1 Section 4- Characterization  Characterization is 95% of the Success of ISCO  Develop a complete and comprehensive Conceptual Site Model  ISCO is a.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Site Conceptual Models
Advertisements

THE CONCEPTUAL SITE MODEL A Visual Journey Though Data and Time October 29, 2013.
Alert: Waste Spill Environmental Science. Artesian well.
Introduction to Environmental Engineering Lecture 15 Water Supply and Groundwater.
Geologic Storage of CO 2 : Leakage Pathways and Environmental Risks Michael A. Celia, Catherine A. Peters, and Stefan Bachu Princeton University and Alberta.
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
© 2011 COLUMBIA Technologies. Use of MiHpt Systems to Improve Project Outcomes Rapid, Real-Time High Resolution Site Characterization © 2013 COLUMBIA Technologies.
Environment Engineering I
Biodegradation and Natural Attenuation
Assessing and Communicating Risk: A Partnership to Evaluate a Superfund Site on Leech Lake Tribal Lands Groundwater Movement and Contamination By Cindy.
Add Main Topic Here Created by Educational Technology Network
Dale T Littlejohn Senior Geologist. What is fate and transport in the vadose zone? Vadose Zone Hydrocarbon release from buried pipeline Aquifer Surface.
Air Force Plant 4 Superfund Site Evaluation of SVE Combined with ERH for the Remediation of TCE Source Material Jeffrey Ragucci SWS 6262 – Soil Contamination.
1 Thermal Remediation Services, Inc. Electrical Resistance Heating for In-Situ Remediation of Soil & Groundwater December 10, 2002 Greg Beyke (770)
Distribution of Nitrate in Ground Water Under Three Unsewered Subdivisions Erin P. Eid Mike Trojan Jim Stockinger Jennifer Maloney Minnesota Pollution.
LDEQ’s RECAP Soil Protective of Groundwater - Soil GW Soil Saturation - Soil sat.
1 Groundwater Pollution Week 5 – 0407 Investigating the Site and Monitoring.
Phytotechnologies for Environmental Restoration and Management Micah Beard, M.S. Shaw Environmental, Inc.
Multiphase Extraction for Soil and Groundwater Remediation Nick Swiger Spring 2007.
1 Soil Vapor Extraction Limitations and Enhancements LeeAnn Racz AgE 558 Semester Project April 2001.
Introduction to GW contamination and
Monroe L. Weber-Shirk S chool of Civil and Environmental Engineering Partitioning of Volatile Organic Carbon Compoundss.
Partitioning of VOCs: Why do we care? ä Determines how best to treat a site ä vapor extraction ä pump and treat ä remove contaminated soil ä Determines.
Vadose-zone Monitoring System
General Electric – Housatonic River Project November 6, 2002 Overview of NAPL and Groundwater Programs Mike Nalipinski EPA New England Mike Nalipinski.
Presentation Outline Attenuation Concepts for Radionuclides
1 In-Situ Treatment of Groundwater with Non-aqueous Phase Liquids December 10-12, 2002, Chicago, IL Scott G. Huling, Ph.D., P.E. USEPA Robert S. Kerr Environmental.
What’s New with In Situ Chemical Oxidation
FSA Groundwater Flow and Solute Transport Model Presentation to Scottsdale Citizens Group March 19, 1999.
1 Case Summary: Electrical Resistance Heating ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Portland, Oregon Jennifer Sutter, Project Manager Oregon DEQ EPA Technology Innovation.
Groundwater Flow and Transport over Larger Volumes of Rock: Cross-Hole Hydraulic and Tracer Testing USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
Roger Miller, Arkansas Department of Environmental Quality Barry Jackson, USGS Arkansas Water Science Center ARKANSAS EXCHANGE NETWORK FOR GROUNDWATER-QUALITY.
Predicting Vapor Intrusion Risks in the Presence of Soil Heterogeneities and Anthropogenic Preferential Pathways Brown University Ozgur Bozkurt, Kelly.
