBARC Wednesday, 07 October 2015Slide No. 1 Safety at Sea and Efficiency in Ports A European Project to Improve the Advanced Use of VTM EMBARC FARGIS.
e-Navigation Architecture The present status and work ahead Nordic Institute of Navigation Bergen Rolf Zetterberg.
e-Navigation and it’s applicability to inland waterways
The GLAs’ e-Navigation Programme Dr Sally Basker & Dr Nick Ward Presented at CGSIC, 22 nd September 2009.
Center for Satellite Applications and Research (STAR) Review 09 – 11 March 2010 Image: MODIS Land Group, NASA GSFC March 2000 Commerce and Transportation.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® The US Committee on the Marine Transportation System and e-Navigation PIANC Annual Meeting 27 August 2012.
Martitime Traffic Monitoring Baltic Master midterm conference Snekkersten October 2006 Łukasz Bibik, Maritime Office Gdynia.
1 IRIS Europe II – Implementation of River Information Services in Europe This project is co-funded by the European Commission / DG-TREN / TEN-T A project.
Maritime Navigation and Information Services (MarNavIS) Proposal for FP6.
Augmented Reality in ships navigation Information support in the E-navigation way.
HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan – progress on the eve of the 2013 Ministerial Meeting Monika Stankiewicz HELCOM Executive Secretary Baltic Marine Environment.
Authorities point of view How TOSCA can be a relevant tool for antipollution control? -> Commissaire Général (Ret) Alain VERDEAUX, PREMAR MED Authorities.
Oil drift modelling BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
BE-AWARE I HNS Risk Assessment Bonn Agreement: Area-wide Assessment of Risk Evaluations Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
Accidents and potential releases of mineral oil the Bonn Agreement Area Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument BE-AWARE II Final.
Traffic model for the Bonn Agreement Area BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
Baltic Master WP2 Seminar Safe Transportation at Sea Kalmar, June,2006.
Environmental damage: Combining impact and vulnerability BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection.
ACCSEAS: e-Navigation and its benefits to the environment Dr Alwyn I. Williams ACCSEAS Project Manager BE-AWARE II Final Conference Ronneby, Sweden 18.
Risk Management Conclusions BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument.
EfficienSea – Efficient, Safe and Sustainable Traffic at Sea TKI –toiminnan teemapäivä Kymenlaakson ammattikorkeakoulussa
Scenario Comparison Which are the most effective scenarios for the BE-AWARE project regions? BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Rönneby, Sweden.
Bridge Resource Management
Response modelling including dispersants BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial.
MarNIS Maritime Navigation and Information Services FP6 - Integrated Project.
Regional Action Plan for Sustainable Transport of Dangerous Goods along the Mekong River Final Regional Workshop, October 2014 Bangkok, Thailand.
Legal base for harmonized data protection Stefan Jenner Meeting of IALA LAP 12 March 7-8, 2013.
Next Steps: Implementing the BE-AWARE Project Results.
Integrated navigation systems for inland navigation – beyond chart and radar Dr.-Ing. Martin Sandler in – innovative navigation GmbH Leibnizstr
Kiev / 27 January 2016 Giuseppe Russo / Senior Project Officer Department B: Safety and Standards / Technical cooperation TRACECA Maritime Safety and Security.
GPS Jamming and the Impact on Maritime Navigation Alan Grant, Paul Williams, Nick Ward and Sally Basker General Lighthouse Authorities of the United Kingdom.
Regional Marine Pollution Emergency Response Centre for the Mediterranean Sea, Malta A REGIONAL STRATEGY FOR PREVENTION OF AND RESPONSE TO MARINE POLLUTION.
ADRIATIC MARITIME LAW CONFERENCE MARINE POLLUTION FROM
WORLD MARITIME DAY PARALLEL EVENT
The shore based AIS Service as an e-navigation service
HELCOM objectives in shipping field
COASTAL STATE RESPONSIBILITY (IMO) – HYDROGRAPHY
e-Navigation Overview
e-Navigation The Benefits to Ship Operators John Vonli General Manager
Handling Over and Taking Over the Navigational Watch
Welcome address Conference opening Date: 6 FEB 2019 / ENUW.
Presentation transcript:

Risk reduction and response scenarios BE-AWARE II Final Conference, November, Ronneby, Sweden Co-financed by the EU – Civil Protection Financial Instrument

Format Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Impact Oil on water [g] Dispersed oil in water [g] Oil on coast [g/year] Damage Oil damage[g weighted]

Change Risk reduction and reponse scenarios

Scenario overview Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Scenario name Risk Reducing Measure Response Measure Vessel Traffic Services (VTS)X Traffic Separation Schemes (TSS)X AIS alarm (Wind turbines)X E-navigationX New Emergency Towing Vessels (ETVs)X(X) Improved night detection capability X Further use of dispersants X 50% increase in response equipment X

VTS scenario Risk reduction and reponse scenarios ›The area where the traffic is affected by VTS is extended according to the figure ›Significant effect on vessels without pilots, limited effect on vessels with pilots

TSS scenario Risk reduction and reponse scenarios ›Risk of head-on collisions is reduced significantly for some of the routes. ›Additional risk of overtaking collisions ›Combined positive risk reduction effect of implementing the measure

AIS alarm – wind turbines Risk reduction and reponse scenarios ›Risk reduction effect comparable to VTS - Only on powered collisions

E-navigation Risk reduction and reponse scenarios IMO definition E-navigation is defined as “the harmonized collection, integration, exchange, presentation and analysis of marine information on board and ashore by electronic means to enhance berth to berth navigation and related services for safety and security at sea and protection of the marine environment.” ›The term E-Navigation covers a range of electronic systems which can improve the navigation and reduce the risk of accidents by providing additional information or alerting vessel crews to dangerous situations. ›A cost benefit analysis of E-navigation published by IMO May 2013 reviewed the various Risk Control Options including an evaluation of their risk reducing effect of various E-navigation by an expert group ›A generic risk reduction factor for all relevant types of maritime accidents can be developed based on the IMO paper. With an indicated risk reduction factor on all maritime accidents of between 8 and 17% for the individual e-navigation options in the paper, a combined reduction of 25% to illustrate the effect of E- navigation in general has been used. Based on the numbers in the report this is a conservative estimation. ›This scenario is applied to the full model area.

New ETVs Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Measure the regional effect of inserting three new ETVs. It is underlined that the ETV’s actually are both, a response and risk reducing measure, as they can prevent accidents as well as being involved in the recovery of oil following a spill. ›Risk reduction effect of ETVs – reduction of the oil spill by 30%. ›Furthermore response capacity is included on the vessels and the response model is therefore also influenced.

Night detection Risk reduction and reponse scenarios ›The combination of dedicated oil detection radars and infrared cameras on oil response vessels increases the recovery capability of these vessels during the night and in bad weather. This scenario investigates the effect of implementing these systems to an additional number of vessels.

Further use of dispersants Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Currently only the UK apply dispersants as a part of its first line of oil spill response, however other Contracting Parties may use them under special conditions or are investigating their further use. This scenario investigates the effect of applying dispersants in the full Bonn Agreement area. The same dispersant response capability as currently used for UK waters is applied for all other areas as well, including spill size and response time limitations, etc. The principle is to apply dispersants in areas with a water depth greater than 20m plus 1nm.

50% additional response equipment Risk reduction and reponse scenarios ›Additional 50% usable equipment ›Additional vessels where necessary to support equipment ›Additional response vessel in Esbjerg. +50%

Results – Region 1 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 1 - Oil on coast ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -0,39%-0,08%-0,27% TSS -0,55%-0,15%-0,40% AIS Alarm -0,14%-0,65%-0,33% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland -0,03%-5,54%-2,10% Night visibility -1,07%-0,49%-0,85% Dispersants -0,78%-0,40%-0,64% +50% response -1,16%-1,10%-1,14% Region 1 - Oil on water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -0,39%-0,04%-0,19% TSS -0,69%-0,08%-0,34% AIS Alarm -0,33%-1,12%-0,79% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland -0,06%-3,02%-1,78% Night visibility -1,00%-0,54%-0,73% Dispersants -1,38%-0,75%-1,01% +50% response -0,98%-1,35%-1,19%

Results – Region 1 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 1 - Dispersed oil in water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS 0,00% TSS 0,00% AIS Alarm -0,34%-1,46%-0,61% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland -0,07%-0,14%-0,09% Night visibility 0,00% Dispersants 47,51%31,54%43,66% +50% response 0,00% Region 1 - Damage ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS-0,27%-0,04%-0,17% TSS-0,41%-0,08%-0,26% AIS Alarm-0,47%-3,34%-1,74% E-navigation-25% ETV in Ireland-0,12%-3,52%-1,63% Night visibility-1,74%-0,63%-1,25% Dispersants2,23%0,47%1,45% +50% response-1,91%-1,39%-1,68%

Results – Region 2 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 2 - Oil on coast ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -0,68%-0,42%-0,63% TSS -0,11%-0,58%-0,20% AIS Alarm -0,01%-0,23%-0,05% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility -0,07%-0,08%-0,07% Dispersants 0,03%-0,33%-0,03% +50% response -1,00%-2,25%-1,23% Region 2 - Oil on water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -3,09%-3,15%-3,12% TSS -4,21%-6,21%-5,20% AIS Alarm -0,17%-0,18% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility -0,02%-0,16%-0,09% Dispersants 0,16%-0,28%-0,06% +50% response -0,45%-2,00%-1,22%

Results – Region 2 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 2 - Dispersed oil in water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -0,13%-0,15%-0,14% TSS 0,00% AIS Alarm -0,07%-0,57%-0,15% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility 0,00% Dispersants 55,61%81,23%59,61% +50% response 0,00% Region 2 - Damage ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS-1,13%-1,52%-1,28% TSS-0,70%-1,60%-1,04% AIS Alarm-0,12%-0,49%-0,26% E-navigation-25% ETV in Ireland0,00% Night visibility-0,04%-0,18%-0,09% Dispersants4,18%1,29%3,10% +50% response-1,04%-1,85%-1,34%