Overview of Remedial Approaches at Superfund Fractured Bedrock Sites Edward Gilbert, CPG Technology Assessment Branch Technology Innovation and Field Services.
Jan Smolders ( 史默德) Independent Consultant Soil & Groundwater Remediation Jan Smolders, Client Advisor Soil & Groundwater Remediation 1.
Introduction to NAPLs Review of general concepts
1 Section 5: Limitations. 2 ISCO Limitations  Saturated Zone vs Unsaturated Zone  Chemistry  CoSolvents  Geology /Geochemistry/Hydrogeology  NAPL.
Remediation System Design & Implementation Presented by.
1 Section II: ISCO Technology  Importance of ISCO chemistry  Terminology  Reaction sequences/products/byproducts  Oxidant selection/contaminants 
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site August 20, 2013.
Chapter 16 Study Notes: Groundwater.
The world’s leading sustainability consultancy In Situ Chemical Oxidation of Pesticides Using Shallow Soil Mixing The world’s leading sustainability consultancy.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
1 Section 6- ISCO DESIGN  Initial Site Evaluation  ISCO Compatibility  ISCO Modeling and Dosage Considerations  Bench Testing  Pilot Testing/Delivery.
Ground Water. Makes up 0.397% of Earth’s Water. - song.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model. Typical Site Management Problems: Site complexities  Complicated hydrogeology  Multiple contaminants of concern (COCs)
Ground Water Write everything in PURPLE!.
1, 12/2/ Key factors for a successful ISCO application with Permanganate Prepared by: Richard W Lewis CPG Program Manager ERM.
1 Practical Considerations for Source Area Treatment: Interim Measures Dean Williamson, P.E. CH2M HILL Constructors, Inc. December 11, 2002.
Working With Simple Models to Predict Contaminant Migration Matt Small U.S. EPA, Region 9, Underground Storage Tanks Program Office.
7th Avenue and Bethany Home Road Water Quality Assurance Revolving Fund Site February 19, 2013.
A comparison of numerical and field modeling techniques in tracking contaminant plumes: 1. Analysis of subsurface contaminant migration and remediation.
Evaluating the Practicality of LNAPL Recovery Jeff Lane, P.G. November 17, 2015 International Petroleum Environmental Conference (IPEC) IPEC 22 Contact.
Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Risk Evaluation/Corrective Action Program (RECAP)
Protection of ground water meeting UPUS Determining ground water zones – Ground water definition – Determining how many zones Examples POGWMUPUS and GW.
By Alex Walton Josh Bush Alex Walton, Josh Bush1.
ArcHydro Groundwater Data Model Build off from the ArcHydro surface water data model to create a logical connection between surface water and groundwater.
1 Section 4: Health and Safety  Health and safety is the #1 Design Consideration All oxidants Site Information Oxidant-specific.
Groundwater Geol 1110 Newell guest lecture 3/28/16.
1 Groundwater Pollution GW 10 Monitored Natural Attenuation.
 Water Quality Variability in a Bioswell and Concrete Drainage Pipe, Southwest Lincoln, Nebraska Jessica Shortino, B.S. University of Nebraska-Lincoln.
Expediting Site Remediation By Integrating The Membrane Interface Probe With In-Situ Remediation Injection Design Eliot Cooper,
Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Remediating Contaminated Groundwater with Slow-Release Oxidants Steve Comfort – University.
Jesse Taylor: Remington Technologies
Welcome.
Rapid Closure of Lingering Off-Site Plume Remediation Program in Residential Neighborhood using Horizontal Air Sparge and Soil Vapor Extraction Wells Narayanan.
System Monitoring/Regulatory Evaluation
Dan Bryant and Jim Wilson Geo-Cleanse International, Inc.
Preparing a Site Conceptual Model
Presentation transcript:

1 Section 4- Characterization  Characterization is 95% of the Success of ISCO  Develop a complete and comprehensive Conceptual Site Model  ISCO is a Mass Destruction Technology  Successful Treatment must Identify both target and non target analytes and contain all phases of Mass  Know Flow paths within soil Structure

2 Conceptual Site Model Development  Characterization of nature and mass of contaminants present Sorbed Dissolved Free product phases  Subsurface geology, site topography, aquifer geochemistry  Identification of major migration pathways for contaminants of concern (COC) Surface and subsurface structures Underground utilities  Direction / gradient / velocity of groundwater flow  Surface water features / uses, and potential receptors in the area First and most important step in remediation project includes

3 Contaminant Mass PSH, Sorbed, Dissolved Appl. Well Existing MW Number of Wells Total VOCs (average for all Areas)ppm850 Area x7510 TICppm0 Area x130 (includes Area 1)35 TPH/Cosolvents ppm 0Area x Multiply the number of wells times the reagent requirement Total Contaminant Loadppm850

4  Contamination mass exists in four phases in the contaminated zone Soil gas Sorbed Dissolved Non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) or phase-separated  Geochemistry, partitioning coefficient (K ow ) determines the relationship between phases in the saturated zone  Majority of mass (normally >80%) is sorbed and phase-separated Total Mass Evaluation Nature of Contamination Graphic source: Suthersan, 1996

5 Total Mass Evaluation Importance of Mass Calculations  Evaluate pre- and post- total contaminant mass  Sorbed and non-aqueous phase mass converts to dissolved during treatment and until site reaches post treatment final equilibrium  Possible “rebound” causes Dissolution of sorbed or non-aqueous phase Inadequate site characterization Change in groundwater flow direction  Decrease in total mass may not be reflected in short-term dissolved concentrations Electroconductivity Diagram

6 Treatment Volume Estimate CleanOX Appl. Well Existing MW Radius of Influenceft20 Area of Influencesft1258 Screen Depth, topft5 Screen Depth, bot.ft30 Total Treatment Volumecft31450 Total Groundwater Volumegal70583 Total Groundwater Weightlb588744

7 Value of Data Quantity vs. Certified Analytical Data  ISCO requires contaminant delineation, precise concentration data quality not as critical as for closure confirmation  References – available at under “Guidance Documents” ITRC Technical and Regulatory Guidance for the Triad Approach: A New Paradigm for Environmental Project Management (SCM-1, December 2003) ITRC Strategies for Monitoring the Performance of DNAPL Source Zone Remedies (DNAPLs-5, August 2004)

8 Site Geochemistry/Geology UnitsValue Range LimitsNotes Porosity%0.3 Permeabilitymd ,000 pHs.u.6.5<8.5 Specific conductanceuS/cm Groundwater temperature 0F0F Groundwater velocityft/day

9 Oxidant Demand Nomenclature  Natural oxidant demand (NOD)  Soil oxidant demand (SOD)  Total oxidant demand (TOD)  Natural organic matter (NOM)  Standard laboratory measurements of oxidizable matter in groundwater include Chemical oxygen demand (COD) Total organic carbon (TOC) Total inorganic carbon (TIC)

10 Site Geochemistry/Geology UnitsValue Range LimitsNotes Redox potential (ORP)mV070 - (-70) Grain sizemm % pt. Dissolved oxygen (DO)ppm TDSppm TOC in groundwaterppm4<40 Hydroxyl scavengerppm100<400 Well diameterinch11/2 new SS

11 Conditions that Require Special Consideration  Low permeable soils  Deep aquifers  LNAPL/DNAPL  Confined formations  Swamps or high organic soils  Old landfills and dumps  River embankments  Under buildings

12 Surface Water Body Pipeline I-55 Limited Access Highway Private Property Access Only No Utilities Flood Prone Area with Dirt Roads Special Site Model Considerations

13 Lithology and Flow Path  Borings need to be properly installed by experienced personnel, which is contrary to reimbursement program pricing  Fine Sand lenses and variations in permeability are difficult to determine with Geoprobe programs  Wells need to be properly screened and developed (not three well volumes as in PST programs)  Confining layers are critical

14 Conceptual Site Model Target Interval Identification Target Interval Contaminant Mass Soil Conductivity