Results – Region 3 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 3 - Oil on coast ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -27,06%-28,27%-27,56% TSS -22,42%-43,55%-31,09% AIS Alarm -0,51%-0,35%-0,45% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility -0,15%-0,11%-0,13% Dispersants -7,59%-3,27%-5,82% +50% response -1,19%-0,86%-1,06% Region 3 - Oil on water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -31,59%-30,53%-30,95% TSS -53,24%-50,92%-51,84% AIS Alarm -0,80%-1,04%-0,95% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility -0,18%-0,61%-0,44% Dispersants 8,98%0,32%3,73% +50% response -1,10%-2,14%-1,73%

Results – Region 3 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 3 - Dispersed oil in water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -20,33%-15,36%-19,49% TSS 0,00% AIS Alarm -0,16%-0,01%-0,13% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility 0,00% Dispersants % response 0,00% Region 3 - Damage ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS-24,66%-28,57%-26,58% TSS-34,87%-48,64%-41,62% AIS Alarm-1,68%-0,93%-1,31% E-navigation-25% ETV in Ireland0,00% Night visibility-0,13%-0,31%-0,22% Dispersants52,75%12,07%32,80% +50% response-2,22%-1,72%-1,97%

Results – Region 4 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 4 - Oil on coast ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -14,30%-15,45%-14,87% TSS -1,01%-0,94%-0,97% AIS Alarm -1,17%-1,15%-1,16% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility -0,01%-1,08%-0,53% Dispersants -4,62%-3,08%-3,86% +50% response -0,89%-1,51%-1,20% Region 4 - Oil on water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -22,41%-21,21%-21,70% TSS -3,83%-2,52%-3,06% AIS Alarm -1,61%-3,61%-2,79% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility -0,04%-1,77%-1,06% Dispersants 10,21%3,65%6,35% +50% response -1,04%-2,68%-2,01%

Results – Region 4 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 4 - Dispersed oil in water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -29,57%-22,36%-27,11% TSS 0,00% AIS Alarm -0,45%-1,24%-0,72% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility 0,00% Dispersants 264%349%293% +50% response 0,00% Region 4 - Damage ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS-12,42%-9,37%-10,74% TSS-3,33%-2,39%-2,82% AIS Alarm-1,96%-1,32%-1,61% E-navigation-25% ETV in Ireland0,00% Night visibility-0,02%-1,69%-0,94% Dispersants17,73%13,00%15,12% +50% response-1,98%-2,67%-1,91%

Results – Region 5 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 5 - Oil on coast ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -3,97%-3,05%-3,43% TSS -0,02%-0,01% AIS Alarm -0,38%-0,79%-0,62% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00%-0,01%0,00% Night visibility -0,15%-0,75%-0,50% Dispersants -4,14%-3,44%-3,73% +50% response -0,55%-1,02%-0,83% Region 5 - Oil on water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -1,18%-0,72%-0,86% TSS 0,00% AIS Alarm -0,19%-0,41%-0,34% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00%-0,04%-0,02% Night visibility -0,74%-1,56%-1,30% Dispersants 6,80%1,31%3,01% +50% response -0,88%-2,18%-1,78%

Results – Region 5 Risk reduction and reponse scenarios Region 5 - Dispersed oil in water ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS -0,78%-0,60%-0,70% TSS 0,00% AIS Alarm -0,10%-0,18%-0,14% E-navigation -25% ETV in Ireland 0,00% Night visibility 0,00% Dispersants 101%145%120% +50% response 0,00% Region 5 - Damage ScenarioSpill<5000tSpill>5000tTotal VTS-3,84%-2,71%-3,18% TSS-0,01%0,00%-0,01% AIS Alarm-0,24%-0,36%-0,31% E-navigation-25% ETV in Ireland0,00%-0,01% Night visibility-0,14%-1,11%-0,71% Dispersants37,43%19,69%27,07% +50% response-0,70%-1,71%-1,29%

Results – Overview Effectiveness Risk reduction and response scenarios Regional overview – 3 most effective scenarios Region12345 Parameter (coast, surface, dispersed) csdcsdcsdcsdcsd Scenario VTS Scenario TSS Scenario AIS Alarm Scenario E- navigation Scenario ETVs 223 Scenario Night visibility 3 Scenario Dispersants Scenario +50% response

Results – Overview Damage Regional overview for damage – 3 most effective scenarios Region12345 Scenario VTS 3222 Scenario TSS 13 Scenario AIS Alarm2 Scenario E-navigation11311 Scenario ETV in Ireland Scenario Night visibility Scenario Dispersants Scenario +50% response 32 3

Questions? Thank you beaware.bonnagreement.org